Advertisement

by Arshanid Deccan » Mon Nov 02, 2020 3:47 pm

by Insaanistan » Mon Nov 02, 2020 3:48 pm
The Marlborough wrote:Insaanistan wrote:
I feel okay, and I specifically should be good. The most people have ever done was tell me to go back to where I came from (which is... America) or call me a terrorist or say I’m going to hell. Some people today actually came to me with questions about Islam. I’ll just make extra sure my phone is shut off during class so it doesn’t go “Allahu Akbar! Allahu Akbar!” in the middle of class and freak everyone out.
Well that is good. Though I will say it is still kind of weird to have that as your ringtone in general.
It’s not my ringtone. You know how we have to pray five times a day? There are apps that play the call to prayer at prayer time for us.
by Insaanistan » Mon Nov 02, 2020 3:48 pm
Arshanid Deccan wrote:According recent developments the supposed "Islamic" terrorist attacks in Avignon and Lyon last week were not conducted by Muslims at all. The attacker in Avignon was a far-right white supremecist who even did the Nazi Salute, he was taking advantage of the situation and was yelling "Allahu Akbar" and the French media was quick to report the "Allahu Akbar" part but no one is talking about how he was a Nazi sympathizer. In Lyon the motive was personal as the attacker was a Priest who already had legal trouble with another Priest of the Orthodox Church and the French media falsely stated that he chanted "Allahu Akbar" when attacking. No one is talking about these false reports which simply add fuel to the fire.

by The Marlborough » Mon Nov 02, 2020 3:50 pm

by Diarcesia » Mon Nov 02, 2020 3:51 pm
Arshanid Deccan wrote:According recent developments the supposed "Islamic" terrorist attacks in Avignon and Lyon last week were not conducted by Muslims at all. The attacker in Avignon was a far-right white supremecist who even did the Nazi Salute, he was taking advantage of the situation and was yelling "Allahu Akbar" and the French media was quick to report the "Allahu Akbar" part but no one is talking about how he was a Nazi sympathizer. In Lyon the motive was personal as the attacker was a Priest who already had legal trouble with another Priest of the Orthodox Church and the French media falsely stated that he chanted "Allahu Akbar" when attacking. No one is talking about these false reports which simply add fuel to the fire.

by New Steuben » Mon Nov 02, 2020 3:52 pm
Diarcesia wrote:Arshanid Deccan wrote:According recent developments the supposed "Islamic" terrorist attacks in Avignon and Lyon last week were not conducted by Muslims at all. The attacker in Avignon was a far-right white supremecist who even did the Nazi Salute, he was taking advantage of the situation and was yelling "Allahu Akbar" and the French media was quick to report the "Allahu Akbar" part but no one is talking about how he was a Nazi sympathizer. In Lyon the motive was personal as the attacker was a Priest who already had legal trouble with another Priest of the Orthodox Church and the French media falsely stated that he chanted "Allahu Akbar" when attacking. No one is talking about these false reports which simply add fuel to the fire.
Illustrates my point that Nazis can make their attacks and the world will still look at the Muslims when one of their number does it.

by Albrenia » Mon Nov 02, 2020 3:53 pm
Diarcesia wrote:Arshanid Deccan wrote:According recent developments the supposed "Islamic" terrorist attacks in Avignon and Lyon last week were not conducted by Muslims at all. The attacker in Avignon was a far-right white supremecist who even did the Nazi Salute, he was taking advantage of the situation and was yelling "Allahu Akbar" and the French media was quick to report the "Allahu Akbar" part but no one is talking about how he was a Nazi sympathizer. In Lyon the motive was personal as the attacker was a Priest who already had legal trouble with another Priest of the Orthodox Church and the French media falsely stated that he chanted "Allahu Akbar" when attacking. No one is talking about these false reports which simply add fuel to the fire.
Illustrates my point that Nazis can make their attacks and the world will still look at the Muslims when one of their number does it.

by New Steuben » Mon Nov 02, 2020 3:53 pm
Albrenia wrote:Diarcesia wrote:Illustrates my point that Nazis can make their attacks and the world will still look at the Muslims when one of their number does it.
Which works in all of the Bad Guys favour.
Islamist nutcases get fresh recruits from the backlash on Muslim communities, alt-right loons get recruits from the controversy.

by Diarcesia » Mon Nov 02, 2020 3:54 pm
New Steuben wrote:Diarcesia wrote:Illustrates my point that Nazis can make their attacks and the world will still look at the Muslims when one of their number does it.
Well, I think it's because recently Islamic terror has taken the fore front
Paris had what 180 dead?, Nice had 85 with the car attack, and now these string of attacks, Turkey and other nations rhetoric of support etc etc
It's a combination.

by New Steuben » Mon Nov 02, 2020 3:55 pm
Diarcesia wrote:New Steuben wrote:
Well, I think it's because recently Islamic terror has taken the fore front
Paris had what 180 dead?, Nice had 85 with the car attack, and now these string of attacks, Turkey and other nations rhetoric of support etc etc
It's a combination.
And yet it's the far-right attacks that actually does the more damage
Though I get that the Islamists get more casualties per attack. Your points are fair.

by The Huskar Social Union » Mon Nov 02, 2020 3:56 pm
Insaanistan wrote:Arshanid Deccan wrote:According recent developments the supposed "Islamic" terrorist attacks in Avignon and Lyon last week were not conducted by Muslims at all. The attacker in Avignon was a far-right white supremecist who even did the Nazi Salute, he was taking advantage of the situation and was yelling "Allahu Akbar" and the French media was quick to report the "Allahu Akbar" part but no one is talking about how he was a Nazi sympathizer. In Lyon the motive was personal as the attacker was a Priest who already had legal trouble with another Priest of the Orthodox Church and the French media falsely stated that he chanted "Allahu Akbar" when attacking. No one is talking about these false reports which simply add fuel to the fire.
I believe I and Rojava chatted about it for a bit.

by Insaanistan » Mon Nov 02, 2020 3:57 pm

by The Huskar Social Union » Mon Nov 02, 2020 3:58 pm
Insaanistan wrote:Fun fact: Suicide is a HIGE sin in Islam.

by New Steuben » Mon Nov 02, 2020 3:58 pm
Insaanistan wrote:Fun fact: Suicide is a HIGE sin in Islam.

by The Marlborough » Mon Nov 02, 2020 3:59 pm
And all people are going to care about is the number of casualties. If one ideology carries out two attacks per year killing 200 people in total vs a group who carries out 20 attacks for 10 deaths, the group carrying out the fewer but far deadlier attacks will be seen as a greater threat.Diarcesia wrote:New Steuben wrote:
Well, I think it's because recently Islamic terror has taken the fore front
Paris had what 180 dead?, Nice had 85 with the car attack, and now these string of attacks, Turkey and other nations rhetoric of support etc etc
It's a combination.
And yet it's the far-right attacks that actually does the more damage
Though I get that the Islamists get more casualties per attack. Your points are fair.

by New Steuben » Mon Nov 02, 2020 4:00 pm
The Marlborough wrote:And all people are going to care about is the number of casualties. If one ideology carries out two attacks per year killing 200 people in total vs a group who carries out 20 attacks for 10 deaths, the group carrying out the fewer but far deadlier attacks will be seen as a greater threat.Diarcesia wrote:And yet it's the far-right attacks that actually does the more damage
Though I get that the Islamists get more casualties per attack. Your points are fair.
It's also worth taking into account demographic perceptions as well. If such deadly attacks originates from a group that say makes up 3% of the population compared to one that makes up say 90% of the population.

by Insaanistan » Mon Nov 02, 2020 4:01 pm

by Paddy O Fernature » Mon Nov 02, 2020 4:01 pm
Insaanistan wrote:Fun fact: Suicide is a HIGE sin in Islam.

by The Marlborough » Mon Nov 02, 2020 4:01 pm

by New Steuben » Mon Nov 02, 2020 4:02 pm

by Arshanid Deccan » Mon Nov 02, 2020 4:03 pm

by New Steuben » Mon Nov 02, 2020 4:04 pm
Arshanid Deccan wrote:Also I hate the use of the term "Islamic Terror", when there is a terrorist attack conducted by a Muslim its automatically deemed "Islamic". If thats the case then why isn't any good action done by a Muslim considered Islamic or associated with the religion. For example when Muhammad Ali passed away, all the headlines were "American Hero" not "Islamic Hero". And this also goes for the term "Moderate Muslim". Why do we have to be categorized as "moderates" as if we aren't following our religion completely and if we were to follow Islam fully then we would some how become extremists. A peace-loving and progressive lifestyle is completely compatible with being strictly adherent to the religion. Terrorism is terrorism there is no such thing as Islamic Terrorism. One may argue that the terrorists are referring to Islamic texts to execute their agenda but at the same time people are blind towards the fact that the majority of Muslims who are living peacefully and who are constantly condemming these extremists also follow examples set by these same Islamic texts.

by Insaanistan » Mon Nov 02, 2020 4:04 pm

by Insaanistan » Mon Nov 02, 2020 4:05 pm
Arshanid Deccan wrote:Also I hate the use of the term "Islamic Terror", when there is a terrorist attack conducted by a Muslim its automatically deemed "Islamic". If thats the case then why isn't any good action done by a Muslim considered Islamic or associated with the religion. For example when Muhammad Ali passed away, all the headlines were "American Hero" not "Islamic Hero". And this also goes for the term "Moderate Muslim". Why do we have to be categorized as "moderates" as if we aren't following our religion completely and if we were to follow Islam fully then we would some how become extremists. A peace-loving and progressive lifestyle is completely compatible with being strictly adherent to the religion. Terrorism is terrorism there is no such thing as Islamic Terrorism. One may argue that the terrorists are referring to Islamic texts to execute their agenda but at the same time people are blind towards the fact that the majority of Muslims who are living peacefully and who are constantly condemming these extremists also follow examples set by these same Islamic texts.
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Dumb Ideologies, Immoren, Majestic-12 [Bot], Riviere Renard, The Rio Grande River Basin
Advertisement