Same.
Advertisement
by Insaanistan » Fri Oct 16, 2020 9:30 pm
by Debate Proxy 1 » Fri Oct 16, 2020 9:35 pm
Sarderia wrote:Greed and Death wrote:
Interesting Libyans were painted as fairly light.
I think they are indeed lighter-skinned than the Egyptians, perhaps the same tone as they depicted Asians (Levantines, the Hyksos who ruled Egypt before the New Kingdom period). Nowadays, even after centuries of interbreeding and gene mixing, Southern Europeans from Sicily and Northern Africans from Tunisia for example looks similar enough. The Ancient Egyptian skin tone is a rather tan hue, similar to what you would classify as Brown (think Hindi/Punjabi Indians, Central Americans, SE Asians e.g. Malay, Indonesian, etc.) They are certainly not black Africans (those are Nubians; they did ruled Egypt, I forgot which dynasty, but only in a short time period before being overthrown by a native lord), and they obviously weren't white to the degree of Greeks/Southern Italians either. Egyptians are their own, extremely unique and fascinating group of people.
by Sarderia » Fri Oct 16, 2020 10:05 pm
Debate Proxy 1 wrote:Sarderia wrote:I think they are indeed lighter-skinned than the Egyptians, perhaps the same tone as they depicted Asians (Levantines, the Hyksos who ruled Egypt before the New Kingdom period). Nowadays, even after centuries of interbreeding and gene mixing, Southern Europeans from Sicily and Northern Africans from Tunisia for example looks similar enough. The Ancient Egyptian skin tone is a rather tan hue, similar to what you would classify as Brown (think Hindi/Punjabi Indians, Central Americans, SE Asians e.g. Malay, Indonesian, etc.) They are certainly not black Africans (those are Nubians; they did ruled Egypt, I forgot which dynasty, but only in a short time period before being overthrown by a native lord), and they obviously weren't white to the degree of Greeks/Southern Italians either. Egyptians are their own, extremely unique and fascinating group of people.
Even Nubians weren't always black, though. Sort of a similar story compared to the appearance range of Amhara people. Once upon a time in human history, nations could be constructed pretty freely before the idea of race arose.
by Page » Fri Oct 16, 2020 10:52 pm
by Infected Mushroom » Fri Oct 16, 2020 10:54 pm
Page wrote:I think that it's justified to demand more representation for people of color but it's embarrassing that so many people are ignorant of the fact that Cleopatra and her entire dynasty were Greeks. I hate the circle jerk of "political correctness gone mad" and therefore I wish people did a little googling before complaining about an "Egyptian" being played by a white actress, it's fuel for all of the reactionaries and no doubt they will milk the fuck out of this.
by Page » Fri Oct 16, 2020 11:02 pm
Infected Mushroom wrote:Page wrote:I think that it's justified to demand more representation for people of color but it's embarrassing that so many people are ignorant of the fact that Cleopatra and her entire dynasty were Greeks. I hate the circle jerk of "political correctness gone mad" and therefore I wish people did a little googling before complaining about an "Egyptian" being played by a white actress, it's fuel for all of the reactionaries and no doubt they will milk the fuck out of this.
G... Greek? 0_0
Is that so???? I’m shocked.
by Debate Proxy 1 » Fri Oct 16, 2020 11:03 pm
Sarderia wrote:Debate Proxy 1 wrote:Even Nubians weren't always black, though. Sort of a similar story compared to the appearance range of Amhara people. Once upon a time in human history, nations could be constructed pretty freely before the idea of race arose.
That is always the case with every ancient society - if you follow their manners, speak their language, do their customs, follow their religion, and integrate - you are automatically a member of that civilization. That is why we don't see Ancient Egyptians distance themselves from Nubians the way they regard themselves different than other civilizations, because the Nubians and Egyptians had the same gods (largely), spoke a similar, if not a different branch of language (Meroitic and Coptic), share the same religious customs (the Nubians also write Hieroglyphs, I think, and Sudan owns even more pyramids than Egypt).
To be fair, let's take another comparison; if you speak Latin, pray to Jupiter and Caesar, don the Toga and other Roman garbs, serve as a Legionnary, you're automatically Roman; even though you're born in a distant Syrian desert. Case in example Elagabalus. The concept of "race" in the modern form (of skin tones, racism, etc.) really only emerged after the golden age of European imperialism.
by Sarderia » Fri Oct 16, 2020 11:05 pm
Infected Mushroom wrote:Page wrote:I think that it's justified to demand more representation for people of color but it's embarrassing that so many people are ignorant of the fact that Cleopatra and her entire dynasty were Greeks. I hate the circle jerk of "political correctness gone mad" and therefore I wish people did a little googling before complaining about an "Egyptian" being played by a white actress, it's fuel for all of the reactionaries and no doubt they will milk the fuck out of this.
G... Greek? 0_0
Is that so???? I’m shocked.
by Nevertopia » Fri Oct 16, 2020 11:10 pm
So the CCP won't let me be or let me be me so let me see, they tried to shut me down on CBC but it feels so empty without me.
| Civilization Index: Class 9.28 Tier 7: Stellar Settler | Level 7: Wonderful Wizard | Type 7: Astro Ambassador This nation's overview is the primary canon. For more information use NS stats. |
|
by Baltenstein » Fri Oct 16, 2020 11:32 pm
The mummy DNA study highlights the irony of the anti-Gadot campaign. Inadvertently it makes a very good argument for casting the Israeli actress in the role of the Egyptian queen. If indeed Cleopatra had mixed Greek and ancient Egyptian heritage and if we accept that ancestry should be a factor when choosing an actor to play a historical character (a big if)
by Albrenia » Fri Oct 16, 2020 11:37 pm
by EnragedMaldivians » Sat Oct 17, 2020 2:04 am
by Kandorith » Sat Oct 17, 2020 2:06 am
☾ Great Empire of Kanyori | 大宮来国 | Arashi Kanyori Yokoku ☽
Overview | Constitution | Anthem | Imperial Anthem | Armed Forces | Foreign Affairs | Emperor
Hikari Kyoyu Headlines:
BREAKING NEWS: LDP wins elections in landslide though Yoshiro Murakami will not return as prime minister they stated. | Latest technology showcased at the Empress Masumi Stadium as the January Tech Summit starts for the weekend | CDP claims LDP stole the election and will take legal steps against the election results
by Twicetagram and JYPe » Sat Oct 17, 2020 2:08 am
by Sarderia » Sat Oct 17, 2020 2:29 am
Trollzyn the Infinite wrote:Insaanistan wrote:Well, the Greeks and Romans didn’t out of fear of being overthrown. The erosion of Ancient Egyptian culture was quite gradual and mainly of free will (especially at the beginning of Muslim rule). Much of it was because as people accepted Islam, they got rid off practices non-compatible with Islam.
Whitewashing garbage. Stop perpetrating the "tolerant Muslim conquerors" myth.
by Karakars » Sat Oct 17, 2020 4:51 am
Insaanistan wrote:Even in the time of ancient Egypt, Greek historians literally refused to write about the dynasty in Egypt when black Nubians ruled. They didn’t really even try to hide that they were hiding something: they literally skipped the entire dynasty and didn’t rename the next one to make it seem like the Nubian duke never occurred.
by The New California Republic » Sat Oct 17, 2020 4:55 am
by Karakars » Sat Oct 17, 2020 4:59 am
Baltenstein wrote:Just gonna smh in disgust that this is even a topic. The entire debate is so bizarre and absurd that I don't even know what to make fun about first:
- the idea that Cleopatra was ethnically Egyptian, when she was famously Greek, altough I guess I should be glad that the Republic of Northern Macedonia isn't claiming her also and wants a blonde Slavic woman for the role
- even worse, the idea that she was ethnically black (I know "We Wuz Kangz" is a horrible racist meme, but come on)
- the idea that a member of a foreign-descended, notoriously inbred dynasty living in a certain region 2000 years ago absolutely must look like you average person living in the same region today
- that Egyptians are "People of Color" while Israelis who live right next to them apparently are not
- that "People of Color" is a thing anyway - lumping together vastly different groups on arbitrary grounds, while segregating others - like Israelis and Egyptians, who originate in the same region and speak closely related languages - Hebrew, Ancient Egyptian and Arab all belong to the Semitic languages
- and worst of all, that one's bloodline and "race" should be a decisive factor when being cast for a role
"Race is everything and everything is about race"
- Northern European racists, ca. 1920
"Race is everything and everything is about race"
- Certain 'progressives', ca. 2020
by Kandorith » Sat Oct 17, 2020 5:02 am
Karakars wrote:Insaanistan wrote:Even in the time of ancient Egypt, Greek historians literally refused to write about the dynasty in Egypt when black Nubians ruled. They didn’t really even try to hide that they were hiding something: they literally skipped the entire dynasty and didn’t rename the next one to make it seem like the Nubian duke never occurred.
I'd rather assume that they missed Dynasty #23 - the one that was concurrent with #22, and wrongly gave #24 number 23.
Another explanation is that #24 was quickly retreating because of the Assyrians, and that those two invasions were lumped into one.
Or maybe the Assyrians forbade mentioning the previous dynasty?
------------
NOT EVERYTHING IS ABOUT RACISM. Racism is found in all times and cultures, but it is never found to explain every and all wrong.
☾ Great Empire of Kanyori | 大宮来国 | Arashi Kanyori Yokoku ☽
Overview | Constitution | Anthem | Imperial Anthem | Armed Forces | Foreign Affairs | Emperor
Hikari Kyoyu Headlines:
BREAKING NEWS: LDP wins elections in landslide though Yoshiro Murakami will not return as prime minister they stated. | Latest technology showcased at the Empress Masumi Stadium as the January Tech Summit starts for the weekend | CDP claims LDP stole the election and will take legal steps against the election results
by Borderlands of Rojava » Sat Oct 17, 2020 5:05 am
Kandorith wrote:Karakars wrote:
I'd rather assume that they missed Dynasty #23 - the one that was concurrent with #22, and wrongly gave #24 number 23.
Another explanation is that #24 was quickly retreating because of the Assyrians, and that those two invasions were lumped into one.
Or maybe the Assyrians forbade mentioning the previous dynasty?
------------
NOT EVERYTHING IS ABOUT RACISM. Racism is found in all times and cultures, but it is never found to explain every and all wrong.
I believe the Nubian rule over Egypt was the 25th Dynastic rule, its quite well recorded and as far as I know: not very eventful. The 23rd were Libyan/Berber rulers.
by Borderlands of Rojava » Sat Oct 17, 2020 5:07 am
Baltenstein wrote:Just gonna smh in disgust that this is even a topic. The entire debate is so bizarre and absurd that I don't even know what to make fun about first:
- the idea that Cleopatra was ethnically Egyptian, when she was famously Greek, altough I guess I should be glad that the Republic of Northern Macedonia isn't claiming her also and wants a blonde Slavic woman for the role
- even worse, the idea that she was ethnically black (I know "We Wuz Kangz" is a horrible racist meme, but come on)
- the idea that a member of a foreign-descended, notoriously inbred dynasty living in a certain region 2000 years ago absolutely must look like you average person living in the same region today
- that Egyptians are "People of Color" while Israelis who live right next to them apparently are not
- that "People of Color" is a thing anyway - lumping together vastly different groups on arbitrary grounds, while segregating others - like Israelis and Egyptians, who originate in the same region and speak closely related languages - Hebrew, Ancient Egyptian and Arab all belong to the Semitic languages
- and worst of all, that one's bloodline and "race" should be a decisive factor when being cast for a role
"Race is everything and everything is about race"
- Northern European racists, ca. 1920
"Race is everything and everything is about race"
- Certain 'progressives', ca. 2020The mummy DNA study highlights the irony of the anti-Gadot campaign. Inadvertently it makes a very good argument for casting the Israeli actress in the role of the Egyptian queen. If indeed Cleopatra had mixed Greek and ancient Egyptian heritage and if we accept that ancestry should be a factor when choosing an actor to play a historical character (a big if)
by Kandorith » Sat Oct 17, 2020 5:12 am
Borderlands of Rojava wrote:Kandorith wrote:
I believe the Nubian rule over Egypt was the 25th Dynastic rule, its quite well recorded and as far as I know: not very eventful. The 23rd were Libyan/Berber rulers.
So around that time random people were just showing up like "alright I'm king of Egypt now"?
☾ Great Empire of Kanyori | 大宮来国 | Arashi Kanyori Yokoku ☽
Overview | Constitution | Anthem | Imperial Anthem | Armed Forces | Foreign Affairs | Emperor
Hikari Kyoyu Headlines:
BREAKING NEWS: LDP wins elections in landslide though Yoshiro Murakami will not return as prime minister they stated. | Latest technology showcased at the Empress Masumi Stadium as the January Tech Summit starts for the weekend | CDP claims LDP stole the election and will take legal steps against the election results
by Karakars » Sat Oct 17, 2020 5:13 am
Sarderia wrote:
From the name, obviously Greek:
Kleopátra (Κλεοπάτρα), meaning "glory of her father", from κλέος (kléos, "glory") and πᾰτήρ(patḗr, "father")
And she's pretty much well-known as a Greek, i.e. different than the average Egyptian look
by Albionist Great Britain » Sat Oct 17, 2020 5:14 am
by The Blaatschapen » Sat Oct 17, 2020 5:15 am
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Austria-Bohemia-Hungary, Corrian, The Huskar Social Union, The Selkie
Advertisement