Because of rampant ethnic tensions, not its economic system.
Advertisement
by Washington Resistance Army » Mon Dec 07, 2020 5:20 pm
by Kowani » Mon Dec 07, 2020 5:21 pm
You mean democratically elected ex-leader
Who cut the poverty rate in half, raised the medium income, increased GDP by 80%, all while ending the profitable slavery enterprises and preventing inflation?who presided over an extremely poor country
that is leagues behind Chile and Argentina,the most free-market and wealthiest countries in South America? That guy?
by Odreria » Mon Dec 07, 2020 5:21 pm
Valrifell wrote:
Disregard whatever this poster says
by Rijk van Afrika » Mon Dec 07, 2020 5:21 pm
by -Ra- » Mon Dec 07, 2020 5:22 pm
Odreria wrote:China Cuba Vietnam Bolivia Yugoslavia Burkina Faso
Your vote counts. Go vote
Links to register:
United Kingdom | United States
Canada | Australia | New Zealand
by Washington Resistance Army » Mon Dec 07, 2020 5:22 pm
by Salus Maior » Mon Dec 07, 2020 5:24 pm
Kowani wrote:and the USSR was Socialist.
well
that's up for a lot of debate, but i would firmly argue that no
by Rijk van Afrika » Mon Dec 07, 2020 5:24 pm
-Ra- wrote:Odreria wrote:China Cuba Vietnam Bolivia Yugoslavia Burkina Faso
China is capitalist with socialist dressing.
Cuba is an oppressive hellhole whose best minds all fled to the US.
Vietnam only fares well because it is propped up by China, and even so has very high food insecurity.
Bolivia is the second poorest nation in South America (just ahead of another socialist paradise, Venezuela)
Yugoslavia doesn't exist, and was never successful when it did.
Burkina Faso has a life expectancy of 61.2
by Washington Resistance Army » Mon Dec 07, 2020 5:25 pm
-Ra- wrote:Vietnam only fares well because it is propped up by China, and even so has very high food insecurity.
by -Ra- » Mon Dec 07, 2020 5:25 pm
Your vote counts. Go vote
Links to register:
United Kingdom | United States
Canada | Australia | New Zealand
by Kowani » Mon Dec 07, 2020 5:25 pm
by Salus Maior » Mon Dec 07, 2020 5:27 pm
by -Ra- » Mon Dec 07, 2020 5:28 pm
Kowani wrote:-Ra- wrote:
Bolivia is the second poorest nation in South America (just ahead of another socialist paradise, Venezuela)
Objectively false
Your vote counts. Go vote
Links to register:
United Kingdom | United States
Canada | Australia | New Zealand
by Kowani » Mon Dec 07, 2020 5:28 pm
-Ra- wrote:
Chile has a market freedom rating of 15. Bolivia has one of 175. Which country's people are better off.
Burgeoning dictator Morales did so much for his country that he brought its GDP per capita to a whopping 3,552 USD, or about the same as Djibouti.
by Odreria » Mon Dec 07, 2020 5:28 pm
Valrifell wrote:
Disregard whatever this poster says
by Odreria » Mon Dec 07, 2020 5:29 pm
Valrifell wrote:
Disregard whatever this poster says
by Kowani » Mon Dec 07, 2020 5:31 pm
by Suriyanakhon » Mon Dec 07, 2020 5:31 pm
Ali ibn Abi Talib (عَلَيْهِ ٱلسَّلَامُ) wrote:The Messenger of Allah, peace and blessings be upon him, said, “Verily, Allah is astonished at a servant when he says: There is no God but You, I have wronged myself so forgive me, for none forgives sins but You. Allah says: My servant acknowledges that he has a Lord who forgives and punishes.”
by -Ra- » Mon Dec 07, 2020 5:34 pm
Kowani wrote:-Ra- wrote:Chile has a market freedom rating of 15. Bolivia has one of 175. Which country's people are better off.
Burgeoning dictator Morales did so much for his country that he brought its GDP per capita to a whopping 3,552 USD, or about the same as Djibouti.
almost like morales started from a worst place or something and saw a huge reduction in poverty and a huge increase in median incomes
strange how that works
Your vote counts. Go vote
Links to register:
United Kingdom | United States
Canada | Australia | New Zealand
by Salus Maior » Mon Dec 07, 2020 5:36 pm
by -Ra- » Mon Dec 07, 2020 5:37 pm
Kowani wrote:
...why the fuck would you measure a country's wealth by gdp per capita
that's not...that's not how anyone does it
if you want to look at the citizens' wealth, then look at median income or percentage of the population in poverty
if you want to look at the whole country, use adjusted GDP. You're wrong yet again
Your vote counts. Go vote
Links to register:
United Kingdom | United States
Canada | Australia | New Zealand
by -Ra- » Mon Dec 07, 2020 5:37 pm
Odreria wrote:
So you're saying they have less capital but do a better job of eliminating poverty? Socialism must be a good system.
Your vote counts. Go vote
Links to register:
United Kingdom | United States
Canada | Australia | New Zealand
by Odreria » Mon Dec 07, 2020 5:38 pm
Valrifell wrote:
Disregard whatever this poster says
by Kexholm Karelia » Mon Dec 07, 2020 5:38 pm
-Ra- wrote:Kowani wrote:almost like morales started from a worst place or something and saw a huge reduction in poverty and a huge increase in median incomes
strange how that works
The man who fashioned himself a 29-storey presidential palace was truly a fighting man for the bourgeoisie. You are right that GDP per capita went up during Morales's rule, but it also did so for Bolivia's neighbours and all of South America really. Compare, for instance, with Chile, or Argentina.
by Grill Pill » Mon Dec 07, 2020 5:38 pm
-Ra- wrote:Kowani wrote:...why the fuck would you measure a country's wealth by gdp per capita
that's not...that's not how anyone does it
if you want to look at the citizens' wealth, then look at median income or percentage of the population in poverty
if you want to look at the whole country, use adjusted GDP. You're wrong yet again
Even if you use adjusted GDP per capita, Bolivia is still 2nd only to Venezuela.
Try again.
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Ancientania, Austria-Bohemia-Hungary, Burnt Calculators, Cerula, Hidrandia, Mont de Philippe, Post War America, Valentine Z, Valrifall, Valyxias, Vanuzgard
Advertisement