NATION

PASSWORD

New Arizona Immigration Law Poll

For discussion and debate about anything. (Not a roleplay related forum; out-of-character commentary only.)

Advertisement

Remove ads

Do you support Arizona's new immigration law?

Yes
34
10%
No
178
51%
Don't care
11
3%
I'd like all of our states to embrace it
129
37%
 
Total votes : 352

User avatar
Gravlen
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 16632
Founded: Jul 01, 2005
Father Knows Best State

Postby Gravlen » Fri Apr 30, 2010 8:32 am

Our Constitution wrote:Every U.S. Citizen is responsible for assisting in apprehending them and deporting them to their Nation's Jurisdiction. They are not U.S. Citizens and they are not under U.S. Jurisdiction.

You're wrong about this one. Foreign nationals are under US jurisdiction while in the US. That's the main rule.
EnragedMaldivians wrote:That's preposterous. Gravlens's not a white nationalist; Gravlen's a penguin.

Unio de Sovetaj Socialismaj Respublikoj wrote:There is no use arguing the definition of murder with someone who has a picture of a penguin with a chainsaw as their nations flag.

User avatar
Gravlen
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 16632
Founded: Jul 01, 2005
Father Knows Best State

Postby Gravlen » Fri Apr 30, 2010 8:35 am

Dyakovo wrote:
Gravlen wrote:
Dyakovo wrote:If the immigration laws weren't such a mess than fewer people would feel it was necessary to risk breaking the laws.

Can you back up that assertion?

I admit that no, I cannot.

It's just that I don't think it'll be enough to simply make immigration laws "less messy". Even if they're clear and straightforward, people will still come illegally as long as there's any form of restrictions on immigration.
EnragedMaldivians wrote:That's preposterous. Gravlens's not a white nationalist; Gravlen's a penguin.

Unio de Sovetaj Socialismaj Respublikoj wrote:There is no use arguing the definition of murder with someone who has a picture of a penguin with a chainsaw as their nations flag.

User avatar
Tekania
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 21669
Founded: May 26, 2004
Civil Rights Lovefest

Postby Tekania » Fri Apr 30, 2010 8:38 am

Gravlen wrote:
Dyakovo wrote:
Gravlen wrote:
Dyakovo wrote:If the immigration laws weren't such a mess than fewer people would feel it was necessary to risk breaking the laws.

Can you back up that assertion?

I admit that no, I cannot.

It's just that I don't think it'll be enough to simply make immigration laws "less messy". Even if they're clear and straightforward, people will still come illegally as long as there's any form of restrictions on immigration.


One could remove immigration restrictions...
Such heroic nonsense!

User avatar
Gravlen
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 16632
Founded: Jul 01, 2005
Father Knows Best State

Postby Gravlen » Fri Apr 30, 2010 8:53 am

Tekania wrote:
Gravlen wrote:
Dyakovo wrote:
Gravlen wrote:
Dyakovo wrote:If the immigration laws weren't such a mess than fewer people would feel it was necessary to risk breaking the laws.

Can you back up that assertion?

I admit that no, I cannot.

It's just that I don't think it'll be enough to simply make immigration laws "less messy". Even if they're clear and straightforward, people will still come illegally as long as there's any form of restrictions on immigration.


One could remove immigration restrictions...

Yes, that would be an option.

I'm not in favour of that though.

(I would be very interested to see any western first-world country besides my own doing that though. It would be an interesting experiment...)
EnragedMaldivians wrote:That's preposterous. Gravlens's not a white nationalist; Gravlen's a penguin.

Unio de Sovetaj Socialismaj Respublikoj wrote:There is no use arguing the definition of murder with someone who has a picture of a penguin with a chainsaw as their nations flag.

User avatar
DaWoad
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 9066
Founded: Nov 05, 2005
Ex-Nation

Postby DaWoad » Fri Apr 30, 2010 8:58 am

Gravlen wrote:
Tekania wrote:
Gravlen wrote:
Dyakovo wrote:
Gravlen wrote:
Dyakovo wrote:If the immigration laws weren't such a mess than fewer people would feel it was necessary to risk breaking the laws.

Can you back up that assertion?

I admit that no, I cannot.

It's just that I don't think it'll be enough to simply make immigration laws "less messy". Even if they're clear and straightforward, people will still come illegally as long as there's any form of restrictions on immigration.


One could remove immigration restrictions...

Yes, that would be an option.

I'm not in favour of that though.

(I would be very interested to see any western first-world country besides my own doing that though. It would be an interesting experiment...)

I suspect the consequences might be . . .unpleasant. For one thing every fleeing fugitive and his brother would dash straight for that country.
Official Nation States Trainer
Factbook:http://nationstates.wikia.com/wiki/User:Dawoad
Alliances:The Hegemony, The GDF, SCUTUM

Supporter of making [citation needed] the official NSG way to say "source?"

User avatar
NotnotgnimmiJymmiJ
Minister
 
Posts: 3272
Founded: Apr 04, 2009
Ex-Nation

Postby NotnotgnimmiJymmiJ » Fri Apr 30, 2010 9:13 am

DaWoad wrote:I suspect the consequences might be . . .unpleasant. For one thing every fleeing fugitive and his brother would dash straight for that country.

Generally when people talk about removing restrictions on immigration, they mean letting workers into the country, not criminals.
You-Gi-Owe wrote:I hate all "spin doctoring". I don't mind honest disagreement and it's possible that people are expressing honest opinions, but spin doctoring is so pervasive, I gotta ask if I suspect it.

User avatar
Gravlen
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 16632
Founded: Jul 01, 2005
Father Knows Best State

Postby Gravlen » Fri Apr 30, 2010 9:13 am

DaWoad wrote:
Gravlen wrote:
Tekania wrote:
Gravlen wrote:
Dyakovo wrote:
Gravlen wrote:
Dyakovo wrote:If the immigration laws weren't such a mess than fewer people would feel it was necessary to risk breaking the laws.

Can you back up that assertion?

I admit that no, I cannot.

It's just that I don't think it'll be enough to simply make immigration laws "less messy". Even if they're clear and straightforward, people will still come illegally as long as there's any form of restrictions on immigration.


One could remove immigration restrictions...

Yes, that would be an option.

I'm not in favour of that though.

(I would be very interested to see any western first-world country besides my own doing that though. It would be an interesting experiment...)

I suspect the consequences might be . . .unpleasant. For one thing every fleeing fugitive and his brother would dash straight for that country.

I'm curious if other western countries would reallocate resources from their own migration systems to purchase transportation to that country for any migrants who would find themselves at their borders...
EnragedMaldivians wrote:That's preposterous. Gravlens's not a white nationalist; Gravlen's a penguin.

Unio de Sovetaj Socialismaj Respublikoj wrote:There is no use arguing the definition of murder with someone who has a picture of a penguin with a chainsaw as their nations flag.

User avatar
Gravlen
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 16632
Founded: Jul 01, 2005
Father Knows Best State

Postby Gravlen » Fri Apr 30, 2010 9:16 am

NotnotgnimmiJymmiJ wrote:
DaWoad wrote:I suspect the consequences might be . . .unpleasant. For one thing every fleeing fugitive and his brother would dash straight for that country.

Generally when people talk about removing restrictions on immigration, they mean letting workers into the country, not criminals.

You have to decide if you want restrictions on immigration or not.

Will they have to apply to get in? Then you need a system for dealing with the aplications.
Can they be turned down? Then you have restrictions.
Can they be turned away at the border? Well then you risk getting illegal immigrants who sneak across anyway.
Last edited by Gravlen on Fri Apr 30, 2010 9:17 am, edited 1 time in total.
EnragedMaldivians wrote:That's preposterous. Gravlens's not a white nationalist; Gravlen's a penguin.

Unio de Sovetaj Socialismaj Respublikoj wrote:There is no use arguing the definition of murder with someone who has a picture of a penguin with a chainsaw as their nations flag.

User avatar
NotnotgnimmiJymmiJ
Minister
 
Posts: 3272
Founded: Apr 04, 2009
Ex-Nation

Postby NotnotgnimmiJymmiJ » Fri Apr 30, 2010 9:23 am

Gravlen wrote:
NotnotgnimmiJymmiJ wrote:
DaWoad wrote:I suspect the consequences might be . . .unpleasant. For one thing every fleeing fugitive and his brother would dash straight for that country.

Generally when people talk about removing restrictions on immigration, they mean letting workers into the country, not criminals.

You have to decide if you want restrictions on immigration or not.

Will they have to apply to get in? Then you need a system for dealing with the aplications.
We already have one.
Can they be turned down? Then you have restrictions.
Can they be turned away at the border? Well then you risk getting illegal immigrants who sneak across anyway.

But if you let in all the immigrants who aren't criminals and just want to work, then the amount of people crossing the border illegally will literally be less than 1% of what it is now. It would be much, much easier to defend our borders and keep actual criminals out.
You-Gi-Owe wrote:I hate all "spin doctoring". I don't mind honest disagreement and it's possible that people are expressing honest opinions, but spin doctoring is so pervasive, I gotta ask if I suspect it.

User avatar
Sacrifist
Civil Servant
 
Posts: 7
Founded: Mar 14, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Sacrifist » Fri Apr 30, 2010 9:34 am

I love how the right is calling Obama a marxist, communist, and everything else they can think of. Yet some of them are supporting this act which is very reminiscent of Nazi Germany.

I agree something needs to be done, but this isn't the way to go. We are getting one step closer to history repeating itself with this bill.

User avatar
Gravlen
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 16632
Founded: Jul 01, 2005
Father Knows Best State

Postby Gravlen » Fri Apr 30, 2010 10:03 am

NotnotgnimmiJymmiJ wrote:
Gravlen wrote:
NotnotgnimmiJymmiJ wrote:
DaWoad wrote:I suspect the consequences might be . . .unpleasant. For one thing every fleeing fugitive and his brother would dash straight for that country.

Generally when people talk about removing restrictions on immigration, they mean letting workers into the country, not criminals.

You have to decide if you want restrictions on immigration or not.

Will they have to apply to get in? Then you need a system for dealing with the aplications.
We already have one.
Can they be turned down? Then you have restrictions.
Can they be turned away at the border? Well then you risk getting illegal immigrants who sneak across anyway.

But if you let in all the immigrants who aren't criminals and just want to work, then the amount of people crossing the border illegally will literally be less than 1% of what it is now. It would be much, much easier to defend our borders and keep actual criminals out.

And what about those who don't want to work, but for different reasons want to live there? This also includes people who want to commit crimes but haven't as of yet, or isn't wanted in other jurisdiction. Like suspected terrorists.

Also, what about those who just want (free) education or (free) healthcare?

Also, do you think there are any limits as to how many immigrants the country can handle?
EnragedMaldivians wrote:That's preposterous. Gravlens's not a white nationalist; Gravlen's a penguin.

Unio de Sovetaj Socialismaj Respublikoj wrote:There is no use arguing the definition of murder with someone who has a picture of a penguin with a chainsaw as their nations flag.

User avatar
NotnotgnimmiJymmiJ
Minister
 
Posts: 3272
Founded: Apr 04, 2009
Ex-Nation

Postby NotnotgnimmiJymmiJ » Fri Apr 30, 2010 10:32 am

Gravlen wrote:And what about those who don't want to work, but for different reasons want to live there? This also includes people who want to commit crimes but haven't as of yet,
Unless you can read their minds and tell who WANTS to commit a crime, this is an argument against people, not an argument against immigrants.

or isn't wanted in other jurisdiction. Like suspected terrorists.
Don't let them in.

Also, what about those who just want (free) education or (free) healthcare?
I actually believe in free education and free health care.

Also, do you think there are any limits as to how many immigrants the country can handle?

We're not anywhere even remotely close to that number. Really, the vast majority of people who come here, really do want to work.
Last edited by NotnotgnimmiJymmiJ on Fri Apr 30, 2010 10:33 am, edited 2 times in total.
You-Gi-Owe wrote:I hate all "spin doctoring". I don't mind honest disagreement and it's possible that people are expressing honest opinions, but spin doctoring is so pervasive, I gotta ask if I suspect it.

User avatar
MisanthropicPopulism
Minister
 
Posts: 3299
Founded: Apr 10, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby MisanthropicPopulism » Fri Apr 30, 2010 10:34 am

NotnotgnimmiJymmiJ wrote:
Gravlen wrote:And what about those who don't want to work, but for different reasons want to live there? This also includes people who want to commit crimes but haven't as of yet,
Unless you can read their minds and tell who WANTS to commit a crime, this is an argument against people, not an argument against immigration.

You havn't been keeping up with the political winds. All latino people in the US are illegal immigrants who have come here to steal our jobs and sit around, do nothing but mooch off the social programs that thrive in right-wing tight-ass states, and murder hapless and innocent white folk for drugs (because the drop rate on marijuana from a white person is 73.5%)
Last edited by MisanthropicPopulism on Fri Apr 30, 2010 10:35 am, edited 2 times in total.
When life gives you lemons, lemonade for the lemonade god!

User avatar
Gravlen
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 16632
Founded: Jul 01, 2005
Father Knows Best State

Postby Gravlen » Fri Apr 30, 2010 10:46 am

NotnotgnimmiJymmiJ wrote:
Gravlen wrote:And what about those who don't want to work, but for different reasons want to live there? This also includes people who want to commit crimes but haven't as of yet,
Unless you can read their minds and tell who WANTS to commit a crime, this is an argument against people, not an argument against immigrants.

Not really. It's being done every day already.

NotnotgnimmiJymmiJ wrote:
or isn't wanted in other jurisdiction. Like suspected terrorists.
Don't let them in.

But they want to work.

But I guess you do want restrictions on immigration after all...

NotnotgnimmiJymmiJ wrote:
Also, what about those who just want (free) education or (free) healthcare?
I actually believe in free education and free health care.

So I can send my children there to get a free education? You'll pay for it? Nice!

NotnotgnimmiJymmiJ wrote:
Also, do you think there are any limits as to how many immigrants the country can handle?

We're not anywhere even remotely close to that number. Really, the vast majority of people who come here, really do want to work.

So 2-3 million extra each year is fine... What about 5-6 million extra?
EnragedMaldivians wrote:That's preposterous. Gravlens's not a white nationalist; Gravlen's a penguin.

Unio de Sovetaj Socialismaj Respublikoj wrote:There is no use arguing the definition of murder with someone who has a picture of a penguin with a chainsaw as their nations flag.

User avatar
Vikenia
Lobbyist
 
Posts: 12
Founded: Apr 10, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Vikenia » Fri Apr 30, 2010 11:05 am

70% of Arizona voters support the bill? That should add up to about 1.5 northern voters LOL. Any body that enacts legislation to victimize people who look or sound foreign cannot claim to have freedom or equal rights. All Arizona has done is remove civil rights for many of its inhabitants, which is why it is being prosecuted by the Federal Government. Taking away the rights of many to protect against a smaller number of illegal immigrants is a right-wing knee-jerk reaction that will not work and merely alienates people even further.
Last edited by Vikenia on Fri Apr 30, 2010 11:05 am, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
Vikenia
Lobbyist
 
Posts: 12
Founded: Apr 10, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Vikenia » Fri Apr 30, 2010 11:08 am

MisanthropicPopulism wrote:All latino people in the US are illegal immigrants who have come here to steal our jobs and sit around, do nothing but mooch off the social programs that thrive in right-wing tight-ass states, and murder hapless and innocent white folk for drugs (because the drop rate on marijuana from a white person is 73.5%)

Did you read this garbage before you posted it? What a load of crap. If you want to look at illegal immigrants then face the fact that every non-Native American is an immigrant and illegally too. Ye gods man ..... there are thousands of legal Latino immigrants in the United States. Where do you get this drivel from?

User avatar
Vikenia
Lobbyist
 
Posts: 12
Founded: Apr 10, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Vikenia » Fri Apr 30, 2010 11:09 am

Sacrifist wrote:I love how the right is calling Obama a marxist, communist, and everything else they can think of. Yet some of them are supporting this act which is very reminiscent of Nazi Germany.

I agree something needs to be done, but this isn't the way to go. We are getting one step closer to history repeating itself with this bill.

AMEN!

User avatar
NotnotgnimmiJymmiJ
Minister
 
Posts: 3272
Founded: Apr 04, 2009
Ex-Nation

Postby NotnotgnimmiJymmiJ » Fri Apr 30, 2010 11:14 am

Gravlen wrote:
NotnotgnimmiJymmiJ wrote:
Gravlen wrote:And what about those who don't want to work, but for different reasons want to live there? This also includes people who want to commit crimes but haven't as of yet,
Unless you can read their minds and tell who WANTS to commit a crime, this is an argument against people, not an argument against immigrants.

Not really. It's being done every day already.
uh huh.

NotnotgnimmiJymmiJ wrote:
or isn't wanted in other jurisdiction. Like suspected terrorists.
Don't let them in.

But they want to work.

But I guess you do want restrictions on immigration after all...
Correct.

NotnotgnimmiJymmiJ wrote:
Also, what about those who just want (free) education or (free) healthcare?
I actually believe in free education and free health care.

So I can send my children there to get a free education? You'll pay for it? Nice!
Pretty much.

NotnotgnimmiJymmiJ wrote:
Also, do you think there are any limits as to how many immigrants the country can handle?

We're not anywhere even remotely close to that number. Really, the vast majority of people who come here, really do want to work.

So 2-3 million extra each year is fine... What about 5-6 million extra?
Sounds good to me.
Last edited by NotnotgnimmiJymmiJ on Fri Apr 30, 2010 11:16 am, edited 2 times in total.
You-Gi-Owe wrote:I hate all "spin doctoring". I don't mind honest disagreement and it's possible that people are expressing honest opinions, but spin doctoring is so pervasive, I gotta ask if I suspect it.

User avatar
MisanthropicPopulism
Minister
 
Posts: 3299
Founded: Apr 10, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby MisanthropicPopulism » Fri Apr 30, 2010 11:18 am

Vikenia wrote:
MisanthropicPopulism wrote:All latino people in the US are illegal immigrants who have come here to steal our jobs and sit around, do nothing but mooch off the social programs that thrive in right-wing tight-ass states, and murder hapless and innocent white folk for drugs (because the drop rate on marijuana from a white person is 73.5%)

Did you read this garbage before you posted it? What a load of crap. If you want to look at illegal immigrants then face the fact that every non-Native American is an immigrant and illegally too. Ye gods man ..... there are thousands of legal Latino immigrants in the United States. Where do you get this drivel from?

:palm: :palm: :palm:

If including a video game item percentile drop rate doesn't indicate it's satire, I guess nothing will but proper [satire][/satire] tags.
Last edited by MisanthropicPopulism on Fri Apr 30, 2010 11:19 am, edited 1 time in total.
When life gives you lemons, lemonade for the lemonade god!

User avatar
Dyakovo
Post Kaiser
 
Posts: 83162
Founded: Nov 13, 2007
Ex-Nation

Postby Dyakovo » Fri Apr 30, 2010 11:24 am

MisanthropicPopulism wrote:
Vikenia wrote:
MisanthropicPopulism wrote:All latino people in the US are illegal immigrants who have come here to steal our jobs and sit around, do nothing but mooch off the social programs that thrive in right-wing tight-ass states, and murder hapless and innocent white folk for drugs (because the drop rate on marijuana from a white person is 73.5%)

Did you read this garbage before you posted it? What a load of crap. If you want to look at illegal immigrants then face the fact that every non-Native American is an immigrant and illegally too. Ye gods man ..... there are thousands of legal Latino immigrants in the United States. Where do you get this drivel from?

:palm: :palm: :palm:

If including a video game item percentile drop rate doesn't indicate it's satire, I guess nothing will but proper [satire][/satire] tags.

The problem is that there are actually people who think like that... As demonstrated by this law and its overwhelming support...
Don't take life so serious... It isn't permanent...
Freedom from religion is an integral part of Freedom of religion
Married to Koshka
USMC veteran MOS 0331/8152
Grave_n_Idle: Maybe that's why the bible is so anti-other-gods, the other gods do exist, but they diss on Jehovah all the time for his shitty work.
Ifreann: Odds are you're secretly a zebra with a very special keyboard.
Ostro: I think women need to be trained
Margno, Llamalandia, Tarsonis Survivors, Bachmann's America, Internationalist Bastard B'awwwww! You're mean!

User avatar
MisanthropicPopulism
Minister
 
Posts: 3299
Founded: Apr 10, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby MisanthropicPopulism » Fri Apr 30, 2010 11:28 am

Dyakovo wrote:
MisanthropicPopulism wrote:
Vikenia wrote:
MisanthropicPopulism wrote:All latino people in the US are illegal immigrants who have come here to steal our jobs and sit around, do nothing but mooch off the social programs that thrive in right-wing tight-ass states, and murder hapless and innocent white folk for drugs (because the drop rate on marijuana from a white person is 73.5%)

Did you read this garbage before you posted it? What a load of crap. If you want to look at illegal immigrants then face the fact that every non-Native American is an immigrant and illegally too. Ye gods man ..... there are thousands of legal Latino immigrants in the United States. Where do you get this drivel from?

:palm: :palm: :palm:

If including a video game item percentile drop rate doesn't indicate it's satire, I guess nothing will but proper [satire][/satire] tags.

The problem is that there are actually people who think like that... As demonstrated by this law and its overwhelming support...

He can't identify satire and you don't seem to know it's definition.
When life gives you lemons, lemonade for the lemonade god!

User avatar
Quattrablegia
Spokesperson
 
Posts: 170
Founded: Mar 17, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Quattrablegia » Fri Apr 30, 2010 11:30 am

Democracy = majority rules, and that being the be-all and end-all of discussion, is a first-grade understanding of democracy.

User avatar
Dyakovo
Post Kaiser
 
Posts: 83162
Founded: Nov 13, 2007
Ex-Nation

Postby Dyakovo » Fri Apr 30, 2010 11:33 am

MisanthropicPopulism wrote:
Dyakovo wrote:
MisanthropicPopulism wrote:
Vikenia wrote:
MisanthropicPopulism wrote:All latino people in the US are illegal immigrants who have come here to steal our jobs and sit around, do nothing but mooch off the social programs that thrive in right-wing tight-ass states, and murder hapless and innocent white folk for drugs (because the drop rate on marijuana from a white person is 73.5%)

Did you read this garbage before you posted it? What a load of crap. If you want to look at illegal immigrants then face the fact that every non-Native American is an immigrant and illegally too. Ye gods man ..... there are thousands of legal Latino immigrants in the United States. Where do you get this drivel from?

:palm: :palm: :palm:

If including a video game item percentile drop rate doesn't indicate it's satire, I guess nothing will but proper [satire][/satire] tags.

The problem is that there are actually people who think like that... As demonstrated by this law and its overwhelming support...

He can't identify satire and you don't seem to know it's definition.

I'm sorry, obviously I need to rephrase what I said to make it a bit more obvious...
The problem is you did too good a job.
Don't take life so serious... It isn't permanent...
Freedom from religion is an integral part of Freedom of religion
Married to Koshka
USMC veteran MOS 0331/8152
Grave_n_Idle: Maybe that's why the bible is so anti-other-gods, the other gods do exist, but they diss on Jehovah all the time for his shitty work.
Ifreann: Odds are you're secretly a zebra with a very special keyboard.
Ostro: I think women need to be trained
Margno, Llamalandia, Tarsonis Survivors, Bachmann's America, Internationalist Bastard B'awwwww! You're mean!

User avatar
MisanthropicPopulism
Minister
 
Posts: 3299
Founded: Apr 10, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby MisanthropicPopulism » Fri Apr 30, 2010 11:34 am

Dyakovo wrote:The problem is you did too good a job.

It's not good satire if it can't be easily identified with its target. Hence why I wrote it so absurdly and additionally included the video game item percentile drop rate.
Never mind that the sentence he left out when quoting me implied the next sentence (the one he did quote) would not be a real opinion but instead a hyperbole of what the political winds were.
Last edited by MisanthropicPopulism on Fri Apr 30, 2010 11:35 am, edited 2 times in total.
When life gives you lemons, lemonade for the lemonade god!

User avatar
Tekania
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 21669
Founded: May 26, 2004
Civil Rights Lovefest

Postby Tekania » Fri Apr 30, 2010 11:42 am

Quattrablegia wrote:Democracy = majority rules, and that being the be-all and end-all of discussion, is a first-grade understanding of democracy.


I don't approve of absolute democracy... Luckily we don't live in an absolute democracy, and so majority does not necessarily mean de facto rule...
Such heroic nonsense!

PreviousNext

Advertisement

Remove ads

Return to General

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Cannot think of a name, Elwher, Eternal Algerstonia, Necroghastia, Northern Socialist Council Republics, Tarsonis, Urkennalaid, Zolotaya Sobaka

Advertisement

Remove ads