NATION

PASSWORD

New Arizona Immigration Law Poll

For discussion and debate about anything. (Not a roleplay related forum; out-of-character commentary only.)

Advertisement

Remove ads

Do you support Arizona's new immigration law?

Yes
34
10%
No
178
51%
Don't care
11
3%
I'd like all of our states to embrace it
129
37%
 
Total votes : 352

User avatar
Muravyets
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 12755
Founded: Aug 18, 2005
Ex-Nation

Postby Muravyets » Sun May 02, 2010 8:35 pm

The Southern Dictators wrote:
North Calaveras wrote:
The Southern Dictators wrote:
North Calaveras wrote:
The Southern Dictators wrote:Well they have to be called "illegal" immigrants for something.


you mean sneaking into a nation is okay with you?


Sneaking into a nation is not okay.


Then how should we punish someone sneaking into a nation?


If they remain illegal when caught, deport them.

Which is what the federal laws we already have do. The argument is over how we catch them. A small group of well-connected racists in Arizona have decided that the best way is to just assume that someone is illegal by how they look and on the basis of that, ship any of them who can't wave a green card at you (which a citizen wouldn't be able to do) "back" to Mexico (thus, obviously, assuming that all illegal immigrants will be from Mexico). An encouragingly high number of Americans think that's totally fucked up.
Kick back at Cafe Muravyets
And check out my other RP, too. (Don't take others' word for it -- see for yourself. ;) )
I agree with Muravyets because she scares me. -- Verdigroth
However, I am still not the topic of this thread.

User avatar
The Cat-Tribe
Negotiator
 
Posts: 5548
Founded: Jan 18, 2005
Ex-Nation

Postby The Cat-Tribe » Sun May 02, 2010 8:37 pm

North Calaveras wrote:Look, you want open borders and everyone to just come in, that sounds fun an all, but then the country collapses, there is no real loyalty anymore to the United States of America, they don't have a respect for it. If every immigrant came here and was illegal but had nothing but patriotism to the American dream and showed loyalty to this nation I would not have a problem with it, but that's a fantasy.


I could raise several issues with your UN-AMERICAN attitude and statements, but this talk of open borders is a red herring. I never advocated them. What I said was (1) the choice between laws like AZ's SB 1070 and open borders is a false dichotomy and (2), if it wasn't, I'd rather live in a nation that respected the U.S. Constitution and equality of persons than a racist fortress.
I quit (again).
The Altani Confederacy wrote:
The Cat-Tribe wrote:With that, I am done with these shenanigans. Do as thou wilt.

Can't miss you until you're gone, Ambassador. Seriously, your delegation is like one of those stores that has a "Going Out Of Business" sale for twenty years. Stay or go, already.*snip*
"Don't give me no shit because . . . I've been Tired . . ." ~ Pixies
With that, "he put his boots on, he took a face from the Ancient Gallery, and he walked on down the Hall . . ."

User avatar
The Southern Dictators
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1364
Founded: Nov 22, 2009
Ex-Nation

Postby The Southern Dictators » Sun May 02, 2010 8:38 pm

Muravyets wrote:
The Southern Dictators wrote:
North Calaveras wrote:
The Southern Dictators wrote:
North Calaveras wrote:
The Southern Dictators wrote:Well they have to be called "illegal" immigrants for something.


you mean sneaking into a nation is okay with you?


Sneaking into a nation is not okay.


Then how should we punish someone sneaking into a nation?


If they remain illegal when caught, deport them.

Which is what the federal laws we already have do. The argument is over how we catch them. A small group of well-connected racists in Arizona have decided that the best way is to just assume that someone is illegal by how they look and on the basis of that, ship any of them who can't wave a green card at you (which a citizen wouldn't be able to do) "back" to Mexico (thus, obviously, assuming that all illegal immigrants will be from Mexico). An encouragingly high number of Americans think that's totally fucked up.


Catch them with the census. Which is what happened to my neighbors.
Last edited by The Southern Dictators on Sun May 02, 2010 8:38 pm, edited 1 time in total.
PT Factbook Under ConstructionPMT Factbook Under Heavy ConstructionFT Factbook Under Heavy Construction

GENERATION 28: The first time you see this, copy it into your signature on any forum and add 1 to the generation. Social experiment

Volnotova wrote:Oh ffs, if there is one thing I can't stand it is this plethora of weeping and depressed people in this thread that will not hesitate to use every opportunity available to exlcaim how something like this made them lose (all) faith in humanity(including themselves).

:palm: x 3

User avatar
Muravyets
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 12755
Founded: Aug 18, 2005
Ex-Nation

Postby Muravyets » Sun May 02, 2010 8:46 pm

The Southern Dictators wrote:
Muravyets wrote:
The Southern Dictators wrote:
North Calaveras wrote:
The Southern Dictators wrote:
North Calaveras wrote:
The Southern Dictators wrote:Well they have to be called "illegal" immigrants for something.


you mean sneaking into a nation is okay with you?


Sneaking into a nation is not okay.


Then how should we punish someone sneaking into a nation?


If they remain illegal when caught, deport them.

Which is what the federal laws we already have do. The argument is over how we catch them. A small group of well-connected racists in Arizona have decided that the best way is to just assume that someone is illegal by how they look and on the basis of that, ship any of them who can't wave a green card at you (which a citizen wouldn't be able to do) "back" to Mexico (thus, obviously, assuming that all illegal immigrants will be from Mexico). An encouragingly high number of Americans think that's totally fucked up.


Catch them with the census. Which is what happened to my neighbors.

Wait -- are you telling me that it could then be considered suspicious if someone refused to cooperate with the Census, and we could just round those people up and toss them out? Oh that's too good a scenario -- it can't be true.
Last edited by Muravyets on Sun May 02, 2010 8:46 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Kick back at Cafe Muravyets
And check out my other RP, too. (Don't take others' word for it -- see for yourself. ;) )
I agree with Muravyets because she scares me. -- Verdigroth
However, I am still not the topic of this thread.

User avatar
The Southern Dictators
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1364
Founded: Nov 22, 2009
Ex-Nation

Postby The Southern Dictators » Sun May 02, 2010 8:48 pm

Muravyets wrote:
The Southern Dictators wrote:
Muravyets wrote:
The Southern Dictators wrote:
North Calaveras wrote:
The Southern Dictators wrote:
North Calaveras wrote:
The Southern Dictators wrote:Well they have to be called "illegal" immigrants for something.


you mean sneaking into a nation is okay with you?


Sneaking into a nation is not okay.


Then how should we punish someone sneaking into a nation?


If they remain illegal when caught, deport them.

Which is what the federal laws we already have do. The argument is over how we catch them. A small group of well-connected racists in Arizona have decided that the best way is to just assume that someone is illegal by how they look and on the basis of that, ship any of them who can't wave a green card at you (which a citizen wouldn't be able to do) "back" to Mexico (thus, obviously, assuming that all illegal immigrants will be from Mexico). An encouragingly high number of Americans think that's totally fucked up.


Catch them with the census. Which is what happened to my neighbors.

Wait -- are you telling me that it could then be considered suspicious if someone refused to cooperate with the Census, and we could just round those people up and toss them out? Oh that's too good a scenario -- it can't be true.


No. When my neighbors mailed back their census sheets, I guess the whole family were wanted illegals for some reason. The next morning immigration came and picked them up.
PT Factbook Under ConstructionPMT Factbook Under Heavy ConstructionFT Factbook Under Heavy Construction

GENERATION 28: The first time you see this, copy it into your signature on any forum and add 1 to the generation. Social experiment

Volnotova wrote:Oh ffs, if there is one thing I can't stand it is this plethora of weeping and depressed people in this thread that will not hesitate to use every opportunity available to exlcaim how something like this made them lose (all) faith in humanity(including themselves).

:palm: x 3

User avatar
Muravyets
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 12755
Founded: Aug 18, 2005
Ex-Nation

Postby Muravyets » Sun May 02, 2010 8:55 pm

The Southern Dictators wrote:
Muravyets wrote:
The Southern Dictators wrote:
Muravyets wrote:
The Southern Dictators wrote:
North Calaveras wrote:
The Southern Dictators wrote:
North Calaveras wrote:
The Southern Dictators wrote:Well they have to be called "illegal" immigrants for something.


you mean sneaking into a nation is okay with you?


Sneaking into a nation is not okay.


Then how should we punish someone sneaking into a nation?


If they remain illegal when caught, deport them.

Which is what the federal laws we already have do. The argument is over how we catch them. A small group of well-connected racists in Arizona have decided that the best way is to just assume that someone is illegal by how they look and on the basis of that, ship any of them who can't wave a green card at you (which a citizen wouldn't be able to do) "back" to Mexico (thus, obviously, assuming that all illegal immigrants will be from Mexico). An encouragingly high number of Americans think that's totally fucked up.


Catch them with the census. Which is what happened to my neighbors.

Wait -- are you telling me that it could then be considered suspicious if someone refused to cooperate with the Census, and we could just round those people up and toss them out? Oh that's too good a scenario -- it can't be true.


No. When my neighbors mailed back their census sheets, I guess the whole family were wanted illegals for some reason. The next morning immigration came and picked them up.

I know that's what you meant, but think about it. If we decide to hunt illegal immigrants via the census, then refusing to fill out the census (which is required by law under the Constitution) would be a suspicious activity, right? And just think of the people we could rid ourselves of that way -- all those anti-census dumbasses... *indulges in guilty pleasure fantasizing for a moment* Ah, but no, that would be wrong of us.
Last edited by Muravyets on Sun May 02, 2010 8:55 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Kick back at Cafe Muravyets
And check out my other RP, too. (Don't take others' word for it -- see for yourself. ;) )
I agree with Muravyets because she scares me. -- Verdigroth
However, I am still not the topic of this thread.

User avatar
The Southern Dictators
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1364
Founded: Nov 22, 2009
Ex-Nation

Postby The Southern Dictators » Sun May 02, 2010 8:57 pm

Muravyets wrote:
The Southern Dictators wrote:
Muravyets wrote:
The Southern Dictators wrote:
Muravyets wrote:
The Southern Dictators wrote:
North Calaveras wrote:
The Southern Dictators wrote:
North Calaveras wrote:
The Southern Dictators wrote:Well they have to be called "illegal" immigrants for something.


you mean sneaking into a nation is okay with you?


Sneaking into a nation is not okay.


Then how should we punish someone sneaking into a nation?


If they remain illegal when caught, deport them.

Which is what the federal laws we already have do. The argument is over how we catch them. A small group of well-connected racists in Arizona have decided that the best way is to just assume that someone is illegal by how they look and on the basis of that, ship any of them who can't wave a green card at you (which a citizen wouldn't be able to do) "back" to Mexico (thus, obviously, assuming that all illegal immigrants will be from Mexico). An encouragingly high number of Americans think that's totally fucked up.


Catch them with the census. Which is what happened to my neighbors.

Wait -- are you telling me that it could then be considered suspicious if someone refused to cooperate with the Census, and we could just round those people up and toss them out? Oh that's too good a scenario -- it can't be true.


No. When my neighbors mailed back their census sheets, I guess the whole family were wanted illegals for some reason. The next morning immigration came and picked them up.

I know that's what you meant, but think about it. If we decide to hunt illegal immigrants via the census, then refusing to fill out the census (which is required by law under the Constitution) would be a suspicious activity, right? And just think of the people we could rid ourselves of that way -- all those anti-census dumbasses... *indulges in guilty pleasure fantasizing for a moment* Ah, but no, that would be wrong of us.


Well as long as the illegals don't know how they got caught...the HUNT !
*lights a torch*
What other ways other than the census can be used to track down illegals ?
PT Factbook Under ConstructionPMT Factbook Under Heavy ConstructionFT Factbook Under Heavy Construction

GENERATION 28: The first time you see this, copy it into your signature on any forum and add 1 to the generation. Social experiment

Volnotova wrote:Oh ffs, if there is one thing I can't stand it is this plethora of weeping and depressed people in this thread that will not hesitate to use every opportunity available to exlcaim how something like this made them lose (all) faith in humanity(including themselves).

:palm: x 3

User avatar
Muravyets
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 12755
Founded: Aug 18, 2005
Ex-Nation

Postby Muravyets » Sun May 02, 2010 8:59 pm

The Southern Dictators wrote:
Well as long as the illegals don't know how they got caught...the HUNT !
*lights a torch*
What other ways other than the census can be used to track down illegals ?

None, I would think, since the census does not ask for proof of citizenship anyway. I think the arrest might have been just a coincidence to the census.
Last edited by Muravyets on Sun May 02, 2010 9:00 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Kick back at Cafe Muravyets
And check out my other RP, too. (Don't take others' word for it -- see for yourself. ;) )
I agree with Muravyets because she scares me. -- Verdigroth
However, I am still not the topic of this thread.

User avatar
The Southern Dictators
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1364
Founded: Nov 22, 2009
Ex-Nation

Postby The Southern Dictators » Sun May 02, 2010 9:02 pm

Muravyets wrote:
The Southern Dictators wrote:
Well as long as the illegals don't know how they got caught...the HUNT !
*lights a torch*
What other ways other than the census can be used to track down illegals ?

None, I would think, since the census does not ask for proof of citizenship anyway. I think the arrest might have been just a coincidence to the census.


Well they must of known somehow. I sure didn't know they were illegal. They were on some "wanted illegals" list. I just know that they were caught through the census.
PT Factbook Under ConstructionPMT Factbook Under Heavy ConstructionFT Factbook Under Heavy Construction

GENERATION 28: The first time you see this, copy it into your signature on any forum and add 1 to the generation. Social experiment

Volnotova wrote:Oh ffs, if there is one thing I can't stand it is this plethora of weeping and depressed people in this thread that will not hesitate to use every opportunity available to exlcaim how something like this made them lose (all) faith in humanity(including themselves).

:palm: x 3

User avatar
North Calaveras
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 16483
Founded: Mar 22, 2007
Ex-Nation

Postby North Calaveras » Sun May 02, 2010 10:27 pm

Blodeuwydd wrote:The thing about that bill isn't that its aim is to criminalize illegal immigration. That makes sense. And if all it was was a measure which stated that if the cops pull you over for another offense, and ask you to appear in court to prove your citizenship, then we're having a conversation. (Not that I would be 100% for that, but at least its reasonable) However, I can't have you walking over to someone with dark skin and demanding papers at 7-11. Thats Schutzstaffel type stuff. And anyway, how're they determining who is "suspicious" of being eere illegally? Are they darting around street corners, with shifty eyes? Of course not, its racial profiling. Thats ballsy, especially in a state where, quite literally, the US-Mexico border crossed them overnight a hundred years ago. Can't do it


If you can't single anybody out than we might as well give up on investigating any kind of illegal immigration since they could just play a race card.
Government: Romanist Ceasarist Dictatorship
Political Themes: Nationalism, Romanticism, Ceasarism, Militarism, Social Liberalism, Cult of Personality
Ethnic Groups: American, Latino, Filipino

User avatar
Jaunty tunes
Chargé d'Affaires
 
Posts: 482
Founded: Apr 15, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Jaunty tunes » Sun May 02, 2010 10:41 pm

There are some signs of a person who is not legal in your country. The biggest one is the inability to speak English as if someone was educated or worked in the US it is very likely some English is required. As long as the request is simple such as one piece of ID like a drivers licence then I think it is alright. There needs to be some way of identifying people who are illegally in the country and if someone appears to be an illegal person then a few questions need to be asked.
When I travel I always know where my passport is. I could easily show that to the police with the correct visa stamp in the US. It is not hard and does not need to take much time at all. The only worry would be fake ID's. But the cops could catch onto them when a fake ID is known and if suspicious just take one minute more to look in the data base.
If there are local police it would be even easier to identify illegal migrants and the same legal individuals would not be asked all the time.

User avatar
The REAL Glasers
Minister
 
Posts: 2621
Founded: Feb 28, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby The REAL Glasers » Sun May 02, 2010 10:52 pm

Jaunty tunes wrote:There are some signs of a person who is not legal in your country. The biggest one is the inability to speak English as if someone was educated or worked in the US it is very likely some English is required. As long as the request is simple such as one piece of ID like a drivers licence then I think it is alright. There needs to be some way of identifying people who are illegally in the country and if someone appears to be an illegal person then a few questions need to be asked.
When I travel I always know where my passport is. I could easily show that to the police with the correct visa stamp in the US. It is not hard and does not need to take much time at all. The only worry would be fake ID's. But the cops could catch onto them when a fake ID is known and if suspicious just take one minute more to look in the data base.
If there are local police it would be even easier to identify illegal migrants and the same legal individuals would not be asked all the time.


So first generation immigrants that don't yet know the language are completely impossible, as are political refugees?

I almost always have my ID on me, except for a few notable exceptions. I was at a concert last week and only brought my ticket and cash, coincidentally, there was an altercation outside the venue where the police nearly got involved. If they did, and I had lived in AZ, who's to say they couldn't have just randomly asked us all for our IDs to find out if we were illegals? It shouldn't be a requirement for us to carry around identification. Is it convenient? Yes. Necessary, hell no.
YouTube Channel
http://rateyourmusic.com/~Onespeed
http://www.last.fm/user/TheYardstick
Economic Left/Right: -4.88 - Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -6.67
I want a riot grrrlfriend

User avatar
North Calaveras
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 16483
Founded: Mar 22, 2007
Ex-Nation

Postby North Calaveras » Sun May 02, 2010 10:54 pm

The REAL Glasers wrote:
Jaunty tunes wrote:There are some signs of a person who is not legal in your country. The biggest one is the inability to speak English as if someone was educated or worked in the US it is very likely some English is required. As long as the request is simple such as one piece of ID like a drivers licence then I think it is alright. There needs to be some way of identifying people who are illegally in the country and if someone appears to be an illegal person then a few questions need to be asked.
When I travel I always know where my passport is. I could easily show that to the police with the correct visa stamp in the US. It is not hard and does not need to take much time at all. The only worry would be fake ID's. But the cops could catch onto them when a fake ID is known and if suspicious just take one minute more to look in the data base.
If there are local police it would be even easier to identify illegal migrants and the same legal individuals would not be asked all the time.


So first generation immigrants that don't yet know the language are completely impossible, as are political refugees?

I almost always have my ID on me, except for a few notable exceptions. I was at a concert last week and only brought my ticket and cash, coincidentally, there was an altercation outside the venue where the police nearly got involved. If they did, and I had lived in AZ, who's to say they couldn't have just randomly asked us all for our IDs to find out if we were illegals? It shouldn't be a requirement for us to carry around identification. Is it convenient? Yes. Necessary, hell no.


Then you should be able to show them, they will put your name on a list and the next time it happens they can just ring your name up through the cops computer in car and he will let you go.
Government: Romanist Ceasarist Dictatorship
Political Themes: Nationalism, Romanticism, Ceasarism, Militarism, Social Liberalism, Cult of Personality
Ethnic Groups: American, Latino, Filipino

User avatar
The REAL Glasers
Minister
 
Posts: 2621
Founded: Feb 28, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby The REAL Glasers » Sun May 02, 2010 11:12 pm

North Calaveras wrote:
The REAL Glasers wrote:
Jaunty tunes wrote:There are some signs of a person who is not legal in your country. The biggest one is the inability to speak English as if someone was educated or worked in the US it is very likely some English is required. As long as the request is simple such as one piece of ID like a drivers licence then I think it is alright. There needs to be some way of identifying people who are illegally in the country and if someone appears to be an illegal person then a few questions need to be asked.
When I travel I always know where my passport is. I could easily show that to the police with the correct visa stamp in the US. It is not hard and does not need to take much time at all. The only worry would be fake ID's. But the cops could catch onto them when a fake ID is known and if suspicious just take one minute more to look in the data base.
If there are local police it would be even easier to identify illegal migrants and the same legal individuals would not be asked all the time.


So first generation immigrants that don't yet know the language are completely impossible, as are political refugees?

I almost always have my ID on me, except for a few notable exceptions. I was at a concert last week and only brought my ticket and cash, coincidentally, there was an altercation outside the venue where the police nearly got involved. If they did, and I had lived in AZ, who's to say they couldn't have just randomly asked us all for our IDs to find out if we were illegals? It shouldn't be a requirement for us to carry around identification. Is it convenient? Yes. Necessary, hell no.


Then you should be able to show them, they will put your name on a list and the next time it happens they can just ring your name up through the cops computer in car and he will let you go.


Except the venue was within cycling from my place of residence, which I had left my wallet at, and a responsible officer sure as hell would not have let me cycle back to my place of residence just to possibly obtain something that may prove I'm not illegal, they'd much rather detain me by law, since that's their job.
YouTube Channel
http://rateyourmusic.com/~Onespeed
http://www.last.fm/user/TheYardstick
Economic Left/Right: -4.88 - Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -6.67
I want a riot grrrlfriend

User avatar
North Calaveras
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 16483
Founded: Mar 22, 2007
Ex-Nation

Postby North Calaveras » Sun May 02, 2010 11:18 pm

The REAL Glasers wrote:
North Calaveras wrote:
The REAL Glasers wrote:
Jaunty tunes wrote:There are some signs of a person who is not legal in your country. The biggest one is the inability to speak English as if someone was educated or worked in the US it is very likely some English is required. As long as the request is simple such as one piece of ID like a drivers licence then I think it is alright. There needs to be some way of identifying people who are illegally in the country and if someone appears to be an illegal person then a few questions need to be asked.
When I travel I always know where my passport is. I could easily show that to the police with the correct visa stamp in the US. It is not hard and does not need to take much time at all. The only worry would be fake ID's. But the cops could catch onto them when a fake ID is known and if suspicious just take one minute more to look in the data base.
If there are local police it would be even easier to identify illegal migrants and the same legal individuals would not be asked all the time.


So first generation immigrants that don't yet know the language are completely impossible, as are political refugees?

I almost always have my ID on me, except for a few notable exceptions. I was at a concert last week and only brought my ticket and cash, coincidentally, there was an altercation outside the venue where the police nearly got involved. If they did, and I had lived in AZ, who's to say they couldn't have just randomly asked us all for our IDs to find out if we were illegals? It shouldn't be a requirement for us to carry around identification. Is it convenient? Yes. Necessary, hell no.


Then you should be able to show them, they will put your name on a list and the next time it happens they can just ring your name up through the cops computer in car and he will let you go.


Except the venue was within cycling from my place of residence, which I had left my wallet at, and a responsible officer sure as hell would not have let me cycle back to my place of residence just to possibly obtain something that may prove I'm not illegal, they'd much rather detain me by law, since that's their job.


so you deal with te inconvenience one time in your life, you should probably go put yourself on the list that way you would avoid it.
Government: Romanist Ceasarist Dictatorship
Political Themes: Nationalism, Romanticism, Ceasarism, Militarism, Social Liberalism, Cult of Personality
Ethnic Groups: American, Latino, Filipino

User avatar
The REAL Glasers
Minister
 
Posts: 2621
Founded: Feb 28, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby The REAL Glasers » Sun May 02, 2010 11:20 pm

Because this has nothing to do with my constitutional rights violated.

And what is the mythical list of which you speak?
YouTube Channel
http://rateyourmusic.com/~Onespeed
http://www.last.fm/user/TheYardstick
Economic Left/Right: -4.88 - Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -6.67
I want a riot grrrlfriend

User avatar
North Calaveras
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 16483
Founded: Mar 22, 2007
Ex-Nation

Postby North Calaveras » Sun May 02, 2010 11:25 pm

The REAL Glasers wrote:Because this has nothing to do with my constitutional rights violated.

And what is the mythical list of which you speak?


I would assume you would be put on a list so they don't have to recheck you over and over again.
Government: Romanist Ceasarist Dictatorship
Political Themes: Nationalism, Romanticism, Ceasarism, Militarism, Social Liberalism, Cult of Personality
Ethnic Groups: American, Latino, Filipino

User avatar
Whole Conviction
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1935
Founded: Aug 10, 2009
Left-wing Utopia

Postby Whole Conviction » Mon May 03, 2010 1:15 am

North Calaveras wrote:
The REAL Glasers wrote:Because this has nothing to do with my constitutional rights violated.

And what is the mythical list of which you speak?


I would assume you would be put on a list so they don't have to recheck you over and over again.

One would assume.

One would be wrong.
I got told to get a blog. So I did.

User avatar
Pope Joan
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 19500
Founded: Mar 11, 2009
Ex-Nation

Postby Pope Joan » Mon May 03, 2010 2:08 am

Arizona Iced Tea is suffering the effects of a boycott by angry consumers.

Apparently social consciousness and tea drinking go together.

They are now busily working to let the world know that they have nothing to do with the American Southwest; they're really all nice people from Long Island.
"Life is difficult".

-M. Scott Peck

User avatar
Natapoc
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 19864
Founded: Antiquity
Ex-Nation

Postby Natapoc » Mon May 03, 2010 2:17 am

Pope Joan wrote:Arizona Iced Tea is suffering the effects of a boycott by angry consumers.

Apparently social consciousness and tea drinking go together.

They are now busily working to let the world know that they have nothing to do with the American Southwest; they're really all nice people from Long Island.


I've heard of this. Is it actually real? I was under the impression everyone knew they were not really from Arizona.
Did you see a ghost?

User avatar
Pope Joan
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 19500
Founded: Mar 11, 2009
Ex-Nation

Postby Pope Joan » Mon May 03, 2010 2:35 am

Natapoc wrote:
Pope Joan wrote:Arizona Iced Tea is suffering the effects of a boycott by angry consumers.

Apparently social consciousness and tea drinking go together.

They are now busily working to let the world know that they have nothing to do with the American Southwest; they're really all nice people from Long Island.


I've heard of this. Is it actually real? I was under the impression everyone knew they were not really from Arizona.


I heard it on NPR's "All Things Considered", so I have no notion whether or not it may be factual.
"Life is difficult".

-M. Scott Peck

User avatar
Muravyets
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 12755
Founded: Aug 18, 2005
Ex-Nation

Postby Muravyets » Mon May 03, 2010 4:58 am

The Southern Dictators wrote:
Muravyets wrote:
The Southern Dictators wrote:
Well as long as the illegals don't know how they got caught...the HUNT !
*lights a torch*
What other ways other than the census can be used to track down illegals ?

None, I would think, since the census does not ask for proof of citizenship anyway. I think the arrest might have been just a coincidence to the census.


Well they must of known somehow. I sure didn't know they were illegal. They were on some "wanted illegals" list. I just know that they were caught through the census.

Right, because if you didn't know it, there's no way the cops and/or immigration authorities could have known it. What -- you mean you couldn't tell just by looking at them, like the AZ law says you should?! :o
Kick back at Cafe Muravyets
And check out my other RP, too. (Don't take others' word for it -- see for yourself. ;) )
I agree with Muravyets because she scares me. -- Verdigroth
However, I am still not the topic of this thread.

User avatar
Muravyets
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 12755
Founded: Aug 18, 2005
Ex-Nation

Postby Muravyets » Mon May 03, 2010 4:59 am

North Calaveras wrote:
Blodeuwydd wrote:The thing about that bill isn't that its aim is to criminalize illegal immigration. That makes sense. And if all it was was a measure which stated that if the cops pull you over for another offense, and ask you to appear in court to prove your citizenship, then we're having a conversation. (Not that I would be 100% for that, but at least its reasonable) However, I can't have you walking over to someone with dark skin and demanding papers at 7-11. Thats Schutzstaffel type stuff. And anyway, how're they determining who is "suspicious" of being eere illegally? Are they darting around street corners, with shifty eyes? Of course not, its racial profiling. Thats ballsy, especially in a state where, quite literally, the US-Mexico border crossed them overnight a hundred years ago. Can't do it


If you can't single anybody out than we might as well give up on investigating any kind of illegal immigration since they could just play a race card.

So, it's your idea that there is no law without racism and no order with picking out a scapegoat?
Kick back at Cafe Muravyets
And check out my other RP, too. (Don't take others' word for it -- see for yourself. ;) )
I agree with Muravyets because she scares me. -- Verdigroth
However, I am still not the topic of this thread.

User avatar
Muravyets
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 12755
Founded: Aug 18, 2005
Ex-Nation

Postby Muravyets » Mon May 03, 2010 5:03 am

Jaunty tunes wrote:There are some signs of a person who is not legal in your country. The biggest one is the inability to speak English as if someone was educated or worked in the US it is very likely some English is required. As long as the request is simple such as one piece of ID like a drivers licence then I think it is alright. There needs to be some way of identifying people who are illegally in the country and if someone appears to be an illegal person then a few questions need to be asked.
When I travel I always know where my passport is. I could easily show that to the police with the correct visa stamp in the US. It is not hard and does not need to take much time at all. The only worry would be fake ID's. But the cops could catch onto them when a fake ID is known and if suspicious just take one minute more to look in the data base.
If there are local police it would be even easier to identify illegal migrants and the same legal individuals would not be asked all the time.

Gods, the level of ignorant in your post... :palm:

1. There is no language requirement in the US.
2. Many native born Americans are so un-functional in English you'd take them for non-native speakers anyway.
3. New legal immigrants would not be fluent in English yet, even when they get their citizenship.
4. Immigrants can come from English-speaking countries, and even might be here illegally.
5. Citizens do not have to carry their passport to move around inside their own country, even if they're not English-fluent.
6. Driver's license =/= proof of citizenship or legal residency.
7. Read the fucking thread.
Kick back at Cafe Muravyets
And check out my other RP, too. (Don't take others' word for it -- see for yourself. ;) )
I agree with Muravyets because she scares me. -- Verdigroth
However, I am still not the topic of this thread.

User avatar
Muravyets
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 12755
Founded: Aug 18, 2005
Ex-Nation

Postby Muravyets » Mon May 03, 2010 5:06 am

The REAL Glasers wrote:Because this has nothing to do with my constitutional rights violated.

And what is the mythical list of which you speak?

Oh, it's the big Giant Compendium of Who's OK To Be Here. It lists everyone who ever existed, does exist and ever will and has either a little green check or a big red X next to their names. God wrote it, and every cop gets one with his gun and his shield.
Kick back at Cafe Muravyets
And check out my other RP, too. (Don't take others' word for it -- see for yourself. ;) )
I agree with Muravyets because she scares me. -- Verdigroth
However, I am still not the topic of this thread.

PreviousNext

Advertisement

Remove ads

Return to General

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Bovad, Canarsia, Ethel mermania, Firb, Forsher, Perikuresu, Rusozak, Ryemarch

Advertisement

Remove ads