I never justified the ethnic cleansing.
If you want to feel real ‘holier than thou’ by attacking positions I don’t actually have, you go ahead. Hope you feel good about yourself today.
Advertisement
by Salus Maior » Sun Nov 15, 2020 11:43 am
by Punished UMN » Sun Nov 15, 2020 11:45 am
by Novus America » Sun Nov 15, 2020 11:45 am
Salus Maior wrote:Punished UMN wrote:Cool. I don't see how needing to defend territory that isn't legally yours gives you any legal right to occupy land that isn't yours and expel its residents.
The law in this case not giving any shit to what the native people actually want.
We both know that international law is bullshit, UMN. Unless you’ve suddenly become a total shill for that.
by Salus Maior » Sun Nov 15, 2020 11:49 am
Novus America wrote:
Armenia failed to secure Artsakh anyways. Because simply taking more land did not overcome its other failures.
by Salus Maior » Sun Nov 15, 2020 11:56 am
Punished UMN wrote:The fact that you see any kind of disagreement as personal spite isn't my problem. The problem is that I explicitly mentioned the ethnic cleansing of Azeris from the security corridor and your response was "If Armenia had done any less to secure Artsakh" etc etc. How is that not describing it as a strategic necessity?
by Novus America » Sun Nov 15, 2020 11:58 am
by Salus Maior » Sun Nov 15, 2020 12:01 pm
Novus America wrote:Salus Maior wrote:
They secured it for a couple decades and won every conflict up to this point. I wouldn’t call it a total failure.
Perhaps not a total failure short term, but certainly a failure long term.
Clearly it was not a long term viable strategy.
They did overextend, taking more than they could hold.
And it is over now. Each year it will get worse.
It is all downhill for Armenians from here unfortunately.
Barring some miracle that fixes their endemic political chaos, economic inferiority and low fertility.
by Salus Maior » Sun Nov 15, 2020 12:21 pm
Secularist Eura wrote:There was no ethnic cleansing of armenians by the turks. both sides slaughtered one another. armenia is bringing up this topic over and over again due to modern-day political issues.
by Rio Cana » Sun Nov 15, 2020 12:54 pm
by Dakran » Sun Nov 15, 2020 12:55 pm
Rio Cana wrote:According to a youtube source. A group of so called foreign fighters in Nagorno Karabakh that were fighting for the Azeris tried crossing into Iran. This group also fired some shoots into Iranian settlements. In response, the Iranian military used there artillery to attack these foreign groups stationed in Azeri territory. Some think Turkey will use Azerbaijan to station foreign fighters who in order to launch attacks into Iran.
Source but its in Spanish - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dXNmIxtsdks
Baltenstein wrote:Source:
The Turkish minister of Turkishness, Öztürk Türkuglu.
by Rio Cana » Sun Nov 15, 2020 1:10 pm
Dakran wrote:Rio Cana wrote:According to a youtube source. A group of so called foreign fighters in Nagorno Karabakh that were fighting for the Azeris tried crossing into Iran. This group also fired some shoots into Iranian settlements. In response, the Iranian military used there artillery to attack these foreign groups stationed in Azeri territory. Some think Turkey will use Azerbaijan to station foreign fighters who in order to launch attacks into Iran.
Source but its in Spanish - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dXNmIxtsdks
Well that's certainly... something.
by Nakena » Sun Nov 15, 2020 1:28 pm
Bogatygora wrote:The sad thing is that dog Aliyev has only had his popularity increased by this war. The Azeris truly are modern lemmings.
by Novus America » Sun Nov 15, 2020 1:30 pm
by Punished UMN » Sun Nov 15, 2020 1:46 pm
Salus Maior wrote:Punished UMN wrote:The fact that you see any kind of disagreement as personal spite isn't my problem. The problem is that I explicitly mentioned the ethnic cleansing of Azeris from the security corridor and your response was "If Armenia had done any less to secure Artsakh" etc etc. How is that not describing it as a strategic necessity?
Because keeping a large amount of people whose loyalty lies with Azerbaijan within the border of a country at war with Azerbaijan isn’t conducive to a secure position. That’s the logic at play here, and it’s honestly not that wrong as far as practical reality and the nature of the war is concerned.
That doesn’t make it right, and that doesn’t excuse the worst things Armenia did, but what else were they supposed to do in an existential conflict based on ethnic lines?
by Wropdeedop » Sun Nov 15, 2020 3:08 pm
by Albionist Great Britain » Sun Nov 15, 2020 3:14 pm
Novus America wrote:Nakena wrote:
typtical tactic of fledging unpopular autocrat. Start a war!
It is. Unfortunately this will also boost Erdogan.
The difficulty with the tactic is if you lose, your regime usually falls.
But they won here. It is a high risk tactic but sometimes it pays off. It did here.
by Albionist Great Britain » Sun Nov 15, 2020 3:15 pm
Rio Cana wrote:According to a youtube source. A group of so called foreign fighters in Nagorno Karabakh that were fighting for the Azeris tried crossing into Iran. This group also fired some shoots into Iranian settlements. In response, the Iranian military used there artillery to attack these foreign groups stationed in Azeri territory. Some think Turkey will use Azerbaijan to station foreign fighters in order to launch attacks into Iran.
Source but its in Spanish - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dXNmIxtsdks
by Trollzyn the Infinite » Sun Nov 15, 2020 3:24 pm
Albionist Great Britain wrote:Rio Cana wrote:According to a youtube source. A group of so called foreign fighters in Nagorno Karabakh that were fighting for the Azeris tried crossing into Iran. This group also fired some shoots into Iranian settlements. In response, the Iranian military used there artillery to attack these foreign groups stationed in Azeri territory. Some think Turkey will use Azerbaijan to station foreign fighters in order to launch attacks into Iran.
Source but its in Spanish - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dXNmIxtsdks
Hopefully Iran becomes more belligerent and deals with these transgressions.
by Dakran » Sun Nov 15, 2020 3:29 pm
Baltenstein wrote:Source:
The Turkish minister of Turkishness, Öztürk Türkuglu.
by The Marlborough » Sun Nov 15, 2020 3:39 pm
by Salus Maior » Sun Nov 15, 2020 4:26 pm
Punished UMN wrote:Salus Maior wrote:
Because keeping a large amount of people whose loyalty lies with Azerbaijan within the border of a country at war with Azerbaijan isn’t conducive to a secure position. That’s the logic at play here, and it’s honestly not that wrong as far as practical reality and the nature of the war is concerned.
That doesn’t make it right, and that doesn’t excuse the worst things Armenia did, but what else were they supposed to do in an existential conflict based on ethnic lines?
"What else were they supposed to do except ethnic cleansing?"
Okay so your position is just open hypocrisy.
by Salus Maior » Sun Nov 15, 2020 4:38 pm
Rio Cana wrote:According to a youtube source. A group of so called foreign fighters in Nagorno Karabakh that were fighting for the Azeris tried crossing into Iran. This group also fired some shoots into Iranian settlements. In response, the Iranian military used there artillery to attack these foreign groups stationed in Azeri territory. Some think Turkey will use Azerbaijan to station foreign fighters in order to launch attacks into Iran.
Source but its in Spanish - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dXNmIxtsdks
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Beliras, DutchFormosa, Mergold-Aurlia, Tiami, Tillania
Advertisement