NationStates

Heloin wrote:

Bombadil wrote:Luckily..

In order to ease the peaceful transfer of power this coming January, Amazon has offered its Prime delivery service to ship Donald J. Trump out of the White House within twenty-four hours.

Speaking from his corporate headquarters, the Amazon founder, Jeff Bezos, said that he understood why Trump had misgivings about leaving the White House. “Moving is always hard,” Bezos said. “At Amazon, we want to make Donald Trump’s move as speedy as possible.”

Bezos said that, on Inauguration Day, an Amazon Prime delivery truck will arrive at the White House to prepare Trump for shipping, “free of charge.”

After he has been packed, bar-coded, and scanned into the system, Bezos said, Trump will be expedited to the destination of his choice.

“Amazon Prime guarantees that he will be at Mar-a-Lago within twenty-four hours,” Bezos said, adding that it would take slightly longer if the shipping address is in Moscow.

Link

Does that mean we'll still get it a week late?

The Black Forrest wrote:

Greater Miami Shores wrote:and how are you going to determine that, based on your facts, decided by you, me, or anyone else on here? Decided by whom?

Simple. Judge the law and the cases. Not carry out conservative morality.

San Lumen wrote:

Greater Miami Shores wrote:and how are you going to determine that, based on your facts, decided by you, me, or anyone else on here? Decided by whom?

Would you kindly share with the class your evidence of voter fraud or tis that just another lie that Breitbart and OANN propaganda told you?

Greater Miami Shores wrote:

The Black Forrest wrote:
Simple. Judge the law and the cases. Not carry out conservative morality.

oh you must mean as long as they carry out Leftist Liberal Democrat moralities, because that is the opposite of conservative right wing morality, lol.

The Black Forrest wrote:

San Lumen wrote:
Would you kindly share with the class your evidence of voter fraud or tis that just another lie that Breitbart and OANN propaganda told you?

Why are you asking? He won’t. The fact I once had a package stolen off my porch means voter fraud will happen.

Greater Miami Shores wrote:

The Black Forrest wrote:
Why are you asking? He won’t. The fact I once had a package stolen off my porch means voter fraud will happen.

I never said will happen, I said might happen, that is a very big difference, lol again

Greater Miami Shores wrote:

The Black Forrest wrote:
Why are you asking? He won’t. The fact I once had a package stolen off my porch means voter fraud will happen.

I never said will happen, I said might happen, that is a very big difference, lol again

Greater Miami Shores wrote:

Organized States wrote:I don't think you understand how the Courts work...

The Justices on the Court are not Republicans. In fact, most aren't affiliated with partisan organizations in anyway. The term Conservative or Liberal refers to their interpretation of the Constitution, with Conservatives tending towards siding with an originalist, meaning that the way the Constitution was written in the late 1780s. By contrast, most liberal justices view the Constitution as a living document and take an interpretative view of the document, arguing that the Framers intended for the Constitution to change and evolve over time.

Both Republicans and Democrats have nominated liberal and conservative justices to the Supreme Court. Note that Sandra Day O'Connor, who frequently sided with the liberal wing of the Court, was nominated by Reagan.

lol, I am a political junkie just like you guys are. I do understand how the US Supreme Court works. President Trump is correct when he said, there are leftist judges, what he did not say is, there are leftist US Supreme Court Justices like RBG at the time, and right wing Justices like Brett Kavanaugh.

This is why a conservative right wing majority on the US Supreme Court is important to the Republican Party, and a Leftist Liberal Democrat majority on the US Supreme Court is important to the Democratic Party. I don't kwon anything about the US Supreme Court, lol, I should be having another lol attack,

Greater Miami Shores wrote:

The Black Forrest wrote:
Why are you asking? He won’t. The fact I once had a package stolen off my porch means voter fraud will happen.

I never said will happen, I said might happen, that is a very big difference, lol again

Bombadil wrote:

Greater Miami Shores wrote:I never said will happen, I said might happen, that is a very big difference, lol again

There's never been any evidence it has happened, so let's do everything we can to umm.. keep it not ever happening.. absolutely nothing to do with my only chance being to remove as many votes against me as possible.

The only reason he's doing this is that it's the only means by which he can 'win'. He's made up an issue that doesn't exist to remove votes.

Worse he's egging on his already dangerous crowd into reacting violently against his loss.

He's really the very worst of presidents, he's putting himself in front of the safety and well-being of all America.

San Lumen wrote:

Greater Miami Shores wrote:I never said will happen, I said might happen, that is a very big difference, lol again

No it doesnt happen but keep believing the lies of Breitbart and OANN.

Greater Miami Shores wrote:

San Lumen wrote:No it doesnt happen but keep believing the lies of Breitbart and OANN.

What about the lies of MSNBC, the Progressive and other such sources? why don't you ever mention them?

Greater Miami Shores wrote:

San Lumen wrote:No it doesnt happen but keep believing the lies of Breitbart and OANN.

What about the lies of MSNBC, the Progressive and other such sources? why don't you ever mention them?

The Black Forrest wrote:

Greater Miami Shores wrote:What about the lies of MSNBC, the Progressive and other such sources? why don't you ever mention them?

Reuters. You should read them.

That would mean leaving your echo chamber though.

San Lumen wrote:

Greater Miami Shores wrote:What about the lies of MSNBC, the Progressive and other such sources? why don't you ever mention them?

They are actual news agencies unlike the trash you watch and cite but Im sure you'll have the same auto response or canned answer as usual since your incapable of actual debate.

Greater Miami Shores wrote:

San Lumen wrote:No it doesnt happen but keep believing the lies of Breitbart and OANN.

What about the lies of MSNBC, the Progressive and other such sources? why don't you ever mention them?

Washington Resistance Army wrote:

San Lumen wrote:
They are actual news agencies unlike the trash you watch and cite but Im sure you'll have the same auto response or canned answer as usual since your incapable of actual debate.

MSNBC is pretty objectively trash though.

Organized States wrote:

Greater Miami Shores wrote:lol, I am a political junkie just like you guys are. I do understand how the US Supreme Court works. President Trump is correct when he said, there are leftist judges, what he did not say is, there are leftist US Supreme Court Justices like RBG at the time, and right wing Justices like Brett Kavanaugh.

This is why a conservative right wing majority on the US Supreme Court is important to the Republican Party, and a Leftist Liberal Democrat majority on the US Supreme Court is important to the Democratic Party. I don't kwon anything about the US Supreme Court, lol, I should be having another lol attack,

Once again, I think I should be having the lol attack.

The Courts aren't leftist or rightist. They're the Courts. Their interpretation of the Constitution is different, but the Courts are not the same kind of partisan institution that Congress is. Republicans and Democrats frequently vote across the aisle and across party lines on Justices (note Justice Roberts' confirmation hearings and those for Justice Sotomayor).

The President and McConnell have chosen to make the Courts a partisan issue.

Greater Miami Shores wrote:

Organized States wrote:Once again, I think I should be having the lol attack.

The Courts aren't leftist or rightist. They're the Courts. Their interpretation of the Constitution is different, but the Courts are not the same kind of partisan institution that Congress is. Republicans and Democrats frequently vote across the aisle and across party lines on Justices (note Justice Roberts' confirmation hearings and those for Justice Sotomayor).

The President and McConnell have chosen to make the Courts a partisan issue.

Thank you if the US Supreme Court are not leftist or rightist, and are non Partisan, than you really should not have any objections for President Trump to name and try to confirm a US Supreme Court Justice at any time during his elected term, as the Democratic US Constitution allows? lol again,

Greater Miami Shores wrote:

Organized States wrote:Once again, I think I should be having the lol attack.

The Courts aren't leftist or rightist. They're the Courts. Their interpretation of the Constitution is different, but the Courts are not the same kind of partisan institution that Congress is. Republicans and Democrats frequently vote across the aisle and across party lines on Justices (note Justice Roberts' confirmation hearings and those for Justice Sotomayor).

The President and McConnell have chosen to make the Courts a partisan issue.

Thank you if the US Supreme Court are not leftist or rightist, and are non Partisan, than you really should not have any objections for President Trump to name and try to confirm a US Supreme Court Justice at any time during his elected term, as the Democratic US Constitution allows? lol again,

San Lumen wrote:

Greater Miami Shores wrote:Thank you if the US Supreme Court are not leftist or rightist, and are non Partisan, than you really should not have any objections for President Trump to name and try to confirm a US Supreme Court Justice at any time during his elected term, as the Democratic US Constitution allows? lol again,

Why wasn't;t Obama allowed to get his pick for Supreme court a vote when Scalia died or is there a different standard for Democrats?

Greater Miami Shores wrote:

San Lumen wrote:
Why wasn't;t Obama allowed to get his pick for Supreme court a vote when Scalia died or is there a different standard for Democrats?

Don't ask me, ask them, I dont know, lol again

Bombadil wrote:

Greater Miami Shores wrote:Don't ask me, ask them, I dont know, lol again

Of course you know, they said it wasn't right for a president to appoint an SC in election year, and that this would now be a precedent - no appointments in election year!

Except..

Greater Miami Shores wrote:

San Lumen wrote:
Why wasn't;t Obama allowed to get his pick for Supreme court a vote when Scalia died or is there a different standard for Democrats?

Don't ask me, ask them, I dont know, lol again