Page 125 of 368

PostPosted: Fri Mar 05, 2021 5:01 pm
by Borderlands of Rojava
I remember seeing some white protesters going to the Oakland BLM marches saying "we're there to protect the black protesters cause our whiteness stands as a shield between them and state violence" and I said "if only you knew how wrong you were."

Honestly

PostPosted: Fri Mar 05, 2021 5:01 pm
by Cynetia
Honestly, I have no idea why tf riots have been acceptable in the first place. What good message are you sending by ruining the fucking town and destroying everything?

PostPosted: Fri Mar 05, 2021 5:04 pm
by Atheris
Cynetia wrote:Honestly, I have no idea why tf riots have been acceptable in the first place. What good message are you sending by ruining the fucking town and destroying everything?

Anarchy! It's fun, you should try it sometime!

PostPosted: Fri Mar 05, 2021 5:05 pm
by Borderlands of Rojava
Cynetia wrote:Honestly, I have no idea why tf riots have been acceptable in the first place. What good message are you sending by ruining the fucking town and destroying everything?


Well they tried peaceful protesting and the police beat them down. If peaceful protests aren't accepted, violence is inevitable.

Btw burning down the third precinct in Minneapolis had a purpose. The people abusing people's rights had a headquarters there so the mob ran them out and destroyed the place they work out of anger. You don't have to agree with it to understand why it happened. But don't stand around calling for peace when people get bent out of shape about ppl peacefully protesting too. People flipped out when Colin kapernick knelt to the American theme song for God's sake.

PostPosted: Fri Mar 05, 2021 5:16 pm
by Esalia
Cynetia wrote:Honestly, I have no idea why tf riots have been acceptable in the first place. What good message are you sending by ruining the fucking town and destroying everything?


Violence is a fairly good tool to get what you want, whether in the idealistic (riot to force the government to listen to and support your cause, especially when peaceful measures fail) or opportunistic (riot because violence is fun and why not steal some stuff whilst you can) sense.

PostPosted: Fri Mar 05, 2021 6:12 pm
by Kowani
Fahran wrote:
Vassenor wrote:Who is born a cop? That's kind of a requirement for a "blue life" to be a thing.

I don't think #BlackLivesMatter and #BlueLivesMatter have to be contradictory. Folks dying due to preventable and often, if we're being frank, stupid violence is never a good thing. I'm mostly salty that people keep bringing up #BlueLives when the conversation is about #BlackLives because that's a red herring that solely distracts from the conversation at hand unless someone's actually going to make a point about cops being endangered by proposed policy changes or rhetoric.

when has anyone ever said "#BlueLivesMatter" when it wasn't to distract from police brutality
it's not an honest slogan in the slightest

Cynetia wrote:Honestly, I have no idea why tf riots have been acceptable in the first place. What good message are you sending by ruining the fucking town and destroying everything?

notice how Kaepernick isn't playing in the NFL anymore?

PostPosted: Fri Mar 05, 2021 7:34 pm
by Senkaku
Cynetia wrote:Honestly, I have no idea why tf riots have been acceptable in the first place. What good message are you sending by ruining the fucking town and destroying everything?

That if the state doesn't change its ways, you'll threaten its legitimacy and monopoly on violence?

PostPosted: Fri Mar 05, 2021 7:38 pm
by Greater Cesnica
Senkaku wrote:
Cynetia wrote:Honestly, I have no idea why tf riots have been acceptable in the first place. What good message are you sending by ruining the fucking town and destroying everything?

That if the state doesn't change its ways, you'll threaten its legitimacy and monopoly on violence?

Thus, it is a justified tactic.

PostPosted: Fri Mar 05, 2021 8:14 pm
by Kowani

PostPosted: Fri Mar 05, 2021 9:28 pm
by Borderlands of Rojava

PostPosted: Sat Mar 06, 2021 8:27 am
by Gravlen
Galloism wrote:
Gravlen wrote:I feel like the attention given to Rittenhouse has been disproportionate, but since there's various reasons for that, I'm feeding the beast with this video:

Kyle Rittenhouse Shooting: He's Not the Problem. A Legal Analysis.

It's an interesting perspective, looking a bit wider than just the specific case, and explaining a bit more about the place this case holds in the criminal justice system. That's a perspective which is more interesting to me. Here's her first video, which she references. The older video goes more directly into the case, but I didn't like as much because I felt it was too superficial.

Sorry I had to wait to get home to watch your link. I have now done so.

This video was much better than the first one (I had seen it already). I also like what she said about the grand jury and how the fact many states allow the prosecutor to skip it is a travesty (including Wisconsin).

I also liked her pointing out that most of the people mad at Kyle aren’t mad at Kyle, but at the unjust system. They want the system to punish Kyle not because he’s some monster, she pointed out how that’s not true, but he’s become a symbol of the injustice of the system. Essentially, they are being placated by the system by the system publicly being as unjust towards him as it has been against many young black teens throughout the years.

It’s a deflection strategy. If they crucify Rittenhouse to placate the crowd, they don’t have to actually do anything about what the crowd is angry about.

I thought that was very insightful.

By the way, here's a new video by the same lawyer asking some good questions concerning the issuing of the no-knock warrant which led to the death of Breonna Taylor. I think it's worth a watch as well.

PostPosted: Sat Mar 06, 2021 9:08 am
by Ifreann

PostPosted: Sat Mar 06, 2021 9:43 am
by Borderlands of Rojava

PostPosted: Sat Mar 06, 2021 10:29 am
by Gravlen

PostPosted: Sat Mar 06, 2021 10:44 am
by Kowani
Rochester police pepper spray, tackle woman with 3 year-old child

In that footage, an officer can be seen driving up to a woman who is walking along the side of the road carrying a young child in her arms.

The officer stops next to her, gets out of the car and says “Did you steal from that store? Oh come on they said you stole what’d you take? Tell me the truth!” She says she didn’t steal anything and the officer says, “I don’t have time for BS so you better be quick with me.”

She puts the child down and shows the officer everything in her purse.

Holding the contents of her purse in front of him, she says, “Nothing, right?”

The officer says, “Well we’ve got to talk with them and see, so I need you to hop in the back of my car with your kid really quick and we’re going to go check.”

“No, see—sir, sir—” the woman says.

“If you didn’t steal you’re out of here, but you have to stay with me,” the officer says.

“What?” the woman says as a second police car pulls up. She runs to a nearby store and tries to enter, saying she didn’t do anything.

The officer then grabs the woman from behind, takes the child from her arms and puts the child on the ground.

The camera is shaking and out of focus and it is difficult to see what happens next, but the officer appears to force her onto the ground with her arms behind her back. He yells “Relax! Turn around so I can cuff you! … I have to cuff you!” The woman continues to yell “I did not do anything!”

“It should have stopped” when the woman showed the police she did not have anything in her purse, Board Member Arlene Brown said. “It was the officers’ actions from then on that escalated the situation, clearly putting the mother and child in stress.”

Board Member Conor Reynolds said security camera footage from the store appears to show the woman holding the child by the hand when she was pepper-sprayed.

The woman, who has not been named, was “charged with trespassing and issued an appearance ticket as the store confirmed she knocked a number of items off the shelf and refused repeated requests to leave,” Reynolds said, quoting a statement from Rochester’s chief of police.


Relevant footage

PostPosted: Sat Mar 06, 2021 10:46 am
by Borderlands of Rojava
Kowani wrote:Rochester police pepper spray, tackle woman with 3 year-old child

In that footage, an officer can be seen driving up to a woman who is walking along the side of the road carrying a young child in her arms.

The officer stops next to her, gets out of the car and says “Did you steal from that store? Oh come on they said you stole what’d you take? Tell me the truth!” She says she didn’t steal anything and the officer says, “I don’t have time for BS so you better be quick with me.”

She puts the child down and shows the officer everything in her purse.

Holding the contents of her purse in front of him, she says, “Nothing, right?”

The officer says, “Well we’ve got to talk with them and see, so I need you to hop in the back of my car with your kid really quick and we’re going to go check.”

“No, see—sir, sir—” the woman says.

“If you didn’t steal you’re out of here, but you have to stay with me,” the officer says.

“What?” the woman says as a second police car pulls up. She runs to a nearby store and tries to enter, saying she didn’t do anything.

The officer then grabs the woman from behind, takes the child from her arms and puts the child on the ground.

The camera is shaking and out of focus and it is difficult to see what happens next, but the officer appears to force her onto the ground with her arms behind her back. He yells “Relax! Turn around so I can cuff you! … I have to cuff you!” The woman continues to yell “I did not do anything!”

“It should have stopped” when the woman showed the police she did not have anything in her purse, Board Member Arlene Brown said. “It was the officers’ actions from then on that escalated the situation, clearly putting the mother and child in stress.”

Board Member Conor Reynolds said security camera footage from the store appears to show the woman holding the child by the hand when she was pepper-sprayed.

The woman, who has not been named, was “charged with trespassing and issued an appearance ticket as the store confirmed she knocked a number of items off the shelf and refused repeated requests to leave,” Reynolds said, quoting a statement from Rochester’s chief of police.


Relevant footage


The shootings are the tip of the iceberg. The police abuse their power every day.

PostPosted: Sat Mar 06, 2021 1:45 pm
by Greater Cesnica
Borderlands of Rojava wrote:
Kowani wrote:Rochester police pepper spray, tackle woman with 3 year-old child

In that footage, an officer can be seen driving up to a woman who is walking along the side of the road carrying a young child in her arms.

The officer stops next to her, gets out of the car and says “Did you steal from that store? Oh come on they said you stole what’d you take? Tell me the truth!” She says she didn’t steal anything and the officer says, “I don’t have time for BS so you better be quick with me.”

She puts the child down and shows the officer everything in her purse.

Holding the contents of her purse in front of him, she says, “Nothing, right?”

The officer says, “Well we’ve got to talk with them and see, so I need you to hop in the back of my car with your kid really quick and we’re going to go check.”

“No, see—sir, sir—” the woman says.

“If you didn’t steal you’re out of here, but you have to stay with me,” the officer says.

“What?” the woman says as a second police car pulls up. She runs to a nearby store and tries to enter, saying she didn’t do anything.

The officer then grabs the woman from behind, takes the child from her arms and puts the child on the ground.

The camera is shaking and out of focus and it is difficult to see what happens next, but the officer appears to force her onto the ground with her arms behind her back. He yells “Relax! Turn around so I can cuff you! … I have to cuff you!” The woman continues to yell “I did not do anything!”

“It should have stopped” when the woman showed the police she did not have anything in her purse, Board Member Arlene Brown said. “It was the officers’ actions from then on that escalated the situation, clearly putting the mother and child in stress.”

Board Member Conor Reynolds said security camera footage from the store appears to show the woman holding the child by the hand when she was pepper-sprayed.

The woman, who has not been named, was “charged with trespassing and issued an appearance ticket as the store confirmed she knocked a number of items off the shelf and refused repeated requests to leave,” Reynolds said, quoting a statement from Rochester’s chief of police.


Relevant footage


The shootings are the tip of the iceberg. The police abuse their power every day.

But don't you understand, the officer was taunted by the little girl and he was fearful of his ego being harmed! Completely justified.

PostPosted: Sat Mar 06, 2021 2:26 pm
by Ors Might
Kowani wrote:Rochester police pepper spray, tackle woman with 3 year-old child

In that footage, an officer can be seen driving up to a woman who is walking along the side of the road carrying a young child in her arms.

The officer stops next to her, gets out of the car and says “Did you steal from that store? Oh come on they said you stole what’d you take? Tell me the truth!” She says she didn’t steal anything and the officer says, “I don’t have time for BS so you better be quick with me.”

She puts the child down and shows the officer everything in her purse.

Holding the contents of her purse in front of him, she says, “Nothing, right?”

The officer says, “Well we’ve got to talk with them and see, so I need you to hop in the back of my car with your kid really quick and we’re going to go check.”

“No, see—sir, sir—” the woman says.

“If you didn’t steal you’re out of here, but you have to stay with me,” the officer says.

“What?” the woman says as a second police car pulls up. She runs to a nearby store and tries to enter, saying she didn’t do anything.

The officer then grabs the woman from behind, takes the child from her arms and puts the child on the ground.

The camera is shaking and out of focus and it is difficult to see what happens next, but the officer appears to force her onto the ground with her arms behind her back. He yells “Relax! Turn around so I can cuff you! … I have to cuff you!” The woman continues to yell “I did not do anything!”

“It should have stopped” when the woman showed the police she did not have anything in her purse, Board Member Arlene Brown said. “It was the officers’ actions from then on that escalated the situation, clearly putting the mother and child in stress.”

Board Member Conor Reynolds said security camera footage from the store appears to show the woman holding the child by the hand when she was pepper-sprayed.

The woman, who has not been named, was “charged with trespassing and issued an appearance ticket as the store confirmed she knocked a number of items off the shelf and refused repeated requests to leave,” Reynolds said, quoting a statement from Rochester’s chief of police.


Relevant footage

Absolutely disgusting but I’m distracted by the fact that Youtube is saying that this is a video made for kids..

PostPosted: Sat Mar 06, 2021 2:29 pm
by New Eclium
Ors Might wrote:
Kowani wrote:Rochester police pepper spray, tackle woman with 3 year-old child

In that footage, an officer can be seen driving up to a woman who is walking along the side of the road carrying a young child in her arms.

The officer stops next to her, gets out of the car and says “Did you steal from that store? Oh come on they said you stole what’d you take? Tell me the truth!” She says she didn’t steal anything and the officer says, “I don’t have time for BS so you better be quick with me.”

She puts the child down and shows the officer everything in her purse.

Holding the contents of her purse in front of him, she says, “Nothing, right?”

The officer says, “Well we’ve got to talk with them and see, so I need you to hop in the back of my car with your kid really quick and we’re going to go check.”

“No, see—sir, sir—” the woman says.

“If you didn’t steal you’re out of here, but you have to stay with me,” the officer says.

“What?” the woman says as a second police car pulls up. She runs to a nearby store and tries to enter, saying she didn’t do anything.

The officer then grabs the woman from behind, takes the child from her arms and puts the child on the ground.

The camera is shaking and out of focus and it is difficult to see what happens next, but the officer appears to force her onto the ground with her arms behind her back. He yells “Relax! Turn around so I can cuff you! … I have to cuff you!” The woman continues to yell “I did not do anything!”

“It should have stopped” when the woman showed the police she did not have anything in her purse, Board Member Arlene Brown said. “It was the officers’ actions from then on that escalated the situation, clearly putting the mother and child in stress.”

Board Member Conor Reynolds said security camera footage from the store appears to show the woman holding the child by the hand when she was pepper-sprayed.

The woman, who has not been named, was “charged with trespassing and issued an appearance ticket as the store confirmed she knocked a number of items off the shelf and refused repeated requests to leave,” Reynolds said, quoting a statement from Rochester’s chief of police.


Relevant footage

Absolutely disgusting but I’m distracted by the fact that Youtube is saying that this is a video made for kids..

gotta teach 'em young

PostPosted: Sat Mar 06, 2021 8:52 pm
by Kowani

PostPosted: Sat Mar 06, 2021 8:54 pm
by Greater Cesnica

Good on Arizona for this good step. I would hope this sets a chilling precedent against property confiscations nationwide, including firearms seizures.

PostPosted: Sun Mar 07, 2021 12:22 pm
by Kowani

PostPosted: Sun Mar 07, 2021 12:24 pm
by Galloism

Crap. Next week is going to suck.

Everyone needs to chill the fuck out.

PostPosted: Sun Mar 07, 2021 1:49 pm
by Neanderthaland

PostPosted: Sun Mar 07, 2021 1:59 pm
by Paddy O Fernature


Sadly, the only thing I find surprising here is that the shooting happened before the trial and not immediately after.