You should combine all three.
Advertisement

by Korouse » Tue Oct 13, 2020 1:57 am
Cordel One wrote:Korouse wrote:The President, the current government and their supporters are immediate threats to my future and my democratic rights. No need to explain the concept of retribution to me. I stand by what I said - you people hold extremely naive and silly opinions.
This thread runs rampant with those lacking the intellectual capacity to converse with an individual as enlightened as yourself. It is with great displeasure that I must inform you these plebeians most likely do not have the mental capacity to comprehend Rick and Morty, and as such they are not worth your time.

by Gravlen » Sat Oct 17, 2020 4:02 am
Investigators said this week that Reinoehl—pursued for fatally shooting Aaron "Jay" Danielson during a confrontation at an August 29 protest in Portland—had a loaded handgun when local law enforcement serving on the U.S. Marshals Pacific Northwest Violent Offender Task Force killed him on September 3. But the gun was still in Reinoehl's front pants pocket as police fired more than 30 bullets at him.
"The new information follows initial reports from investigators [that] the federal fugitive task force involved in shooting Reinoehl gave conflicting statements," reports ABC News.
One member of the task force claimed that Reinoehl pointed a gun at them. Another said that didn't happen, but Reinoehl was reaching for a gun when they shot him. A U.S. Marshal's Office press release claimed Reinoehl "produced a firearm, threatening the lives of law enforcement officers."
This week, Thurston County Sheriff's Lt. Ray Brady said that Reinoehl's hand may have been on a gun or may have been merely "near" the gun.
At a Tuesday press conference, investigators said they still do not know if the gun in Reinoehl's pocket on the night of his death was the same gun used to kill Danielson a few nights prior.
Almost two dozen witnesses to Reinoehl's subsequent death say task force members never identified themselves or warned Reinoehl before opening fire on him, though Sheriff Brady disputed this on Tuesday.
Nathaniel Dingess, who lived nearby, told The Oregonian in September that he "saw Reinoehl walk toward his car holding a cellphone in his hand when two unmarked law enforcement vehicles converged outside the complex [and] began firing at Reinoehl." After initially shooting, they told Reinoehl to halt and then resumed shooting, Dingess said, adding that he never saw Reinoehl reach for a gun.
The New York Times talked with 22 people who had been nearby when Reinoehl was killed, and only one recalled the task force members saying anything before they starting shooting:
Mr. Louis…some 140 feet from Mr. Reinoehl, also said the police opened fire immediately, without giving any warnings—as did Mr. Smith and Mr. Cutler.
"There was no, 'Get out of the car!' There was no, 'Stop!' There was no nothing. They just got out of the car and started shooting," Mr. Louis said.
Mr. Smith described it similarly: "There was no yelling. There was no screaming. There was no altercation. It was just straight to gunshots."
Of the five eyewitnesses, none saw Reinoehl holding or reaching for a gun.
Despite the questions surrounding the officers conduct, Trump has repeatedly bragged about this operation—and even described it as "retribution."

by Gravlen » Sat Oct 17, 2020 4:07 am

by Nobel Hobos 2 » Sat Oct 17, 2020 4:24 am
Korouse wrote:Nobel Hobos 2 wrote:
"Disproportionate" would be anything more than necessary to defend oneself from imminent harm.
If someone punched you, for instance, but you didn't think to draw your gun until they were walking away, you've missed your chance to shoot them in "self-defense" since walking away, they pose no more risk to you than a completely innocent person does.
"But they did it once, that means they might do it again if I don't neutralize the threat" ... uh-uh. Tomorrow is not "imminent".
The President, the current government and their supporters are immediate threats to my future and my democratic rights. No need to explain the concept of retribution to me. I stand by what I said - you people hold extremely naive and silly opinions.

by Chan Island » Sat Oct 17, 2020 4:30 am
Gravlen wrote:Police Are Cutting Ties With Domestic Violence Programs That Support Black Lives Matter
So if you just mention that police violence is a thing, your funding will be cut and the sensitive police departments will retaliate against victims of violence by refusing to assist them in finding domestic violence programs and shelters.
Conserative Morality wrote:"It's not time yet" is a tactic used by reactionaries in every era. "It's not time for democracy, it's not time for capitalism, it's not time for emancipation." Of course it's not time. It's never time, not on its own. You make it time. If you're under fire in the no-man's land of WW1, you start digging a foxhole even if the ideal time would be when you *aren't* being bombarded, because once you wait for it to be 'time', other situations will need your attention, assuming you survive that long. If the fields aren't furrowed, plow them. If the iron is not hot, make it so. If society is not ready, change it.

by Nobel Hobos 2 » Sat Oct 17, 2020 4:37 am
Gravlen wrote:Police Are Cutting Ties With Domestic Violence Programs That Support Black Lives Matter
So if you just mention that police violence is a thing, your funding will be cut and the sensitive police departments will retaliate against victims of violence by refusing to assist them in finding domestic violence programs and shelters.

by Nobel Hobos 2 » Sat Oct 17, 2020 4:40 am
Chan Island wrote:Gravlen wrote:Police Are Cutting Ties With Domestic Violence Programs That Support Black Lives Matter
So if you just mention that police violence is a thing, your funding will be cut and the sensitive police departments will retaliate against victims of violence by refusing to assist them in finding domestic violence programs and shelters.
It's stuff like this as well as the shootings that make it look more and more like there's an overmighty law enforcement that believes it can get away with anything in dire need of massive reform.

by Gravlen » Sat Oct 17, 2020 4:54 am
Nobel Hobos 2 wrote:Gravlen wrote:Police Are Cutting Ties With Domestic Violence Programs That Support Black Lives Matter
So if you just mention that police violence is a thing, your funding will be cut and the sensitive police departments will retaliate against victims of violence by refusing to assist them in finding domestic violence programs and shelters.
Horrible. Particularly that the local government took the side of police and also withdrew support for the centers.
$25,000 worth. I wouldn't be surprised if those police somehow take possession of $25,000 of new gear.

by Nobel Hobos 2 » Sat Oct 17, 2020 5:26 am
Gravlen wrote:Nobel Hobos 2 wrote:
Horrible. Particularly that the local government took the side of police and also withdrew support for the centers.
$25,000 worth. I wouldn't be surprised if those police somehow take possession of $25,000 of new gear.
"Defund the Domestic Violence Programs" is an unexpected policy slogan.
by Cordel One » Sat Oct 17, 2020 9:27 pm
Korouse wrote:Cordel One wrote:This thread runs rampant with those lacking the intellectual capacity to converse with an individual as enlightened as yourself. It is with great displeasure that I must inform you these plebeians most likely do not have the mental capacity to comprehend Rick and Morty, and as such they are not worth your time.
Don't look at it as necessarily a mental capacity thing. This forum is too used to low-tier posts from people who think they're way too smart and way too funny, so you get things like Rick and Morty jokes without a punchline (it's a feat to make fun of a show that relies on epic bacon humor but end out coming below even that). Keep up the 20 posts a day and maybe you'll post something people wanna read.

by The Lone Alliance » Sat Oct 17, 2020 10:26 pm
Nobel Hobos 2 wrote:Gravlen wrote:Police Are Cutting Ties With Domestic Violence Programs That Support Black Lives Matter
So if you just mention that police violence is a thing, your funding will be cut and the sensitive police departments will retaliate against victims of violence by refusing to assist them in finding domestic violence programs and shelters.
Horrible. Particularly that the local government took the side of police and also withdrew support for the centers.
$25,000 worth. I wouldn't be surprised if those police somehow take possession of $25,000 of new gear.

by Telconi » Sat Oct 17, 2020 10:34 pm
Nobel Hobos 2 wrote:Gravlen wrote:Police Are Cutting Ties With Domestic Violence Programs That Support Black Lives Matter
So if you just mention that police violence is a thing, your funding will be cut and the sensitive police departments will retaliate against victims of violence by refusing to assist them in finding domestic violence programs and shelters.
Horrible. Particularly that the local government took the side of police and also withdrew support for the centers.
$25,000 worth. I wouldn't be surprised if those police somehow take possession of $25,000 of new gear.

by Kowani » Sat Oct 17, 2020 10:40 pm
Abolitionism in the North has leagued itself with Radical Democracy, and so the Slave Power was forced to ally itself with the Money Power; that is the great fact of the age.

by Senkaku » Sat Oct 17, 2020 11:08 pm
Telconi wrote:Nobel Hobos 2 wrote:
Horrible. Particularly that the local government took the side of police and also withdrew support for the centers.
$25,000 worth. I wouldn't be surprised if those police somehow take possession of $25,000 of new gear.
Who did you expect them to take the side of, if. Ot themselves?

by Telconi » Sat Oct 17, 2020 11:29 pm
Senkaku wrote:Telconi wrote:
Who did you expect them to take the side of, if. Ot themselves?
idk why it's crazy that people would be surprised that men and women who profess to be public servants dedicated to protecting their communities would be willing to cut ties with organizations aiding domestic violence victims just because those organizations may have said something critical of their policies or history? like... yeah, in a world where cops were actually interested in protecting the citizenry, I would expect them to say "well, they're free to criticize us, but we still believe in their mission"? wtf Tel lmao

by Senkaku » Sat Oct 17, 2020 11:35 pm
Telconi wrote:Senkaku wrote:idk why it's crazy that people would be surprised that men and women who profess to be public servants dedicated to protecting their communities would be willing to cut ties with organizations aiding domestic violence victims just because those organizations may have said something critical of their policies or history? like... yeah, in a world where cops were actually interested in protecting the citizenry, I would expect them to say "well, they're free to criticize us, but we still believe in their mission"? wtf Tel lmao
Naivety is always surprising.

by Telconi » Sat Oct 17, 2020 11:36 pm

by Vassenor » Sun Oct 18, 2020 12:36 am

by Gravlen » Sun Oct 18, 2020 2:28 am
The Lone Alliance wrote:Nobel Hobos 2 wrote:
Horrible. Particularly that the local government took the side of police and also withdrew support for the centers.
$25,000 worth. I wouldn't be surprised if those police somehow take possession of $25,000 of new gear.
Considering the vast amount of money a lot of BLM groups have gotten a good counter would be to donate the 25,000 themselves, or maybe a donation drive by supporters of BLM, would be a good PR move.

by The Lone Alliance » Sun Oct 18, 2020 2:33 am
Gravlen wrote:The Lone Alliance wrote:Considering the vast amount of money a lot of BLM groups have gotten a good counter would be to donate the 25,000 themselves, or maybe a donation drive by supporters of BLM, would be a good PR move.
The Domestic Violence shelter took your idea and ran with it. A Gofundme has been set up and has reached $60,000 as of now.

by Nobel Hobos 2 » Sun Oct 18, 2020 3:11 am
Telconi wrote:Nobel Hobos 2 wrote:
Horrible. Particularly that the local government took the side of police and also withdrew support for the centers.
$25,000 worth. I wouldn't be surprised if those police somehow take possession of $25,000 of new gear.
Who did you expect them to take the side of, if not themselves?

by Nobel Hobos 2 » Sun Oct 18, 2020 3:13 am
Gravlen wrote:The Lone Alliance wrote:Considering the vast amount of money a lot of BLM groups have gotten a good counter would be to donate the 25,000 themselves, or maybe a donation drive by supporters of BLM, would be a good PR move.
The Domestic Violence shelter took your idea and ran with it. A Gofundme has been set up and has reached $60,000 as of now.

by Gravlen » Tue Oct 20, 2020 12:19 pm
Kowani wrote:Breonna Taylor update: Attorney General D. Cameron admits he never recommended murder or manslaughter charges to the Grand Jury.

by Gravlen » Thu Oct 22, 2020 1:32 pm
Cahill's ruling states the jury should decide if the state of Minnesota has proven the guilt of the former officers, writing in his summary that the state has met the burden of probable cause in the charges against Thao, Lane and Kueng.
The exception was the third-degree murder charge against Chauvin. Cahill wrote the charge can "be sustained only in situations in which the defendant's actions were 'eminently dangerous to other persons' and were not specifically directed at the particular person whose death occurred."
But the evidence presented by the state does not show that Chauvin's actions were "eminently dangerous" to anyone but Floyd, the ruling says.
CNN senior legal analyst Laura Coates explained the third-degree murder charge was "odd" to begin with, saying it "wouldn't have stuck."
"Third-degree in Minnesota is meant to be someone firing a gun into a crowd with no specific target or driving down the wrong side of the road," Coates said. "You mean to harm or know that you could harm someone, but you don't have a particular person in mind or a personal vendetta."
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Applebania, Ebenia, The Holy Therns, Washington Resistance Army
Advertisement