If I may ask, were they affected by the MRKH syndrome, or do they "identify as a man"
Advertisement
by Spokesland » Fri Dec 10, 2021 3:12 pm
by Vassenor » Fri Dec 10, 2021 3:15 pm
by Spokesland » Fri Dec 10, 2021 3:53 pm
Vassenor wrote:Those scare quotes are doing a lot of heavy lifting in that post.
by Austria-Bohemia-Hungary » Fri Dec 10, 2021 4:00 pm
by The New California Republic » Fri Dec 10, 2021 4:02 pm
Spokesland wrote:Vassenor wrote:Those scare quotes are doing a lot of heavy lifting in that post.
I put quotation marks around it because I do not believe in it and so I believe that quotation marks were essential, and if you oppose my beliefs and quoting please ignore it and move on because that was a comment given by a person, and a person is full of opinion
by Spokesland » Fri Dec 10, 2021 8:05 pm
The New California Republic wrote:This is a discussion forum, not a blog. If you are posting here and thinking people would or should not respond to posts you make then you are sorely mistaken.
by Great Algerstonia » Fri Dec 10, 2021 8:09 pm
Resilient Acceleration wrote:After a period of letting this discussion run its course without my involvement due to sheer laziness and a new related NS project, I have returned with an answer and that answer is Israel.
by Maricarland » Fri Dec 10, 2021 8:12 pm
Great Algerstonia wrote:
Dude's literally a man, he shouldn't be deciding what women are called. Every woman I know would not be comfortable with being called a "person with a uterus" and if I were to call a woman I just met a "person with a uterus" she would probably walk away and never talk to me again.
by Necroghastia » Fri Dec 10, 2021 8:19 pm
Great Algerstonia wrote:
Dude's literally a man, he shouldn't be deciding what women are called. Every woman I know would not be comfortable with being called a "person with a uterus" and if I were to call a woman I just met a "person with a uterus" she would probably walk away and never talk to me again.
by Spokesland » Fri Dec 10, 2021 8:22 pm
Maricarland wrote:
I am not deciding what women are called. In the context of the abortion argument, there are non-women who are able to become pregnant, and we need language that includes them as well as women.
by Katganistan » Fri Dec 10, 2021 8:22 pm
Thepeopl wrote:Katganistan wrote:Who do you think are hurt wort by abortion bans?
The poor, who are then faced with how to afford raising them, and vilified for accepting public assistance.
They can always resort to the diy abortions that quite possibly will kill them. Or render them infertile.
I think the abortion ban is less anti women and more anti poor.
by Katganistan » Fri Dec 10, 2021 8:27 pm
by Maricarland » Fri Dec 10, 2021 8:30 pm
Spokesland wrote:Maricarland wrote:
I am not deciding what women are called. In the context of the abortion argument, there are non-women who are able to become pregnant, and we need language that includes them as well as women.
wait wait wait, explain this to me, non-women by biological sex or by gender identity, just curious about what you are saying here
by Great Algerstonia » Fri Dec 10, 2021 8:34 pm
Necroghastia wrote:Great Algerstonia wrote:Dude's literally a man, he shouldn't be deciding what women are called. Every woman I know would not be comfortable with being called a "person with a uterus" and if I were to call a woman I just met a "person with a uterus" she would probably walk away and never talk to me again.
Every person with a uterus I know that is not a woman would not appreciate being called a woman. In addition, no shit sherlock, context matters.
Resilient Acceleration wrote:After a period of letting this discussion run its course without my involvement due to sheer laziness and a new related NS project, I have returned with an answer and that answer is Israel.
by Great Algerstonia » Fri Dec 10, 2021 8:35 pm
Maricarland wrote:Spokesland wrote:
wait wait wait, explain this to me, non-women by biological sex or by gender identity, just curious about what you are saying here
Examples of non-women who may be able to become pregnant:
* Transmen
* Non-Binary people
* Intersex people
* (maybe in the future) Transwomen and Cismen with uterus transplants
Resilient Acceleration wrote:After a period of letting this discussion run its course without my involvement due to sheer laziness and a new related NS project, I have returned with an answer and that answer is Israel.
by Hispida » Fri Dec 10, 2021 8:37 pm
by Maricarland » Fri Dec 10, 2021 8:40 pm
by Spokesland » Fri Dec 10, 2021 8:42 pm
Maricarland wrote:Spokesland wrote:
wait wait wait, explain this to me, non-women by biological sex or by gender identity, just curious about what you are saying here
Examples of non-women who may be able to become pregnant:
* Transmen
* Non-Binary people
* Intersex people
* (maybe in the future) Transwomen and Cismen with uterus transplants
by Great Algerstonia » Fri Dec 10, 2021 8:45 pm
Maricarland wrote:Great Algerstonia wrote:Cis!? My allegiance is to the Republic, to democracy!
There is some research being done (though not much) to develop procedures that would allow for transplanting a functional uterus into someone without the normal reproductive anatomy for becoming pregnant. This would allow transwomen (who are women, I mistakenly included them in the list of non-women that may be able to get pregnant) and cismen to carry their child if they wish.
Resilient Acceleration wrote:After a period of letting this discussion run its course without my involvement due to sheer laziness and a new related NS project, I have returned with an answer and that answer is Israel.
by Maricarland » Fri Dec 10, 2021 8:53 pm
Great Algerstonia wrote:Maricarland wrote:
There is some research being done (though not much) to develop procedures that would allow for transplanting a functional uterus into someone without the normal reproductive anatomy for becoming pregnant. This would allow transwomen (who are women, I mistakenly included them in the list of non-women that may be able to get pregnant) and cismen to carry their child if they wish.
Something's not right. I can feel it.
by Stellar Colonies » Fri Dec 10, 2021 8:57 pm
Floofybit wrote:Your desired society should be one where you are submissive and controlled
Primitive Communism wrote:What bodily autonomy do men need?
Techocracy101010 wrote:If she goes on a rampage those saggy wonders are as deadly as nunchucks
Parmistan wrote:It's not ALWAYS acceptable when we do it, but it's MORE acceptable when we do it.
Theodorable wrote:Jihad will win.
Distruzio wrote:All marriage outside the Church is gay marriage.
I try to be objective, but I do have some biases.
North Californian.
Stellar Colonies is a loose galactic confederacy.
The Confederacy & the WA.
Add 1200 years.
by Maricarland » Fri Dec 10, 2021 10:22 pm
by Sundiata » Fri Dec 10, 2021 11:15 pm
by Maricarland » Fri Dec 10, 2021 11:19 pm
Sundiata wrote:
It's not really a problem with messaging. It's more that the United States isn't a full democracy, it's an oligarchy with limits on democracy like gerrymandering, the electoral college, corporate lobbying, and lifelong supreme court appointments. That's why Roe v Wade is gone. Most Americans support legal abortion.
by The Alma Mater » Fri Dec 10, 2021 11:21 pm
Great Algerstonia wrote:Maricarland wrote:
There is some research being done (though not much) to develop procedures that would allow for transplanting a functional uterus into someone without the normal reproductive anatomy for becoming pregnant. This would allow transwomen (who are women, I mistakenly included them in the list of non-women that may be able to get pregnant) and cismen to carry their child if they wish.
Something's not right. I can feel it.
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Cormonval, Cyptopir, Eurocom, Europa Undivided, Great-Desolates, La Paz de Los Ricos, Likhinia, Love Peace and Friendship, Nioya, Ors Might, Senkaku, Shirahime, The Jamesian Republic, Umeria, Uvolla, Warvick, Washington Resistance Army
Advertisement