
and which pendejo made you the arbiter of that?
One doesn't need to be an arbiter nor a judge to follow the law in all of its forms.

Because sometimes even national leaders just want to hang out
https://forum.nationstates.net/
and which pendejo made you the arbiter of that?
Michel Meilleur wrote:Spirit of Hope wrote:So a fetus has yet to gain personhood then. Either way it isn't a person.
A toddler has yet to gain personhood. A mentally deficient child has yet to gain personhood. Either way, they're still a person and claiming the contrary is just peddling Nazi "life unworthy of life" rhethoric.
Necroghastia wrote:are you seriously pretending that "nuh uh ur wrong lololol" isn't what your posts amount to
Michel Meilleur wrote:Necroghastia wrote:are you seriously pretending that "nuh uh ur wrong lololol" isn't what your posts amount to
Well, if telling you that "you don't get to deny another human's humanity because it's inconvenient to you" is "nuh uh ur wrong lololol" to you, then I don't think I can do much for you.
Michel Meilleur wrote:
I'm denying another human's humanity by... Saying that personhood and its nebulous definition isn't enough to deny someone's humanity?![]()
Quite the take you have, I sure would love to hear your reasoning because I ain't getting it lmfao
Michel Meilleur wrote:A toddler has yet to gain personhood. A mentally deficient child has yet to gain personhood..
You know, you can just admit you were wrong and read too quickly instead of lying through your teeth like that.
Necroghastia wrote:He said, as he blatantly and shamelessly quote edited.
Not in the habit of saying I was wrong about things I wasn't wrong about.
You know that it's not allowed by the rules to do what you're trying to do, right?
Not in the habit of saying I was wrong about things I wasn't wrong about.
You're clearly in the habit of lying about being right for things you can and have been very easily proved wrong, lol
Necroghastia wrote:You mean the post I snipped to point out where precisely you denied certain peoples' humanity?
Michel Meilleur wrote:A toddler has yet to gain personhood. A mentally deficient child has yet to gain personhood. Either way, they're still a person and claiming the contrary is just peddling Nazi "life unworthy of life" rhethoric.
If you honestly think I did anything wrong, the appropriate venue is the moderation subforum.
Yes, yes you are. You're also clearly in the habit of referring to yourself in the second person.
Michel Meilleur wrote:Necroghastia wrote:You mean the post I snipped to point out where precisely you denied certain peoples' humanity?
The post you removed the second part to change totally the meaning of and are now still pathetically lying in an attempt to pretend that you haven't fucked up pitifully, indeed.Michel Meilleur wrote:A toddler has yet to gain personhood. A mentally deficient child has yet to gain personhood. Either way, they're still a person and claiming the contrary is just peddling Nazi "life unworthy of life" rhethoric.
Necroghastia wrote:"they don't have personhood but they're persons" is a total oxymoron and you know it. But, somehow, you think I am the one who has "fucked up pitifully." Weeeeird.
Michel Meilleur wrote:Necroghastia wrote:"they don't have personhood but they're persons" is a total oxymoron and you know it. But, somehow, you think I am the one who has "fucked up pitifully." Weeeeird.
It's almost as if "personhood" as a claim to what make a person, a person is bogus bullshit made up by peoples who want to justify abortion by dehumanizing fetus and babies.