Advertisement
by Suriyanakhon » Thu Feb 04, 2021 5:39 pm
by The Caleshan Valkyrie » Thu Feb 04, 2021 8:00 pm
Suriyanakhon wrote:https://www.nytimes.com/2021/01/28/world/asia/thailand-abortion-rights.html
While this new legalization does not go far enough, it is a good first step in Thailand.
by Borderlands of Rojava » Thu Feb 04, 2021 10:00 pm
Suriyanakhon wrote:https://www.nytimes.com/2021/01/28/world/asia/thailand-abortion-rights.html
While this new legalization does not go far enough, it is a good first step in Thailand.
by Suriyanakhon » Thu Feb 04, 2021 10:21 pm
Borderlands of Rojava wrote:Suriyanakhon wrote:https://www.nytimes.com/2021/01/28/world/asia/thailand-abortion-rights.html
While this new legalization does not go far enough, it is a good first step in Thailand.
Abortion was illegal in Thailand? I didn't know it would be banned in a place where few people are of the abrahamic faith.
by A-Series-Of-Tubes » Fri Feb 05, 2021 12:00 am
Borderlands of Rojava wrote:Suriyanakhon wrote:https://www.nytimes.com/2021/01/28/world/asia/thailand-abortion-rights.html
While this new legalization does not go far enough, it is a good first step in Thailand.
Abortion was illegal in Thailand? I didn't know it would be banned in a place where few people are of the abrahamic faith.
by Punished UMN » Fri Feb 05, 2021 12:15 am
A-Series-Of-Tubes wrote:Borderlands of Rojava wrote:
Abortion was illegal in Thailand? I didn't know it would be banned in a place where few people are of the abrahamic faith.
Buddhism has "not taking life" as a far more fundamental belief than Abraham's lot.
I think it's the Fifth Commandment "thou shall not kill" rather than any regular passage, at foundation of their opposition to abortion, and the hypocrisy can be measured not just by how few of them oppose the death penalty or war, but how many violate the other Commandments. If any Commandments should be held above the other, then "thou shall not kill" ranks below either "keep the Sabbath day holy" or "though shall not covet" which I really doubt many do observe. Frankly I think their anti-abortion views aren't founded in the Bible at all, they're a reaction to Roe v. Wade which came at the end of the hippy era and crystalized for religious conservatives everything they didn't like about (70's) modern morality.
You're probably too young to remember, but these same people were squealing with glee when AIDS swept through the gay community. They didn't mind when junkies got it either. But church-going monogamous white people got it too, through blood transfusions, so the religious right rediscovered that death really sucks.
It's entirely proper that modern pro-lifers stay away from religious justifications. Because there aren't any. It was only ever a sham to hide baseless moralism behind religion.
I should have said more about Buddhism, but I don't know much.
by A-Series-Of-Tubes » Fri Feb 05, 2021 1:05 am
Punished UMN wrote:A-Series-Of-Tubes wrote:
Buddhism has "not taking life" as a far more fundamental belief than Abraham's lot.
I think it's the Fifth Commandment "thou shall not kill" rather than any regular passage, at foundation of their opposition to abortion, and the hypocrisy can be measured not just by how few of them oppose the death penalty or war, but how many violate the other Commandments. If any Commandments should be held above the other, then "thou shall not kill" ranks below either "keep the Sabbath day holy" or "though shall not covet" which I really doubt many do observe. Frankly I think their anti-abortion views aren't founded in the Bible at all, they're a reaction to Roe v. Wade which came at the end of the hippy era and crystalized for religious conservatives everything they didn't like about (70's) modern morality.
You're probably too young to remember, but these same people were squealing with glee when AIDS swept through the gay community. They didn't mind when junkies got it either. But church-going monogamous white people got it too, through blood transfusions, so the religious right rediscovered that death really sucks.
It's entirely proper that modern pro-lifers stay away from religious justifications. Because there aren't any. It was only ever a sham to hide baseless moralism behind religion.
I should have said more about Buddhism, but I don't know much.
The abortion debate isn't entirely centered around the United States, you know.
And, to reiterate a point I made earlier, everyone is a hypocrite, just because a lot of people who hold a certain view are hypocrites doesn't mean they don't genuinely hold a view, and it doesn't mean that everyone who holds that view is hypocritical about that. And even if some people holding that view are being facetious about it, that doesn't mean everyone is. But that would get in the way of demonizing the opposition. A good chunk of the people in the Pro-life camp (and probably virtually all of them who post on this site) weren't even alive, let alone politically involved, during the AIDS crisis.
by Esheaun Stroakuss » Fri Feb 05, 2021 2:06 am
by A-Series-Of-Tubes » Fri Feb 05, 2021 2:08 am
by Esheaun Stroakuss » Fri Feb 05, 2021 2:10 am
by The Caleshan Valkyrie » Fri Feb 05, 2021 1:01 pm
by Atheris » Fri Feb 05, 2021 2:01 pm
by Genivaria » Sat Feb 06, 2021 1:13 pm
by Albrenia » Sat Feb 06, 2021 1:17 pm
Genivaria wrote:'Pro-Life Activist' convinces mother not to abort and is now objecting to now being put down as preferred placement citing financial and health reasons.
The irony is utterly hilarious.
https://friendlyatheist.patheos.com/202 ... she-saved/
by Galloism » Sat Feb 06, 2021 1:31 pm
Genivaria wrote:'Pro-Life Activist' convinces mother not to abort and is now objecting to now being put down as preferred placement citing financial and health reasons.
The irony is utterly hilarious.
https://friendlyatheist.patheos.com/202 ... she-saved/
by Kowani » Sat Feb 06, 2021 1:50 pm
by The New California Republic » Sat Feb 06, 2021 1:54 pm
Kowani wrote:Arkansas senate passes bill (28-5) requiring women to call a hotline before getting an abortion
The bill still requires the signature of Gov. Asa Hutchinson (R).
"The idea with this is that you're empowering women in order to be able to make the choice to not have an abortion," Republican Sen. Bob Ballinger said before the vote.
by Esalia » Sat Feb 06, 2021 1:55 pm
The New California Republic wrote:Kowani wrote:Arkansas senate passes bill (28-5) requiring women to call a hotline before getting an abortion
The bill still requires the signature of Gov. Asa Hutchinson (R).
From the article:"The idea with this is that you're empowering women in order to be able to make the choice to not have an abortion," Republican Sen. Bob Ballinger said before the vote.
Bullshit. Cynical bullshit.
by Istoreya » Sat Feb 06, 2021 1:56 pm
Genivaria wrote:'Pro-Life Activist' convinces mother not to abort and is now objecting to now being put down as preferred placement citing financial and health reasons.
The irony is utterly hilarious.
https://friendlyatheist.patheos.com/202 ... she-saved/
by San Lumen » Sat Feb 06, 2021 1:58 pm
Kowani wrote:Arkansas senate passes bill (28-5) requiring women to call a hotline before getting an abortion
The bill still requires the signature of Gov. Asa Hutchinson (R).
by Galloism » Sat Feb 06, 2021 2:05 pm
San Lumen wrote:Kowani wrote:Arkansas senate passes bill (28-5) requiring women to call a hotline before getting an abortion
The bill still requires the signature of Gov. Asa Hutchinson (R).
totally insane. I hope he vetoes it. Its also probably unconstitutional.
by Galloism » Sat Feb 06, 2021 2:12 pm
by Kowani » Sat Feb 06, 2021 2:14 pm
San Lumen wrote:Kowani wrote:Arkansas senate passes bill (28-5) requiring women to call a hotline before getting an abortion
The bill still requires the signature of Gov. Asa Hutchinson (R).
totally insane. I hope he vetoes it. Its also probably unconstitutional.
by Neutraligon » Sat Feb 06, 2021 2:16 pm
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: DutchFormosa, Port Carverton, Tungstan, Varsemia
Advertisement