Australian rePublic wrote:It's more that she's extremely unpopular than anything else. Politicians are play politics, after all
Who's playing what politics?
Advertisement
by Amorosa-Coonarra Coasts » Sat May 29, 2021 1:31 am
Australian rePublic wrote:It's more that she's extremely unpopular than anything else. Politicians are play politics, after all
by Australian rePublic » Sat May 29, 2021 1:43 am
by New Jacobland » Sat May 29, 2021 1:50 am
by Australian rePublic » Sat May 29, 2021 2:23 am
by Saiwania » Sat May 29, 2021 2:33 am
by Koletsia » Sat May 29, 2021 3:18 am
Saiwania wrote:Pauline Hanson looks to be the best and brightest hope for Australia overall out of all the options. The only portion of her political platform I don't like, is climate change denialism.
by An Alan Smithee Nation » Sat May 29, 2021 3:30 am
by Amorosa-Coonarra Coasts » Sat May 29, 2021 4:35 am
An Alan Smithee Nation wrote:It's a shame that climate change denialism is still a political position people are prepared to stand on.
by The Blaatschapen » Sat May 29, 2021 5:43 am
by Australian rePublic » Sat May 29, 2021 7:49 am
by Koletsia » Sat May 29, 2021 8:06 am
Australian rePublic wrote:Not political, but, I think there are parts of Australia where there should be towns but currently aren't any. I'd love to have the ability to comission towns there if no one else does. But sadly, I can't comission towns. If I started a political party (which won't happen, and it remains a hyperthetical), if I started a political party, one of my platforms would be to comission such towns
by Amorosa-Coonarra Coasts » Sat May 29, 2021 5:55 pm
by Australian rePublic » Sat May 29, 2021 8:59 pm
Amorosa-Coonarra Coasts wrote:I once drafted up a hypothetical map of a possible extension of the South Coast Line, but seeing how much forest it runs through, and the terrain, I can see why there isn't a feasible route to Ulladulla, or even into Nowra's CBD. Too expensive, too much of an impact on urban and rural environments.
Also, I hear people on the Sunshine Coast don't want a new light rail. I can see why, as they don't want the Sunny Coast to become the Gold Coast. The main line needs bloody upgrading though, it's all single track w/ passing loops north of Caboolture, two services to and from Gympie each day, and one station's shelter (Traveston, the second-most northerly station, and least used, on the Brisbane rail network) is falling to pieces because of termites.
However, I can see why there's only two services to and from Gympie. It's likely because of the fact that most will not care to catch a train to Gympie when they can drive. (to the east of Gympie, given they're building a bypass of the place) And one line in Brisbane was partially shut (the Doomben line) past Doomben. The trains that do go past Doomben are freight trains bound for the Port.
Rail transport can be weird. But I guess you can justify it.
by Amorosa-Coonarra Coasts » Tue Jun 01, 2021 7:18 am
by Australian rePublic » Thu Jun 03, 2021 3:50 am
Amorosa-Coonarra Coasts wrote:What's everyones thoughts on the Government's handling of the Vaccine rollout?
(Note: it was on the Saturday Paper.)
Plus, I just have to say, I picked up a copy of the SMH, and smackdab on the front page, questions over NSW Labor 'who's gonna lead now' cos they lost a by-election which Labor could not win. Upper Hunter is coal country. You cannot elect Labor for more than a few terms in coal country.
So what's the surprise then? Labor weren't supposed to win it. So why the 'oh my god, this was the deciding by-election for Labor'?
Honestly, this is pretty shocking - and a little disgusting. Jodi wasn't that unpopular, was she? I mean, yeah, that one scandal, and yes, the polls aren't in her favour, but ffs, they only represent those who actually answer the polls - AND they can be manipulated if left unchecked.
Who do you think should run for Opp. Leader, Aus Republic?
by Australian rePublic » Thu Jun 03, 2021 3:54 am
by Amorosa-Coonarra Coasts » Thu Jun 03, 2021 5:23 am
Australian rePublic wrote:My sister purchased a car not too long ago and she gets me to fill it with petrol for her. When reading the operator's manual to see how to open the fuel gauge, ad it's an old car, it said "unleaded only, do not use leaded petrol". I then remembered the existence of leaded petrol and how it was fazed out. I was then curious about leaded petrol, which lead me down an interesting rabbit hole.
Did you know that whilst Australian feul has a MAXIMUM of 10% ethanol (E10), many, many other countries require a MINIMUM of 10% ethanol? And Australian feul contains much more sulfir than feel in other countries, and that the EU tried to negotiate a lower sulfir quantity in our fuel into trade deals? Bloody interesting!
by Kenobot » Thu Jun 03, 2021 5:38 am
Amorosa-Coonarra Coasts wrote:Australian rePublic wrote:My sister purchased a car not too long ago and she gets me to fill it with petrol for her. When reading the operator's manual to see how to open the fuel gauge, ad it's an old car, it said "unleaded only, do not use leaded petrol". I then remembered the existence of leaded petrol and how it was fazed out. I was then curious about leaded petrol, which lead me down an interesting rabbit hole.
Did you know that whilst Australian feul has a MAXIMUM of 10% ethanol (E10), many, many other countries require a MINIMUM of 10% ethanol? And Australian feul contains much more sulfir than feel in other countries, and that the EU tried to negotiate a lower sulfir quantity in our fuel into trade deals? Bloody interesting!
Cool!
Also, I heard a home out in north-west NSW
got destroyed by fire due to mice chewing on wires.
Has anyone on the outskirts of Sydney (e.g. Picton, Katoomba, Richmond)
been having huge mice influxes lately?
Also also, just curious, what do you think are some of the worst rail crossings on the NSW rail network (can include Blue Mts/S. HIghlands/SC Lines), but there's not many in Sydney, I believe
by Mathuvan Union » Thu Jun 03, 2021 9:16 pm
Kenobot wrote:Amorosa-Coonarra Coasts wrote:
Cool!
Also, I heard a home out in north-west NSW
got destroyed by fire due to mice chewing on wires.
Has anyone on the outskirts of Sydney (e.g. Picton, Katoomba, Richmond)
been having huge mice influxes lately?
Also also, just curious, what do you think are some of the worst rail crossings on the NSW rail network (can include Blue Mts/S. HIghlands/SC Lines), but there's not many in Sydney, I believe
I know some of my relations out that way have been catching 30-40 mice a day with traps outside. It's pretty bad
by Australian rePublic » Thu Jun 03, 2021 10:04 pm
by Kenobot » Thu Jun 03, 2021 10:15 pm
by Australian rePublic » Fri Jun 04, 2021 2:53 am
by Australian rePublic » Fri Jun 04, 2021 5:24 am
Amorosa-Coonarra Coasts wrote:Australian rePublic wrote:My sister purchased a car not too long ago and she gets me to fill it with petrol for her. When reading the operator's manual to see how to open the fuel gauge, ad it's an old car, it said "unleaded only, do not use leaded petrol". I then remembered the existence of leaded petrol and how it was fazed out. I was then curious about leaded petrol, which lead me down an interesting rabbit hole.
Did you know that whilst Australian feul has a MAXIMUM of 10% ethanol (E10), many, many other countries require a MINIMUM of 10% ethanol? And Australian feul contains much more sulfir than feel in other countries, and that the EU tried to negotiate a lower sulfir quantity in our fuel into trade deals? Bloody interesting!
Cool!
Also, I heard a home out in north-west NSW
got destroyed by fire due to mice chewing on wires.
Has anyone on the outskirts of Sydney (e.g. Picton, Katoomba, Richmond)
been having huge mice influxes lately?
Also also, just curious, what do you think are some of the worst rail crossings on the NSW rail network (can include Blue Mts/S. HIghlands/SC Lines), but there's not many in Sydney, I believe
by Mathuvan Union » Fri Jun 04, 2021 6:17 am
Australian rePublic wrote:Mathuvan Union wrote:Fucking government doesn’t want shit to do with that.
Can even agree if someone got raped.
Can't even agree if someone got raped? You mean a complex legal matter which required the careful deliberation of a 12 person jury and a magistrate in a full court of law over a manner which could potentially send someone to jail for a lengthy period of time? Thank God the government "can't decide" whether or not someone was raped. That's why we have courts of law!
by Australian rePublic » Fri Jun 04, 2021 6:36 am
Mathuvan Union wrote:Australian rePublic wrote:Can't even agree if someone got raped? You mean a complex legal matter which required the careful deliberation of a 12 person jury and a magistrate in a full court of law over a manner which could potentially send someone to jail for a lengthy period of time? Thank God the government "can't decide" whether or not someone was raped. That's why we have courts of law!
My point of order was more that the government itself couldn’t actually admit that the person was raped—it’s a problem that half the government is saying it’s bullshit.
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Ethel mermania, Ineva, Likhinia, Plan Neonie, Saiwana, Shrillland, Statesburg, Tiami, Tungstan
Advertisement