Chan Island wrote:Tranzoria wrote:
Istanbul is good, but then again, so is every coastal city in the Middle East.
I suppose that's true. Tyre, Sidon, Alexandria, Acre and many others have similar stories to Istanbul...
With the exception that they have been in much less defensible positions. Tyre was on an island, but then Alexander the Great reversed that one. And all of them were swept up by the Arab invasions in less time than it takes to sneeze. Istanbul meanwhile has been the target of war for centuries, and only rarely has an army even gotten close. Last time it was taken was in 1453, and we still never hear the end of that one- impressive for a place that powers have tried to nab even as recently as the First World War.
And then of course there's the political chokehold the place represents. The entire fate of Russia has on multiple occasions been decided not in Moscow, but by those in Istanbul. As recently as 1918 basically all of the Middle East was ruled by those in Istanbul, as well as big chunks of the balkans.
In many ways in fact, the current time is a historical anomaly for it, in not being a capital. Small sting though, for a metropolis that has 3 times the populace of all 3 Baltic states put together, and still represents something like a quarter of Turkey's entire economy.
Now that I think about it, a lot of cities on the Mediterranean are good to have cities. Even though some could be flooded, it's good for building-wise.