They really shouldn’t, though.
Advertisement
by Insaanistan » Wed Sep 02, 2020 3:27 pm
by Neuer Deutsches Reich » Wed Sep 02, 2020 3:29 pm
by SD_Film Artists » Wed Sep 02, 2020 3:29 pm
Washington Resistance Army wrote:Based, I can respect the bravery to do it again.
by Kowani » Wed Sep 02, 2020 3:32 pm
by Loben III » Wed Sep 02, 2020 3:34 pm
Insaanistan wrote:Loben III wrote:A warlord was a anti militarism advocate?
Not a warlord. While he did go to war, you’ll that for much of his life as commander, the wars were against the Makkans who persecuted his people through assassination attempts, murders, etc. Then you have the additional time he spent fighting people who betrayed his treaties, like Banu Qurayza. Also, here are his rules of war:
1. Do not kill any child, any woman, or any elder or sick person.
2. Do not practice treachery or mutilation.
3. Do not uproot or burn palms or cut down fruitful trees.
4. Do not slaughter a sheep or a cow or a camel, except for food.
5. If one fights his brother, [he must] avoid striking the face, for God created him in the image of Adam.
6. Do not kill the monks in monasteries, and do not kill those sitting in places of worship.
7. Do not destroy the villages and towns, do not spoil the cultivated fields and gardens, and do not slaughter the cattle.
8. Do not wish for an encounter with the enemy; pray to God to grant you security; but when you [are forced to] encounter them, exercise patience.
9. No one may punish with fire except the Lord of Fire.
10. Accustom yourselves to do good if people do good, and to not do wrong even if they commit evil.
by Northern Davincia » Wed Sep 02, 2020 3:35 pm
Conserative Morality wrote:"Two gin-scented tears trickled down the sides of his nose. But it was all right, everything was all right, the struggle was finished. He had won the victory over himself. He loved Big Hoppe."
by Asle Leopolka » Wed Sep 02, 2020 3:43 pm
by VlaRiSsiA » Wed Sep 02, 2020 3:48 pm
tl;dr - after nuclear war, corrupt oligarchical hellhole emerges. ogre leads revolution, kills oligarchs after civil war, improves quality of life with progressive social policies and industrialization. couple foreign invasions, assassination attempts, personal losses, and rebellions later, ogre goes psychotic and kills anyone he’s sus of. then a fascist midget invades and kills third of the population, ogre manages to defeat him but goes completely bonkers.
now we got a hyper-totalitarian hyper-militaristic industrial hive-mind quasi-slave state that the ogre 70 years ago would be horrified at
by Borderlands of Rojava » Wed Sep 02, 2020 3:49 pm
VlaRiSsiA wrote:While I consider Hebdo’s actions disrespectful, he really shouldn’t be persecuted for doing it. I believe in freedom of speech and religious freedom.
by Insaanistan » Wed Sep 02, 2020 3:50 pm
Kowani wrote:Insaanistan wrote:“And among God’s signs is this: He created for you mates from amongst yourselves (males […] for females and vice versa) that you might find tranquility and peace in them. And he has put love and kindness among you. Herein surely are signs for those who reflect.” (Qur’an, 30: 21)
“They (your wives) are your garment and you are a garment for them.” (Qur’an, 2: 187)
“Observe your duty to Allah in respect to the women, and treat them well.” (Part of Prophet Muhammad (pbuh)’s Last Sermon)
Need more?
"And they (women) have rights similar to those (of men) over them in kindness, and men are a degree above them. (Qu'ran: 2:228)
" And call two witness from among your men, two witnesses. And if two men be not at hand, then a man and two women," (Qu'ran 2:282)
4:11 "Allah chargeth you concerning (the provision for) your children: to the male the equivalent of the portion of two females"
4:34 "Men are in charge of women, because Allah hath made the one of them to excel the other, and because they spend of their property (for the support of women). So good women are the obedient, guarding in secret that which Allah hath guarded. As for those from whom ye fear rebellion, admonish them and banish them to beds apart, and scourge them."
24:31" And tell the believing women to lower their gaze and be modest, and to display of their adornment only that which is apparent, and to draw their veils over their bosoms, and not to reveal their adornment save to their own husbands or fathers or husbands' fathers, or their sons or their husbands' sons, or their brothers or their brothers' sons or sisters' sons, or their women, or their slaves, or male attendants who lack vigour, or children who know naught of women's nakedness. And let them not stamp their feet so as to reveal what they hide of their adornment."
by VlaRiSsiA » Wed Sep 02, 2020 3:52 pm
Oh, thanks for clarifying.
tl;dr - after nuclear war, corrupt oligarchical hellhole emerges. ogre leads revolution, kills oligarchs after civil war, improves quality of life with progressive social policies and industrialization. couple foreign invasions, assassination attempts, personal losses, and rebellions later, ogre goes psychotic and kills anyone he’s sus of. then a fascist midget invades and kills third of the population, ogre manages to defeat him but goes completely bonkers.
now we got a hyper-totalitarian hyper-militaristic industrial hive-mind quasi-slave state that the ogre 70 years ago would be horrified at
by Whitemore » Wed Sep 02, 2020 3:52 pm
by The Lone Alliance » Wed Sep 02, 2020 4:10 pm
by Major-Tom » Wed Sep 02, 2020 4:12 pm
by Insaanistan » Wed Sep 02, 2020 4:12 pm
by Major-Tom » Wed Sep 02, 2020 4:14 pm
Insaanistan wrote:I hate that when Muslims get angry over it, these things happen:
People tell Muslims to “learn to laugh at themselves”; people who would probably stab us for mentioning a war crime committed in the Middle East by a western country.
Regular Muslims who protest, obviously upset about the Prophet (pbuh) being insulted, are portrayed as violent rioters coming to destroy Western Civilization.
And...
“Muslims” send death threats to these people (which directly violates Islamic principles), and this just gives Islamophobes more stuff to use to make us seem the way they portray us.
by Kowani » Wed Sep 02, 2020 4:15 pm
Insaanistan wrote:So, couple things:
“Women have rights similar to those of men equitably, although men have a degree of responsibility above them. And God is Almighty and All-Wise.” 2:228
Check my other post for info on pregnancy brain.
That would be sexist against men.This is because in Islam, as Nouman Ali Khan puts it, “Your money is hers. And her money... is hers.” That’s right.
Ah, yes, objectification.Also, women don’t pay dowries when they marry. They get paid dowries.
“Men are the caretakers of women, as men have been provisioned by God over women and tasked with supporting them financially.
And righteous women are devoutly obedient and, when alone, protective of what God has entrusted them with [their husbands honor and wealth]. And if you sense ill-conduct from your women, advise them [first], [if they persist], do not share their beds, [but if they still persist] then discipline them gently [anywhere but the face, not hard enough to leave a mark, and with a toothbrush or some grass. So basically, you can tap your wife’s arm with some grass]. But if they change their ways, do not be unjust to them. Surely Allah is Most High, All-Great” (4:34)
[/quote]Translation is off, but basically... you think women shouldn’t go around half naked... is oppressive...?
by Uiiop » Wed Sep 02, 2020 4:15 pm
The Lone Alliance wrote:Here's the thing I don't really get, Muslims say it's wrong to draw a picture of Mohammed, if that's true, how the hell does anyone know what Mohammed looks like in the first place to claim it's a drawing of him?
If someone took a stick and stood it up against the wall and said "It's a statue of Mohammed" that doesn't make it so, all Muslims have to say is that it's a "Fake Mohammed".
Hell doesn't the rule itself only applies to Muslims because Mohammed didn't want Muslims worshipping him, I think it's very clear that Charlie Hebbo isn't drawing pictures of Mohammed to worship, so unless Muslims start bowing down and praying to the cartoons no sin has been committed.
by Bear Stearns » Wed Sep 02, 2020 4:17 pm
by Sao Nova Europa » Wed Sep 02, 2020 4:19 pm
by Agarntrop » Wed Sep 02, 2020 4:20 pm
Insaanistan wrote:I hate that when Muslims get angry over it, these things happen:
People tell Muslims to “learn to laugh at themselves”; people who would probably stab us for mentioning a war crime committed in the Middle East by a western country.
Regular Muslims who protest, obviously upset about the Prophet (pbuh) being insulted, are portrayed as violent rioters coming to destroy Western Civilization.
And...
“Muslims” send death threats to these people (which directly violates Islamic principles), and this just gives Islamophobes more stuff to use to make us seem the way they portray us.
by New haven america » Wed Sep 02, 2020 4:21 pm
Insaanistan wrote:Why? J-just why? How empty must your life be to make fun of an anti-slavery, anti-sexism, anti-racism and anti-militarism advocate?
by Borderlands of Rojava » Wed Sep 02, 2020 4:22 pm
Insaanistan wrote:Kowani wrote:"And they (women) have rights similar to those (of men) over them in kindness, and men are a degree above them. (Qu'ran: 2:228)
" And call two witness from among your men, two witnesses. And if two men be not at hand, then a man and two women," (Qu'ran 2:282)
4:11 "Allah chargeth you concerning (the provision for) your children: to the male the equivalent of the portion of two females"
4:34 "Men are in charge of women, because Allah hath made the one of them to excel the other, and because they spend of their property (for the support of women). So good women are the obedient, guarding in secret that which Allah hath guarded. As for those from whom ye fear rebellion, admonish them and banish them to beds apart, and scourge them."
24:31" And tell the believing women to lower their gaze and be modest, and to display of their adornment only that which is apparent, and to draw their veils over their bosoms, and not to reveal their adornment save to their own husbands or fathers or husbands' fathers, or their sons or their husbands' sons, or their brothers or their brothers' sons or sisters' sons, or their women, or their slaves, or male attendants who lack vigour, or children who know naught of women's nakedness. And let them not stamp their feet so as to reveal what they hide of their adornment."
So, couple things:
“Women have rights similar to those of men equitably, although men have a degree of responsibility above them. And God is Almighty and All-Wise.” 2:228
Check my other post for info on pregnancy brain.
This is because in Islam, as Nouman Ali Khan puts it, “Your money is hers. And her money... is hers.” That’s right. Also, women don’t pay dowries when they marry. They get paid dowries.
“Men are the caretakers of women, as men have been provisioned by God over women and tasked with supporting them financially. And righteous women are devoutly obedient and, when alone, protective of what God has entrusted them with [their husbands honor and wealth]. And if you sense ill-conduct from your women, advise them [first], [if they persist], do not share their beds, [but if they still persist] then discipline them gently [anywhere but the face, not hard enough to leave a mark, and with a toothbrush or some grass. So basically, you can tap your wife’s arm with some grass]. But if they change their ways, do not be unjust to them. Surely Allah is Most High, All-Great” (4:34)
Translation is off, but basically... you think women shouldn’t go around half naked... is oppressive...?
by Agarntrop » Wed Sep 02, 2020 4:22 pm
Sao Nova Europa wrote:Freedom of speech includes the right to ridicule and mock religious figures. If Muslims do not like it, they can peacefully protest (freedom of expression and assembly) or pen cartoons of their own ridiculing and mocking Charlie Hebdo authors.
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Autumn Wind, Celritannia, Cyptopir, Dimetrodon Empire, DutchFormosa, Emotional Support Crocodile, Ifreann, Mesogiria, Pale Dawn, Port Carverton, Three Galaxies, Tungstan, Varsemia
Advertisement