Was he forced to marry another man? The answer is no therefore I fail to see your point.
Advertisement

by New haven america » Mon Sep 07, 2020 9:09 pm
by Jedi Council » Mon Sep 07, 2020 9:11 pm
The Huskar Social Union wrote:Jedi Council is in fact, the big gay... The lord of all gays.

by Sundiata » Mon Sep 07, 2020 9:12 pm

by Telconi » Mon Sep 07, 2020 9:13 pm

by New haven america » Mon Sep 07, 2020 9:14 pm
by Jedi Council » Mon Sep 07, 2020 9:14 pm
The Huskar Social Union wrote:Jedi Council is in fact, the big gay... The lord of all gays.

by San Lumen » Mon Sep 07, 2020 9:16 pm
Telconi wrote:San Lumen wrote:Was he forced to marry another man? The answer is no therefore I fail to see your point.
The things that you fail to see aren't relevant. He was forced to contribute to the action of two men marrying, thus disproving the concept that it doesn't effect anyone else.
If you want to defend it's lack of extraneous effect, stop forcing people to be effected.

by Telconi » Mon Sep 07, 2020 9:17 pm
San Lumen wrote:Telconi wrote:
The things that you fail to see aren't relevant. He was forced to contribute to the action of two men marrying, thus disproving the concept that it doesn't effect anyone else.
If you want to defend it's lack of extraneous effect, stop forcing people to be effected.
He wasn’t forced to do anything. The court ruled in his favor albeit very narrowly.

by Sundiata » Mon Sep 07, 2020 9:19 pm
Jedi Council wrote:Why does God care who you do it with?

by New haven america » Mon Sep 07, 2020 9:19 pm

by Heloin » Mon Sep 07, 2020 9:19 pm

by Crockerland » Mon Sep 07, 2020 9:20 pm
Jedi Council wrote:Cekoviu wrote:relationships don't happen in a vacuum. gay marriage is ok not just because it's between two consenting adults, but because its effects on wider society aren't negative, and that has to be acknowledged as well. things like bdsm and pornography might be between consenting individuals, but are still overall harmful.
How are BDSM or pornography harmful, provided the participants are consenting adults?
Evidence suggests that, in some settings, a significant proportion of young transgender women engage in selling sex. This is often a result of social exclusion, economic vulnerability and difficulty in finding employment (11). In El Salvador, close to 47% of transgender women reported that their main income comes from selling sex (12). Selling sex has been significantly associated with low levels of education, homelessness, drug use and a perceived lack of social support

by Telconi » Mon Sep 07, 2020 9:20 pm

by Sundiata » Mon Sep 07, 2020 9:21 pm

by -SARS- » Mon Sep 07, 2020 9:23 pm
Heloin wrote:Sundiata wrote:Why would I? It's a blessing to be in their company, the company of any woman really.
The Mother Superior at the Catholic school I went to as a kid was a swearing Afrikaner in her late 80s who said she didn't care which of us turned out gay, so long as you memorised the fucking prayers you'd turn out alright. She also punched a homophobic American missionary.


by Sundiata » Mon Sep 07, 2020 9:24 pm
Heloin wrote:Sundiata wrote:Why would I? It's a blessing to be in their company, the company of any woman really.
The Mother Superior at the Catholic school I went to as a kid was a swearing Afrikaner in her late 80s who said she didn't care which of us turned out gay, so long as you memorised the fucking prayers you'd turn out alright. She also punched a homophobic American missionary.
by Jedi Council » Mon Sep 07, 2020 9:25 pm
Sundiata wrote:Jedi Council wrote:Why does God care who you do it with?
Because sex within the bounds of the matrimonial sacrament consummates a marriage. To be married is to be open to the following things: intimacy, struggle, child-bearing, and God's love. It's to become one flesh with one's spouse and share in the mystery that is God's love for us all.
The Huskar Social Union wrote:Jedi Council is in fact, the big gay... The lord of all gays.

by San Lumen » Mon Sep 07, 2020 9:25 pm
Crockerland wrote:Jedi Council wrote:How are BDSM or pornography harmful, provided the participants are consenting adults?
If we are talking about corporate porn involving paid "actors" (prostitutes), that could be harmful as in many cases. There is no real difference between corporate pornography and prostitution, which is criminalized for good reason in most countries, aside from that one is filmed. Said prostitution relies on the victimization of impoverished women - whose choices are to either go homeless and sleep on the street (where they will likely face the threat of physical violence, rape, robbery, etc. daily) or be so-called sex "workers."
This especially affects disadvantaged groups such as transgender individuals, as explained by the Joint United Nations Programme on HIV/AIDS:Evidence suggests that, in some settings, a significant proportion of young transgender women engage in selling sex. This is often a result of social exclusion, economic vulnerability and difficulty in finding employment (11). In El Salvador, close to 47% of transgender women reported that their main income comes from selling sex (12). Selling sex has been significantly associated with low levels of education, homelessness, drug use and a perceived lack of social support
A predator targeting destitute women for his own sexual gratification seems like a harmful situation to me. If it's filmed and that predator is calling himself a "director" I can't say I think that changes much. Much like a man getting a woman drunk or high before having his way with her, we would recognize that this is a situation where, although consent has been given, this consent is given under such circumstances so as to make the dynamic between the two parties a one-sided and predatory one.
However, there are other things we might refer to as porn which are not harmful. There's nothing wrong with a couple having sex and deciding to film it, or share that recording with whoever they like. Things like erotic literature, drawings, and statues are also non-harmful, and would be protected under the Freedom of Expression.

by New haven america » Mon Sep 07, 2020 9:25 pm
Sundiata wrote:Heloin wrote:The Mother Superior at the Catholic school I went to as a kid was a swearing Afrikaner in her late 80s who said she didn't care which of us turned out gay, so long as you memorised the fucking prayers you'd turn out alright. She also punched a homophobic American missionary.
While she is standing up for what is right there's a beauty in that. However, I don't condone of violence or homophobia. I'm glad she didn't stand for the latter.

by Telconi » Mon Sep 07, 2020 9:26 pm

by Neutraligon » Mon Sep 07, 2020 9:27 pm

by Telconi » Mon Sep 07, 2020 9:28 pm
San Lumen wrote:Crockerland wrote:If we are talking about corporate porn involving paid "actors" (prostitutes), that could be harmful as in many cases. There is no real difference between corporate pornography and prostitution, which is criminalized for good reason in most countries, aside from that one is filmed. Said prostitution relies on the victimization of impoverished women - whose choices are to either go homeless and sleep on the street (where they will likely face the threat of physical violence, rape, robbery, etc. daily) or be so-called sex "workers."
This especially affects disadvantaged groups such as transgender individuals, as explained by the Joint United Nations Programme on HIV/AIDS:Evidence suggests that, in some settings, a significant proportion of young transgender women engage in selling sex. This is often a result of social exclusion, economic vulnerability and difficulty in finding employment (11). In El Salvador, close to 47% of transgender women reported that their main income comes from selling sex (12). Selling sex has been significantly associated with low levels of education, homelessness, drug use and a perceived lack of social support
A predator targeting destitute women for his own sexual gratification seems like a harmful situation to me. If it's filmed and that predator is calling himself a "director" I can't say I think that changes much. Much like a man getting a woman drunk or high before having his way with her, we would recognize that this is a situation where, although consent has been given, this consent is given under such circumstances so as to make the dynamic between the two parties a one-sided and predatory one.
However, there are other things we might refer to as porn which are not harmful. There's nothing wrong with a couple having sex and deciding to film it, or share that recording with whoever they like. Things like erotic literature, drawings, and statues are also non-harmful, and would be protected under the Freedom of Expression.
You clearly know nothing about the industry. Good studios pay their actors well and treat them well and are working for them under their on free will. They can leave at any time. What harm is being done if they are working there because they want too? This is better suited for its on thread though.

by Neutraligon » Mon Sep 07, 2020 9:28 pm

by Telconi » Mon Sep 07, 2020 9:30 pm

Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Emotional Support Crocodile, Spirit of Hope
Advertisement