NATION

PASSWORD

Opinion On Same-Sex Marriage

For discussion and debate about anything. (Not a roleplay related forum; out-of-character commentary only.)

Advertisement

Remove ads

Opinion On Same-Sex Marriage

Legal
162
79%
Illegal
32
16%
Abstain/ Unsure
12
6%
 
Total votes : 206

User avatar
San Lumen
Post Kaiser
 
Posts: 81228
Founded: Jul 02, 2009
Liberal Democratic Socialists

Postby San Lumen » Mon Sep 07, 2020 9:08 pm

Telconi wrote:
San Lumen wrote:You have any evidence of that absurd claim?


Sure do!

Was he forced to marry another man? The answer is no therefore I fail to see your point.

User avatar
New haven america
Post Czar
 
Posts: 43454
Founded: Oct 08, 2012
Left-Leaning College State

Postby New haven america » Mon Sep 07, 2020 9:09 pm

Sundiata wrote:
New haven america wrote:You cry over virginal women in their 70's?

... Whatever floats your boat I guess.

Not every religious sister is an older woman, those who do fit that description nonetheless are still very beautiful. Any woman who resembles Our Lady is a tear-inducing sight.

Have you considered therapy?
Human of the male variety
Will accept TGs
Char/Axis 2024

That's all folks~

User avatar
Jedi Council
Senator
 
Posts: 4139
Founded: Jan 01, 2018
Anarchy

Postby Jedi Council » Mon Sep 07, 2020 9:11 pm

Sundiata wrote:
New haven america wrote:You cry over virginal women in their 70's?

... Whatever floats your boat I guess.

Not every religious sister is an older woman, those who do fit that description nonetheless are still very beautiful. Any woman who resembles Our Lady is a tear-inducing sight.

Including the many who abused children, both physically, mentally, and sexually, or those that covered up for the crimes of others. Yes, I too would shed a tear if I ever met such monsters.
Sundiata wrote:
Geneviev wrote:God creates homosexuality, but I don't think you believe that he is capable of creating sin.

Homosexuality is not sinful. In fact, sexuality in general is not sinful. It's sexual acts contrary to or outside of the sacrament of matrimony that are sinful.


Why?

Why are sexual acts sinful? It's an act of biology, as natural as eating or shitting. Why must is occur specifically within a certain set of rules? Why does God care who you do it with?
Last edited by Jedi Council on Mon Sep 07, 2020 9:11 pm, edited 1 time in total.
New Liberal | Humanist
Surfing NS Since 2013
The Huskar Social Union wrote:Jedi Council is in fact, the big gay... The lord of all gays.

User avatar
Sundiata
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 9755
Founded: Sep 27, 2019
Ex-Nation

Postby Sundiata » Mon Sep 07, 2020 9:12 pm

New haven america wrote:
Sundiata wrote:Not every religious sister is an older woman, those who do fit that description nonetheless are still very beautiful. Any woman who resembles Our Lady is a tear-inducing sight.

Have you considered therapy?

Why would I? It's a blessing to be in their company, the company of any woman really.
Last edited by Sundiata on Mon Sep 07, 2020 9:13 pm, edited 1 time in total.
"Don't say, 'That person bothers me.' Think: 'That person sanctifies me.'"
-St. Josemaria Escriva

User avatar
Telconi
Post Czar
 
Posts: 34903
Founded: Oct 08, 2016
Ex-Nation

Postby Telconi » Mon Sep 07, 2020 9:13 pm

San Lumen wrote:
Telconi wrote:
Sure do!

Was he forced to marry another man? The answer is no therefore I fail to see your point.


The things that you fail to see aren't relevant. He was forced to contribute to the action of two men marrying, thus disproving the concept that it doesn't effect anyone else.

If you want to defend it's lack of extraneous effect, stop forcing people to be effected.
-2.25 LEFT
-3.23 LIBERTARIAN

PRO:
-Weapons Rights
-Gender Equality
-LGBTQ Rights
-Racial Equality
-Religious Freedom
-Freedom of Speech
-Freedom of Association
-Life
-Limited Government
-Non Interventionism
-Labor Unions
-Environmental Protections
ANTI:
-Racism
-Sexism
-Bigotry In All Forms
-Government Overreach
-Government Surveillance
-Freedom For Security Social Transactions
-Unnecessary Taxes
-Excessively Specific Government Programs
-Foreign Entanglements
-Religious Extremism
-Fascists Masquerading as "Social Justice Warriors"

"The Constitution is NOT an instrument for the government to restrain the people,it is an instrument for the people to restrain the government-- lest it come to dominate our lives and interests." ~ Patrick Henry

User avatar
New haven america
Post Czar
 
Posts: 43454
Founded: Oct 08, 2012
Left-Leaning College State

Postby New haven america » Mon Sep 07, 2020 9:14 pm

Sundiata wrote:
New haven america wrote:Have you considered therapy?

Why would I? It's a blessing to be in their company as well as the company of any woman.

All I'm saying is that if you start crying at the very sight of a nun then there's probably an underlying issue that should be looked at.
Human of the male variety
Will accept TGs
Char/Axis 2024

That's all folks~

User avatar
Jedi Council
Senator
 
Posts: 4139
Founded: Jan 01, 2018
Anarchy

Postby Jedi Council » Mon Sep 07, 2020 9:14 pm

Sundiata wrote:
New haven america wrote:Have you considered therapy?

Why would I? It's a blessing to be in their company, the company of any woman really.

Tell that to the multitudes they abused.
New Liberal | Humanist
Surfing NS Since 2013
The Huskar Social Union wrote:Jedi Council is in fact, the big gay... The lord of all gays.

User avatar
San Lumen
Post Kaiser
 
Posts: 81228
Founded: Jul 02, 2009
Liberal Democratic Socialists

Postby San Lumen » Mon Sep 07, 2020 9:16 pm

Telconi wrote:
San Lumen wrote:Was he forced to marry another man? The answer is no therefore I fail to see your point.


The things that you fail to see aren't relevant. He was forced to contribute to the action of two men marrying, thus disproving the concept that it doesn't effect anyone else.

If you want to defend it's lack of extraneous effect, stop forcing people to be effected.

He wasn’t forced to do anything. The court ruled in his favor albeit very narrowly.

User avatar
Telconi
Post Czar
 
Posts: 34903
Founded: Oct 08, 2016
Ex-Nation

Postby Telconi » Mon Sep 07, 2020 9:17 pm

San Lumen wrote:
Telconi wrote:
The things that you fail to see aren't relevant. He was forced to contribute to the action of two men marrying, thus disproving the concept that it doesn't effect anyone else.

If you want to defend it's lack of extraneous effect, stop forcing people to be effected.

He wasn’t forced to do anything. The court ruled in his favor albeit very narrowly.


So you agree with the court in that instance?
-2.25 LEFT
-3.23 LIBERTARIAN

PRO:
-Weapons Rights
-Gender Equality
-LGBTQ Rights
-Racial Equality
-Religious Freedom
-Freedom of Speech
-Freedom of Association
-Life
-Limited Government
-Non Interventionism
-Labor Unions
-Environmental Protections
ANTI:
-Racism
-Sexism
-Bigotry In All Forms
-Government Overreach
-Government Surveillance
-Freedom For Security Social Transactions
-Unnecessary Taxes
-Excessively Specific Government Programs
-Foreign Entanglements
-Religious Extremism
-Fascists Masquerading as "Social Justice Warriors"

"The Constitution is NOT an instrument for the government to restrain the people,it is an instrument for the people to restrain the government-- lest it come to dominate our lives and interests." ~ Patrick Henry

User avatar
Sundiata
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 9755
Founded: Sep 27, 2019
Ex-Nation

Postby Sundiata » Mon Sep 07, 2020 9:19 pm

Jedi Council wrote:Why does God care who you do it with?

Because sex within the bounds of the matrimonial sacrament consummates a marriage. To be married is to be open to the following things: intimacy, struggle, child-bearing, and God's love. It's to become one flesh with one's spouse and share in the mystery that is God's love for us all.
"Don't say, 'That person bothers me.' Think: 'That person sanctifies me.'"
-St. Josemaria Escriva

User avatar
New haven america
Post Czar
 
Posts: 43454
Founded: Oct 08, 2012
Left-Leaning College State

Postby New haven america » Mon Sep 07, 2020 9:19 pm

Telconi wrote:
San Lumen wrote:He wasn’t forced to do anything. The court ruled in his favor albeit very narrowly.


So you agree with the court in that instance?

Nope.

A public business is open to the public. If he didn't want to serve them then he should've opened a bakery club, as clubs are still sadly legally allowed to discriminate.
Human of the male variety
Will accept TGs
Char/Axis 2024

That's all folks~

User avatar
Heloin
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 26091
Founded: Mar 30, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Heloin » Mon Sep 07, 2020 9:19 pm

Sundiata wrote:
New haven america wrote:Have you considered therapy?

Why would I? It's a blessing to be in their company, the company of any woman really.

The Mother Superior at the Catholic school I went to as a kid was a swearing Afrikaner in her late 80s who said she didn't care which of us turned out gay, so long as you memorised the fucking prayers you'd turn out alright. She also punched a homophobic American missionary.

User avatar
Crockerland
Negotiator
 
Posts: 5456
Founded: Oct 15, 2015
Ex-Nation

Postby Crockerland » Mon Sep 07, 2020 9:20 pm

Jedi Council wrote:
Cekoviu wrote:relationships don't happen in a vacuum. gay marriage is ok not just because it's between two consenting adults, but because its effects on wider society aren't negative, and that has to be acknowledged as well. things like bdsm and pornography might be between consenting individuals, but are still overall harmful.

How are BDSM or pornography harmful, provided the participants are consenting adults?

If we are talking about corporate porn involving paid "actors" (prostitutes), that could be harmful as in many cases. There is no real difference between corporate pornography and prostitution, which is criminalized for good reason in most countries, aside from that one is filmed. Said prostitution relies on the victimization of impoverished women - whose choices are to either go homeless and sleep on the street (where they will likely face the threat of physical violence, rape, robbery, etc. daily) or be so-called sex "workers."

This especially affects disadvantaged groups such as transgender individuals, as explained by the Joint United Nations Programme on HIV/AIDS:
Evidence suggests that, in some settings, a significant proportion of young transgender women engage in selling sex. This is often a result of social exclusion, economic vulnerability and difficulty in finding employment (11). In El Salvador, close to 47% of transgender women reported that their main income comes from selling sex (12). Selling sex has been significantly associated with low levels of education, homelessness, drug use and a perceived lack of social support


A predator targeting destitute women for his own sexual gratification seems like a harmful situation to me. If it's filmed and that predator is calling himself a "director" I can't say I think that changes much. Much like a man getting a woman drunk or high before having his way with her, we would recognize that this is a situation where, although consent has been given, this consent is given under such circumstances so as to make the dynamic between the two parties a one-sided and predatory one.


However, there are other things we might refer to as porn which are not harmful. There's nothing wrong with a couple having sex and deciding to film it, or share that recording with whoever they like. Things like erotic literature, drawings, and statues are also non-harmful, and would be protected under the Freedom of Expression.
Free Taiwan, Hong Kong, and Tibet.
Gay not Queer / Why Abortion is Genocide / End Gay Erasure
PROUD SUPPORTER OF:
National Liberalism, Nuclear & Geothermal Power, GMOs, Vaccines, Biodiesel, LGBTIA equality, Universal Healthcare, Universal Basic Income, Constitutional Carry, Emotional Support Twinks, Right to Life


User avatar
Telconi
Post Czar
 
Posts: 34903
Founded: Oct 08, 2016
Ex-Nation

Postby Telconi » Mon Sep 07, 2020 9:20 pm

New haven america wrote:
Telconi wrote:
So you agree with the court in that instance?

Nope.

A public business is open to the public. If he didn't want to serve them then he should've opened a bakery club, as clubs are still sadly legally allowed to discriminate.


Well I didn't expect better, you're seemingly saddened by all things decent.
-2.25 LEFT
-3.23 LIBERTARIAN

PRO:
-Weapons Rights
-Gender Equality
-LGBTQ Rights
-Racial Equality
-Religious Freedom
-Freedom of Speech
-Freedom of Association
-Life
-Limited Government
-Non Interventionism
-Labor Unions
-Environmental Protections
ANTI:
-Racism
-Sexism
-Bigotry In All Forms
-Government Overreach
-Government Surveillance
-Freedom For Security Social Transactions
-Unnecessary Taxes
-Excessively Specific Government Programs
-Foreign Entanglements
-Religious Extremism
-Fascists Masquerading as "Social Justice Warriors"

"The Constitution is NOT an instrument for the government to restrain the people,it is an instrument for the people to restrain the government-- lest it come to dominate our lives and interests." ~ Patrick Henry

User avatar
Sundiata
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 9755
Founded: Sep 27, 2019
Ex-Nation

Postby Sundiata » Mon Sep 07, 2020 9:21 pm

New haven america wrote:
Sundiata wrote:Why would I? It's a blessing to be in their company as well as the company of any woman.

All I'm saying is that if you start crying at the very sight of a nun then there's probably an underlying issue that should be looked at.

When you come to understand the beauty of Mary you'll come to realize how how blessed they are, and in turn, all women too.
"Don't say, 'That person bothers me.' Think: 'That person sanctifies me.'"
-St. Josemaria Escriva

User avatar
-SARS-
Diplomat
 
Posts: 501
Founded: May 02, 2020
Ex-Nation

Postby -SARS- » Mon Sep 07, 2020 9:23 pm

Heloin wrote:
Sundiata wrote:Why would I? It's a blessing to be in their company, the company of any woman really.

The Mother Superior at the Catholic school I went to as a kid was a swearing Afrikaner in her late 80s who said she didn't care which of us turned out gay, so long as you memorised the fucking prayers you'd turn out alright. She also punched a homophobic American missionary.


That sounds kind of awesome, actually. :lol:
This nation is made with pure 100% all-natural SARS. Non-GMO, gluten-free, and ZERO ADDED SUGAR!

User avatar
Sundiata
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 9755
Founded: Sep 27, 2019
Ex-Nation

Postby Sundiata » Mon Sep 07, 2020 9:24 pm

Heloin wrote:
Sundiata wrote:Why would I? It's a blessing to be in their company, the company of any woman really.

The Mother Superior at the Catholic school I went to as a kid was a swearing Afrikaner in her late 80s who said she didn't care which of us turned out gay, so long as you memorised the fucking prayers you'd turn out alright. She also punched a homophobic American missionary.

While she is standing up for what is right there's a beauty in that. However, I don't condone of violence or homophobia. I'm glad she didn't stand for the latter.
"Don't say, 'That person bothers me.' Think: 'That person sanctifies me.'"
-St. Josemaria Escriva

User avatar
Jedi Council
Senator
 
Posts: 4139
Founded: Jan 01, 2018
Anarchy

Postby Jedi Council » Mon Sep 07, 2020 9:25 pm

Sundiata wrote:
Jedi Council wrote:Why does God care who you do it with?

Because sex within the bounds of the matrimonial sacrament consummates a marriage. To be married is to be open to the following things: intimacy, struggle, child-bearing, and God's love. It's to become one flesh with one's spouse and share in the mystery that is God's love for us all.


Ah so just metaphysical nonsense then, gotcha
New Liberal | Humanist
Surfing NS Since 2013
The Huskar Social Union wrote:Jedi Council is in fact, the big gay... The lord of all gays.

User avatar
San Lumen
Post Kaiser
 
Posts: 81228
Founded: Jul 02, 2009
Liberal Democratic Socialists

Postby San Lumen » Mon Sep 07, 2020 9:25 pm

Crockerland wrote:
Jedi Council wrote:How are BDSM or pornography harmful, provided the participants are consenting adults?

If we are talking about corporate porn involving paid "actors" (prostitutes), that could be harmful as in many cases. There is no real difference between corporate pornography and prostitution, which is criminalized for good reason in most countries, aside from that one is filmed. Said prostitution relies on the victimization of impoverished women - whose choices are to either go homeless and sleep on the street (where they will likely face the threat of physical violence, rape, robbery, etc. daily) or be so-called sex "workers."

This especially affects disadvantaged groups such as transgender individuals, as explained by the Joint United Nations Programme on HIV/AIDS:
Evidence suggests that, in some settings, a significant proportion of young transgender women engage in selling sex. This is often a result of social exclusion, economic vulnerability and difficulty in finding employment (11). In El Salvador, close to 47% of transgender women reported that their main income comes from selling sex (12). Selling sex has been significantly associated with low levels of education, homelessness, drug use and a perceived lack of social support


A predator targeting destitute women for his own sexual gratification seems like a harmful situation to me. If it's filmed and that predator is calling himself a "director" I can't say I think that changes much. Much like a man getting a woman drunk or high before having his way with her, we would recognize that this is a situation where, although consent has been given, this consent is given under such circumstances so as to make the dynamic between the two parties a one-sided and predatory one.


However, there are other things we might refer to as porn which are not harmful. There's nothing wrong with a couple having sex and deciding to film it, or share that recording with whoever they like. Things like erotic literature, drawings, and statues are also non-harmful, and would be protected under the Freedom of Expression.

You clearly know nothing about the industry. Good studios pay their actors well and treat them well and are working for them under their on free will. They can leave at any time. What harm is being done if they are working there because they want too? This is better suited for its on thread though.

User avatar
New haven america
Post Czar
 
Posts: 43454
Founded: Oct 08, 2012
Left-Leaning College State

Postby New haven america » Mon Sep 07, 2020 9:25 pm

Sundiata wrote:
Heloin wrote:The Mother Superior at the Catholic school I went to as a kid was a swearing Afrikaner in her late 80s who said she didn't care which of us turned out gay, so long as you memorised the fucking prayers you'd turn out alright. She also punched a homophobic American missionary.

While she is standing up for what is right there's a beauty in that. However, I don't condone of violence or homophobia. I'm glad she didn't stand for the latter.

Well except you do because you don't believe LGBT should be allowed to get married.
Human of the male variety
Will accept TGs
Char/Axis 2024

That's all folks~

User avatar
Telconi
Post Czar
 
Posts: 34903
Founded: Oct 08, 2016
Ex-Nation

Postby Telconi » Mon Sep 07, 2020 9:26 pm

New haven america wrote:
Sundiata wrote:While she is standing up for what is right there's a beauty in that. However, I don't condone of violence or homophobia. I'm glad she didn't stand for the latter.

Well except you do because you don't believe LGBT should be allowed to get married.


"Phobia" means "fear", not "Thinks this thing ought not get married"
-2.25 LEFT
-3.23 LIBERTARIAN

PRO:
-Weapons Rights
-Gender Equality
-LGBTQ Rights
-Racial Equality
-Religious Freedom
-Freedom of Speech
-Freedom of Association
-Life
-Limited Government
-Non Interventionism
-Labor Unions
-Environmental Protections
ANTI:
-Racism
-Sexism
-Bigotry In All Forms
-Government Overreach
-Government Surveillance
-Freedom For Security Social Transactions
-Unnecessary Taxes
-Excessively Specific Government Programs
-Foreign Entanglements
-Religious Extremism
-Fascists Masquerading as "Social Justice Warriors"

"The Constitution is NOT an instrument for the government to restrain the people,it is an instrument for the people to restrain the government-- lest it come to dominate our lives and interests." ~ Patrick Henry

User avatar
Neutraligon
Game Moderator
 
Posts: 40510
Founded: Oct 01, 2011
New York Times Democracy

Postby Neutraligon » Mon Sep 07, 2020 9:27 pm

Sundiata wrote:
New haven america wrote:All I'm saying is that if you start crying at the very sight of a nun then there's probably an underlying issue that should be looked at.

When you come to understand the beauty of Mary you'll come to realize how how blessed they are, and in turn, all women too.

Since Mary is long dead, if she ever existed, I doubt I will ever "see her beauty" nor do I see what her looks/personality has to do with SSM.
If you want to call me by a nickname, call me Gon...or NS Batman.
Mod stuff: One Stop Rules Shop | Reppy's Sig Workshop | Getting Help Request
Just A Little though

User avatar
Telconi
Post Czar
 
Posts: 34903
Founded: Oct 08, 2016
Ex-Nation

Postby Telconi » Mon Sep 07, 2020 9:28 pm

San Lumen wrote:
Crockerland wrote:If we are talking about corporate porn involving paid "actors" (prostitutes), that could be harmful as in many cases. There is no real difference between corporate pornography and prostitution, which is criminalized for good reason in most countries, aside from that one is filmed. Said prostitution relies on the victimization of impoverished women - whose choices are to either go homeless and sleep on the street (where they will likely face the threat of physical violence, rape, robbery, etc. daily) or be so-called sex "workers."

This especially affects disadvantaged groups such as transgender individuals, as explained by the Joint United Nations Programme on HIV/AIDS:
Evidence suggests that, in some settings, a significant proportion of young transgender women engage in selling sex. This is often a result of social exclusion, economic vulnerability and difficulty in finding employment (11). In El Salvador, close to 47% of transgender women reported that their main income comes from selling sex (12). Selling sex has been significantly associated with low levels of education, homelessness, drug use and a perceived lack of social support


A predator targeting destitute women for his own sexual gratification seems like a harmful situation to me. If it's filmed and that predator is calling himself a "director" I can't say I think that changes much. Much like a man getting a woman drunk or high before having his way with her, we would recognize that this is a situation where, although consent has been given, this consent is given under such circumstances so as to make the dynamic between the two parties a one-sided and predatory one.


However, there are other things we might refer to as porn which are not harmful. There's nothing wrong with a couple having sex and deciding to film it, or share that recording with whoever they like. Things like erotic literature, drawings, and statues are also non-harmful, and would be protected under the Freedom of Expression.

You clearly know nothing about the industry. Good studios pay their actors well and treat them well and are working for them under their on free will. They can leave at any time. What harm is being done if they are working there because they want too? This is better suited for its on thread though.


The fact that possibly the single most famous pornographic actor is presently on trial for literally dozens of incidents where he abused his co-workers seems to indicate otherwise.
-2.25 LEFT
-3.23 LIBERTARIAN

PRO:
-Weapons Rights
-Gender Equality
-LGBTQ Rights
-Racial Equality
-Religious Freedom
-Freedom of Speech
-Freedom of Association
-Life
-Limited Government
-Non Interventionism
-Labor Unions
-Environmental Protections
ANTI:
-Racism
-Sexism
-Bigotry In All Forms
-Government Overreach
-Government Surveillance
-Freedom For Security Social Transactions
-Unnecessary Taxes
-Excessively Specific Government Programs
-Foreign Entanglements
-Religious Extremism
-Fascists Masquerading as "Social Justice Warriors"

"The Constitution is NOT an instrument for the government to restrain the people,it is an instrument for the people to restrain the government-- lest it come to dominate our lives and interests." ~ Patrick Henry

User avatar
Neutraligon
Game Moderator
 
Posts: 40510
Founded: Oct 01, 2011
New York Times Democracy

Postby Neutraligon » Mon Sep 07, 2020 9:28 pm

Telconi wrote:
New haven america wrote:Well except you do because you don't believe LGBT should be allowed to get married.


"Phobia" means "fear", not "Thinks this thing ought not get married"

Hydrophobic does not mean a substance fears water.
If you want to call me by a nickname, call me Gon...or NS Batman.
Mod stuff: One Stop Rules Shop | Reppy's Sig Workshop | Getting Help Request
Just A Little though

User avatar
Telconi
Post Czar
 
Posts: 34903
Founded: Oct 08, 2016
Ex-Nation

Postby Telconi » Mon Sep 07, 2020 9:30 pm

Neutraligon wrote:
Telconi wrote:
"Phobia" means "fear", not "Thinks this thing ought not get married"

Hydrophobic does not mean a substance fears water.


It also doesn't mean that water ought not get married. :roll:
-2.25 LEFT
-3.23 LIBERTARIAN

PRO:
-Weapons Rights
-Gender Equality
-LGBTQ Rights
-Racial Equality
-Religious Freedom
-Freedom of Speech
-Freedom of Association
-Life
-Limited Government
-Non Interventionism
-Labor Unions
-Environmental Protections
ANTI:
-Racism
-Sexism
-Bigotry In All Forms
-Government Overreach
-Government Surveillance
-Freedom For Security Social Transactions
-Unnecessary Taxes
-Excessively Specific Government Programs
-Foreign Entanglements
-Religious Extremism
-Fascists Masquerading as "Social Justice Warriors"

"The Constitution is NOT an instrument for the government to restrain the people,it is an instrument for the people to restrain the government-- lest it come to dominate our lives and interests." ~ Patrick Henry

PreviousNext

Advertisement

Remove ads

Return to General

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Emotional Support Crocodile, Spirit of Hope

Advertisement

Remove ads