I am channelling my inner spoon
Advertisement

by The Huskar Social Union » Tue Sep 22, 2020 9:19 am

by CoraSpia » Tue Sep 22, 2020 9:19 am

by Celritannia » Tue Sep 22, 2020 9:22 am
Oot Land wrote:Its because of refugees and immagration the Uk left the EU
My DeviantArt Obey When you annoy a Celritannian U W0T M8?
| Citizen of Earth, Commonwealthian, European, British, Yorkshireman. Atheist, Environmentalist, Pansexual, Left-Libertarian. |

by Fartsniffage » Tue Sep 22, 2020 9:31 am
The Huskar Social Union wrote:Fartsniffage wrote:
Huskar is currently standing outside number 10 holding a sign that says "Come and have a go if you think you're hard enough!".
I am channelling my inner spoon

by Hurdergaryp » Tue Sep 22, 2020 9:32 am

by Dumb Ideologies » Tue Sep 22, 2020 9:33 am
Oot Land wrote:Its because of refugees and immagration the Uk left the EU

by The Huskar Social Union » Tue Sep 22, 2020 9:35 am
Fartsniffage wrote:The Huskar Social Union wrote:I am channelling my inner spoon
I love that movie to the point that I even know where I was on the weekend it was set.

by The Blaatschapen » Tue Sep 22, 2020 10:26 am
An Alan Smithee Nation wrote:No government wants to lose votes by being the ones who ruined Christmas. It's not about religion, or discrimination, it is about votes, the retail economy, and public morale.

by Kowani » Tue Sep 22, 2020 10:41 am
Abolitionism in the North has leagued itself with Radical Democracy, and so the Slave Power was forced to ally itself with the Money Power; that is the great fact of the age.

by CoraSpia » Tue Sep 22, 2020 12:04 pm

by Fartsniffage » Tue Sep 22, 2020 12:59 pm
Dumb Ideologies wrote:Oot Land wrote:Its because of refugees and immagration the Uk left the EU
Right only in the sense that our leaders (especially His Tonyness around the time of the accession of the Eastern European states) used "the EU" as their excuse for not limiting immigration. In reality we were perfectly entitled to limit the number of Poles, Romanians etc who came but our politicians lied to us. It's very convenient to take the GDP benefits while going "oh no, our hands our tied" whenever anyone talks about the employment, housing, and socio-cultural issues caused by a laissez-faire approach to these things.
Then Dave decided to try to make political capital out of people's frustration and completely failed to effectively challenge the opposing narrative, being as he was Blair 2.0 with all the vapid lack of substance that comes with that.
The public narrative on Brexit is crayon-smear childish because the government has been deliberately infantilising the electorate for decades. We're sitting around noisily shaking our rattles and screaming when the only sound should be the rhythmic thump of guillotines outside the House of Commons.
Just in case someone wants to report that, let me clarify that the guillotines might be cutting delicious cake to serve to our current and former MPs. Maybe that serving will be forcible and maybe the cake might contain poison. Who knows? It's an unpredictable world out there

by Ostroeuropa » Tue Sep 22, 2020 3:19 pm

by CoraSpia » Tue Sep 22, 2020 3:56 pm
Ostroeuropa wrote:Starmer and his crew pushing patriotism and arguing we need to put British interests first has set off the twitter mob.
The Labour reddits and forums are divided between people arguing this is pandering to the far-right and whining about colonialism/imperialism, saying britain is unlikable and we should be ashamed of it, saying patriotism is irrational and stupid (but their anti-patriotism somehow isn't), and people agreeing with Starmer and arguing that the former group needs to just cope and that they're absolutely toxic, the reason we keep losing and so on, as well as advancing arguments for patriotism etc.
It's a positive shift provided Starmer keeps at it. A good step in the right direction on sociocultural issues, my estimation of him has risen considerably.

by CoraSpia » Tue Sep 22, 2020 3:59 pm

by Salandriagado » Tue Sep 22, 2020 11:32 pm
The Nihilistic view wrote:So question. Given all this opposition to fines displayed here should all fines for any crime be replaced with custodial sentences for fairness?

by Salandriagado » Tue Sep 22, 2020 11:33 pm
The New California Republic wrote:Philjia wrote:Scotland is banning people from different households meeting inside. The measure was already in place in Glasgow but will now be extended to the whole country.
There are only a few exceptions, such as grandparents looking after kids, and noncohabiting couples.

by An Alan Smithee Nation » Wed Sep 23, 2020 12:09 am

by The New California Republic » Wed Sep 23, 2020 12:25 am
Salandriagado wrote:The New California Republic wrote:There are only a few exceptions, such as grandparents looking after kids, and noncohabiting couples.
Grandparents being an exception is so bloody stupid. They're the last people you want doing childcare. Hell, I've got a general offer out to provide childcare to anybody I know who would otherwise rely on grandparents.

by Chan Island » Wed Sep 23, 2020 1:55 am
Ostroeuropa wrote:Starmer and his crew pushing patriotism and arguing we need to put British interests first has set off the twitter mob.
The Labour reddits and forums are divided between people arguing this is pandering to the far-right and whining about colonialism/imperialism, saying britain is unlikable and we should be ashamed of it, saying patriotism is irrational and stupid (but their anti-patriotism somehow isn't), and people agreeing with Starmer and arguing that the former group needs to just cope and that they're absolutely toxic, the reason we keep losing and so on, as well as advancing arguments for patriotism etc.
It's a positive shift provided Starmer keeps at it. A good step in the right direction on sociocultural issues, my estimation of him has risen considerably.
Conserative Morality wrote:"It's not time yet" is a tactic used by reactionaries in every era. "It's not time for democracy, it's not time for capitalism, it's not time for emancipation." Of course it's not time. It's never time, not on its own. You make it time. If you're under fire in the no-man's land of WW1, you start digging a foxhole even if the ideal time would be when you *aren't* being bombarded, because once you wait for it to be 'time', other situations will need your attention, assuming you survive that long. If the fields aren't furrowed, plow them. If the iron is not hot, make it so. If society is not ready, change it.

by Salandriagado » Wed Sep 23, 2020 2:01 am
The New California Republic wrote:Salandriagado wrote:
Grandparents being an exception is so bloody stupid. They're the last people you want doing childcare. Hell, I've got a general offer out to provide childcare to anybody I know who would otherwise rely on grandparents.
...I'll mind not to forward your post to my mother, who regularly looks after my nephew, and a very good job she does of it too.

by Vassenor » Wed Sep 23, 2020 2:05 am
Ostroeuropa wrote:Starmer and his crew pushing patriotism and arguing we need to put British interests first has set off the twitter mob.
The Labour reddits and forums are divided between people arguing this is pandering to the far-right and whining about colonialism/imperialism, saying britain is unlikable and we should be ashamed of it, saying patriotism is irrational and stupid (but their anti-patriotism somehow isn't), and people agreeing with Starmer and arguing that the former group needs to just cope and that they're absolutely toxic, the reason we keep losing and so on, as well as advancing arguments for patriotism etc.
It's a positive shift provided Starmer keeps at it. A good step in the right direction on sociocultural issues, my estimation of him has risen considerably.

by CoraSpia » Wed Sep 23, 2020 2:18 am
Vassenor wrote:Ostroeuropa wrote:Starmer and his crew pushing patriotism and arguing we need to put British interests first has set off the twitter mob.
The Labour reddits and forums are divided between people arguing this is pandering to the far-right and whining about colonialism/imperialism, saying britain is unlikable and we should be ashamed of it, saying patriotism is irrational and stupid (but their anti-patriotism somehow isn't), and people agreeing with Starmer and arguing that the former group needs to just cope and that they're absolutely toxic, the reason we keep losing and so on, as well as advancing arguments for patriotism etc.
It's a positive shift provided Starmer keeps at it. A good step in the right direction on sociocultural issues, my estimation of him has risen considerably.
And what do you define as patriotism and what makes enforcing it so vital?

by Vassenor » Wed Sep 23, 2020 2:19 am

by CoraSpia » Wed Sep 23, 2020 2:29 am
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Adaure, American Legionaries, Based Illinois, Bradfordville, Cannot think of a name, Dakran, Dimetrodon Empire, Greater Cesnica, Insaanistan, La Xinga, Lord Dominator, Qingguo, Rusozak, Valyxias, Yugoz
Advertisement