Definitely Not Trumptonium wrote:The New California Republic wrote:"It's bad because in other countries it's different." Lol wut. UK laws apply to police officers in the UK, so mentioning what the speed limits are in other countries as if it's relevant is just stupid.
The police officers in this case broke that specific law when they were meant to be enforcing it. The ruling of gross misconduct is entirely justified.
I didn't say that UK police officers should enforce different countries speed limits. Are you even reading my post or not even bothering?
Your post was extremely thin on the whole content aspect, so why you even mentioned speed limits in other countries was odd, hence why I was pointing out why it isn't really relevant to this case.
Definitely Not Trumptonium wrote:The problem here is that a police officer lost his job because he went just 10mph over what he would get caught out by, and if it was a normal civilian, it would just be a minor fine. Moreover, the press and police report proclaim this to be a tragedy, whereas the real tragedy is that he wouldn't even be fined across the vast majority of Europe for travelling at 89mph, and in most relevant large countries, he would be entirely within the speed limit.
Again though who gives a shit what the speed limit is in other countries? It's not relevant. So again the fact you are treating it as if it's some really important point in relation to this case is just odd.













