Well, they’re Maoist, but the difference is very small, however it is there.
And have you ever heard of the Great Purge?
Advertisement
by Socialist States of Ludistan » Wed Aug 26, 2020 9:46 pm
by Stylan » Wed Aug 26, 2020 9:46 pm
Grenartia wrote:Socialist States of Ludistan wrote:As much as I like Bernie he doesn’t know anything about socialism nor communism, he just says dumb stuff that makes it harder for him to get elected.
Actually, the stuff he says is quite smart. More intelligent than what Trump spews on a daily basis, and even more intelligent than Biden. And shockingly, its made it easier for him to get elected. His only main obstacle to victory is the DNC establishment. Even among working class Republicans, he is well respected, and he has earned that respect without diverging a single iota from progressivism.Stylan wrote:
something something Stalin tried to step down and the party refused to let him four times something something
Yeah, he probably did it for show and had his goons hold the party's families at gunpoint or something. Just like that time he unpersoned the first man to stop clapping and sit down after he was introduced before a speech.In case of this actually happening, it would be very good, as the proles could revolt against their vanguard party and establish communism. Anyway that doesn't happen.
Doesn't happen because the party gets addicted to its own fucking power. You cannot squeeze communism or socialism out of fascism, not even red fascism.Because if Lenin lived 1000+ years with Stalin and co. the USSR would be a full communist state by 2070.
I very much doubt that.Mao almost reached full communism btw, would you like links on that?
No, because I already know it would be full of shit, just like the sources that say Kim Jong Il golfed a perfect game on his first try. And for the same reasons.
by Cisairse » Wed Aug 26, 2020 9:46 pm
by Socialist States of Ludistan » Wed Aug 26, 2020 9:47 pm
Cisairse wrote:Socialist States of Ludistan wrote:Have you turned into an anarchist now?
No; my post was meant to be interpreted philosophically, not literally.
In a liberal system, such as that which I espouse, every person is responsible for their own governance by virtue of being involved in decision making, even when their own absolute influence over policy may be small. In this sense, the generic "I" does govern the generic "myself," although via various state apparatus which implement actual policies. In this way, totalitarianism is avoided, but if such a situation arises (such as invasion) to require guidance over productive forces such guidance is available (assuming the populace as a whole would seek self-perpetuation over foreign annexation, which can be safely assumed).
by Stylan » Wed Aug 26, 2020 9:47 pm
Socialist States of Ludistan wrote:Cisairse wrote:No; my post was meant to be interpreted philosophically, not literally.
In a liberal system, such as that which I espouse, every person is responsible for their own governance by virtue of being involved in decision making, even when their own absolute influence over policy may be small. In this sense, the generic "I" does govern the generic "myself," although via various state apparatus which implement actual policies. In this way, totalitarianism is avoided, but if such a situation arises (such as invasion) to require guidance over productive forces such guidance is available (assuming the populace as a whole would seek self-perpetuation over foreign annexation, which can be safely assumed).
Listen, I agree with all that, I just want that without being communist.
by Cisairse » Wed Aug 26, 2020 9:48 pm
Socialist States of Ludistan wrote:Cisairse wrote:No; my post was meant to be interpreted philosophically, not literally.
In a liberal system, such as that which I espouse, every person is responsible for their own governance by virtue of being involved in decision making, even when their own absolute influence over policy may be small. In this sense, the generic "I" does govern the generic "myself," although via various state apparatus which implement actual policies. In this way, totalitarianism is avoided, but if such a situation arises (such as invasion) to require guidance over productive forces such guidance is available (assuming the populace as a whole would seek self-perpetuation over foreign annexation, which can be safely assumed).
Listen, I agree with all that, I just want that without being communist.
by Ravenstva » Wed Aug 26, 2020 9:49 pm
by Socialist States of Ludistan » Wed Aug 26, 2020 9:49 pm
Grenartia wrote:Socialist States of Ludistan wrote:As much as I like Bernie he doesn’t know anything about socialism nor communism, he just says dumb stuff that makes it harder for him to get elected.
Actually, the stuff he says is quite smart. More intelligent than what Trump spews on a daily basis, and even more intelligent than Biden. And shockingly, its made it easier for him to get elected. His only main obstacle to victory is the DNC establishment. Even among working class Republicans, he is well respected, and he has earned that respect without diverging a single iota from progressivism.Stylan wrote:
something something Stalin tried to step down and the party refused to let him four times something something
Yeah, he probably did it for show and had his goons hold the party's families at gunpoint or something. Just like that time he unpersoned the first man to stop clapping and sit down after he was introduced before a speech.In case of this actually happening, it would be very good, as the proles could revolt against their vanguard party and establish communism. Anyway that doesn't happen.
Doesn't happen because the party gets addicted to its own fucking power. You cannot squeeze communism or socialism out of fascism, not even red fascism.Because if Lenin lived 1000+ years with Stalin and co. the USSR would be a full communist state by 2070.
I very much doubt that.Mao almost reached full communism btw, would you like links on that?
No, because I already know it would be full of shit, just like the sources that say Kim Jong Il golfed a perfect game on his first try. And for the same reasons.
by Stylan » Wed Aug 26, 2020 9:50 pm
by Socialist States of Ludistan » Wed Aug 26, 2020 9:50 pm
by Socialist States of Ludistan » Wed Aug 26, 2020 9:52 pm
by Socialist States of Ludistan » Wed Aug 26, 2020 9:52 pm
by Ravenstva » Wed Aug 26, 2020 9:54 pm
Socialist States of Ludistan wrote:Ravenstva wrote:No they're Dengist, China suppresses Maoists in its own population.
And yes I have, have you ever heard of what communism is?
Yes, it’s an ideology that socialises consumption and production, and I like how you didn’t comment any further on the Great Purge, it’s ever Stalinists big weakness.
by Stylan » Wed Aug 26, 2020 9:54 pm
Socialist States of Ludistan wrote:Ravenstva wrote:No they're Dengist, China suppresses Maoists in its own population.
And yes I have, have you ever heard of what communism is?
Yes, it’s an ideology that socialises consumption and production, and I like how you didn’t comment any further on the Great Purge, it’s ever Stalinists big weakness.
by Stylan » Wed Aug 26, 2020 9:55 pm
Ravenstva wrote:Socialist States of Ludistan wrote:Yes, it’s an ideology that socialises consumption and production, and I like how you didn’t comment any further on the Great Purge, it’s ever Stalinists big weakness.
firstly, your definition is wrong.
secondly, I'm a Titoist but the purges were epic.
by Cisairse » Wed Aug 26, 2020 9:56 pm
by Socialist States of Ludistan » Wed Aug 26, 2020 9:58 pm
Stylan wrote:Socialist States of Ludistan wrote:Yes, it’s an ideology that socialises consumption and production, and I like how you didn’t comment any further on the Great Purge, it’s ever Stalinists big weakness.
I'm not a Stalinist but I defend Stalin.Socialist States of Ludistan wrote:Yes, but he said his way of thinking was the only way, so did Stalin and Hitler, although this person is nothing close to them.
I don't think Stalin said his way of thinking was the only way
Ravenstva wrote:Socialist States of Ludistan wrote:Yes, it’s an ideology that socialises consumption and production, and I like how you didn’t comment any further on the Great Purge, it’s ever Stalinists big weakness.
firstly, your definition is wrong.
secondly, I'm a Titoist but the purges were epic.
by Socialist States of Ludistan » Wed Aug 26, 2020 9:59 pm
Cisairse wrote:Socialist States of Ludistan wrote:You did it again, you said your way of thinking is the only right way of thinking, now, I don’t want to compare you to people like Hitler and Stalin, but...
Listen, I'm not going to restate hundreds of books each containing hundreds or thousands of pages to you, I'm just going to tell you to read them
Specifically Capital
by Ravenstva » Wed Aug 26, 2020 10:00 pm
by Kustonia » Wed Aug 26, 2020 10:00 pm
Cisairse wrote:Socialist States of Ludistan wrote:You did it again, you said your way of thinking is the only right way of thinking, now, I don’t want to compare you to people like Hitler and Stalin, but...
Listen, I'm not going to restate hundreds of books each containing hundreds or thousands of pages to you, I'm just going to tell you to read them
Specifically Capital
by Cisairse » Wed Aug 26, 2020 10:01 pm
Kustonia wrote:Cisairse wrote:
Listen, I'm not going to restate hundreds of books each containing hundreds or thousands of pages to you, I'm just going to tell you to read them
Specifically Capital
We've heard Marx's theories. We don't need you to be part of the echo chamber. What we do need from you is specific historical examples.
by Socialist States of Ludistan » Wed Aug 26, 2020 10:01 pm
by Grenartia » Wed Aug 26, 2020 10:05 pm
Nevertopia wrote:communism has failed everytime its been tried.
Socialist States of Ludistan wrote:I mean, he isn’t gonna socialise production, so he isn’t a socialist
Stylan wrote:Grenartia wrote:
Can't do that if most of the workers aren't in the party and also not eligible to join it.
A statement which has fundamentally elitist and classist overtones that even you can't deny.
Absolutely false.
It shouldn't fucking take 70 fucking years to 'transition into communism', especially as a totalitarian state. At a certain point, it stops becoming a question of whether the CPSU was too fucking incompetent to transition into communism, and more about whether or not they actually wanted to in the first place.
Believe it or not, but it is possible, and even desirable, to completely skip capitalism altogether. You can, in fact, go from feudalism to socialism to communism. And with minimal totalitarian bullshit (i.e., none at all), too!
No you can't, if you are following Marx's theories you will understand it is a complete impossibility to transfer from feudalism to communism.
Do you want me to start quoting Marx and Engels at you? lol
And yeah, the USSR literally had a great standard of living,
and were a global superpower after being a "Shithole country" for like 300 years.
Perhaps there are classist elements in that, I mean Lenin was a lawyer, so he was wealthier than a lot of Russians, but as long as we aren't bourgeoisie we will be fine.
Now if you mean in the U.S. we can go from capitalism to communism, you may be correct, I have reservations about this though as undoubtedly the world elite would conspire against that, and food production would start to shrink, pensions would dry up etc etc. A brief transition stage is essential, and by brief I mean about 100-200 years.
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Ancientania, DataDyneIrkenAlliance, Dimetrodon Empire, Floofybit, Google [Bot], Hidrandia, Kreigsreich of Iron, Nerasian Empire, Nu Elysium, Plan Neonie, Tungstan, Western Theram, Wisteria and Surrounding Territories
Advertisement