Advertisement
by Italia Orientale » Sun Jun 28, 2009 12:30 pm
by Colonic Immigration » Sun Jun 28, 2009 12:31 pm
Intangelon wrote:Colonic Immigration wrote:The confed cup is piss poor, so it would make no dif. Besides, when was the last time you won anything substantial?
I won tenure last year. Good enough?
I am not my nation's soccer team, and I'm sorry you think that way.
Also, uh, if you can't get excited about the potential for your team's first FIFA cup win, what's the point of being a soccer fan? Isn't ending a streak of futility a GREAT reason to get excited?
What's wrong with you fractious sourpusses?
by Intangelon » Sun Jun 28, 2009 12:31 pm
Colonic Immigration wrote:Steel Butterfly wrote:Colonic Immigration wrote:And anyone that thinks it is knows nothing about football, in my book.
I'm not saying it means something in the grand scheme of things...obviously next summer matters infinitely more. I'm just saying that to America, which has never even been in a FIFA final let alone won one, it matters.
Do any yanks actually care about football?
by Steel Butterfly » Sun Jun 28, 2009 12:31 pm
Colonic Immigration wrote:Letat wrote:Colonic Immigration wrote:Do any yanks actually care about football?
Though it's not as popular as basketball, baseball, and American football, here, but a victory in the confederations cup would get picked up by the major networks. And considering that people like to root for winners, news of a victory will increase interest and buzz over football in this country.
Most countries have football as their first sport (or atleast in their top three). You guys just seem to have a nack at creating shyte sports
by Colonic Immigration » Sun Jun 28, 2009 12:33 pm
Iron Chariots wrote:Ferrous Oxide wrote:Bluth Corporation wrote:Quite a bit.
Soccer, not so much.
Sorry, in this reality, "football" actually involves feet. You're thinking of "Run with it, fatty!ball".
The "foot" in football most likely refers to the fact that it's played on foot.
But either way, football is not a single sport, but a family of sports, derived from a common ancestor, much like poker is not a single card game, but a family of card games that includes Hold 'em, Five Card Draw, Seven Card Stud, and others.
Any sport descended from the common football ancestor can correctly be called "football." Saying "Soccer" is just a more specific term, as is "gridiron" or "rugby."
So maybe you should avoid being arrogant when discussing subjects about which you don't know shit.
by Scandavian States » Sun Jun 28, 2009 12:35 pm
Ferrous Oxide wrote:"Run with it, fatty!ball".
by Kadinichung » Sun Jun 28, 2009 12:35 pm
by Tarantum » Sun Jun 28, 2009 12:36 pm
by Italia Orientale » Sun Jun 28, 2009 12:36 pm
Steel Butterfly wrote:I think anyone who hates on either sport is just a loser. Sure, joke around, but there's no reason for this "my sport is better than your sport" immaturity.
by No Names Left Damn It » Sun Jun 28, 2009 12:37 pm
by Steel Butterfly » Sun Jun 28, 2009 12:37 pm
Tarantum wrote:Brazil scores, 2-1.
by Iron Chariots » Sun Jun 28, 2009 12:37 pm
Colonic Immigration wrote:Iron Chariots wrote:Ferrous Oxide wrote:
Sorry, in this reality, "football" actually involves feet. You're thinking of "Run with it, fatty!ball".
The "foot" in football most likely refers to the fact that it's played on foot.
But either way, football is not a single sport, but a family of sports, derived from a common ancestor, much like poker is not a single card game, but a family of card games that includes Hold 'em, Five Card Draw, Seven Card Stud, and others.
Any sport descended from the common football ancestor can correctly be called "football." Saying "Soccer" is just a more specific term, as is "gridiron" or "rugby."
So maybe you should avoid being arrogant when discussing subjects about which you don't know shit.
Harrdly being arrogant- being sensible.
by Wilgrove » Sun Jun 28, 2009 12:38 pm
by Intangelon » Sun Jun 28, 2009 12:38 pm
Colonic Immigration wrote:Intangelon wrote:I won tenure last year. Good enough?
I am not my nation's soccer team, and I'm sorry you think that way.Also, uh, if you can't get excited about the potential for your team's first FIFA cup win, what's the point of being a soccer fan? Isn't ending a streak of futility a GREAT reason to get excited?
What's wrong with you fractious sourpusses?
We won ours 43 years ago and have done fuckall since...and that was a real tournament.
by Italia Orientale » Sun Jun 28, 2009 12:38 pm
by Wilgrove » Sun Jun 28, 2009 12:39 pm
Italia Orientale wrote:hell of a goal by fabiano
go to fifa.com
by Colonic Immigration » Sun Jun 28, 2009 12:40 pm
Scandavian States wrote:Ferrous Oxide wrote:"Run with it, fatty!ball".
<snip>
by Intangelon » Sun Jun 28, 2009 12:40 pm
Steel Butterfly wrote:Tarantum wrote:Brazil scores, 2-1.
Perfect....2-1. This means I'm getting $150 if the US wins by 1
$100 for the USA win
$50 for it being within 1 either way
by Letat » Sun Jun 28, 2009 12:43 pm
Colonic Immigration wrote:Scandavian States wrote:Ferrous Oxide wrote:"Run with it, fatty!ball".
<snip>
Atleast in rugby we don't need those pads like pussies.
by Ferrous Oxide » Sun Jun 28, 2009 12:44 pm
Scandavian States wrote:
Meet Ronnie Brown. 6'0" and 230lbs of solid muscle. He's made a career of leveling his shoulders and putting 200lb+ men on the injured list.
Scandavian States wrote:I would also wager that he could easily outrun any soccer star you could name; you know, something that involves the feet you so proudly tout.
by Colonic Immigration » Sun Jun 28, 2009 12:44 pm
Intangelon wrote:Colonic Immigration wrote:Intangelon wrote:I won tenure last year. Good enough?
I am not my nation's soccer team, and I'm sorry you think that way.Also, uh, if you can't get excited about the potential for your team's first FIFA cup win, what's the point of being a soccer fan? Isn't ending a streak of futility a GREAT reason to get excited?
What's wrong with you fractious sourpusses?
We won ours 43 years ago and have done fuckall since...and that was a real tournament.
Facepalm all you like. You're the one saying "you", as if I were on the team. You also seem to be inveterately determined to ignore the point that it's a big deal regardless of your opinion on the tournament. It is a sad little world you must inhabit if you can't allow fans of perennial losers to feel good about winning.
I'm sorry your nation's team hasn't won anything for 43 years. My nation's team hasn't won anything at all.
I'm excited, and your childish attempts at negation are ineffectual.
by Italia Orientale » Sun Jun 28, 2009 12:45 pm
Colonic Immigration wrote:Atleast in rugby we don't need those pads like pussies
by Sdaeriji » Sun Jun 28, 2009 12:47 pm
by Ferrous Oxide » Sun Jun 28, 2009 12:48 pm
Italia Orientale wrote:my boy brandon jacobs (#27) would run over any rugby player alive, please go tell him he is a pussy
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Arzastan, Big Eyed Animation, Utrachiasa, Vassenor
Advertisement