Fartsniffage wrote:https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-us-canada-54110457
Microsoft says the Russians are at it again.
Oh those wacky Russians.
Advertisement

by Thermodolia » Thu Sep 10, 2020 2:22 pm
Cannot think of a name wrote:Shrillland wrote:In Plaza news, Prop 22 in California is now the most expensive ballot measure in the state's history with over $186 million spent on the campaigns, the vast majority of which is coming from Uber and Lyft: https://news.ballotpedia.org/2020/09/09/with-funding-from-uber-lyft-and-doordash-campaign-behind-california-proposition-22-tops-180-million/
Could have spent that money on their drivers...

by Dresderstan » Thu Sep 10, 2020 2:25 pm

by Vassenor » Thu Sep 10, 2020 2:27 pm
Glorious Hong Kong wrote:The United Nations and a number of international institutions have already been or are in the process of being subverted by the CCP, including a certain world body I won't name here because of site rules. The Trump Administration is right to give the United Nations, the WHO, UNESCO, and other international bodies the big, fat, middle finger. International law has been politicized and appropriated by the likes of Russia, China, Iran, and other bad actors. If China can tear up the Sino-British Joint Declaration and genocide the Uighurs and if Assad and Russia can slaughter Syrian civilians, then Boris Johnson can tear up the Withdrawal Agreement and Israel can continue building settlements in the West Bank. Why should the United States and its Western allies continue to play by a set of rules that its enemies keep ignoring? To hell with the UN and international law. Trump's foreign policy is so much better than Obama's ever was. All's fair in love and war.

by Washington Resistance Army » Thu Sep 10, 2020 2:28 pm

by Thermodolia » Thu Sep 10, 2020 2:29 pm

by Valrifell » Thu Sep 10, 2020 2:30 pm

by Dresderstan » Thu Sep 10, 2020 2:30 pm
Thermodolia wrote:San Lumen wrote:It’s what should be done. Nuclear weapons should never be used and serve no purpose. Might as well dismantle every single one.
It will never happen. Especially when nations like Israel, Iran, North Korea, Pakistan, PRC, and India exist. They don’t care about the international world. Hell India, Pakistan, Israel, and North Korea aren’t even members of the Non-Proliferation Treaty which says they shouldn’t have nukes in the first place.
It’s not hard to make a nuclear bomb if you know how. Nukes are stuck with us unless we destroy all Nuclear technology

by Thermodolia » Thu Sep 10, 2020 2:31 pm

by San Lumen » Thu Sep 10, 2020 2:33 pm
Thermodolia wrote:San Lumen wrote:How has it done that?
No sane nation wants to go to war with a nation that has nukes. Ever since Pakistan and India got nukes they haven’t gone to a major shooting war. North Korea got nukes to keep from being invaded.
South Africa had the same idea, and gave them up because they didn’t want a bunch of non-whites to have control of them.

by Thermodolia » Thu Sep 10, 2020 2:34 pm
Valrifell wrote:Washington Resistance Army wrote:
It displays a gross misunderstanding of the usage of WMD's in maintaining a semblance of international balance and preventing another 1939.
I mean while the threat of nukes have been helpful to preventing war, it wasn't the only contributing factor. Further, having several close calls and being on the precipice on annihilation isn't exactly a fun prospect.
It's never the purposeful first strikes that anyone should be concerned about, it's communication and systems failure.

by Washington Resistance Army » Thu Sep 10, 2020 2:34 pm

by Thermodolia » Thu Sep 10, 2020 2:36 pm
San Lumen wrote:Thermodolia wrote:No sane nation wants to go to war with a nation that has nukes. Ever since Pakistan and India got nukes they haven’t gone to a major shooting war. North Korea got nukes to keep from being invaded.
South Africa had the same idea, and gave them up because they didn’t want a bunch of non-whites to have control of them.
And then we have someone like Trump who would drop a nuclear bomb on Tehran or Pyongyang because he felt like it. There are terrible weapons that never should have been developed and it’s long past time we set an example and dismantled every single one of ours.

by San Lumen » Thu Sep 10, 2020 2:37 pm
Washington Resistance Army wrote:San Lumen wrote:How has it done that?
Nuclear weapons in particular can largely be attributed to be the reason why conventional warfare didn't break out between ourselves and the Soviets on numerous occasions. Whilst I maintain that we would have beaten them in such a conflict our ability to vaporize a city with a single undoubtedly put a damper on any March to the Atlantic scenarios.

by Dresderstan » Thu Sep 10, 2020 2:37 pm
San Lumen wrote:Thermodolia wrote:No sane nation wants to go to war with a nation that has nukes. Ever since Pakistan and India got nukes they haven’t gone to a major shooting war. North Korea got nukes to keep from being invaded.
South Africa had the same idea, and gave them up because they didn’t want a bunch of non-whites to have control of them.
And then we have someone like Trump who would drop a nuclear bomb on Tehran or Pyongyang because he felt like it. There are terrible weapons that never should have been developed and it’s long past time we set an example and dismantled every single one of ours.

by San Lumen » Thu Sep 10, 2020 2:38 pm
Dresderstan wrote:San Lumen wrote:And then we have someone like Trump who would drop a nuclear bomb on Tehran or Pyongyang because he felt like it. There are terrible weapons that never should have been developed and it’s long past time we set an example and dismantled every single one of ours.
Get off your fucking soapbox and fucking listen why don't you, the answer is no.

by Thermodolia » Thu Sep 10, 2020 2:39 pm
San Lumen wrote:Washington Resistance Army wrote:
Nuclear weapons in particular can largely be attributed to be the reason why conventional warfare didn't break out between ourselves and the Soviets on numerous occasions. Whilst I maintain that we would have beaten them in such a conflict our ability to vaporize a city with a single undoubtedly put a damper on any March to the Atlantic scenarios.
No city should ever suffer a fate like Hiroshima did.

by Dresderstan » Thu Sep 10, 2020 2:40 pm

by Washington Resistance Army » Thu Sep 10, 2020 2:41 pm
San Lumen wrote:Washington Resistance Army wrote:
Nuclear weapons in particular can largely be attributed to be the reason why conventional warfare didn't break out between ourselves and the Soviets on numerous occasions. Whilst I maintain that we would have beaten them in such a conflict our ability to vaporize a city with a single undoubtedly put a damper on any March to the Atlantic scenarios.
No city should ever suffer a fate like Hiroshima did.

by Dresderstan » Thu Sep 10, 2020 2:41 pm

by Fartsniffage » Thu Sep 10, 2020 2:41 pm
San Lumen wrote:Washington Resistance Army wrote:
Nuclear weapons in particular can largely be attributed to be the reason why conventional warfare didn't break out between ourselves and the Soviets on numerous occasions. Whilst I maintain that we would have beaten them in such a conflict our ability to vaporize a city with a single undoubtedly put a damper on any March to the Atlantic scenarios.
No city should ever suffer a fate like Hiroshima did.
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Dimetrodon Empire, El Lazaro, Enaia, Existential Cats, Galactic Powers, Gran Cordoba, Gravlen, Hispida, Ifreann, La Xinga, Northern Seleucia, Stellar Colonies, The Dodo Republic, Victorious Friesland, Violetist Britannia, Washington-Columbia, Xind
Advertisement