Y has nobody considered the possibility of abolishing women?

[Unstoppable Empire of Doom]

Uhhh... true that young men form the core of any violent revolution. However since the majority of men like vagina lots and lots (its pretty much our main interest) few sane people would make any sort of push to wipe it from existance.

[Dryicor]

Four words: Is this a joke?

[Des-Bal]

It's great when you hear the worst thing you'll hear all day before noon, the day can only improve.

[Picairn]

Four words: Is this a joke?

The OP seems sincere about it. I think I'm gonna throw up.

[Picairn]

Yeah this is another trait which women universally exhibit (not saying you're a woman but still, this is the textbook behaviour), they cannot argue in good faith. It's always about who wins and who is "right", not who is actually correct. It's like kids arguing in a schoolyard. I may be right, but your dad works at Nintendo and can beat me up, so I better shut my mouth. While I may have no right to speak according to you who wants to shut me up, I have God-given first amendment rights created by GROWN MEN and I'm going to use them.
All I "demand" of women is that they have as much to offer as men. Since men are normal human beings this shouldn't be too hard. Instead, women fail at this and demonstrate that they are incomplete human beings somewhere around the level of children or farm animals. Schopenhauer knew it, Weninger knew it, Nietzsche knew it, Kant knew it - everyone knows it deep down.

Stop with the sweeping generalizations. That's arguing in bad-faith. Also quote me the exact phrases that these philosophers said about women.

[Mestovakia]

Well, this is gonna be locked.

[Sundiata]

Women are more than just reproductive tools. To even suggest something like this is an attack on the female contributions to our society in science, industry, and just about any profession.

Did you know that a tiny minority of people with Down Syndrome actually make it to university? We better tell people to stop terminating pregnancies with an extra chromosome, society will surely benefit!
Ada Lovelace was literally descended from Lord Byron, you can't tell me she didn't have some extreme A+-tier genes in her. I bet if she was born a man instead computing technology would be a decade ahead now anyway.

Bigotry aside, it's not a bad thing that people with Down Syndrome attend university and contribute to particular professions or fields of study. Anyway, it likewise isn't wrong for women to do the same, or men for that matter. Everyone should have an equal opportunity to prosper in this world.

[Thermodolia]

I mean theoretically you could have a world without women and have everyone grow up in artificial vats. Though if that happened I’m 90% sure that gay sex would become a very common thing.

Ya know what now I got an idea for a FT nation full of gay people

I wonder if op means like get rid of anyone considered AFAB?

If you do that, you still can't get rid of women that way, but who am I kidding, lack of trans awareness is the least of OP's problems.

I assume the OP ment anyone who is biologically female, which includes AFAB.

[Mestovakia]

Well, this is gonna be locked.

wdym

I know what I mean.

[Kowani]

…


It’s just gonna be one of those days.

I think it's summer.

Yes, that would help.

[Picairn]

I think it's summer.

Yes, that would help.

August is still Summer. Gotta wait till September.

[Gondwana island]

Please let this be a joke

[Thermodolia]

I assume the OP ment anyone who is biologically female, which includes AFAB.

XY and you ride with me brah

Ok let’s say some how you accomplish your goals. What happens when men reject your advances? Because let’s be honest here in a world where there are no women homosexuality will become the norm.

[Mestovakia]

?

You know the mods are gonna look at this, right?

[Dryicor]

Which brings up the inverse possibility - could men abolish women? Unlike its opposite, it IS physically possible. It would be physically possible for men to kill every woman on the planet, IF enough put their minds to it.

Quite possibly. But who, in their right mind, would? We need the male-female balance to survive, and as gender equality is big now, would anybody want to?

It might sound like lunatic talk, but there's some real merit to this proposal in terms of its effects (it can be a means to many pretty admirable ends). Why has nobody proposed this?

Because it is lunatic talk.

[Galloism]

Stop with the sweeping generalizations. That's arguing in bad-faith. Also quote me the exact phrases that these philosophers said about women.

http://www.theabsolute.net/misogyny/onwomen.html
This is one of the nicer passages Schopenhauer wrote about women.
Why were women not allowed to vote or serve on a jury until the 20th century? Why were they not given the ability to manage property in most cases? Why do that to half of the potentially useful and wonderful population?

Mostly to protect them most likely - like how we treat children. We shouldn’t have done that of course, women are not children, but that’s roughly how they were treated for a long time.

[Sundiata]

You demand so much from women, what do you offer them? Are you an exceptionally fit genius who always operates morally?

Stop judging others or you'll be judged yourself.

Yeah this is another trait which women universally exhibit (not saying you're a woman but still, this is the textbook behaviour), they cannot argue in good faith. It's always about who wins and who is "right", not who is actually correct. It's like kids arguing in a schoolyard. I may be factually right, but your dad works at Nintendo and can beat me up, so I better shut my mouth. While I may have no right to speak according to you who wants to shut me up, I have God-given first amendment rights created by GROWN MEN and I'm going to use them. Another thing women like doing during arguments is taking statements unrelated to them as personal insults, since the world revolves around them.
All I "demand" of women is that they have as much to offer as men. Since men are normal human beings this shouldn't be too hard. Instead, women fail at this and demonstrate that they are incomplete human beings somewhere around the level of children or farm animals. Schopenhauer knew it, Weninger knew it, Nietzsche knew it, Kant knew it - everyone knows it deep down.

You have the right to say whatever you like as long as you're not inciting violence.

Anyway, there are women who offer as much or more than the vast majority of men of men out there. There are women who contribute to their families as mothers. Conversely, there are deadbeat dad's. There are women who have PHDs. Conversely, there are men without college educations.

Ultimately, what matters the most above all else though, is character and there are plenty of women with good character, especially in the Catholic Church.

[Picairn]

http://www.theabsolute.net/misogyny/onwomen.html
This is one of the nicer passages Schopenhauer wrote about women.
Why were women not allowed to vote or serve on a jury until the 20th century? Why were they not given the ability to manage property in most cases? Why do that to half of the potentially useful and wonderful population?

Schopenhauer wrote this:

The fundamental defect of the female character is a lack of a sense of justice. This originates first and foremost in their want of rationality and capacity for reflexion but it is strengthened by the fact that, as the weaker sex, they are driven to rely not on force but on cunning.

And you genuinely believe that? All of it?

[Des-Bal]

They aren't worth protecting at all.
Name one reason post-feminism and post-modern tech a woman is worth protecting or hanging around. Do you like the taste of alimony?

Have you been eating alimony? Is that what this is about? You are not supposed to eat that.

[Galloism]

Mostly to protect them most likely - like how we treat children. We shouldn’t have done that of course, women are not children, but that’s roughly how they were treated for a long time.

They aren't worth protecting at all.
Name one reason post-feminism and post-modern tech a woman is worth protecting or hanging around. Do you like the taste of alimony?

I don’t think we should protect them any more or less than we should protect men. All individuals should be treated as individuals based on their own merits.

[Southeastern Xiatao]

I mean without a woman you couldn't be born. I mean two guys can't get have sex and get the other pregnant, it just biologically impossible.

In order for a human to be born you have to have a man and woman engage in sexual intercourse.

So if you get rid of women, you doom all of humanity to a slow depressing extinction.

Without women, there would not be anymore men.

[Heloin]

Ok let’s say some how you accomplish your goals. What happens when men reject your advances? Because let’s be honest here in a world where there are no women homosexuality will become the norm.

I'm not gay so idc
I'll just vibe out with a sex robot and the warm cameraderie of my friends.

If you want to be a social recluse who hates people you can do that without the genocide.

[Farnhamia]

As Reppy says, so eloquently, DOS go boom.