Page 18 of 35

PostPosted: Wed Aug 05, 2020 4:02 pm
by Andsed
La xinga wrote:
Fartsniffage wrote:
You're a weird one. On my ignore list you go.

Okay then?
Heloin wrote:What your saying makes no sense wand is so unlikely to have happened that considering it is utterly ludicrous.

No it really does not.

It really makes no sense. IIRC fire started during work hours. The warehouse would have been watched and guarded. Some kids going in and starting a fire is extremely improbable if not outright impossible.

PostPosted: Wed Aug 05, 2020 4:03 pm
by La Xinga
Andsed wrote:
La xinga wrote:Okay then?

No it really does not.

It really makes no sense. IIRC fire started during work hours. The warehouse would have been watched and guarded. Some kids going in and starting a fire is extremely improbable if not outright impossible.

Kids can't smuggle in during work hours?

PostPosted: Wed Aug 05, 2020 4:03 pm
by The New California Republic
La xinga wrote:
The New California Republic wrote:It probably should have stayed there instead of being beamed across the net tbh.

You think so, I do not.

It's a bit of a weird hill to choose to die on tbh, you should probably just admit it was a silly suggestion that has no basis, instead of doubling down.

PostPosted: Wed Aug 05, 2020 4:04 pm
by La Xinga
The New California Republic wrote:
La xinga wrote:You think so, I do not.

It's a bit of a weird hill to choose to die on tbh, you should probably just admit it was a silly suggestion that has no basis, instead of doubling down.

No, since I believe it has a strong chance, even if you don't believe it.

PostPosted: Wed Aug 05, 2020 4:05 pm
by Names Are Too Hard
La xinga wrote:
Names Are Too Hard wrote:Saying “nuh uh” does not help your argument, as has been pointed out to you over numerous occasions.

everyone else is saying "Yuh Huh" and I'm saying "Nuh Uh."

They’re saying the equivalent of “you’re likely incorrect because a., b., c., etc.“

you’re saying “no.”

PostPosted: Wed Aug 05, 2020 4:05 pm
by Neanderthaland
La xinga wrote:
The New California Republic wrote:Lol no it doesn't.

It really does.

And 9/11 was done by the Russian Maffia. You can't prove it wasn't!

PostPosted: Wed Aug 05, 2020 4:06 pm
by La Xinga
Names Are Too Hard wrote:
La xinga wrote:everyone else is saying "Yuh Huh" and I'm saying "Nuh Uh."

They’re saying the equivalent of “you’re likely incorrect because a., b., c., etc.“

you’re saying “no.”

No, they are not. They are saying: This is absurd if not impossible.

I am saying no to that.

Capeesh?

PostPosted: Wed Aug 05, 2020 4:06 pm
by Andsed
La xinga wrote:
Andsed wrote:It really makes no sense. IIRC fire started during work hours. The warehouse would have been watched and guarded. Some kids going in and starting a fire is extremely improbable if not outright impossible.

Kids can't smuggle in during work hours?

In an extremely busy area that is closely watched? It is extremely unlikely that they could of gotten in there. Much less start of a fire. Your theory nothing but a bunch of absurd assumptions with no real backing other than "well it could have happened!" I do not get why you are trying so hard to defend such an absurd idea.

PostPosted: Wed Aug 05, 2020 4:06 pm
by La Xinga
Neanderthaland wrote:
La xinga wrote:It really does.

And 9/11 was done by the Russian Maffia. You can't prove it wasn't!

I know, I cannot.

PostPosted: Wed Aug 05, 2020 4:07 pm
by Heloin
La xinga wrote:
Heloin wrote:Instead of wasting everyone's time with saying "no it makes sense" over and over when it clearly doesn't why not explain how your insane theory could ever make any sense.

I have explained it again and again.

No you haven't actually. All you've done is say "youths did it" and "isn't it possible". Most people wouldn't know what ammonium nitrate looks like so the chances of some youths entering the most secure part of the port and knowing what was stored in that warehouse are so small and slim that the suggestion is entirely absurd.

PostPosted: Wed Aug 05, 2020 4:07 pm
by Names Are Too Hard
Neanderthaland wrote:
La xinga wrote:It really does.

And 9/11 was done by the Russian Maffia. You can't prove it wasn't!

Yes, and the explosion in Beirut was perpetrated by an elite team of terrorist teenagers that infiltrated a facility full of explosive material in order to detonate it.

Because I feel like it

And you can’t prove otherwise.

PostPosted: Wed Aug 05, 2020 4:07 pm
by Lanorth

PostPosted: Wed Aug 05, 2020 4:07 pm
by La Xinga
Heloin wrote:
La xinga wrote:I have explained it again and again.

No you haven't actually. All you've done is say "youths did it" and "isn't it possible". Most people wouldn't know what ammonium nitrate looks like so the chances of some youths entering the most secure part of the port and knowing what was stored in that warehouse are so small and slim that the suggestion is entirely absurd.

I said it is possible that they got there and possibly bribed them, it is not absurd.

PostPosted: Wed Aug 05, 2020 4:08 pm
by La Xinga
Names Are Too Hard wrote:
Neanderthaland wrote:And 9/11 was done by the Russian Maffia. You can't prove it wasn't!

Yes, and the explosion in Beirut was perpetrated by an elite team of terrorist teenagers that infiltrated a facility full of explosive material in order to detonate it.

Because I feel like it

And you can’t prove otherwise.

That's possible too.

PostPosted: Wed Aug 05, 2020 4:08 pm
by Names Are Too Hard
La xinga wrote:
Heloin wrote:No you haven't actually. All you've done is say "youths did it" and "isn't it possible". Most people wouldn't know what ammonium nitrate looks like so the chances of some youths entering the most secure part of the port and knowing what was stored in that warehouse are so small and slim that the suggestion is entirely absurd.

I said it is possible that they got there and possibly bribed them, it is not absurd.

Lmao but you’re just making random hypothetical statements and presenting them as fact.

PostPosted: Wed Aug 05, 2020 4:08 pm
by The New California Republic
La xinga wrote:
The New California Republic wrote:It's a bit of a weird hill to choose to die on tbh, you should probably just admit it was a silly suggestion that has no basis, instead of doubling down.

No, since I believe it has a strong chance, even if you don't believe it.

A belief without any basis whatsoever.

PostPosted: Wed Aug 05, 2020 4:08 pm
by Andsed
La xinga wrote:
Heloin wrote:No you haven't actually. All you've done is say "youths did it" and "isn't it possible". Most people wouldn't know what ammonium nitrate looks like so the chances of some youths entering the most secure part of the port and knowing what was stored in that warehouse are so small and slim that the suggestion is entirely absurd.

I said it is possible that they got there and possibly bribed them, it is not absurd.

No it is. It is extremely absurd.

PostPosted: Wed Aug 05, 2020 4:09 pm
by Heloin
La xinga wrote:
Heloin wrote:No you haven't actually. All you've done is say "youths did it" and "isn't it possible". Most people wouldn't know what ammonium nitrate looks like so the chances of some youths entering the most secure part of the port and knowing what was stored in that warehouse are so small and slim that the suggestion is entirely absurd.

I said it is possible that they got there and possibly bribed them, it is not absurd.

Heloin wrote:You could have done it is a possibility. Why aren't you suggesting you did it?

PostPosted: Wed Aug 05, 2020 4:09 pm
by La Xinga
Names Are Too Hard wrote:
La xinga wrote:I said it is possible that they got there and possibly bribed them, it is not absurd.

Lmao but you’re just making random hypothetical statements and presenting them as fact.

I'm not, how many times to I have to tell you. I said possibility, not a fact!!!
Andsed wrote:
La xinga wrote:I said it is possible that they got there and possibly bribed them, it is not absurd.


No it is. It is extremely absurd.

It is not.
The New California Republic wrote:
La xinga wrote:No, since I believe it has a strong chance, even if you don't believe it.

A belief without any basis whatsoever.

I said it's a possibility, what don't you get?

PostPosted: Wed Aug 05, 2020 4:10 pm
by Andsed
La xinga wrote:
Names Are Too Hard wrote:Yes, and the explosion in Beirut was perpetrated by an elite team of terrorist teenagers that infiltrated a facility full of explosive material in order to detonate it.

Because I feel like it

And you can’t prove otherwise.

That's possible too.

And it is also possible that a worker shat on the floor and set his shit on fire and that is what caused the explosion. Has as much backing as what your suggesting.

PostPosted: Wed Aug 05, 2020 4:10 pm
by The New California Republic
La xinga wrote:
Heloin wrote:No you haven't actually. All you've done is say "youths did it" and "isn't it possible". Most people wouldn't know what ammonium nitrate looks like so the chances of some youths entering the most secure part of the port and knowing what was stored in that warehouse are so small and slim that the suggestion is entirely absurd.

I said it is possible that they got there and possibly bribed them, it is not absurd.

Why are you making up stories? What is going on here? What are you doing? This is really fucking weird man.

PostPosted: Wed Aug 05, 2020 4:10 pm
by La Xinga
Heloin wrote:
La xinga wrote:I said it is possible that they got there and possibly bribed them, it is not absurd.

Heloin wrote:You could have done it is a possibility. Why aren't you suggesting you did it?

Because I know for a fact I didn't. But you could believe I did it.

PostPosted: Wed Aug 05, 2020 4:11 pm
by Names Are Too Hard
La xinga wrote:
Names Are Too Hard wrote:Lmao but you’re just making random hypothetical statements and presenting them as fact.

I'm not, how many times to I have to tell you. I said possibility, not a fact!!!
Andsed wrote:
No it is. It is extremely absurd.

It is not.
The New California Republic wrote:A belief without any basis whatsoever.

I said it's a possibility, what don't you get?

Okay, fine, it’s a possibility without any basis in fact and shouldn’t be considered. Does that work?

PostPosted: Wed Aug 05, 2020 4:11 pm
by La Xinga
Andsed wrote:
La xinga wrote:That's possible too.

And it is also possible that a worker shat on the floor and set his shit on fire and that is what caused the explosion. Has as much backing as what your suggesting.

I know, that's possible.
The New California Republic wrote:
La xinga wrote:I said it is possible that they got there and possibly bribed them, it is not absurd.

Why are you making up stories? What is going on here? What are you doing? This is really fucking weird man.

I'm not. I'm not saying it was not an accident, I'm saying this is a poss.

PostPosted: Wed Aug 05, 2020 4:11 pm
by Andsed
La xinga wrote:
Names Are Too Hard wrote:Lmao but you’re just making random hypothetical statements and presenting them as fact.

I'm not, how many times to I have to tell you. I said possibility, not a fact!!!
Andsed wrote:
No it is. It is extremely absurd.

It is not.
The New California Republic wrote:A belief without any basis whatsoever.

I said it's a possibility, what don't you get?

Why you are defending such an absurd idea. Just because something is possible does not mean it should be taken seriously. You can't just go down whatever rabbit hole on the basis of "well it could of happened!"