Large explosion in Beirut - hundreds reported injured

[La Xinga]

I could have, but I personally know I didn't, so I don't believe it.

But isn't is a possibility, or something else that you'll repeat ad nauseam.

Isn't is a possiblil- what? I don't think I get your grammar.

1. ?
2. And it could have been the reason otherwise.

“multiple city blocks destroyed, hundreds wounded, many dead, but I’m sure this is all the work of no good punk kids”

It could be. Not for sure, but it could.

[Heloin]

No it doesn't actually. It being an accident has quiet a lot of proof, you just apparently refuse to actually know what's going on and pretending there isn't any. What your saying is a hypothetical that you made up.

1. And that proof is not definite.'
2. Everything needs to be made up, unless you're mute that is. Every proof needs to be made up.

Well thanks for admitting that yes, you have literally no idea what's happened in Beirut.

[The New California Republic]

No it shouldn't, because there is fuck all in the way of suggesting that could have been the cause.

I'm sorry, but what?

You have no evidence to suggest that was a possible cause, so it shouldn't even be considered.

[Andsed]

No. That is not how proper investigation works. You don't go looking at every possibility. You narrow it down to sensible things and go from there. Your idea is not sensible and should not be considered.


There is nothing even suggesting your idea happened. It is absurd and can be very easily dismissed.

1. Yes it should, we should look into each and every possibility.
2. Then why haven't you done it yet?

1. Nope. Doing that is just wasting time.

2. Your idea has been shown to be very dubious at best. Your just unwilling to admit it.

[La Xinga]

1. And that proof is not definite.'
2. Everything needs to be made up, unless you're mute that is. Every proof needs to be made up.

Well thanks for admitting that yes, you have literally no idea what's happened in Beirut.

Nobody does.

1. Yes it should, we should look into each and every possibility.
2. Then why haven't you done it yet?

1. Nope. Doing that is just wasting time.

2. Your idea has been shown to be very dubious at best. Your just unwilling to admit it.

1. Nah.
2. It actually has not.

I'm sorry, but what?

You have no evidence to suggest that was a possible cause, so it shouldn't even be considered.

I did, multiple times.

[Names Are Too Hard]

Well thanks for admitting that yes, you have literally no idea what's happened in Beirut.

Nobody does.

1. Nope. Doing that is just wasting time.

2. Your idea has been shown to be very dubious at best. Your just unwilling to admit it.

1. Nah.
2. It actually has not.

You have no evidence to suggest that was a possible cause, so it shouldn't even be considered.

I did, multiple times.

Where’s the evidence you’ve shown us?

[The New California Republic]

Yes it should, we should look into each and every possibility.

No we shouldn't, because we'd be looking into an infinite number of possible permutations in terms of causes, which is a waste of time. We proceed from what is reasonable and what we have evidence for. Your claim fails both of those tests, therefore it is discarded.

[Andsed]

Well thanks for admitting that yes, you have literally no idea what's happened in Beirut.

Nobody does.

1. Nope. Doing that is just wasting time.

2. Your idea has been shown to be very dubious at best. Your just unwilling to admit it.

1. Nah.
2. It actually has not.

You have no evidence to suggest that was a possible cause, so it shouldn't even be considered.

I did, multiple times.

Yes. Looking at every possibility is just not viable. To be considered something needs to have an actual basis behind it. This being an accident does have a strong basis behind it. What your suggesting has nothing backing it. Your just creating a random hypothetical.

[The New California Republic]

You have no evidence to suggest that was a possible cause, so it shouldn't even be considered.

I did, multiple times.

You have presented no such evidence, stop lying.

[La Xinga]

Nobody does.

1. Nah.
2. It actually has not.

I did, multiple times.

Where’s the evidence you’ve shown us?

For a possibility, it possible that teenagers bribed the guards and got in to light stuff up.

Yes it should, we should look into each and every possibility.

No we shouldn't, because we'd be looking into an infinite number of possible permutations in terms of causes, which is a waste of time. We proceed from what is reasonable and what we have evidence for. Your claim fails both of those tests, therefore it is discarded.

Not infinite, stuff that are brought up. Or maybe just look around.

[La Xinga]

viewtopic.php?t=489513&f=16&view=unread#p37490261

I think this is right.

[Names Are Too Hard]

Where’s the evidence you’ve shown us?

For a possibility, it possible that teenagers bribed the guards and got in to light stuff up.

No we shouldn't, because we'd be looking into an infinite number of possible permutations in terms of causes, which is a waste of time. We proceed from what is reasonable and what we have evidence for. Your claim fails both of those tests, therefore it is discarded.

Not infinite, stuff that are brought up. Or maybe just look around.

That’s not evidence, though.

[Andsed]

Where’s the evidence you’ve shown us?

For a possibility, it possible that teenagers bribed the guards and got in to light stuff up.

No we shouldn't, because we'd be looking into an infinite number of possible permutations in terms of causes, which is a waste of time. We proceed from what is reasonable and what we have evidence for. Your claim fails both of those tests, therefore it is discarded.

Not infinite, stuff that are brought up. Or maybe just look around.

Just because it is possible does not mean it can be considered as something that should be looked into. Unless there is actual evidence for it it should be discarded.

[La Xinga]

For a possibility, it possible that teenagers bribed the guards and got in to light stuff up.

Not infinite, stuff that are brought up. Or maybe just look around.

That’s not evidence, though.

It has the same much as the misatke thing.

Anyway, to get back on topic:

https://www.nytimes.com/2020/08/05/worl ... osion.html

WHAT?

[The New California Republic]

Not infinite, stuff that are brought up. Or maybe just look around.

What do you mean "look around"? Look at what, and for what?

[La Xinga]

Not infinite, stuff that are brought up. Or maybe just look around.

What do you mean "look around"? Look at what, and for what?

The area, you know, camera footage, measurements of levels of chemicals, those stuff.

And I literally tried to get this back on topic (^) , it seems you don't want that.

[Ethel mermania]

1. ?
2. And it could have been the reason otherwise.

“multiple city blocks destroyed, hundreds wounded, many dead, but I’m sure this is all the work of no good punk kids”

Or a two-head bear. I hear the scent of Patchouli, was smelled before the blast.

[Agarntrop]

I'm just hoping they can find the assholes responsible for such gross negligence - IE, the people who owned the warehouse, those responsible for storing away the ammonium nitrate, etc etc.

Edit: Wait, turns out it'd been stored by the government after having been confiscated. Welp.

I am also hoping that this will send a message to the rest of the world that they need to get their act together. But seeing as this is not the first time a disaster like this happened(there was one in Texas City that killed around 500 IIRC) I doubt it.

Basically the government blew itself up?

Something doesn’t add up

The government was extremely careless and grossly negligent here. Something that is sadly not uncommon around the world and has caused several incidents like this.

Cough cough grenfell tower cough cough

[La Xinga]

“multiple city blocks destroyed, hundreds wounded, many dead, but I’m sure this is all the work of no good punk kids”

Or a two-head bear. I hear the scent of Patchouli, was smelled before the blast.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Patchouli

That's a plant. Not even in Lebanon.

[La Xinga]

200 dead, 5000 injured

There's probably 1000 dead people in the city of Beirut. That blast tore buildings apart and caused widespread devastation across several city blocks.

It was like the Oklahoma City bombing.

Why do you say 1K dead?

[The New California Republic]

What do you mean "look around"? Look at what, and for what?

The area, you know, camera footage, measurements of levels of chemicals, those stuff.

And I literally tried to get this back on topic (^) , it seems you don't want that.

Vague. Very vague.

You are talking about the possible causes, how is that not on topic?

[Agarntrop]

There's probably 1000 dead people in the city of Beirut. That blast tore buildings apart and caused widespread devastation across several city blocks.

It was like the Oklahoma City bombing.

Why do you say 1K dead?

There are still hundreds missing whose bodies havent been found yet so havent been added to the death toll.

[The New California Republic]

Or a two-head bear. I hear the scent of Patchouli, was smelled before the blast.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Patchouli

That's a plant. Not even in Lebanon.

I don't think you got the joke.

[La Xinga]

The area, you know, camera footage, measurements of levels of chemicals, those stuff.

And I literally tried to get this back on topic (^) , it seems you don't want that.

Vague. Very vague.

You are talking about the possible causes, how is that not on topic?

The report said it isn't, but IDK.

Why do you say 1K dead?

There are still hundreds missing whose bodies havent been found yet so havent been added to the death toll.

But still, 1K? If so, I'm scared to find out the amount of injuries.

[Agarntrop]

Vague. Very vague.

You are talking about the possible causes, how is that not on topic?

The report said it isn't, but IDK.

There are still hundreds missing whose bodies havent been found yet so havent been added to the death toll.

But still, 1K? If so, I'm scared to find out the amount of injuries.

I think that was an exaggeration. I think it will be between 200 and 300 eventually, but not 1000.

Also currently there are at least 5000 confirmed injuries.

Its really shocking to be honest