LimaUniformNovemberAlpha wrote:Why not scrap the appeals process and tell the trial judge to get it right the first time?)
Because that's a solution about as reasonable as amputating your leg because your foot hurts.
Advertisement
by The Holy Therns » Tue Jul 28, 2020 3:01 am
LimaUniformNovemberAlpha wrote:Why not scrap the appeals process and tell the trial judge to get it right the first time?)
Gallade wrote:Love, cake, wine and banter. No greater meaning to life (〜^∇^)〜
Ethel mermania wrote:to therns is to transend the pettiness of the field of play into the field of dreams.
by Katganistan » Tue Jul 28, 2020 2:02 pm
Thermodolia wrote:How about we scrap the death penalty?
by FutureAmerica » Tue Jul 28, 2020 5:53 pm
by Heloin » Tue Jul 28, 2020 6:03 pm
FutureAmerica wrote:Yes, it should be scrapped, otherwise get rid of the death penalty.
by Cekoviu » Tue Jul 28, 2020 7:22 pm
by The Reformed American Republic » Fri Jul 31, 2020 6:22 am
by Organized States » Fri Jul 31, 2020 6:34 am
by The Derpy Democratic Republic Of Herp » Fri Jul 31, 2020 6:42 am
by The Greater Ohio Valley » Fri Jul 31, 2020 7:38 am
The Reformed American Republic wrote:Sometimes there are too many appeals in some jurisdictions.
by The Reformed American Republic » Fri Jul 31, 2020 8:04 am
by Ifreann » Fri Jul 31, 2020 8:20 am
The Reformed American Republic wrote:The Greater Ohio Valley wrote:You can never have too much due process.
Yes you can. We have people who's guilt is beyond dispute and they're on death row for decades. Only a small percentage of people on death row are innocent, but we have problems putting serial killers down.
I'm for due process, but it can be taken too far. People like Richard Ramirez should have been quickly executed.
by The Derpy Democratic Republic Of Herp » Fri Jul 31, 2020 8:22 am
The Reformed American Republic wrote:The Greater Ohio Valley wrote:You can never have too much due process.
Yes you can. We have people who's guilt is beyond dispute and they're on death row for decades. Only a small percentage of people on death row are innocent, but we have problems putting serial killers down.
I'm for due process, but it can be taken too far. People like Richard Ramirez should have been quickly executed.
by The Emerald Legion » Fri Jul 31, 2020 8:26 am
by Ifreann » Fri Jul 31, 2020 8:26 am
The Emerald Legion wrote:The appeals process should also apply to life sentences.
by The Emerald Legion » Fri Jul 31, 2020 8:30 am
by Thermodolia » Fri Jul 31, 2020 8:32 am
by The Emerald Legion » Fri Jul 31, 2020 8:34 am
by Thermodolia » Fri Jul 31, 2020 8:41 am
by The Emerald Legion » Fri Jul 31, 2020 9:12 am
by The Reformed American Republic » Fri Jul 31, 2020 12:53 pm
by Very High IQ » Fri Jul 31, 2020 3:01 pm
by The Reformed American Republic » Sun Aug 02, 2020 6:50 am
Very High IQ wrote:Ifreann wrote:Abolish life sentences.
Would this mean that unrehabilitatable criminals would be let out on the streets after their sentences were up? In Brazil, the maximum penalty is 30 years, and some Brazilian serial killer said that he would go back to killing once his time was up
by The Greater Ohio Valley » Sun Aug 02, 2020 7:24 am
The Reformed American Republic wrote:Very High IQ wrote:Would this mean that unrehabilitatable criminals would be let out on the streets after their sentences were up? In Brazil, the maximum penalty is 30 years, and some Brazilian serial killer said that he would go back to killing once his time was up
But apparently some people believe that life in prison is inherently cruel and unusual.
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Cretie, Ineva, Jerzylvania, Likhinia, Nyoskova, Plan Neonie, Repreteop, Sarolandia, Simonia, Tesseris, Tungstan, Uiiop
Advertisement