NYT was going to publish home address of Fox news reporter

[West Leas Oros 2]

Pretty low, but Tucker Carlson doesn't have any fans who would rush over to his house and defend him? It's not left-leaners who tend to carry firearms.

Speak for yourself. *Loads rifle with communist intent*.

(Not actually saying you should go out and threaten people like Carlson, just that all the Chad lefties carry guns. )

[Alcala-Cordel]

Definitely fucked up. I expect such acts from antifa trolls on social media and shitposters on 4chan, but not a news website I'm told to take seriously.

Only the NYT never did or planned to do this.

Pretty low, but Tucker Carlson doesn't have any fans who would rush over to his house and defend him? It's not left-leaners who tend to carry firearms.

Speak for yourself. *Loads rifle with communist intent*.

(Not actually saying you should go out and threaten people like Carlson, just that all the Chad lefties carry guns. )

People tend to think the left is more pacifist than large portions of it really are

[Liriena]

Pretty low, but Tucker Carlson doesn't have any fans who would rush over to his house and defend him? It's not left-leaners who tend to carry firearms.

Speak for yourself. *Loads rifle with communist intent*.

(Not actually saying you should go out and threaten people like Carlson, just that all the Chad lefties carry guns. )

Nah, chad lefties carry a literal hammer and sickle

[Gormwood]

so, it looks like this thread is only active at this point because some of the people that fell for it are still in denial about it being a hoax. fun.

Believing Tucker To Own The Libs.

[Necroghastia]

So, you have nothing. Got it uwu

Just say you don't have the time to see these articles( I am not blaming you I know you must be busy ) well as just read the Wikipedia page on controversial topics you can clearly see the bias and also OwO is better now c'mon.

No, I have the time. I just don't see what you're talking about, especially when you neglect to mention what specifically is wrong.
Also, OwO is used to denote happiness or excitement, it wouldn't fit the context of my post.
In any case, Wikipedia's bias or lack thereof has little to do with the topic.

[Wallenburg]

Definitely fucked up. I expect such acts from antifa trolls on social media and shitposters on 4chan, but not a news website I'm told to take seriously.

Only the NYT never did or planned to do this.

Plus, Carlson's followers then doxxed the NYT reporter he accused of planning to release his address.

[Alcala-Cordel]

Only the NYT never did or planned to do this.

Plus, Carlson's followers then doxxed the NYT reporter he accused of planning to release his address.

Now that is hypocrisy.

[Liriena]

Only the NYT never did or planned to do this.

Plus, Carlson's followers then doxxed the NYT reporter he accused of planning to release his address.

But it's "the left" that has a real doxxing problem

[West Leas Oros 2]

If true, bad.

If true. So far though, the thread seems to show it is not.

[Outer Sparta]

Only the NYT never did or planned to do this.

Plus, Carlson's followers then doxxed the NYT reporter he accused of planning to release his address.

Yep, in the WaPo article: https://www.washingtonpost.com/nation/2 ... x1mv62fI6m

Specifically this section:

As he lambasted the newspaper on-air, Carlson suggested that his prime-time show could expose the home addresses of the reporter and Times editors.

Within hours, an army of conservative Twitter accounts started publicly posting the address and personal information of the reporter Carlson identified as the story’s writer. Many encouraged people to harass the reporter.

[West Leas Oros 2]

Only the NYT never did or planned to do this.

Plus, Carlson's followers then doxxed the NYT reporter he accused of planning to release his address.

Ah, hypocrisy. It would be funny if it weren’t so depressing.

[Outer Sparta]

Plus, Carlson's followers then doxxed the NYT reporter he accused of planning to release his address.

Ah, hypocrisy. It would be funny if it weren’t so depressing.

Hypocrisy is something Carlson specializes in.

[Wallenburg]

Plus, Carlson's followers then doxxed the NYT reporter he accused of planning to release his address.

But it's "the left" that has a real doxxing problem

It's the same thing with their rhetoric about free speech. Conservatives call mere disagreement with their ideas an attack on their First Amendment rights, while suing, doxxing, and threatening the freedoms of media figures or activists they disagree with.

[Alcala-Cordel]

Ah, hypocrisy. It would be funny if it weren’t so depressing.

Hypocrisy is something Carlson specializes in.

He's pretty good at making baseless claims too

[West Leas Oros 2]

Ah, hypocrisy. It would be funny if it weren’t so depressing.

Hypocrisy is something Carlson specializes in.

That’s why I don’t listen to him.

[Fartsniffage]

Only the NYT never did or planned to do this.

Plus, Carlson's followers then doxxed the NYT reporter he accused of planning to release his address.

What confuses me is the reporter Tucker went after in his lie. He's not a NYT reporter, he's a freelancer who specialises in science and environment stories. He's the editor of The Republican Journal in Maine.

It makes no sense that he would be writing a story to dox Tucker in the NYT.

[Alcala-Cordel]

Plus, Carlson's followers then doxxed the NYT reporter he accused of planning to release his address.

What confuses me is the reporter Tucker went after in his lie. He's not a NYT reporter, he's a freelancer who specialises in science and environment stories. He's the editor of The Republican Journal in Maine.

It makes no sense that he would be writing a story to dox Tucker in the NYT.

He probably didn't look into the reporter before making his accusation.

[Kalaron-A]

so, it looks like this thread is only active at this point because some of the people that fell for it are still in denial about it being a hoax. fun.

I doubt it happened, but I will remind people that CNN scrapped info off of a man's online account, tracked him down with it and essentially "made a deal" with him to delete his accounts, with them reserving the right to include his information in their news story if he didn't. To note, not a single part of them mentioning why they didn't publish his name stems from it being wrong to dox people and exclusively relates to his apology and promise not to do it again.
https://www.google.com/amp/s/amp.cnn.co ... index.html
It's hard to be optimistic with the news when this is basically par for the course.

[Gravlen]

so, it looks like this thread is only active at this point because some of the people that fell for it are still in denial about it being a hoax. fun.

I doubt it happened, but I will remind people that CNN scrapped info off of a man's online account, tracked him down with it and essentially "made a deal" with him to delete his accounts, with them reserving the right to include his information in their news story if he didn't. To note, not a single part of them mentioning why they didn't publish his name stems from it being wrong to dox people and exclusively relates to his apology and promise not to do it again.
https://www.google.com/amp/s/amp.cnn.co ... index.html
It's hard to be optimistic with the news when this is basically par for the course.

I'll remind you that CNN is not the New York Times, though I'm sure you think all news sites look alike.

[Outer Sparta]

so, it looks like this thread is only active at this point because some of the people that fell for it are still in denial about it being a hoax. fun.

I doubt it happened, but I will remind people that CNN scrapped info off of a man's online account, tracked him down with it and essentially "made a deal" with him to delete his accounts, with them reserving the right to include his information in their news story if he didn't. To note, not a single part of them mentioning why they didn't publish his name stems from it being wrong to dox people and exclusively relates to his apology and promise not to do it again.
https://www.google.com/amp/s/amp.cnn.co ... index.html
It's hard to be optimistic with the news when this is basically par for the course.

CNN is not the topic. Carlson lying about the NYT doxxing him is the topic.

[West Leas Oros 2]

I doubt it happened, but I will remind people that CNN scrapped info off of a man's online account, tracked him down with it and essentially "made a deal" with him to delete his accounts, with them reserving the right to include his information in their news story if he didn't. To note, not a single part of them mentioning why they didn't publish his name stems from it being wrong to dox people and exclusively relates to his apology and promise not to do it again.
https://www.google.com/amp/s/amp.cnn.co ... index.html
It's hard to be optimistic with the news when this is basically par for the course.

I'll remind you that CNN is not the New York Times, though I'm sure you think all news sites look alike.

CNN, FOX, NYT. They’re all capitalist propaganda to me

[-Astoria-]

I'll remind you that CNN is not the New York Times, though I'm sure you think all news sites look alike.

CNN, FOX, NYT. They’re all capitalist propaganda to me

Hush, you.

[Alcala-Cordel]

I'll remind you that CNN is not the New York Times, though I'm sure you think all news sites look alike.

CNN, FOX, NYT. They’re all capitalist propaganda to me

Absolutely right

[Kalaron-A]

I doubt it happened, but I will remind people that CNN scrapped info off of a man's online account, tracked him down with it and essentially "made a deal" with him to delete his accounts, with them reserving the right to include his information in their news story if he didn't. To note, not a single part of them mentioning why they didn't publish his name stems from it being wrong to dox people and exclusively relates to his apology and promise not to do it again.
https://www.google.com/amp/s/amp.cnn.co ... index.html
It's hard to be optimistic with the news when this is basically par for the course.

I'll remind you that CNN is not the New York Times, though I'm sure you think all news sites look alike.

You'd be wrong with that assumption. My point was that "reputable" news sites have doxxed people (or threatened, as the case may be) before. It's hard for me, personally, to be incredulous at the idea that NYT might have also been willing to dox someone when it's not exactly without precedent from similar news agencies.

[Outer Sparta]

I'll remind you that CNN is not the New York Times, though I'm sure you think all news sites look alike.

You'd be wrong with that assumption. My point was that "reputable" news sites have doxxed people (or threatened, as the case may be) before. It's hard for me, personally, to be incredulous at the idea that NYT might have also been willing to dox someone when it's not exactly without precedent from similar news agencies.

And you would believe Tucker Carlson claims?