NYT was going to publish home address of Fox news reporter

[Slaughter None]

While the doxxing of the reporter is bad you can see why the NYT would lie and say that they never planned to release his address under such heavy criticism.

And you believe Fox News, a network known for lying and Carlson also known for lying, over the NYT?

Well it just depends you can believe the NYT and CNN who are known for sensationalizing and outright lying or you can believe FOX news.

[Ifreann]

His home address was leaked before where things became so bad that his family was threatened and they had to move. A group associated with Antifa has threatened him saying that they know where he lives. Read it here:-
https://thehill.com/homenews/media/5082 ... -to-injure

So why did he lie about the NYT being about to publish his home address?

[Outer Sparta]

And you believe Fox News, a network known for lying and Carlson also known for lying, over the NYT?

Well it just depends you can believe the NYT and CNN who are known for sensationalizing and outright lying or you can believe FOX news.

Has NYT and CNN have the same track record as Fox when it comes to lying? I wouldn't believe a network with a record of spewing lies.

[Alcala-Cordel]

And you believe Fox News, a network known for lying and Carlson also known for lying, over the NYT?

Well it just depends you can believe the NYT and CNN who are known for sensationalizing and outright lying or you can believe FOX news.

FOX sensationalizes and lies a lot more than the NYT or CNN.

[Fartsniffage]

And you believe Fox News, a network known for lying and Carlson also known for lying, over the NYT?

Well it just depends you can believe the NYT and CNN who are known for sensationalizing and outright lying or you can believe FOX news entertainment channel.

FTFY. They literally went to court to prove that they were an entertainment channel, not a source of news.

[Slaughter None]

Well it just depends you can believe the NYT and CNN who are known for sensationalizing and outright lying or you can believe FOX news.

Has NYT and CNN have the same track record as Fox when it comes to lying? I wouldn't believe a network with a record of spewing lies.

They have an even bigger record of lying to the point where even democrats can see through their lies.

[Liriena]

And you believe Fox News, a network known for lying and Carlson also known for lying, over the NYT?

Well it just depends you can believe the NYT and CNN who are known for sensationalizing and outright lying or you can believe FOX news.

Fox News, who've openly admitted that their pundits, like Carlson, are not meant to be viewed as reliable news reporters.

[Outer Sparta]

Has NYT and CNN have the same track record as Fox when it comes to lying? I wouldn't believe a network with a record of spewing lies.

They have an even bigger record of lying to the point where even democrats can see through their lies.

And your source is?

[Outer Sparta]

Well it just depends you can believe the NYT and CNN who are known for sensationalizing and outright lying or you can believe FOX news.

Fox News, who've openly admitted that their pundits, like Carlson, are not meant to be viewed as reliable news reporters.

Like this article: https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/us/fox-n ... r-BB15FQkR

[-Astoria-]

Has NYT and CNN have the same track record as Fox when it comes to lying? I wouldn't believe a network with a record of spewing lies.

They have an even bigger record of lying to the point where even democrats can see through their lies.

[citation needed]

[Slaughter None]

Well it just depends you can believe the NYT and CNN who are known for sensationalizing and outright lying or you can believe FOX news entertainment channel.

FTFY. They literally went to court to prove that they were an entertainment channel, not a source of news.

They still present their "entertainment" as news several times without even listing it as an "opinion" piece so even if legally they are not News channels they certainly act like one.

[Ifreann]

And you believe Fox News, a network known for lying and Carlson also known for lying, over the NYT?

Well it just depends you can believe the NYT and CNN who are known for sensationalizing and outright lying or you can believe FOX news.

As has been pointed out in this thread, Fox News themselves have argued that no reasonable person would take Tucker Carlson's comments to be factually true.

[Liriena]

Has NYT and CNN have the same track record as Fox when it comes to lying? I wouldn't believe a network with a record of spewing lies.

They have an even bigger record of lying to the point where even democrats can see through their lies.

[citation needed]

You and your ilk here sure are desperate to kiss a known grifter's lying ass. Pure ideology and gullibility.

[Slaughter None]

They have an even bigger record of lying to the point where even democrats can see through their lies.

And your source is?

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/CNN_controversies

[Fartsniffage]

FTFY. They literally went to court to prove that they were an entertainment channel, not a source of news.

They still present their "entertainment" as news several times without even listing it as an "opinion" piece so even if legally they are not News channels they certainly act like one.

And I could dress up in a robe and wig but it wouldn't make me a judge.

Simply clothing themselves in the trappings of a news source does not make them one. Especially when they go to court to argue they are not a news source in order to avoid being held to pesky news source standards like telling the truth.

[LimaUniformNovemberAlpha]

Even if this turns out to be a hoax, it has nonetheless exposed the level of support some people on this site happen to have for doxxing people they don't like.

[Slaughter None]

They have an even bigger record of lying to the point where even democrats can see through their lies.

[citation needed]

You and your ilk here sure are desperate to kiss a known grifter's lying ass. Pure ideology and gullibility.

Gullibility? Saying that your opponents are gullible instead of providing evidence to the contrary is a low blow.

[Outer Sparta]

And your source is?

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/CNN_controversies

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fox_News_controversies

The Fox News controversies Wikipedia page is much longer than that of the CNN one.

[Necroghastia]

And your source is?

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/CNN_controversies

If their record of lying is bigger than Fox's, why is this article longer?

[Necroghastia]

[citation needed]

You and your ilk here sure are desperate to kiss a known grifter's lying ass. Pure ideology and gullibility.

Gullibility? Saying that your opponents are gullible instead of providing evidence to the contrary is a low blow.

How about you first? Show some evidence that Tucker was telling the truth.

[Alcala-Cordel]

And your source is?

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/CNN_controversies

FOX also has one of those pages. I'm no fan of CNN or FOX, but pretending FOX is better is hypocrisy.

[TURTLESHROOM II]

Tucker Carlson should be threatened and deplatformed

The desire to censor and drive out a man that does not think like you seems to be a modern hallmark of the current American far-left. Imagine hating someone who disagrees with you so much that you want his home address revealed to the iconoclasts and rioters. I think Acosta is the worst man in journalism, but I would NEVER advocate for people to be put at risk for their lives.

Of course, you liberals have a record of endangering and blackmailing dissidents. (Ugh. I can't believe I had to link a CNN article. Maybe I should go wash my hands after typing that.)

So Tucker Carlson should be protected from reality and continually be in his Fox News bubble?

Preserving the privacy, integrity, and safety of Carlson's mansion, family, and property is not "protecting him from reality". It is affording him the rights all men should be allowed to retain when they speak their mind.

---

There are few men that draw such rabid responses from the iconoclasts, Antifa terrorists, and other leftist fringe lords than Carlson. If his address is revealed, they will come for him and, as CHAZ and that eight year old in Atlanta showed, they are not afraid to commit arson, or, God forbid, murder.

Anyone that supports exposing a man's address because of his beliefs is evil and are making the statements of a sick puppy. I don't care if it's Don Lemon, Acosta, Christ Matthews, or any other jerk out there.

It is NEVER, EVER acceptable, under ANY circumstances, to EVER Dox an innocent person.

Doxxing should be a felonious crime and should be aggressively, viciously prosecuted. Will the bodies have to start dropping before this plague is done?

[Liriena]

Even if this turns out to be a hoax, it has nonetheless exposed the level of support some people on this site happen to have for doxxing people they don't like.

Ah, yes, the "really makes you think" spin.

If you ask me, the bigger problem here is how many people on this site are eager to take an unreliable, sensationalist OP and a known grifter at face value. I have no doubt in my mind that you would have expressed something even dumber in this topic if I and others hadn't pointed out the evidence contradicting Carlson's and the OP's narrative.

[Liriena]

Tucker Carlson should be threatened and deplatformed

The desire to censor and drive out a man that does not think like you seems to be a modern hallmark of the current American far-left. Imagine hating someone who disagrees with you so much that you want his home address revealed to the iconoclasts and rioters. I think Acosta is the worst man in journalism, but I would NEVER advocate for people

So Tucker Carlson should be protected from reality and continually be in his Fox News bubble?

Preserving the privacy, integrity, and safety of Carlson's mansion, family, and property is not "protecting him from reality". It is affording him the rights all men should be allowed to retain when they speak their mind.

---

There are few men that draw such rabid responses from the iconoclasts, Antifa terrorists, and other leftist fringe lords than Carlson. If his address is revealed, they will come for him and, as CHAZ and that eight year old in Atlanta showed, they are not afraid to commit arson, or, God forbid, murder.

Anyone that supports exposing a man's address because of his beliefs is evil and are making the statements of a sick puppy. I don't care if it's Don Lemon, Acosta, Christ Matthews, or any other jerk out there.

It is NEVER, EVER acceptable, under ANY circumstances, to EVER Dox an innocent person.

Doxxing and threatening someone's family is bad. Shame that the right keeps validating people like Andy Ngo who do exactly that.

That said, Carlson specifically deserves to be bullied. Not doxxed, but bullied.

[TURTLESHROOM II]

How about you first? Show some evidence that Tucker was telling the truth.

Imagine believing the word of the New York Times. Leftist publications have Doxxed innocents before. CNN is so full of hate that they successfully Doxxed a child after he made a GIF image of Trump tackling CNN to the ground. They then proceeded to blackmail him until he issued an "apology" under duress.