NYT was going to publish home address of Fox news reporter

[Gravlen]

So you have no evidence that the NYT was going to doxx him and you're deflecting rather than admit it.

I have more reason to believe him than I do believe he just made it up for no reason. Given that he dropped names and the NYT confirmed he had been in contact with them, it's quite evident that they were going to publish something to do with his personal life. If he just made this up then he should expect lawyers contacting him over slander, but NYT don't seem to be doing that and just denying it. Interesting.

Why? This would not be slander, so why should your misunderstanding of the law imply guilt on the part of the NYT? That's silly.

[The Alma Mater]

So you have no evidence that the NYT was going to doxx him and you're deflecting rather than admit it.

I have more reason to believe him than I do believe he just made it up for no reason. Given that he dropped names and the NYT confirmed he had been in contact with them, it's quite evident that they were going to publish something to do with his personal life. If he just made this up then he should expect lawyers contacting him over slander, but NYT don't seem to be doing that and just denying it. Interesting.

Perhaps Tucker lives in a huge mansion in a small town, and any article mentioning the area or cite accusations of neighbours would immediately make it obvious which house is his ?

[Ifreann]

I have more reason to believe him than I do believe he just made it up for no reason. Given that he dropped names and the NYT confirmed he had been in contact with them, it's quite evident that they were going to publish something to do with his personal life. If he just made this up then he should expect lawyers contacting him over slander, but NYT don't seem to be doing that and just denying it. Interesting.

Perhaps Tucker lives in a huge mansion in a small town, and any article mentioning the area or cite accusations of neighbours would immediately make it obvious which house is his ?

He lives in a nice suburb, the houses there are pretty big but not quite mansions, and as I recall Chateau Tucker doesn't stick out especially. Or at least, doesn't since he had the encircled A scrubbed off his driveway.

[Slaughter None]

EDIT: "was going to" has been added to the title.

[Ifreann]

EDIT: "was going to" has been added to the title.

Which is still wrong, there is no reason to believe they were ever going to do anything of the sort.

[Slaughter None]

EDIT: "was going to" has been added to the title.

Which is still wrong, there is no reason to believe they were ever going to do anything of the sort.

They were in contact with him before his segment and might have posted his home address if he did not talk about it on his show.

[Vassenor]

Which is still wrong, there is no reason to believe they were ever going to do anything of the sort.

They were in contact with him before his segment and might have posted his home address if he did not talk about it on his show.

By your logic I could claim this rock keeps tigers away.

[Dogmeat]

Which is still wrong, there is no reason to believe they were ever going to do anything of the sort.

They were in contact with him before his segment and might have posted his home address if he did not talk about it on his show.

At this point this is just pathetic scaremongering. "Might have" is not "was."

[Knask]

Tucker Carlson was going to molest his young daughter.

[Ifreann]

Which is still wrong, there is no reason to believe they were ever going to do anything of the sort.

They were in contact with him before his segment and might have posted his home address if he did not talk about it on his show.

I could as easily say that you were going to publish my address. I don't really think you are, but let's pretend for a minute that I do believe that so I can make a point. You could deny that you were going to publish my address, but then I can say that I stopped you from doing it by going public about it. You could say that there is no proof you were ever going to do it, but I can say that we were in contact in this thread. Does that prove anything? I don't see how, but you seem to believe that reporters talking to Tucker Carlson proves that the NYT were going to publish his address, so logically the same should hold true if I point out that we were in contact.

[Slaughter None]

Tucker Carlson was going to molest his young daughter.

I don't know how this post hasn't already been removed for NSFW and btw do you have even the slightest evidence to prove that?

[Ifreann]

Tucker Carlson was going to molest his young daughter.

I don't know how this post hasn't already been removed for NSFW and btw do you have even the slightest evidence to prove that?

Do you have the slightest evidence to prove that the NYT was going to publish the home address of Fox News commentator Tucker Carlson?

[Aclion]

considering it's been less then a month since the NYT did this to th author of slatestarcodex i'm disinclined to believe their denial, and more inclined to believe cooler heads realized Fox can do the same to them and snubbed the article.

[Juristonia]

Tucker Carlson was going to molest his young daughter.

I don't know how this post hasn't already been removed for NSFW and btw do you have even the slightest evidence to prove that?

About as much as you do, yet here you are.

[Nilokeras]

Which is still wrong, there is no reason to believe they were ever going to do anything of the sort.

They were in contact with him before his segment and might have posted his home address if he did not talk about it on his show.

Well this is pretty circular now isn't it? If whatever story gets published doesn't mention any address (and I'm still not convinced it even is going to, seeing as the guy is a nature writer with no experience in politics - unless Tucker has been feeding squirrels into a woodchipper or something in his spare time) he gets to claim victory and live rent free in the news for another cycle.

[Ifreann]

considering it's been less then a month since the NYT did this to th author of slatestarcodex i'm disinclined to believe their denial, and more inclined to believe cooler heads realized Fox can do the same to them and snubbed the article.

Fox once published the unlisted phone number of a CNN reporter who, as a joke, gave out the number of their Washington bureau on air.

That CNN reporter? Albert Einstein Tucker Carlson.

"They're a mean, sick group of people."
- Tucker Carlson, referring to his current employers

[Aclion]

considering it's been less then a month since the NYT did this to th author of slatestarcodex i'm disinclined to believe their denial, and more inclined to believe cooler heads realized Fox can do the same to them and snubbed the article.

Fox once published the unlisted phone number of a CNN reporter who, as a joke, gave out the number of their Washington bureau on air.

That CNN reporter? Albert Einstein Tucker Carlson.

"They're a mean, sick group of people."
- Tucker Carlson, referring to his current employers

So? Wht bearing does that have on the NYT history of doxxing people?

[Asle Leopolka]

considering it's been less then a month since the NYT did this to th author of slatestarcodex i'm disinclined to believe their denial, and more inclined to believe cooler heads realized Fox can do the same to them and snubbed the article.

Fox once published the unlisted phone number of a CNN reporter who, as a joke, gave out the number of their Washington bureau on air.

That CNN reporter? Albert Einstein Tucker Carlson.

"They're a mean, sick group of people."
- Tucker Carlson, referring to his current employers

Two wrongs don't make a right. Doxing is never an acceptable avenue to silence people who disagree with you.

[Vassenor]

Fox once published the unlisted phone number of a CNN reporter who, as a joke, gave out the number of their Washington bureau on air.

That CNN reporter? Albert Einstein Tucker Carlson.

"They're a mean, sick group of people."
- Tucker Carlson, referring to his current employers

Two wrongs don't make a right. Doxing is never an acceptable avenue to silence people who disagree with you.

You mean like Carlson has done to the reporter who he claims was totally going to doxx him?

[Vapormancer]

Two wrongs don't make a right. Doxing is never an acceptable avenue to silence people who disagree with you.

You mean like Carlson has done to the reporter who he claims was totally going to doxx him?

Oh no, you're supposed to wait for the knife to go instead of keeping it from happening! Just like that NYT reporter who got into it with tech people, its "journalism" when they spy on people but if you leak their conversations you are endangering their lives!

[Vassenor]

You mean like Carlson has done to the reporter who he claims was totally going to doxx him?

Oh no, you're supposed to wait for the knife to go instead of keeping it from happening! Just like that NYT reporter who got into it with tech people, its "journalism" when they spy on people but if you leak their conversations you are endangering their lives!

I'm not sure I follow your point here.

[Ifreann]

Fox once published the unlisted phone number of a CNN reporter who, as a joke, gave out the number of their Washington bureau on air.

That CNN reporter? Albert Einstein Tucker Carlson.

"They're a mean, sick group of people."
- Tucker Carlson, referring to his current employers

So? Wht bearing does that have on the NYT history of doxxing people?

It has bearing on Fox's history of doxxing reporters from competing outlets. The NYT is no doubt aware of that history, so it seems incredible that any of their journalists would invite the wrath of Fox by even considering publishing Carlson's home address.

Also it's very funny that Tucker Carlson actually was doxxed by Fox News and now works for them.

[Ifreann]

Fox once published the unlisted phone number of a CNN reporter who, as a joke, gave out the number of their Washington bureau on air.

That CNN reporter? Albert Einstein Tucker Carlson.

"They're a mean, sick group of people."
- Tucker Carlson, referring to his current employers

Two wrongs don't make a right. Doxing is never an acceptable avenue to silence people who disagree with you.

I wonder if Tucker Carlson agrees. He just threatened to dox people in order to silence them, and works for people that he knows have done the same before. How much can the practice possibly offend him?

[Knask]

Tucker Carlson was going to molest his young daughter.

I don't know how this post hasn't already been removed for NSFW and btw do you have even the slightest evidence to prove that?

Saying that Tucker Carlson was going to sexually abuse his daughter is within the PG-13 threshold.

As for evidence, why are you holding me to a higher standard than a "reporter"?

Besides, it's true. Listen to when he was on Bubba the Love Sponge, either 2009 or 2010. He was going to assault his own child, but was in contact with the child's mother first.

[Outer Sparta]

Do you really think Fox News would do that? Just go on the air and tell lies?

biggest /s ever in case it wasn't obvs lmao

As we all know, Fox News is the most trustworthy news source ever and they would never lie to anyone.