In your own words:
Except the "protesters" are the aggressors. It's kind of like a rapist equipped with pepper spray claiming it's for "self-defense".
Protip: if you stop looting, burning down buildings and assaulting/killing people, you won't need to "defend" yourself against the police. Meanwhile, shooting at the police, beating them up with sticks and baseball bats and throwing bricks, Molotov cocktails and bottles of piss at them, might increase your need for those "defenses".
Sure, you didn't say "all"... you just implied it by saying "the protesters", as opposed to "some of the protesters" or "most of the protesters". Saying just "the protesters" suggests that you didn't find it necessary to distinguish between those who fit your ideological fantasy of the protesters and those who didn't.
Your malicious intent was made all the more clear by your decision to unify all the acts of violence you listed as being the actions of "the protesters" as a whole.
Your language throughout has been totalizing.