Therefore you have no basis for said claim?
Advertisement
by Neutraligon » Mon Sep 07, 2020 4:27 pm
by Eukaryotic Cells » Mon Sep 07, 2020 4:31 pm
San Lumen wrote:Eukaryotic Cells wrote:Hopefully yes. Manufacturing enough doses and distributing them on a global scale will likely take years, though. I suppose you could make sure that everyone going to the Olympics has immunity (either natural immunity or from the vaccine)
Many companies are already mass producing so it doesn't take years.
by Kannap » Mon Sep 07, 2020 4:32 pm
Luna Amore wrote:Please remember to attend the ritualistic burning of Kannap for heresy
by San Lumen » Mon Sep 07, 2020 4:33 pm
Kannap wrote:San Lumen wrote:
Therefore you have no basis for said claim?
No, I've got plenty. How about you?
mid-2021
12-18 months (mid-2021)
Late 2021 - mid 2022
mid-2021
I think its going to happen will before that
I'd expect late 2021, tbh. But even if the vaccine is available to start circulating mid-2021, that's too late for the Olympics.
by Neutraligon » Mon Sep 07, 2020 4:34 pm
San Lumen wrote:I think its going to happen will before thatKannap wrote:
No, I've got plenty. How about you?
mid-2021
12-18 months (mid-2021)
Late 2021 - mid 2022
mid-2021
I'd expect late 2021, tbh. But even if the vaccine is available to start circulating mid-2021, that's too late for the Olympics.
by Kannap » Mon Sep 07, 2020 4:34 pm
San Lumen wrote:Kannap wrote:
No, I've got plenty. How about you?
mid-2021
12-18 months (mid-2021)
Late 2021 - mid 2022
mid-2021
I'd expect late 2021, tbh. But even if the vaccine is available to start circulating mid-2021, that's too late for the Olympics.
I think its going to happen will before that
Luna Amore wrote:Please remember to attend the ritualistic burning of Kannap for heresy
by Eukaryotic Cells » Mon Sep 07, 2020 4:34 pm
Kannap wrote:Eukaryotic Cells wrote:I wonder what sorts of precautions will be taken if they do push ahead with the Olympics. I'm sure this has been discussed somewhere, but I don't typically check Japanese news.
If the situation next Summer is the same as it is now? Cancellation, according to the IOC. There's no way to safely bring 5-7 million people from around the world to one city, no matter what measures you take.
by Borderlands of Rojava » Mon Sep 07, 2020 4:34 pm
by Neanderthaland » Mon Sep 07, 2020 4:38 pm
by Neutraligon » Mon Sep 07, 2020 4:39 pm
Neanderthaland wrote:Borderlands of Rojava wrote:
I mean fauci said many americans may be vaccinated by summer of next year.
Don't know about the whole world though.
They're probably going to start with vulnerable populations first, I imagine. Which wouldn't normally include Olympic athletes.
Unless some special dispensation were arranged.
by Neanderthaland » Mon Sep 07, 2020 4:47 pm
Neutraligon wrote:Neanderthaland wrote:They're probably going to start with vulnerable populations first, I imagine. Which wouldn't normally include Olympic athletes.
Unless some special dispensation were arranged.
Hmm, I would expect doctors and nurses first, as well as those who are high up in the government administration, and diplomats.
by Greater vakolicci haven » Mon Sep 07, 2020 4:47 pm
by Rusozak » Mon Sep 07, 2020 5:22 pm
by Shanghai industrial complex » Mon Sep 07, 2020 6:15 pm
Neanderthaland wrote:Neutraligon wrote:Hmm, I would expect doctors and nurses first, as well as those who are high up in the government administration, and diplomats.
"Of course it would be absolutely vital that our top government and military men be included to foster and impart the required principles of leadership and tradition"
EDIT: I would normally include medical workers as "vulnerable populations." In practice, if not in theory.
by US-SSR » Mon Sep 07, 2020 6:39 pm
Neanderthaland wrote:Neutraligon wrote:Hmm, I would expect doctors and nurses first, as well as those who are high up in the government administration, and diplomats.
"Of course it would be absolutely vital that our top government and military men be included to foster and impart the required principles of leadership and tradition"
EDIT: I would normally include medical workers as "vulnerable populations." In practice, if not in theory.
by Borderlands of Rojava » Mon Sep 07, 2020 7:18 pm
Rusozak wrote:Borderlands of Rojava wrote:
I mean fauci said many americans may be vaccinated by summer of next year.
Don't know about the whole world though.
I'm not even thinking about that for now. The clock doesn't start until they have a fully tested vaccine ready for distribution. And there's numerous contradicting predictions on when that will be, so really there's no way to predict when everyone will be vaccinated or when we will see a return to normalcy.
by Nobel Hobos 2 » Mon Sep 07, 2020 8:20 pm
by Ifreann » Mon Sep 07, 2020 8:45 pm
Kannap wrote:Loben III wrote:
tbh do we really need the Olympics?
They do far more harm than good, for sure. They fuel corruption, make countries spend billions of dollars pointlessly when that money could be better spent elsewhere, and they inflame nationalist sentiment.
Pretty much any time the Olympics comes to a city, it reminds us how little human life and dignity are worth compared to the Olympics:
1. In Beijing 2008, 1.5 million Beijingers lost their homes.
2. In the last 20 years alone, 2 million people have been forcibly displaced to make room for Olympic structures worldwide.
3. In Vancouver 2010, the build-up to the Olympics there caused homelessness to spike.
4. In Sochi 2014, thousands were displaced from their homes to make room for stadiums and rinks that have only been used a handful of times.
5. Cost always overruns and often leaves cities in debt for years following.
6. The money to fund them usually come from taxpayers and should be utilized on more vital things.
7. To fund the Sydney 2000 Games, New South Wales had to sap funds from its health and education budgets.
8. To fund Sochi 2014, the cost was footed by state-run banks while the Russian economy was moving fast towards a full-on recession.
And that's just a short list
If Tokyo goes on as planned next Summer we can add
9. Transmission of COVID among millions of spectators and athletes and deaths of tens or hundreds of thousands as a result.
by -SARS- » Mon Sep 07, 2020 8:54 pm
Ifreann wrote:Kannap wrote:
They do far more harm than good, for sure. They fuel corruption, make countries spend billions of dollars pointlessly when that money could be better spent elsewhere, and they inflame nationalist sentiment.
Pretty much any time the Olympics comes to a city, it reminds us how little human life and dignity are worth compared to the Olympics:
1. In Beijing 2008, 1.5 million Beijingers lost their homes.
2. In the last 20 years alone, 2 million people have been forcibly displaced to make room for Olympic structures worldwide.
3. In Vancouver 2010, the build-up to the Olympics there caused homelessness to spike.
4. In Sochi 2014, thousands were displaced from their homes to make room for stadiums and rinks that have only been used a handful of times.
5. Cost always overruns and often leaves cities in debt for years following.
6. The money to fund them usually come from taxpayers and should be utilized on more vital things.
7. To fund the Sydney 2000 Games, New South Wales had to sap funds from its health and education budgets.
8. To fund Sochi 2014, the cost was footed by state-run banks while the Russian economy was moving fast towards a full-on recession.
And that's just a short list
If Tokyo goes on as planned next Summer we can add
9. Transmission of COVID among millions of spectators and athletes and deaths of tens or hundreds of thousands as a result.
In Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six, the 1998 novel which is the basis for the video game franchise Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six, a critical element of the ultimate plan of the villains is to spread a deadly virus at the 2000 Sydney Olympics, chosen specifically because those infected would return home to nations all over the world. Incidentally, they're radical environmentalists whose goal is to wipe out almost all of the human race to stop us from all our pesky pollution.
Wait...are we living in a Tom Clancy novel?
by Rusozak » Mon Sep 07, 2020 10:11 pm
-SARS- wrote:Ifreann wrote:In Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six, the 1998 novel which is the basis for the video game franchise Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six, a critical element of the ultimate plan of the villains is to spread a deadly virus at the 2000 Sydney Olympics, chosen specifically because those infected would return home to nations all over the world. Incidentally, they're radical environmentalists whose goal is to wipe out almost all of the human race to stop us from all our pesky pollution.
Wait...are we living in a Tom Clancy novel?
COVID isn't deadly enough for that. It's deadly enough to make a noticeable spike in the number of patients at the hospital, but not to wipe out the majority of the human race.
by Glorious Hong Kong » Mon Sep 07, 2020 10:18 pm
by Eukaryotic Cells » Mon Sep 07, 2020 10:29 pm
Glorious Hong Kong wrote:As Americans brace for 2nd wave of COVID-19, here's why experts predict more infections but fewer deaths
A greater domestic abundance of PPE and other medical supplies means that developed countries are now a lot less reliant on the CCP for medical supplies despite repeated spikes in transmission. Let's hope the new drugs, treatments, therapies, and shielding of older people actually work in keeping deaths down. We don't need China's help after all. No more begging, groveling, and going on public record to "thank" China in exchange for free "donations".
Not all countries experience changing seasons. Here in Southeast Asia, it's summer all year-round. We don't have to worry about a flu season that will never arrive. Not to mention the seasons are reversed in the southern hemisphere if you paid any attention in geography class.
by -SARS- » Mon Sep 07, 2020 10:49 pm
Eukaryotic Cells wrote:Glorious Hong Kong wrote:As Americans brace for 2nd wave of COVID-19, here's why experts predict more infections but fewer deaths
A greater domestic abundance of PPE and other medical supplies means that developed countries are now a lot less reliant on the CCP for medical supplies despite repeated spikes in transmission. Let's hope the new drugs, treatments, therapies, and shielding of older people actually work in keeping deaths down. We don't need China's help after all. No more begging, groveling, and going on public record to "thank" China in exchange for free "donations".
Not all countries experience changing seasons. Here in Southeast Asia, it's summer all year-round. We don't have to worry about a flu season that will never arrive. Not to mention the seasons are reversed in the southern hemisphere if you paid any attention in geography class.
I think the case fatality rate will be down, definitely. We know a lot more about this virus than we did back in the spring.
I'm still fairly worried it could inflict a sizable death toll.
by The Black Forrest » Mon Sep 07, 2020 10:54 pm
Eukaryotic Cells wrote:Glorious Hong Kong wrote:As Americans brace for 2nd wave of COVID-19, here's why experts predict more infections but fewer deaths
A greater domestic abundance of PPE and other medical supplies means that developed countries are now a lot less reliant on the CCP for medical supplies despite repeated spikes in transmission. Let's hope the new drugs, treatments, therapies, and shielding of older people actually work in keeping deaths down. We don't need China's help after all. No more begging, groveling, and going on public record to "thank" China in exchange for free "donations".
Not all countries experience changing seasons. Here in Southeast Asia, it's summer all year-round. We don't have to worry about a flu season that will never arrive. Not to mention the seasons are reversed in the southern hemisphere if you paid any attention in geography class.
I think the case fatality rate will be down, definitely. We know a lot more about this virus than we did back in the spring.
I'm still fairly worried it could inflict a sizable death toll.
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Cretie, First Nightmare, Floofybit, Repreteop, Statesburg
Advertisement