NATION

PASSWORD

Study finds State Legislatures Dominated By white Men

For discussion and debate about anything. (Not a roleplay related forum; out-of-character commentary only.)

Advertisement

Remove ads

User avatar
Diarcesia
Negotiator
 
Posts: 6803
Founded: Aug 21, 2016
Scandinavian Liberal Paradise

Postby Diarcesia » Wed Jul 22, 2020 8:03 pm

Alcala-Cordel wrote:
Diarcesia wrote:It does feel like that if the equality is done not by bringing up the disadvantaged, but by pulling down the advantaged.

When you balance a scale, do you bend it so both arms are facing down or do you take some weight off the part with more and add it to the top? It's impossible for everyone to be the privileged class unless there is no privileged class.

There should be no privileged class by extending the privileges of the privileged to everyone. The other way around, in its logical conclusion, leads to a state of equality where everyone is poor.

User avatar
Alcala-Cordel
Senator
 
Posts: 4406
Founded: Dec 16, 2019
Scandinavian Liberal Paradise

Postby Alcala-Cordel » Wed Jul 22, 2020 8:19 pm

Diarcesia wrote:
Alcala-Cordel wrote:When you balance a scale, do you bend it so both arms are facing down or do you take some weight off the part with more and add it to the top? It's impossible for everyone to be the privileged class unless there is no privileged class.

There should be no privileged class by extending the privileges of the privileged to everyone. The other way around, in its logical conclusion, leads to a state of equality where everyone is poor.

It's not possible to make everyone upper-class.The upper class is the product of hierarchy and exploitation, with the richest robbing the workers beneath them of the value of their labor ("profit").

That being said, we don't all need to be poor either. It is possible to be middle class without exploiting others
FROM THE RIVER TO THE SEA

User avatar
Diarcesia
Negotiator
 
Posts: 6803
Founded: Aug 21, 2016
Scandinavian Liberal Paradise

Postby Diarcesia » Wed Jul 22, 2020 8:20 pm

Alcala-Cordel wrote:
Diarcesia wrote:There should be no privileged class by extending the privileges of the privileged to everyone. The other way around, in its logical conclusion, leads to a state of equality where everyone is poor.

It's not possible to make everyone upper-class.The upper class is the product of hierarchy and exploitation, with the richest robbing the workers beneath them of the value of their labor ("profit").

That being said, we don't all need to be poor either. It is possible to be middle class without exploiting others

That's more what I have in mind really...

User avatar
Alcala-Cordel
Senator
 
Posts: 4406
Founded: Dec 16, 2019
Scandinavian Liberal Paradise

Postby Alcala-Cordel » Wed Jul 22, 2020 8:22 pm

Diarcesia wrote:
Alcala-Cordel wrote:It's not possible to make everyone upper-class.The upper class is the product of hierarchy and exploitation, with the richest robbing the workers beneath them of the value of their labor ("profit").

That being said, we don't all need to be poor either. It is possible to be middle class without exploiting others

That's more what I have in mind really...

In that case I agree with you
FROM THE RIVER TO THE SEA

User avatar
Aureumterra
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 8521
Founded: Oct 25, 2017
Ex-Nation

Postby Aureumterra » Wed Jul 22, 2020 8:32 pm

Bear Stearns wrote:Because whiteness is by it's very nature, in fact, violence, white men in positions of power by default represent an oppressive occupying force, even ones who claim to be Allies. And because these white men live in a system where even if they are no longer in politics, their whiteness still oppresses people by virtue of them taking up the physical and mental spaces of People of Color whenever they make their presence known in public. And because they are oppressing people stolen land, all of their earned and inherited wealth is stolen too.

Therefore, the only solution that would be a first step towards justice is not only for any white male to resign from any position of authority he has, but also to relinquish his property to People Color and then promptly kill himself.

If you are a white male and do not take this affirmative stance towards justice, your silence will be viewed as consent with this oppressive system and you will be considered hostile.

/s

Some sociology professor somewhere in Sweden has probably said this word for word
NS Parliament: Aditya Sriraam - Unity and Consolidation Party
Latin American Political RP
RightValues
Icelandic Civic Nationalist and proud
I’m your average Íslandic NS player
I DO NOT USE NS STATS!
A 12 civilization, according to this index.
Scary Right Wing Capitalist who thinks the current state of the world (before the pandemic) is the best it had been

User avatar
Picairn
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 10557
Founded: Feb 21, 2020
Left-wing Utopia

Postby Picairn » Wed Jul 22, 2020 8:40 pm

Bear Stearns wrote:Because whiteness is by it's very nature, in fact, violence, white men in positions of power by default represent an oppressive occupying force, even ones who claim to be Allies. And because these white men live in a system where even if they are no longer in politics, their whiteness still oppresses people by virtue of them taking up the physical and mental spaces of People of Color whenever they make their presence known in public. And because they are oppressing people stolen land, all of their earned and inherited wealth is stolen too.

Therefore, the only solution that would be a first step towards justice is not only for any white male to resign from any position of authority he has, but also to relinquish his property to People Color and then promptly kill himself.

If you are a white male and do not take this affirmative stance towards justice, your silence will be viewed as consent with this oppressive system and you will be considered hostile.

/s

Excellent satire of sociology. :clap:
Picairn's Ministry of Foreign Affairs
Minister: Edward H. Cornell
WA Ambassador: John M. Terry (Active)
Factbook | Constitution | Newspaper
Social democrat, passionate political observer, and naval warfare enthusiast.
More NSG-y than NSG veterans
♛ The Empire of Picairn ♛
-✯ ✯ ✯ ✯ ✯-—————————-✯ ✯ ✯ ✯ ✯-
Colonel (Brevet) of the North Pacific Army, COO of Warzone Trinidad

User avatar
Arkhane
Diplomat
 
Posts: 909
Founded: Jul 29, 2012
Libertarian Police State

Postby Arkhane » Wed Jul 22, 2020 10:42 pm

Studies also find that the African nations and governments are dominated by black men.
Quite a shock to me too.

User avatar
Kowani
Post Czar
 
Posts: 44957
Founded: Apr 01, 2018
Democratic Socialists

Postby Kowani » Wed Jul 22, 2020 10:48 pm

Arkhane wrote:Studies also find that the African nations and governments are dominated by black men.
Quite a shock to me too.

This is a spectacularly bad false equivalence.
American History and Historiography; Political and Labour History, Urbanism, Political Parties, Congressional Procedure, Elections.

Servant of The Democracy since 1896.


Historian, of sorts.

Effortposts can be found here!

User avatar
The Lone Alliance
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 9437
Founded: May 25, 2005
Left-Leaning College State

Postby The Lone Alliance » Thu Jul 23, 2020 12:29 am

I wonder how many State Legislatures are dominated by rich people?

I'm betting almost all of them, clearly this means we need more poor Legislatures.... said no one ever.

But yes that is likely why most State Legislatures are white, because more white people have more wealth and you need a lot of wealth to run for office.

Duvniask wrote:Holy shit, all the thoughtless people coming out the woodwork in this thread.

"Why should we care"

Do you guys not understand why it's good to have governments that are representative and in touch with the concerns of the public? What the fuck.

You're buying into the bigoted mindset that the only way to be in touch with someone is to share their skin color, genitals, or sexual identity... you can share all that and still be a complete heartless sociopath.... like a lot of politicians are.
Last edited by The Lone Alliance on Thu Jul 23, 2020 12:35 am, edited 1 time in total.
"Voice or no voice, the people can always be brought to the bidding of the leaders. That is easy. All you have to do is tell them they are being attacked, and denounce the pacifists for lack of patriotism, and exposing the country to greater danger." -Herman Goering
--------------
War is cruelty, and you cannot refine it; -William Tecumseh Sherman

User avatar
Nobel Hobos 2
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 14114
Founded: Dec 04, 2019
Ex-Nation

Postby Nobel Hobos 2 » Thu Jul 23, 2020 1:06 am

Adamede wrote:For those who have a problem with the racial makeup of American government, how would you solve the problem?


Me, I'd start with my party. Before anyone can get into government, they have to win a primary election where the voters are mostly members of my party. I'd start with my party.
I report offenses if and only if they are crimes.
No footwear industry: citizens cannot afford new shoes.
High rate of Nobel prizes and other academic achievements.

User avatar
Nobel Hobos 2
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 14114
Founded: Dec 04, 2019
Ex-Nation

Postby Nobel Hobos 2 » Thu Jul 23, 2020 1:08 am

The Lone Alliance wrote:I wonder how many State Legislatures are dominated by rich people?

I'm betting almost all of them, clearly this means we need more poor Legislatures.... said no one ever.

But yes that is likely why most State Legislatures are white, because more white people have more wealth and you need a lot of wealth to run for office.


All of them, yes, and yes.
I report offenses if and only if they are crimes.
No footwear industry: citizens cannot afford new shoes.
High rate of Nobel prizes and other academic achievements.

User avatar
Nobel Hobos 2
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 14114
Founded: Dec 04, 2019
Ex-Nation

Postby Nobel Hobos 2 » Thu Jul 23, 2020 1:09 am

A party could offer "scholarships" to help both poor people and minorities study up for primaries.
I report offenses if and only if they are crimes.
No footwear industry: citizens cannot afford new shoes.
High rate of Nobel prizes and other academic achievements.

User avatar
Duvniask
Negotiator
 
Posts: 6565
Founded: Aug 30, 2012
Left-wing Utopia

Postby Duvniask » Thu Jul 23, 2020 4:46 am

The Lone Alliance wrote:
Duvniask wrote:Holy shit, all the thoughtless people coming out the woodwork in this thread.

"Why should we care"

Do you guys not understand why it's good to have governments that are representative and in touch with the concerns of the public? What the fuck.

You're buying into the bigoted mindset that the only way to be in touch with someone is to share their skin color, genitals, or sexual identity... you can share all that and still be a complete heartless sociopath.... like a lot of politicians are.

Show me where I said anything like "the only way to be in touch with someone is to share their skin color, genitals, or sexual identity".

Reading essentialism into what I said is just a strawman. The point is that a bunch of old white men aren't going to necessarily understand the concerns of other groups, they'll probably focus more on issues that, you know, old white men care about.
Last edited by Duvniask on Thu Jul 23, 2020 4:48 am, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
Soiled fruit roll ups
Envoy
 
Posts: 251
Founded: Jun 25, 2020
Ex-Nation

Postby Soiled fruit roll ups » Thu Jul 23, 2020 4:53 am

Duvniask wrote:
The Lone Alliance wrote:You're buying into the bigoted mindset that the only way to be in touch with someone is to share their skin color, genitals, or sexual identity... you can share all that and still be a complete heartless sociopath.... like a lot of politicians are.

Show me where I said anything like "the only way to be in touch with someone is to share their skin color, genitals, or sexual identity".

Reading essentialism into what I said is just a strawman. The point is that a bunch of old white men aren't going to necessarily understand the concerns of other groups, they'll probably focus more on issues that, you know, old white men care about.


White people not being smart enough to understand the complex thinkin of us coloured folks bullshit again. Its not like they could ask, or any of a million ways to work shit out.

Stop being so fucking racist.
JAGERA/TURRBULL/YEERONGPAN
FIRST NATION AUSTRALIAN - ABORIGINAL

The United States is also a one party system but, with typical American extravagance, they have two of them.- Julius Nyerere.

User avatar
Duvniask
Negotiator
 
Posts: 6565
Founded: Aug 30, 2012
Left-wing Utopia

Postby Duvniask » Thu Jul 23, 2020 4:57 am

Soiled fruit roll ups wrote:
Duvniask wrote:Show me where I said anything like "the only way to be in touch with someone is to share their skin color, genitals, or sexual identity".

Reading essentialism into what I said is just a strawman. The point is that a bunch of old white men aren't going to necessarily understand the concerns of other groups, they'll probably focus more on issues that, you know, old white men care about.


White people not being smart enough to understand the complex thinkin of us coloured folks bullshit again. Its not like they could ask, or any of a million ways to work shit out.

Stop being so fucking racist.

So your response to my post saying essentialism is a strawman of me... is to strawman me with more essentialism. Ok buddy.

I know bait when I see it. This reverse psychology bullshit of "you're the real racist for thinking White folks might not entirely be in touch with Black people" isn't going to work. Someone could indeed ask and try to learn the issues, but the problem is: will they? And will they learn it from the perspective of those who suffer the consequences or will they learn it from an abstracted position where they don't get a real sense of it all?
Last edited by Duvniask on Thu Jul 23, 2020 5:02 am, edited 2 times in total.

User avatar
Valrifell
Post Czar
 
Posts: 31063
Founded: Aug 18, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Valrifell » Thu Jul 23, 2020 7:25 am

Aureumterra wrote:
Bear Stearns wrote:Because whiteness is by it's very nature, in fact, violence, white men in positions of power by default represent an oppressive occupying force, even ones who claim to be Allies. And because these white men live in a system where even if they are no longer in politics, their whiteness still oppresses people by virtue of them taking up the physical and mental spaces of People of Color whenever they make their presence known in public. And because they are oppressing people stolen land, all of their earned and inherited wealth is stolen too.

Therefore, the only solution that would be a first step towards justice is not only for any white male to resign from any position of authority he has, but also to relinquish his property to People Color and then promptly kill himself.

If you are a white male and do not take this affirmative stance towards justice, your silence will be viewed as consent with this oppressive system and you will be considered hostile.

/s

Some sociology professor somewhere in Sweden has probably said this word for word


I can never understand why you (and right-wingers in general) harbor such an internal hatred for academics you disagree with and Swedes
HAVING AN ALL CAPS SIG MAKES ME FEEL SMART

User avatar
San Lumen
Post Kaiser
 
Posts: 87402
Founded: Jul 02, 2009
Liberal Democratic Socialists

Postby San Lumen » Thu Jul 23, 2020 8:21 am

Arkhane wrote:Studies also find that the African nations and governments are dominated by black men.
Quite a shock to me too.

That is a terrible analogy

User avatar
Adamede
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 7809
Founded: Jul 22, 2020
Ex-Nation

Postby Adamede » Thu Jul 23, 2020 8:22 am

Nobel Hobos 2 wrote:
Adamede wrote:For those who have a problem with the racial makeup of American government, how would you solve the problem?


Me, I'd start with my party. Before anyone can get into government, they have to win a primary election where the voters are mostly members of my party. I'd start with my party.

So you're telling me that you'd determine who represents you party primarily through what, race?

User avatar
San Lumen
Post Kaiser
 
Posts: 87402
Founded: Jul 02, 2009
Liberal Democratic Socialists

Postby San Lumen » Thu Jul 23, 2020 8:24 am

Adamede wrote:
Nobel Hobos 2 wrote:
Me, I'd start with my party. Before anyone can get into government, they have to win a primary election where the voters are mostly members of my party. I'd start with my party.

So you're telling me that you'd determine who represents you party primarily through what, race?

I think what they are referring to is a closed primary. Only registered members of that party can chose its nominees

User avatar
Giovenith
Retired Moderator
 
Posts: 21421
Founded: Feb 08, 2012
Left-wing Utopia

Postby Giovenith » Thu Jul 23, 2020 8:31 am

Soiled fruit roll ups wrote:
Duvniask wrote:Show me where I said anything like "the only way to be in touch with someone is to share their skin color, genitals, or sexual identity".

Reading essentialism into what I said is just a strawman. The point is that a bunch of old white men aren't going to necessarily understand the concerns of other groups, they'll probably focus more on issues that, you know, old white men care about.


White people not being smart enough to understand the complex thinkin of us coloured folks bullshit again. Its not like they could ask, or any of a million ways to work shit out.

Stop being so fucking racist.


Let's calm a little, okay?
⟡ and in time, and in time, we will all be stars ⟡
she/her

User avatar
Adamede
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 7809
Founded: Jul 22, 2020
Ex-Nation

Postby Adamede » Thu Jul 23, 2020 8:34 am

San Lumen wrote:
Adamede wrote:So you're telling me that you'd determine who represents you party primarily through what, race?

I think what they are referring to is a closed primary. Only registered members of that party can chose its nominees

So what already happens? How would that change the racial makeup of your party's representatives necessarily?

User avatar
San Lumen
Post Kaiser
 
Posts: 87402
Founded: Jul 02, 2009
Liberal Democratic Socialists

Postby San Lumen » Thu Jul 23, 2020 8:39 am

Adamede wrote:
San Lumen wrote:I think what they are referring to is a closed primary. Only registered members of that party can chose its nominees

So what already happens? How would that change the racial makeup of your party's representatives necessarily?

Not all states have closed primaries.What you could do is recruit more women and people of color to run. It’s still up to the electorate to decide who they want in the primary

User avatar
Elwher
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 9275
Founded: May 24, 2012
Capitalizt

Postby Elwher » Thu Jul 23, 2020 9:22 am

Let me see if I've got this.

If I vote for a White politician because he is White I am a racist.

If a Black voter votes for a Black politician because he is Black, he is expressing solidarity.

Right.
CYNIC, n. A blackguard whose faulty vision sees things as they are, not as they ought to be. Hence the custom among the Scythians of plucking out a cynic's eyes to improve his vision.
Ambrose Bierce

User avatar
Valrifell
Post Czar
 
Posts: 31063
Founded: Aug 18, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Valrifell » Thu Jul 23, 2020 9:25 am

Elwher wrote:Let me see if I've got this.

If I vote for a White politician because he is White I am a racist.

If a Black voter votes for a Black politician because he is Black, he is expressing solidarity.

Right.


I don't think you're racist for voting for white politicians nor do I think that voting for minority candidates deserves praise itself.

I find it odd how legislatures can be so irrepresentative of the demographics of their constituents, which isn't supposed to happen in an ideal world. This points to interesting issues with underlying systems and how they make it such that candidates are more likely to be white because of all the capital that's needed to be a candidate and that minority communities are also more likely to be impoverished.

That is to say, mine and several other arguments are aimed at the impersonal systems and economic disparities that are probably behind these stats and are not interested in shaming people for their voting habits.
HAVING AN ALL CAPS SIG MAKES ME FEEL SMART

User avatar
Saiwania
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 22269
Founded: Jun 30, 2008
Ex-Nation

Postby Saiwania » Thu Jul 23, 2020 9:40 am

This is exactly how I like it, most legislatures being majority White. This (unfortunately from my perspective) doesn't correlate to laws that'll better protect a White majority and ensure that the country won't become diverse. I'd expect that it won't be the case for forever. In more diverse states the legislature will become more diverse overtime. But in states like Maine, that has a better chance of remaining predominately White indefinitely if it remains a mostly White state.

Class is ultimately more important in terms of who gets into government beyond the most local level than race is. If you have money or donors, you can get into elected office. If you don't, you can't for the most part; unless your campaign and platform really is so brilliant and popular.
Sith Acolyte
Peace is a lie, there is only passion. Through passion, I gain strength. Through strength, I gain power. Through power, I gain victory. Through victory, my chains are broken!

PreviousNext

Advertisement

Remove ads

Return to General

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Bienenhalde, Big Eyed Animation, Ethel mermania, Floofybit, Hidrandia, Kostane, Kubra, Lagene, Ors Might, Plan Neonie, Ravemath, Spirit of Hope, Stellar Colonies, Uiiop, Umeria, USS Monitor

Advertisement

Remove ads