NationStates

Soiled fruit roll ups wrote:

Duvniask wrote:You talk shit, you get shit. I honestly don't understand how you can think otherwise.

Because victimisation is already considered a crime in most cases and just needs to be expanded to cover this.

So would you apply this for NAMBLA members as well?

The Reformed American Republic wrote:

TURTLESHROOM II wrote:Trump is himself a billionaire and I have been convinced by his ACTIONS that he cares about my interests.

No, he only cares about his own interests. He throws you bones and you fall for it.

Well, if that is the case, then his interests align with mine. Trump is not of good moral character and he has no class, but he hasn't backed down in fighting for the agenda I voted for, to the best of his ability. He stands up to the left instead of kissing their rear (as the GOP, being the Stupid Party, always does) and fights like a Democrat. I may despise the Democrats, but I greatly admire and pine for their conviction, drive, and aggression in getting things done.

Paul Ryan's Trump Derangement was so bad that he deliberately threw the House to the Democrats to keep Trump from getting his way. (The Chamber of Commerce is one of his buddies, and they are the biggest advocates of illegal immigration around.)

So let's say he means nothing and thinks I am trash. What bones is he throwing? I got two hundred miles of Wall, two hundred (preferably Originalist) judges, a defense of my faith and of the Church (despite Trump not being Christian), and countless other accomplishments that I have smiled at over time. Yes, I do not agree with everything Trump does, and yes, he will do something to disappoint me every now and then, but Trump has fought for my interests, be it for himself or me, and that is what matters to me when I choose a politician.

Honestly who cares. He didn’t say anything super crazy, it was funny but irresponsible. I don’t think he did anything wrong.

Valrifell wrote:Giving people and businesses the freedom to distance themselves from individuals with they disagree with has been a thing for centuries. Only now do "Libertarians" rail against it because, shocker, they hate freedom.

No Libertarian advocates for making it illegal to fire someone because they have political beliefs in opposition to yours. With that system in place, I cannot Heck, most Libertarians advocate for an unlimited right of a private enterprise that is not essential (e.g. police, fire, medical, utilities, water) to discriminate in hiring and firing for any and all reasons.

TURTLESHROOM II wrote:
So let's say he means nothing and thinks I am trash. What bones is he throwing? I got two hundred miles of Wall,

No, you got 200 miles of Trump fixing what already existed.
[/quote]

He fucked around and found out. Now Tucker is going to have to find somebody else to write his fascist dog-whistles.

Also, his posts were painfully unfunny, even by "extremely online sad sack of reactionary shit" standards.

Liriena wrote:He fucked around and found out. Now Tucker is going to have to find somebody else to write his fascist dog-whistles.

He has years of practice listening to them, after all.

Liriena wrote:He fucked around and found out. Now Tucker is going to have to find somebody else to write his fascist dog-whistles.

And the douchebag is apparently an InCel. Bonus points.

woah i'm shocked right now
this is me being shocked

Gormwood wrote:

Liriena wrote:He fucked around and found out. Now Tucker is going to have to find somebody else to write his fascist dog-whistles.

And the douchebag is apparently an InCel. Bonus points.

The fact that he used a medieval king as his username was a red flag.

He didn’t say anything wrong though.

Can someone summarize for me exactly what the guy said?

Fedel wrote:Can someone summarize for me exactly what the guy said?

Made fun of minorities, women, and Dems. One must be very careful when speaking ill of the disempowered

Illegal Planets wrote:He didn’t say anything wrong though.

https://edition.cnn.com/2020/07/10/medi ... index.html

Just this week, the writer, Blake Neff, responded to a thread started by another user in 2018 with the subject line, "Would u let a JET BLACK congo n****er do lasik eye surgery on u for 50% off?" Neff wrote, "I wouldn't get LASIK from an Asian for free, so no." (The subject line was not censored on the forum.) On June 5, Neff wrote, "Black doods staying inside playing Call of Duty is probably one of the biggest factors keeping crime down." On June 24, Neff commented, "Honestly given how tired black people always claim to be, maybe the real crisis is their lack of sleep." On June 26, Neff wrote that the only people who care about changing the name of the NFL's Washington Redskins are "white libs and their university-'educated' pets."

And over the course of five years, Neff has maintained a lengthy thread in which he has derided a woman and posted information about her dating life that has invited other users to mock her and invade her privacy. There has at times also been overlap between some material he posted or saw on the forum and Carlson's show.

I hope you're not planning to make a hobby out of covering for racist creeps.

Fedel wrote:Can someone summarize for me exactly what the guy said?

The original CNN article gave some examples. I'm trying to look through the forum in question and see what else is there.

Tucker Carlson is a dry-drunk, bigoted, barely comprehensible, cowardly, bloated pig-faced liar and all around human piece of excrement. Makes sense he would hire someone similar to himself.

Liriena wrote:

Fedel wrote:Can someone summarize for me exactly what the guy said?

The original CNN article gave some examples. I'm trying to look through the forum in question and see what else is there.

Thanks.

Major-Tom wrote:Tucker Carlson is a dry-drunk, bigoted, barely comprehensible, cowardly, bloated pig-faced liar and all around human piece of excrement. Makes sense he would hire someone similar to himself.

Jon Stewart owned him like a brand new home and he never recovered.

Liriena wrote:He fucked around and found out. Now Tucker is going to have to find somebody else to write his fascist dog-whistles.

Well, he isn't fascist, but he clearly is very misinformed and weird. Doesn't mean he has to be persecuted. Unless he threatens a group of people simply for being themselves.

Kowani wrote:

TURTLESHROOM II wrote:
So let's say he means nothing and thinks I am trash. What bones is he throwing? I got two hundred miles of Wall,

No, you got 200 miles of Trump fixing what already existed.

[/quote]

In other words Trump did no more than previous presidents to keep out the scary brown boogeymen.

Illegal Planets wrote:

Fedel wrote:Can someone summarize for me exactly what the guy said?

Made fun of minorities, women, and Dems. One must be very careful when speaking ill of the disempowered

I can almost taste the sarcasm in this post.

The hatred/bigotry isn't a bug, but the feature for a lot of people (including myself). The writer should ignore the controversy until it blows over or quietly come back once the peanut gallery has moved on and their attentions are elsewhere. They arguably did their job satisfactorily. Their only flaw was that they were doxxed.

Saiwania wrote:The hatred/bigotry isn't a bug, but the feature for a lot of people (including myself). The writer should ignore the controversy until it blows over or quietly come back once the peanut gallery has moved on and their attentions are elsewhere. They arguably did their job satisfactorily. Their only flaw was that they were doxxed.

Of course you support this. You are the open racial nationalist.

Saiwania wrote:The hatred/bigotry isn't a bug, but the feature for a lot of people (including myself). The writer should ignore the controversy until it blows over or quietly come back once the peanut gallery has moved on and their attentions are elsewhere. They arguably did their job satisfactorily. Their only flaw was that they were doxxed.

Anyone see the Vaush-Destiny v. James Allsup-Eric Striker debate?
Yeah, Sai’s Eric Striker.