Reddit Starts One-Sided Censorship

[West Leas Oros 2]

Hahahahahahaha! Wait, you're serious? It was MORE of a dumpster fire Before they decided to become vengeful fools hating people simply for being born as "THE EVIL OPPRESSOR IDENTITY!!!"?

what the fuck are u even talking about
can u stop trying (unsuccessfully) to be funny and make a calm, reasonable argument for once

Hey, you’re the one defending reddit being shitty (as they do). I’m not the unreasonable one. That honor goes to the Snoo.

[Liriena]

On the bright side, I think Steve Huffman just broke the record for the most downvoted post on the website
(Image)

Keep that negative going down!

Nah, he's nowhere near the record for most downvoted. Remember Star Wars Battlefront 2.

[The Emerald Legion]

On the bright side, I think Steve Huffman just broke the record for the most downvoted post on the website
(Image)

Keep that negative going down!

Nah, he's nowhere near the record for most downvoted. Remember Star Wars Battlefront 2.

So what you're saying is for that Revolution to happen, EA would have to become president?

[Liriena]

Nah, he's nowhere near the record for most downvoted. Remember Star Wars Battlefront 2.

So what you're saying is for that Revolution to happen, EA would have to become president?

YES

[Liriena]

Sheesh, why are non-whites so sensitive?

Pictured here: white people not being oversensitive at all

[Northern Davincia]

So what you're saying is for that Revolution to happen, EA would have to become president?

YES

EA is basically a benevolent IRS.

[West Leas Oros 2]

Sheesh, why are non-whites so sensitive?

Pictured here: white people not being oversensitive at all

So... a Karen is your proof? Can we all just agree that people of all kinds have varying levels of sensitivity? Met plenty of people, white or not, who were super damned sensitive. Same with the most insensitive. Geez, everybody is so sensitive these days!

[Thermodolia]

Nobody owns them though. So it's not slavery. Am I enslaved because I have to take time out of my day to do my taxes Every year? I'd certainly prefer not to.

Are the people in China who make MAGAhats slaves ? They are required to shop at their employers shops, live in houses owned by their employers and earn less than those facilities costs, meaning their children are required to also work for the employer.

Yes they are slaves and Trump is a known hypocrite in this regard

[Costa Fierro]

On the bright side, I think Steve Huffman just broke the record for the most downvoted post on the website
(Image)

Keep that negative going down!

Why?

[The Emerald Legion]

Nobody owns them though. So it's not slavery. Am I enslaved because I have to take time out of my day to do my taxes Every year? I'd certainly prefer not to.

Are the people in China who make MAGAhats slaves ? They are required to shop at their employers shops, live in houses owned by their employers and earn less than those facilities costs, meaning their children are required to also work for the employer.

I mean, almost everyone in China is a slave. So yes.

[Liriena]

YES

EA is basically a benevolent IRS.

???

[Costa Fierro]

Why would r/redpill be banned when men are the minority in the US and face discrimination in many walks of life :thinking: could it be that corporations don't actually care about discrimination?

RedPill isn't remotely interested in helping men or discussion the many and varied ways in which they are discriminated against. It was really a place for steroid-addicted cavemen to discuss how much rocks they should lift to ignore their insecurities or why men who don't bop women over the head with their clubs and drag them back to their caves are "betas" and "pussies".

It's been like that for a wee while. They were discussing that back in my /r/MGTOW days.

[Liriena]

Pictured here: white people not being oversensitive at all

Oh no, a Karen calling the cops on someone vs blatant racism by a multi-billion dollar corporation.

Gee, which am I gonna think is worse?

I'd say the one which involved a racist liberal trying to use law enforcement as hitmen on someone for asking her to leash her dog.

[Liriena]

Why would r/redpill be banned when men are the minority in the US and face discrimination in many walks of life :thinking: could it be that corporations don't actually care about discrimination?

RedPill isn't remotely interested in helping men or discussion the many and varied ways in which they are discriminated against. It was really a place for steroid-addicted cavemen to discuss how much rocks they should lift to ignore their insecurities or why men who don't bop women over the head with their clubs and drag them back to their caves are "betas" and "pussies".

It's been like that for a wee while. They were discussing that back in my /r/MGTOW days.

Sounds about right.

[West Leas Oros 2]

Why would r/redpill be banned when men are the minority in the US and face discrimination in many walks of life :thinking: could it be that corporations don't actually care about discrimination?

Try “Woke^TM”! The brand new hot commodity guaranteed to bring your company back in good graces with the public! Are those uppity protestors angry about your predatory business practices, or perhaps your reliance on underpaid third world laborers, or maybe a complete disregard for human wellbeing that harms the bottom line? Woke^TM solves all these problems and more! Side effects include the perpetuation of an exploitative system and unnecessary human suffering.

[West Leas Oros 2]

Oh no, a Karen calling the cops on someone vs blatant racism by a multi-billion dollar corporation.

Gee, which am I gonna think is worse?

I'd say the one which involved a racist liberal trying to use law enforcement as hitmen on someone for asking her to leash her dog.

I hope that you still see at least some fault in what reddit is doing.

[Thermodolia]

Actually its mostly white people, usually white liberals, who support this stuff. Us blacks are opposed to tearing down statues of Washington and doing ridiculous one sided censorship, we just want to end police brutality and institute police reform. If you look at the videos of the statues being torn down, it’s mostly white people doing it "one behalf of minorities."

So don’t scapegoat us

Really? All the black protestors I see tearing down statues say otherwise.

A lot of those protesters aren’t black. For example the majority of those who made up CHAZ where white

[Liriena]

I'd say the one which involved a racist liberal trying to use law enforcement as hitmen on someone for asking her to leash her dog.

I hope that you still see at least some fault in what reddit is doing.

I do. The wording of the policy itself is garbage. If they wanted to make it specific and relevant to our current context, in terms of who are the biggest culprits and victims when it comes to hate speech, they could have done a far better job. And beyond that, private platforms tend to be terrible at enforcing their rules on hate speech.

I nevertheless think hate speech policies in online platforms are necessary, because a lot of hate speech is often quite dangerous on a material level, as well as symbolic. No platform, public or private, should allow violent hate movements to organize and recruit.

[West Leas Oros 2]

I hope that you still see at least some fault in what reddit is doing.

I do. The wording of the policy itself is garbage. If they wanted to make it specific and relevant to our current context, in terms of who are the biggest culprits and victims when it comes to hate speech, they could have done a far better job. And beyond that, private platforms tend to be terrible at enforcing their rules on hate speech.

I nevertheless think hate speech policies in online platforms are necessary, because a lot of hate speech is often quite dangerous on a material level, as well as symbolic. No platform, public or private, should allow violent hate movements to organize and recruit.

So, do you or do you not have problems with the implications of this policy, or the provision of “not protecting the majority”? If you have problems with the wording and enforcement of the policy rather than the policy itself, I’d say it’s at least somewhat safe to assume you aren’t fundamentally opposed to this policy.

[Diarcesia]

I do. The wording of the policy itself is garbage. If they wanted to make it specific and relevant to our current context, in terms of who are the biggest culprits and victims when it comes to hate speech, they could have done a far better job. And beyond that, private platforms tend to be terrible at enforcing their rules on hate speech.

I nevertheless think hate speech policies in online platforms are necessary, because a lot of hate speech is often quite dangerous on a material level, as well as symbolic. No platform, public or private, should allow violent hate movements to organize and recruit.

So, do you or do you not have problems with the implications of this policy, or the provision of “not protecting the majority”? If you have problems with the wording and enforcement of the policy rather than the policy itself, I’d say it’s at least somewhat safe to assume you aren’t fundamentally opposed to this policy.

None of this ruckus would have happened if they didn't put in the part about "not protecting the majority".

[Liriena]

I do. The wording of the policy itself is garbage. If they wanted to make it specific and relevant to our current context, in terms of who are the biggest culprits and victims when it comes to hate speech, they could have done a far better job. And beyond that, private platforms tend to be terrible at enforcing their rules on hate speech.

I nevertheless think hate speech policies in online platforms are necessary, because a lot of hate speech is often quite dangerous on a material level, as well as symbolic. No platform, public or private, should allow violent hate movements to organize and recruit.

So, do you or do you not have problems with the implications of this policy, or the provision of “not protecting the majority”?

Yes, I have problems on both accounts.

[The Great-German Empire]

What does race have to do with anything?

This shit was a toxic echo chamber. Burn it.

2000 toxic echochambers? Sorry, but no. There were many subreddits encouraging legit debate on there, and others were meme communities.

Take r/ConsumeProduct, for instance. It was mostly an anti-corporate, anti-mainstream meme subreddit. But because of some particularly edgy anti-consumerism stances, the whole thing got canned.

[West Leas Oros 2]

So, do you or do you not have problems with the implications of this policy, or the provision of “not protecting the majority”?

Yes, I have problems on both accounts.

Okay. Your initial post didn’t seem to imply that, but I figured you did.

[West Leas Oros 2]

Okay. Your initial post didn’t seem to imply that, but I figured you did.

I think we all get caught up in trying to pwn everyone who disagrees that we make our opinions sound harsher than they are.

Hey, that’s NSG for you. Get used to it, because you ain’t seen the half of it.

[Liriena]

Okay. Your initial post didn’t seem to imply that, but I figured you did.

I think we all get caught up in trying to pwn everyone who disagrees that we make our opinions sound harsher than they are.

The lack of self-awareness on display here...