Ostroeuropa wrote:Gravlen wrote:Also incorrect. In PF v Mark Meechan, the intent was to be offensive:You told a newspaper reporter that the video was very offensive. You intended the video to be as offensive as you could make it and you posted it on your own unrestricted publicly accessible video channel which on your own description: “provides offensive social comedy and skits that get people thrown in prison”.
His intent mattered. It was, in fact, decisive.
In which case i'd argue her intent was clearly to offend white people, hence the structure of her sentence. She's merely denying it. But intent can nonetheless be gathered.
I doubt it, since she's not merely denying it but actually providing an explanation. Regardless, you'd then have to reach the level of grossly offensive, which is a high test. "Gas the Jews" or "Kill all Pakis" are on their own clearly substantially different from "White lives don't matter", and a similar level of threat/incitement as is found in the former statements cannot be found in the latter.