Advertisement
by Ifreann » Mon Jun 22, 2020 7:57 am
Atheris wrote:Ifreann wrote:Maybe if you define resistance strictly as "that which results in an independent nation". But if that is the point...well, so what?
"So what?" The foundation of the United States as one of the first modern democracies changed literally the entire world. I don't see how you could ask that.
So that he could hunt them.
No, so he could preserve the land. He hunted, sure, but his main priority for all of those was protecting the environment and the land.
"To waste, to destroy, our natural resources, to skin and exhaust the land instead of using it so as to increase its usefulness, will result in undermining in the days of our children the very prosperity which we ought by right to hand down to them amplified and developed."
"The nation behaves well if it treats the natural resources as assets which it must turn over to the next generation increased, and not impaired, in value."
"Conservation means development as much as it does protection. I recognize the right and duty of this generation to develop and use the natural resources of our land; but I do not recognize the right to waste them, or to rob, by wasteful use, the generations that come after us. I ask nothing of the nation except that it so behave as each farmer here behaves with reference to his own children. That farmer is a poor creature who skins the land and leaves it worthless to his children. The farmer is a good farmer who, having enabled the land to support himself and to provide for the education of his children, leaves it to them a little better than he found it himself. I believe the same thing of a nation."
"The idea that our natural resources were inexhaustible still obtained, and there was as yet no real knowledge of their extent and condition. The relation of the conservation of natural resources to the problems of National welfare and National efficiency had not yet dawned on the public mind. The reclamation of arid public lands in the West was still a matter for private enterprise alone; and our magnificent river system, with its superb possibilities for public usefulness, was dealt with by the National Government not as a unit, but as a disconnected series of pork-barrel problems, whose only real interest was in their effect on the reëlection or defeat of a Congressman here and there—a theory which, I regret to say, still obtains."
All of these quotes are by Theodore Roosevelt. He did not protect animals and the land to hunt them. He protected animals and the land to guard them from people who would hunt them to extinction and who would exploit the land.
Slander doesn't fit you.
No State Here wrote:US-SSR wrote:
1. Taking down a statue = / = forgetting history or any historical figure. In the specific case of statues of Confederates erected decades after the Civil War as symbols of white supremacy, defending them is at best forgetting and at worst denying history.
2. The people are deciding which statues stay up and which come down. If the processes of government do not move fast enough the people are taking the task of removing offensive statues on themselves.
3. How nice it must be to make smug, pointless comparisons and analogies from positions of privilege rather than openly dealing with the oppression and dehumanization inflicted and felt by erecting statues to honor enslavers, colonizers, white supremacists, racists, etc., etc.
Ulysses Grant statue is confederate statue? You know who he was, right?
by Stylan » Mon Jun 22, 2020 8:17 am
Atheris wrote:Ifreann wrote:Maybe if you define resistance strictly as "that which results in an independent nation". But if that is the point...well, so what?
"So what?" The foundation of the United States as one of the first modern democracies changed literally the entire world. I don't see how you could ask that.
by Atheris » Mon Jun 22, 2020 8:20 am
Stylan wrote:Atheris wrote:
"So what?" The foundation of the United States as one of the first modern democracies changed literally the entire world. I don't see how you could ask that.
Give me a fucking break. The U.S. was not a democracy, nor is it at the moment. You seem to forget that to vote in the beginning of the U.S.' history you had to be a straight, white, landowning male. That's just freedom for the rich.
by Luminesa » Mon Jun 22, 2020 8:41 am
Ifreann wrote:The Black Forrest wrote:
You brought up question of the people deciding.
People deciding what they think about historical figures.The Black Forrest wrote:The Natural History Museum of New York is removing a statue of Teddy Roosevelt as they say it shows a Native American and a black man as racially inferior.
https://www.cbsnews.com/news/teddy-roos ... -new-york/
Why was there a statue of Teddy Roosevelt in a natural history museum in the first place?
by Luminesa » Mon Jun 22, 2020 8:42 am
Ifreann wrote:Atheris wrote:
You're missing the point. The American Revolution wasn't the first act of resistance against the British Empire; it was the first successful act of resistance against the British Empire.
Maybe if you define resistance strictly as "that which results in an independent nation". But if that is the point...well, so what?
I'm guessing because he was a hard-line naturalist, founded the national parks, was an outdoorsman all his life, and protected endangered species.
So that he could hunt them.
by The Reformed American Republic » Mon Jun 22, 2020 8:49 am
Stylan wrote:Atheris wrote:
"So what?" The foundation of the United States as one of the first modern democracies changed literally the entire world. I don't see how you could ask that.
Give me a fucking break. The U.S. was not a democracy, nor is it at the moment. You seem to forget that to vote in the beginning of the U.S.' history you had to be a straight, white, landowning male. That's just freedom for the rich.
by Aeritai » Mon Jun 22, 2020 9:07 am
by The Reformed American Republic » Mon Jun 22, 2020 9:09 am
Aeritai wrote:Now that I think about it, don't we still have the Washington Monument and Thomas Jefferson Memorial? Even if these statues are taken down won't we still have those two things to remember Washington and Jefferson?
Stylan wrote:Atheris wrote:
"So what?" The foundation of the United States as one of the first modern democracies changed literally the entire world. I don't see how you could ask that.
Give me a fucking break. The U.S. was not a democracy, nor is it at the moment. You seem to forget that to vote in the beginning of the U.S.' history you had to be a straight, white, landowning male. That's just freedom for the rich.
by Northern Davincia » Mon Jun 22, 2020 9:10 am
The Black Forrest wrote:Ifreann wrote:Maybe if you define resistance strictly as "that which results in an independent nation". But if that is the point...well, so what?
So that he could hunt them.
No. More about land preservation. If he hadn't of done it; there would have been much more building on it. It’s why the “free market” types are loving trump for park land rollbacks.
Conserative Morality wrote:"Two gin-scented tears trickled down the sides of his nose. But it was all right, everything was all right, the struggle was finished. He had won the victory over himself. He loved Big Hoppe."
by Aeritai » Mon Jun 22, 2020 9:11 am
The Reformed American Republic wrote:Aeritai wrote:Now that I think about it, don't we still have the Washington Monument and Thomas Jefferson Memorial? Even if these statues are taken down won't we still have those two things to remember Washington and Jefferson?
For now at least, we would. Who says those memorials won't be targeted?Stylan wrote:Give me a fucking break. The U.S. was not a democracy, nor is it at the moment. You seem to forget that to vote in the beginning of the U.S.' history you had to be a straight, white, landowning male. That's just freedom for the rich.
I'm amending my previous statement. What does a self proclaimed "tankie" like you value as democratic? An obvious blood thirsty dictator?
by The Reformed American Republic » Mon Jun 22, 2020 9:19 am
Aeritai wrote:The Reformed American Republic wrote:For now at least, we would. Who says those memorials won't be targeted?
I'm amending my previous statement. What does a self proclaimed "tankie" like you value as democratic? An obvious blood thirsty dictator?
Unlikely unless the protesters somehow got their hands on C4 and blew those two up.
by The Two Jerseys » Mon Jun 22, 2020 9:43 am
by Sundiata » Mon Jun 22, 2020 9:44 am
by Luminesa » Mon Jun 22, 2020 10:16 am
Sundiata wrote:"Simply because we were licked a hundred years before we started is no reason for us not to try to win."
-Atticus Finch, To Kill a Mockingbird
by Tekania » Mon Jun 22, 2020 10:29 am
Kowani wrote:Rojava Free State wrote:
You dislike a statue? Sign a petition to have it moved to a museum and stop acting like a dickhead. These people are so focused on just destroying statues that they don't realize its self defeating. No one will remember the history of racism in 200 years if you destroy anything remotely connected to racism.
Do you actually think the only way people learn history is through statues?
by The Reformed American Republic » Mon Jun 22, 2020 10:32 am
by Purpelia » Mon Jun 22, 2020 10:33 am
by Atheris » Mon Jun 22, 2020 10:37 am
by Galloism » Mon Jun 22, 2020 10:41 am
Tekania wrote:Kowani wrote:Do you actually think the only way people learn history is through statues?
Here is the statue of Arthur Ashe along Richmond's monument Avenue known for beating children with a tennis racket and lobbing books at them as they shield themselves from his attack.
j/k. Indeed, statutes don't teach anything outside of a sculpting class.
by Farnhamia » Mon Jun 22, 2020 10:47 am
by Stylan » Mon Jun 22, 2020 11:18 am
Atheris wrote:Stylan wrote:Give me a fucking break. The U.S. was not a democracy, nor is it at the moment. You seem to forget that to vote in the beginning of the U.S.' history you had to be a straight, white, landowning male. That's just freedom for the rich.
Americans vote for their leaders. That's democracy.
by Northern Davincia » Mon Jun 22, 2020 11:21 am
Stylan wrote:Atheris wrote:Americans vote for their leaders. That's democracy.
It wasn't originally. Also that is hardly true - I mean, you have two political parties that subscribe to the same economic theory and system (capitalism), and support tons of the same issues (war, bailouts, deregulation, police militarization, domestic spying, the NSA, tortue, Gitmo, etc.)
If the U.S. didn't run the world we'd be viewed as a dictatorship, or at the very least an authoritarian state.
Conserative Morality wrote:"Two gin-scented tears trickled down the sides of his nose. But it was all right, everything was all right, the struggle was finished. He had won the victory over himself. He loved Big Hoppe."
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Aadhirisian Puppet Nation, Castelia, Evil BTM, Glorious Freedonia, Google [Bot], Lartaria, Pale Dawn, Pizurue, The Kaisers Syndicates, Valentine Z, Valrifall, Zurkerx
Advertisement