Page 7 of 13
Posted:
Mon Jun 15, 2020 3:02 pmby San Lumen
Rusozak wrote:The fact we're hearing this in 2020 is a bit sad though. I would have hoped this would have happened long ago and been behind us by now.
It’s happened now and going forward it’s the law of land so I find zero sadness in it. Now I and millions of others can go anywhere in the country and not be discriminated against for who we love
Posted:
Mon Jun 15, 2020 3:04 pmby Aeritai
Good discrimination against any group only causes hate and division among ourselves. We need to show love and respect to have unity.
Posted:
Mon Jun 15, 2020 3:05 pmby Valrifell
Rusozak wrote:The fact we're hearing this in 2020 is a bit sad though. I would have hoped this would have happened long ago and been behind us by now.
Technically it happened in 1964 and nobody noticed until now
Posted:
Mon Jun 15, 2020 3:19 pmby Tekania
Valrifell wrote:Rusozak wrote:The fact we're hearing this in 2020 is a bit sad though. I would have hoped this would have happened long ago and been behind us by now.
Technically it happened in 1964 and nobody noticed until now
If you have a hard time believing people can have issues noticing things, come work with me in HR for a week and you'll no longer have that issue. Assuming you notice of course.
Posted:
Mon Jun 15, 2020 3:46 pmby Shofercia
So was he good at softball or not? How'd Hotlanta do in the season?
Posted:
Mon Jun 15, 2020 3:48 pmby Nanatsu no Tsuki
Neutraligon wrote:Well, there goes the health change Trump just did.
Hopefully and good news indeed.
Posted:
Mon Jun 15, 2020 3:51 pmby Lookamee
Rusozak wrote:The fact we're hearing this in 2020 is a bit sad though. I would have hoped this would have happened long ago and been behind us by now.
I'm pretty sure some people would've said the same thing in 1964 with the Civil Rights Act
Posted:
Mon Jun 15, 2020 3:57 pmby Unstoppable Empire of Doom
The title is misleading.
"LBGT+ Discrimination in the Workplace Illegal in the US for 56 years"
Any blue collar american has seen this posted on a wall at work.
Posted:
Mon Jun 15, 2020 4:16 pmby Farnhamia
Watch as the FBI get orders to have Gorsuch's DNA tested to make sure he's not an imposter surgically altered to look like the guy Trump appointed.
Posted:
Mon Jun 15, 2020 4:21 pmby Ameriganastan
Farnhamia wrote:Watch as the FBI get orders to have Gorsuch's DNA tested to make sure he's not an imposter surgically altered to look like the guy Trump appointed.
Gorsuch was one of the yes votes? That is classic right there.
Posted:
Mon Jun 15, 2020 4:22 pmby Farnhamia
Ameriganastan wrote:Farnhamia wrote:Watch as the FBI get orders to have Gorsuch's DNA tested to make sure he's not an imposter surgically altered to look like the guy Trump appointed.
Gorsuch was one of the yes votes? That is classic right there.
He wrote the majority opinion.
Posted:
Mon Jun 15, 2020 4:24 pmby Outer Sparta
Ameriganastan wrote:Farnhamia wrote:Watch as the FBI get orders to have Gorsuch's DNA tested to make sure he's not an imposter surgically altered to look like the guy Trump appointed.
Gorsuch was one of the yes votes? That is classic right there.
The hardcore evangelical base won't be happy about that. Neither will the Federalist Society be happy.
Posted:
Mon Jun 15, 2020 4:25 pmby American Pere Housh
The Supreme Court interfered in some that should have been a purely legislative question.
Posted:
Mon Jun 15, 2020 4:26 pmby Farnhamia
Outer Sparta wrote:Ameriganastan wrote:Gorsuch was one of the yes votes? That is classic right there.
The hardcore evangelical base won't be happy about that. Neither will the Federalist Society be happy.
He has job security.
Posted:
Mon Jun 15, 2020 4:27 pmby Liriena
Holy shit, SCOTUS just broke 2020's combo of bad shit. You absolutely love to see it folks.
Good. Good, good, good, good and super cool and good.
Posted:
Mon Jun 15, 2020 4:28 pmby The New California Republic
American Pere Housh wrote:The Supreme Court interfered in some that should have been a purely legislative question.
Not really, this does fall within SCOTUS' remit.
Queer Discrimination Now Illegal in the United States
Posted:
Mon Jun 15, 2020 4:29 pmby Deacarsia
Ugh!
Posted:
Mon Jun 15, 2020 4:29 pmby Outer Sparta
Farnhamia wrote:Outer Sparta wrote:The hardcore evangelical base won't be happy about that. Neither will the Federalist Society be happy.
He has job security.
He'll surely vote differently for virtually any other topic (such as abortion), but surely the evangelical base won't like this news.
Posted:
Mon Jun 15, 2020 4:30 pmby The New California Republic
Queer Discrimination Now Illegal in the United States
Any reason you changed LGBT+ to "queer" in the subject line of your post?
Posted:
Mon Jun 15, 2020 4:31 pmby Salus Maior
Everybody's gotta work.
Posted:
Mon Jun 15, 2020 4:33 pmby American Pere Housh
The New California Republic wrote:American Pere Housh wrote:The Supreme Court interfered in some that should have been a purely legislative question.
Not really, this does fall within SCOTUS' remit.
Not something like this should have been left in the states and Congress. The Supreme Court had no business whatsoever making a rulling such as this.
Posted:
Mon Jun 15, 2020 4:33 pmby Deacarsia
The New California Republic wrote:Queer Discrimination Now Illegal in the United States
Any reason you changed LGBT+ to "queer" in the subject line of your post?
I really hate initialisms. It is a pet peeve of mine.
I also changed U.S. to United States.
Posted:
Mon Jun 15, 2020 4:34 pmby The New California Republic
American Pere Housh wrote:The New California Republic wrote:Not really, this does fall within SCOTUS' remit.
Not something like this should have been left in the states and Congress. The Supreme Court had no business whatsoever making a rulling such as this.
Present some evidence that this does not fall within SCOTUS' remit, rather than just insisting that it doesn't.
Posted:
Mon Jun 15, 2020 4:36 pmby Agarntrop
Deacarsia wrote:The New California Republic wrote:Queer Discrimination Now Illegal in the United States
Any reason you changed LGBT+ to "queer" in the subject line of your post?
I really hate acronyms. It is a pet peeve of mine.
I also changed U.S. to United States.
You want them stoned to death.
It's hardly a suprise.
Posted:
Mon Jun 15, 2020 4:39 pmby San Lumen
American Pere Housh wrote:The New California Republic wrote:Not really, this does fall within SCOTUS' remit.
Not something like this should have been left in the states and Congress. The Supreme Court had no business whatsoever making a rulling such as this.
explain. Do you think same sex marriage should have been left to the states as well?