by Thermodolia » Mon Jun 15, 2020 7:26 am
by Greed and Death » Mon Jun 15, 2020 7:39 am
by Washington Resistance Army » Mon Jun 15, 2020 7:40 am
by Thermodolia » Mon Jun 15, 2020 7:40 am
Greed and Death wrote:This is big. The opinion is ridiculously large as well. I will read through it after work.
Also it is a pain to load, it appears the entire gay community is breaking the internet to download it.
by Thermodolia » Mon Jun 15, 2020 7:42 am
Washington Resistance Army wrote:Wasn't something to the same effect said a couple years ago? I swear I remember a very similar case.
by Conterale » Mon Jun 15, 2020 7:42 am
by Kargintina the Third » Mon Jun 15, 2020 7:45 am
by San Lumen » Mon Jun 15, 2020 7:45 am
by Dominioan » Mon Jun 15, 2020 7:47 am
by Neutraligon » Mon Jun 15, 2020 7:49 am
by Greed and Death » Mon Jun 15, 2020 7:51 am
Thermodolia wrote:Greed and Death wrote:This is big. The opinion is ridiculously large as well. I will read through it after work.
Also it is a pain to load, it appears the entire gay community is breaking the internet to download it.
Ya the internet is gonna be broken for awhile. Gorsuch apparently wrote the majority opinion
by San Lumen » Mon Jun 15, 2020 7:52 am
Thermodolia wrote:Greed and Death wrote:This is big. The opinion is ridiculously large as well. I will read through it after work.
Also it is a pain to load, it appears the entire gay community is breaking the internet to download it.
Ya the internet is gonna be broken for awhile. Gorsuch apparently wrote the majority opinion
by Saiwania » Mon Jun 15, 2020 7:55 am
by The Alma Mater » Mon Jun 15, 2020 7:55 am
by San Lumen » Mon Jun 15, 2020 7:56 am
Saiwania wrote:Employers will find ways around this new ruling. Employees don't have as much leverage to sue businesses and etc. If they didn't need the money/job, they'd work for themselves instead of for someone else. How hard is it going to be to prove that x workplace discriminates against LGBT?
by Neutraligon » Mon Jun 15, 2020 7:57 am
Saiwania wrote:Employers will find ways around this new ruling. Employees don't have as much leverage to sue businesses and etc. If they didn't need the money/job, they'd work for themselves instead of for someone else. How hard is it going to be to prove that x workplace discriminates against LGBT?
by Greed and Death » Mon Jun 15, 2020 7:57 am
by Servilis » Mon Jun 15, 2020 7:58 am
San Lumen wrote:Saiwania wrote:Employers will find ways around this new ruling. Employees don't have as much leverage to sue businesses and etc. If they didn't need the money/job, they'd work for themselves instead of for someone else. How hard is it going to be to prove that x workplace discriminates against LGBT?
Explain.
by Neutraligon » Mon Jun 15, 2020 7:59 am
by The Huskar Social Union » Mon Jun 15, 2020 7:59 am
by Greed and Death » Mon Jun 15, 2020 8:00 am
San Lumen wrote:Saiwania wrote:Employers will find ways around this new ruling. Employees don't have as much leverage to sue businesses and etc. If they didn't need the money/job, they'd work for themselves instead of for someone else. How hard is it going to be to prove that x workplace discriminates against LGBT?
Explain.
by Thermodolia » Mon Jun 15, 2020 8:06 am
Saiwania wrote:Employers will find ways around this new ruling. Employees don't have as much leverage to sue businesses and etc. If they didn't need the money/job, they'd work for themselves instead of for someone else. How hard is it going to be to prove that x workplace discriminates against LGBT?
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Anti-void, El Lazaro, Evonath, Krasny-Volny, Krimalia, The Two Jerseys, Valles Marineris Mining co, Xind
Advertisement