nothing wrong with being a logical contradiction, we're inclusive to everyone on the real-surreal spectrum :)
Advertisement
by Centai Mal » Tue Jun 16, 2020 11:11 am
Auzkhia wrote:Tamakuni wrote:Why am I not allowed to be attracted to biological females? I do not care if you get "jaded and a little bit jumpy" because I shouldn't be your, or anyone else's fucking punching bag.
How does this fucking work? I am legit confused. What is the treshold for being a girl? 1%? 50%? 51%?
Presumably by "biological females" you mean cis women. Nobody says you can't be into cis women, but people will think you leave out trans women because the phrase biological females has been used in a way that excludes and misgender various trans people. Even if you meant people that were AFAB, you would be into men, I've seen the red flags, and you're probably not going to like me for point that out.
Hopefully you can learn more and know better!Cekoviu wrote:
that's cause it doesn't work
I love it when people tell me identity doesn't work. Like I'm sorry, I'm just me and that's just happening.
by Tamakuni » Tue Jun 16, 2020 11:12 am
Cekoviu wrote:Tamakuni wrote:Why am I not allowed to be attracted to biological females? I do not care if you get "jaded and a little bit jumpy" because I shouldn't be your, or anyone else's fucking punching bag.
the problem isn't being attracted to "biological females," it's just that wording it like that (or especially "biological women") is pretty common among lesbian TERFs, which introduces a bit of suspicion
especially because your definition would seem to include trans men, which is just totally befuddling tbh and is kinda transphobic or at the very least objectifyingHow does this fucking work? I am legit confused. What is the treshold for being a girl? 1%? 50%? 51%?
that's cause it doesn't work
Disgraces wrote:Tfw tomboys are a whole new gender
Auzkhia wrote:Tamakuni wrote:Why am I not allowed to be attracted to biological females? I do not care if you get "jaded and a little bit jumpy" because I shouldn't be your, or anyone else's fucking punching bag.
How does this fucking work? I am legit confused. What is the treshold for being a girl? 1%? 50%? 51%?
Presumably by "biological females" you mean cis women. Nobody says you can't be into cis women, but people will think you leave out trans women because the phrase biological females has been used in a way that excludes and misgender various trans people. Even if you meant people that were AFAB, you would be into men, I've seen the red flags, and you're probably not going to like me for point that out.
Hopefully you can learn more and know better!
by Necroghastia » Tue Jun 16, 2020 11:13 am
by Tamakuni » Tue Jun 16, 2020 11:13 am
Centai Mal wrote:Auzkhia wrote:Presumably by "biological females" you mean cis women. Nobody says you can't be into cis women, but people will think you leave out trans women because the phrase biological females has been used in a way that excludes and misgender various trans people. Even if you meant people that were AFAB, you would be into men, I've seen the red flags, and you're probably not going to like me for point that out.
Hopefully you can learn more and know better!
I love it when people tell me identity doesn't work. Like I'm sorry, I'm just me and that's just happening.
“I’m not a TERF” says the person using a ton of TERF rhetoric and invalidating lesbians who are not exactly like her, as well as trans men and trans women
by Centai Mal » Tue Jun 16, 2020 11:13 am
by Tamakuni » Tue Jun 16, 2020 11:15 am
Centai Mal wrote:“Lesbians erasure” cries the person erasing trans lesbians and cis lesbians who date trans people.
Tamakuni wrote:Centai Mal wrote:“I’m not a TERF” says the person using a ton of TERF rhetoric and invalidating lesbians who are not exactly like her, as well as trans men and trans women
I've literally said twice that I'm okay with lesbians choosing to date trans women, but I am apparently a TERF because I have my own defined sexuality. Okay then lol
by Cekoviu » Tue Jun 16, 2020 11:15 am
Tamakuni wrote:Cekoviu wrote:the problem isn't being attracted to "biological females," it's just that wording it like that (or especially "biological women") is pretty common among lesbian TERFs, which introduces a bit of suspicion
especially because your definition would seem to include trans men, which is just totally befuddling tbh and is kinda transphobic or at the very least objectifying
that's cause it doesn't work
Huh???? W-What? Now I'm transphobic for-
???
Fine, I'm going to make a new definition for 'lesbian' since that word can apparently be analogous with heterosexual:
- I am attracted to biological females who identify as female and have feminine features. That's all there is to it. Didn't think we'd go full circle and lesbian erasure would become progressive, but whatever.
by Tamakuni » Tue Jun 16, 2020 11:16 am
Cekoviu wrote:Tamakuni wrote:Huh???? W-What? Now I'm transphobic for-
???
Fine, I'm going to make a new definition for 'lesbian' since that word can apparently be analogous with heterosexual:
- I am attracted to biological females who identify as female and have feminine features. That's all there is to it. Didn't think we'd go full circle and lesbian erasure would become progressive, but whatever.
i'm not saying you're transphobic necessarily, the wording you originally used implied transphobia, there is a distinction
new problem: the definition you have here for lesbian erases certain lesbians who are attracted to women without requiring "feminine features" and "being biologically female." it's perfectly fine for that to be your sexual orientation, but it is a narrower field than "lesbian" as a whole.
by Disgraces » Tue Jun 16, 2020 11:18 am
Tamakuni wrote:Cekoviu wrote:i'm not saying you're transphobic necessarily, the wording you originally used implied transphobia, there is a distinction
new problem: the definition you have here for lesbian erases certain lesbians who are attracted to women without requiring "feminine features" and "being biologically female." it's perfectly fine for that to be your sexual orientation, but it is a narrower field than "lesbian" as a whole.
So, according to your definition. I'm not a lesbian. Then what the fuck am I? Straight? Bi?
???
This myriad of definitions, exceptions, additions, exceptions to the exceptions, additions to the additions, are making things more complicated than they fucking are
by Cekoviu » Tue Jun 16, 2020 11:18 am
Tamakuni wrote:Cekoviu wrote:i'm not saying you're transphobic necessarily, the wording you originally used implied transphobia, there is a distinction
new problem: the definition you have here for lesbian erases certain lesbians who are attracted to women without requiring "feminine features" and "being biologically female." it's perfectly fine for that to be your sexual orientation, but it is a narrower field than "lesbian" as a whole.
So, according to your definition. I'm not a lesbian. Then what the fuck am I? Straight? Bi?
???
This myriad of definitions, exceptions, additions, exceptions to the exceptions, additions to the additions, are making things more complicated than they fucking are
by Auzkhia » Tue Jun 16, 2020 11:19 am
Tamakuni wrote:Cekoviu wrote:the problem isn't being attracted to "biological females," it's just that wording it like that (or especially "biological women") is pretty common among lesbian TERFs, which introduces a bit of suspicion
especially because your definition would seem to include trans men, which is just totally befuddling tbh and is kinda transphobic or at the very least objectifying
that's cause it doesn't work
Huh???? W-What? Now I'm transphobic for-
???
Fine, I'm going to make a new definition for 'lesbian' since that word can apparently be analogous with heterosexual:
- I am attracted to biological females who identify as female and have feminine features. That's all there is to it. Didn't think we'd go full circle and lesbian erasure would become progressive, but whatever.Disgraces wrote:Tfw tomboys are a whole new gender
ApparentlyAuzkhia wrote:Presumably by "biological females" you mean cis women. Nobody says you can't be into cis women, but people will think you leave out trans women because the phrase biological females has been used in a way that excludes and misgender various trans people. Even if you meant people that were AFAB, you would be into men, I've seen the red flags, and you're probably not going to like me for point that out.
Hopefully you can learn more and know better!
This is condescending as shit, sis (you're a sis, I guess?). This overall narrative that "oh you need to know better" sounds scarily close to the dudes who say "Oh, you aren't a lesbian. You just haven't found the right guy yet!"
by Tamakuni » Tue Jun 16, 2020 11:19 am
Disgraces wrote:Tamakuni wrote:So, according to your definition. I'm not a lesbian. Then what the fuck am I? Straight? Bi?
???
This myriad of definitions, exceptions, additions, exceptions to the exceptions, additions to the additions, are making things more complicated than they fucking are
You are a lesbian who is attracted to biological females. Simple.
by Necroghastia » Tue Jun 16, 2020 11:21 am
by Tamakuni » Tue Jun 16, 2020 11:21 am
Auzkhia wrote:Tamakuni wrote:Huh???? W-What? Now I'm transphobic for-
???
Fine, I'm going to make a new definition for 'lesbian' since that word can apparently be analogous with heterosexual:
- I am attracted to biological females who identify as female and have feminine features. That's all there is to it. Didn't think we'd go full circle and lesbian erasure would become progressive, but whatever.
Apparently
This is condescending as shit, sis (you're a sis, I guess?). This overall narrative that "oh you need to know better" sounds scarily close to the dudes who say "Oh, you aren't a lesbian. You just haven't found the right guy yet!"
I've never said anything like that, but I guess that's just your brain on transmisogyny, my fellow biogirl.
by Necroghastia » Tue Jun 16, 2020 11:21 am
by Auzkhia » Tue Jun 16, 2020 11:22 am
by Crockerland » Tue Jun 16, 2020 11:22 am
by Necroghastia » Tue Jun 16, 2020 11:22 am
Necroghastia wrote:That NB lesbians are not logical contradictions.
they are tho
by Purgatio » Tue Jun 16, 2020 11:22 am
Necroghastia wrote:Tamakuni wrote:I specifically said I'm only attracted to biological women and that I am ok with lesbians deciging to date trans women. Didn't take too long for people to hurl "TERF" at me, huh?
How does being a non-binary lesbian even work, if non-binary people don't identify as neither male nor female?
Demigirls, genderfluid and bigender people, basically anyone that IDs as not 100% a girl but still girl.
by Tamakuni » Tue Jun 16, 2020 11:23 am
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: 0rganization, Aadhiris, Ancientania, Hidrandia, Ineva, Keltionialang, Maximum Imperium Rex, New Temecula, Ors Might, Sarolandia, Siluvia, Statesburg, The Vooperian Union, Tiami, Vanuzgard
Advertisement