Your ethics. As I said, your ethics are irrelevant to my business. Just a couple days ago I had a doctor tell me there was nothing he could do for my knee pain. Did I throw a tantrum and sue? No. I made an appt with someone else.
Advertisement
by The Republic of Fore » Sun Jun 14, 2020 5:51 am
by The Republic of Fore » Sun Jun 14, 2020 5:52 am
by Nobel Hobos 2 » Sun Jun 14, 2020 5:53 am
by Vassenor » Sun Jun 14, 2020 5:54 am
The Republic of Fore wrote:Vassenor wrote:
And we're back to selfish disregard for professional ethics.
Your ethics. As I said, your ethics are irrelevant to my business. Just a couple days ago I had a doctor tell me there was nothing he could do for my knee pain. Did I throw a tantrum and sue? No. I made an appt with someone else.
by The Republic of Fore » Sun Jun 14, 2020 5:56 am
Nobel Hobos 2 wrote:The Republic of Fore wrote:Don't need a reason. "I don't want to" is all that's required.
If I understand correctly, you won't actually be a medical doctor until you've served an internship.
You will have a boss, who can order you to treat patients.
At least for that time "I don't want to" will not work for you.
by The Republic of Fore » Sun Jun 14, 2020 5:56 am
Vassenor wrote:The Republic of Fore wrote:Your ethics. As I said, your ethics are irrelevant to my business. Just a couple days ago I had a doctor tell me there was nothing he could do for my knee pain. Did I throw a tantrum and sue? No. I made an appt with someone else.
The ethics of your profession.
by Vassenor » Sun Jun 14, 2020 5:57 am
by The Republic of Fore » Sun Jun 14, 2020 5:58 am
by -Astoria » Sun Jun 14, 2020 6:00 am
The Republic of Fore wrote:Yeah, I would. Russia and China wouldn't declare war on us. And the armed forces of the vast majority of other nations are a useless joke compared to ours. Try and enforce your worthless convention. We have nukes.
by -Astoria » Sun Jun 14, 2020 6:01 am
The Republic of Fore wrote:Again, do you understand what the word rare means? Anyone of us here could win the lottery. But I'm not holding my breath.
by The Republic of Fore » Sun Jun 14, 2020 6:01 am
-Astoria wrote:The Republic of Fore wrote:Yeah, I would. Russia and China wouldn't declare war on us. And the armed forces of the vast majority of other nations are a useless joke compared to ours. Try and enforce your worthless convention. We have nukes.
So now we're going straight into exceptionalism & military peepee-measuring, are we?
by The Republic of Fore » Sun Jun 14, 2020 6:03 am
by -Astoria » Sun Jun 14, 2020 6:09 am
The Republic of Fore wrote:It's just stating a fact. Disney has a larger navy than most of the rest of the world. And the world's second largest air force is the US navy.
The Republic of Fore wrote:I'm not saying it can't happen. But I'm not worried about things that are rare. Do you spend every day of your life fearing that you'll be eaten by a komodo dragon? That can happen.
by The Republic of Fore » Sun Jun 14, 2020 6:13 am
-Astoria wrote:The Republic of Fore wrote:It's just stating a fact. Disney has a larger navy than most of the rest of the world. And the world's second largest air force is the US navy.
Not exactly; and also, it was the language used that I was calling 'peepee-measuring'.The Republic of Fore wrote:I'm not saying it can't happen. But I'm not worried about things that are rare. Do you spend every day of your life fearing that you'll be eaten by a komodo dragon? That can happen.
AFAIK, getting seriously injured in a sparsely-populated place is much more likely to happen than getting killed by a specific animal, which can only be found on a specific island.
by Galloism » Sun Jun 14, 2020 6:38 am
The Republic of Fore wrote:Galloism wrote:It’s fairly likely that 1/100 men are supporting their rapist, either via direct support (IE, they live with them) or via child support. It’s hard to say how many are explicit child support, although it’s probably not a small number.
It’s important for you to understand men and women are raped at about the same rate, and almost half of each group is raped by their intimate partner. For the type of rape that can cause pregnancy, that’s 1.7 million men. Per year, mind you. The notion that 1.7 million rapes per year causes a negligible number of rape babies is laughable.
And it is established law that male victims of rape must support the child (and by extension their rapist) regardless. It’s the exception to not have to, not the rule.
I dunno about 1/100, but in 2019, 235 black people were killed by police, out of a population of around 45 million. That’s a little over 1/50,000.
Yet it’s still a big deal.
1/50,000 isn't a big deal to me. That's extremely rare. Especially considering the vast majority of people killed by police are armed when it happens.
by The Alma Mater » Sun Jun 14, 2020 6:47 am
The Republic of Fore wrote:The Alma Mater wrote:
Please do not lie. Everyone can just read back the quote chain, so it is rather silly.
You explicitly denied it being rare to encounter people in need of help on the street. Not the helping of people, the encountering. And did so repeatedly.
But the conclusion is: you would not help. Clear.
That's not denying that accidents happen. But in my entire life, I've never seen someone need help on the street. Going by your earlier logic, I can say I don't think I'm special. So there, It's not common people need help. Same argument you used.
by The Republic of Fore » Sun Jun 14, 2020 8:39 am
The Alma Mater wrote:The Republic of Fore wrote:That's not denying that accidents happen. But in my entire life, I've never seen someone need help on the street. Going by your earlier logic, I can say I don't think I'm special. So there, It's not common people need help. Same argument you used.
Or you are lying, to use your own earlier reply
Still, we could probably do something with statistics to see what version is more likely.
Orrrr - we could just make a poll and ask the residents of NSG if they ever met someone in distress. And then we will know which of us is special
by The Republic of Fore » Sun Jun 14, 2020 8:42 am
Galloism wrote:The Republic of Fore wrote:1/50,000 isn't a big deal to me. That's extremely rare. Especially considering the vast majority of people killed by police are armed when it happens.
Nevertheless, 1 million+ men are raped by women every year in a manner that can cause pregnancy. There is almost certainly a nonnegligible number of men paying child support as a result of being raped.
1/100? Not sure - it could be more or less than that number. But it's a lot.
by Vassenor » Sun Jun 14, 2020 8:56 am
by Thedas Defiant » Sun Jun 14, 2020 8:59 am
The Republic of Fore wrote:Servilis wrote:What part of "in a post-Trump America where Trans people are heavily demonized" did you not understand?
What part of "don't base your argument off extremely rare circumstances" can you not understand? Trans people aren't demonized. Doing anything but kissing their ass can destroy someone's career.
by Hakons » Sun Jun 14, 2020 8:59 am
by Thedas Defiant » Sun Jun 14, 2020 9:02 am
Hakons wrote:Religious health care institutions and workers shouldn’t be forced to go against their beliefs on transition surgeries or therapies. However, as NPR reports this change seems to cover virtually every aspect of healthcare. Not only would religious hospitals or secular hospitals never deny lifesaving healthcare to LGBT people, the law shouldn’t allow it either.
by VVerkia » Sun Jun 14, 2020 9:11 am
Hakons wrote:Religious health care institutions and workers shouldn’t be forced to go against their beliefs on transition surgeries or therapies.
by Hakons » Sun Jun 14, 2020 9:12 am
Thedas Defiant wrote:Hakons wrote:Religious health care institutions and workers shouldn’t be forced to go against their beliefs on transition surgeries or therapies. However, as NPR reports this change seems to cover virtually every aspect of healthcare. Not only would religious hospitals or secular hospitals never deny lifesaving healthcare to LGBT people, the law shouldn’t allow it either.
People who want to let their bigoted beliefs color their treatment of patients shouldn't be in the healthcare profession TBH.
by Vassenor » Sun Jun 14, 2020 9:14 am
Hakons wrote:Religious health care institutions and workers shouldn’t be forced to go against their beliefs on transition surgeries or therapies. However, as NPR reports this change seems to cover virtually every aspect of healthcare. Not only would religious hospitals or secular hospitals never deny lifesaving healthcare to LGBT people, the law shouldn’t allow it either.
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Ancientania, Austria-Bohemia-Hungary, Big Eyed Animation, Fartsniffage, GMS Greater Miami Shores 1, Ifreann, Inferior, La Xinga, Niolia, Ozral, Plan Neonie, The Kharkivan Cossacks, Tungstan
Advertisement