It certainly comes off as one.
Advertisement
by Nobel Hobos 2 » Fri Jul 10, 2020 5:25 pm
by Cisairse » Fri Jul 10, 2020 5:27 pm
Asle Leopolka wrote:As someone who has worked in polling and now manages a team of statisticians and data scientists, I've been urging everyone to avoid the polls until after the first debate. That being said, there's one stat that has a strong historical precedence and is hard to ignore:
SITTING APPROVAL RATING FOR INCUMBENT PRESIDENTS AT THIS POINT OF THEIR PRESIDENCY (Source):
Trump: 38% (TBD)
Obama: 46% (Reelected)
W: 48% (Reelected but lost popular vote)
Clinton: 48% (Reelected)
Bush Sr: 38% (Lost reelection)
Reagan: 54% (Reelected)
Carter: 31% (Lost reelection)
Ford: 45% (Lost reelection)
Nixon: 56% (Reelected)
LBJ: 40% (Chose not to seek reelection but would likely have lost)
Kenedy: 58% before assassination (easily would have been reelected)
Eisenhower: 73% (Reelected)
Truman: 40% and on an upswing (no data on this particular date) (Barely reelected)
Trump is part of a club he should really wish he didn't belong. At this point no president with an approval rating below 45% has been reelected - Truman's 40% is for the two weeks prior to this time period and when he started campaigning hard as hell and had a monumental upswing.
by Tombradyonia » Fri Jul 10, 2020 5:27 pm
by Tombradyonia » Fri Jul 10, 2020 5:30 pm
by Nobel Hobos 2 » Fri Jul 10, 2020 5:35 pm
by Outer Sparta » Fri Jul 10, 2020 5:37 pm
San Lumen wrote:https://twitter.com/AnnCoulter/status/1281688979411271686?s=20
Conservative activist Ann Coulter has endorsed Amy McGrath!!! What is this world coming too when i agree with someone like her? Coulter has a history of highly controversial statements such as if women couldn’t vote we’d never have to worry about another democratic president
by Nobel Hobos 2 » Fri Jul 10, 2020 5:37 pm
Tombradyonia wrote:Nobel Hobos 2 wrote:
Yes. As it stands it's a remarkable change of tack by Coulter.
It is however deniable: she might be beating up an audience for her next paid gig.
Not that I particularly care for Coulter, but she's fairly consistent when it comes to her pet issues. She's even on record that she would vote for Bernie Sanders if Bernie re-adopted his old views about immigration (which apparently were different from what they are now).
by South Odreria 2 » Fri Jul 10, 2020 5:44 pm
Valrifell wrote:
Disregard whatever this poster says
by Northern Davincia » Fri Jul 10, 2020 5:45 pm
South Odreria 2 wrote:Bruh Biden lookin pretty good
Conserative Morality wrote:"Two gin-scented tears trickled down the sides of his nose. But it was all right, everything was all right, the struggle was finished. He had won the victory over himself. He loved Big Hoppe."
by Uiiop » Fri Jul 10, 2020 5:52 pm
South Odreria 2 wrote:Bruh Biden lookin pretty good
by Jerzylvania » Fri Jul 10, 2020 6:02 pm
Tombradyonia wrote:Northern Davincia wrote:I could not be more disappointed in a president than LBJ, my preference goes to Goldwater every time.
Some might say... in your heart you know he's right.
Others would reply... in your guts you feel he's nuts.
The Daisy commercial wasn't so crazy at all. There were more conservatives at the time who were open to the idea of nuclear war, such as Curtis LeMay (often nicknamed "bombs away" LeMay) and a decade earlier Douglas MacArthur had openly toyed with the idea during the Korea war (which rightfully got him dismissed as commander, one of the best decisions Truman ever made and he made many). My grandpa (who grew up during the New Deal) used to talk about it all the time. He loathed Goldwater and considered him a deranged warmonger.
LBJ screwed up badly in Vietnam, and that caused the collapse of the great society.
by Jerzylvania » Fri Jul 10, 2020 6:05 pm
by Outer Sparta » Fri Jul 10, 2020 6:13 pm
South Odreria 2 wrote:Bruh Biden lookin pretty good
by Ngelmish » Fri Jul 10, 2020 6:17 pm
Nobel Hobos 2 wrote:Tombradyonia wrote:
Not that I particularly care for Coulter, but she's fairly consistent when it comes to her pet issues. She's even on record that she would vote for Bernie Sanders if Bernie re-adopted his old views about immigration (which apparently were different from what they are now).
You don't think that's just a snipe at Bernie ..?
She HAS been consistent, which makes the recent tweet rather intriguing.
by South Odreria 2 » Fri Jul 10, 2020 6:55 pm
Valrifell wrote:
Disregard whatever this poster says
by The Black Forrest » Fri Jul 10, 2020 7:00 pm
South Odreria 2 wrote:Uiiop wrote:I'm cynical about him actually following though but if i wasn't his healthcare and eco shit would make me feeling good about voting and not just waiting and see how the state looks come nov.
I’m also skeptical, and I disagree with some of his proposals but I believe that if we keep up the bullying his presidency will be good for the labour movement.Outer Sparta wrote:Does that mean you'll support him now
I already was leaning that direction because his healthcare plan would benefit me.
by Outer Sparta » Fri Jul 10, 2020 7:25 pm
South Odreria 2 wrote:Uiiop wrote:I'm cynical about him actually following though but if i wasn't his healthcare and eco shit would make me feeling good about voting and not just waiting and see how the state looks come nov.
I’m also skeptical, and I disagree with some of his proposals but I believe that if we keep up the bullying his presidency will be good for the labour movement.Outer Sparta wrote:Does that mean you'll support him now
I thought I was pretty clear that I was already leaning that direction
by Outer Sparta » Fri Jul 10, 2020 7:26 pm
The Black Forrest wrote:South Odreria 2 wrote:I’m also skeptical, and I disagree with some of his proposals but I believe that if we keep up the bullying his presidency will be good for the labour movement.
I already was leaning that direction because his healthcare plan would benefit me.
Cool on both fronts.
One the trump disaster is consigned to history; we can work on making the demos less republican lite.
by Outer Sparta » Fri Jul 10, 2020 7:33 pm
by Ngelmish » Fri Jul 10, 2020 7:36 pm
by Outer Sparta » Fri Jul 10, 2020 7:38 pm
Ngelmish wrote:Outer Sparta wrote:Get Biden to stabilize things, then use that as a stepping stone to work for a more progressive future.
Which only works if we keep his successor in office. And her successor, most likely.
Like, I sympathize with idea that Democrats don't do enough (they never have), but that's what it takes. You don't refuse to put Al Gore in office because Clinton sucked, you do it anyway because there's a framework already in place that he can build on. Or you the give the right 4 to 8 to 12 years to just blow things up and the next time you have your 8 years, you, maybe, have just barely gotten a functional structure back together again. Stepping stones require multiple steps, and the worst thing about the Democratic coalition is their tendency to plunge into the water because they didn't like the last stone.
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Emotional Support Crocodile, Fartsniffage, Improper Classifications, Shearoa, Tungstan, Valrifall, Volognova
Advertisement