NATION

PASSWORD

2020 US General Election Thread VII: Summer of Discontent

For discussion and debate about anything. (Not a roleplay related forum; out-of-character commentary only.)

Advertisement

Remove ads

Of All The Parties With 50+ Electoral Votes of Ballot Access, Which Party Do You Prefer?

Republicans
73
23%
Democrats
111
35%
Libertarians
24
8%
Greens
59
19%
Constitution Party
12
4%
Alliance Party
4
1%
Socialism and Liberation
31
10%
 
Total votes : 314

User avatar
Outer Sparta
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 15106
Founded: Dec 26, 2014
Democratic Socialists

Postby Outer Sparta » Tue Jul 07, 2020 7:37 pm

No State Here wrote:
Zurkerx wrote:Some voters who disliked both nominees in 2016 chose a third-party candidate instead. Now, many of them are shunning President Trump and are ready to back Joe Biden. Polling has also shown that for voters that hate both 2020 nominees and didn't vote in 2016 because of the horrendous choices, back Biden overwhelmingly. Even a decent amount of center-right voters are considering or voting for Biden. All of this are dangerous signs for Trump, who's re-election is in jeopardy.

In Florida in 2016, J.C. Planas, a former Republican state representative, was uncomfortable with Hillary Clinton but detested Donald Trump, so he wrote in former Gov. Jeb Bush for president.

In New Hampshire that year, Peter J. Spaulding, a longtime Republican official, supported the Libertarian ticket.

And in Arizona, Lorena Burns, 56, also voted third party, seeing the choice between Mr. Trump and Mrs. Clinton as a contest between “two bads.”

“I didn’t want to be responsible for either,” she said.

This year, all three of them intend to diverge from their Republican leanings and vote for former Vice President Joseph R. Biden Jr., the presumptive Democratic nominee. They are among an emerging group of voters who disliked both major-party presidential nominees in 2016, but who are now so disillusioned with President Trump — and sufficiently comfortable with Mr. Biden — that they are increasingly willing to support the Democrat.

It’s a dynamic that could have significant implications in several of the most competitive battleground states, like Arizona and Wisconsin, where the third-party vote in 2016 was greater than the margin of difference between Mr. Trump and Mrs. Clinton. Recent polling also shows that Mr. Biden has an overwhelming advantage over Mr. Trump among voters who have unfavorable views of both candidates — a cohort that ultimately broke in Mr. Trump’s favor in 2016, exit polls showed.

Ms. Burns of Guadalupe, Ariz., said she recently made her first political donation, to the Democratic National Committee. She said she agreed with many of Mr. Trump’s policies, but was turned off by his behavior. “Just the lying, just the craziness, the bullying — I’d rather pay more money than be with him for another four years,” she said. “I’m willing to pay more money in taxes just to be away from him. He’s corrupting the country.”

In Ms. Burns’s state of Arizona, Mr. Trump won by 3.5 percentage points in 2016. The Libertarian Party nominee, Gary Johnson, won 4.1 percent of the vote, and in other states where the race was even closer — including Pennsylvania, Michigan, Wisconsin and Florida — he pulled in between 2 and 4 percent. The Green Party candidate Jill Stein took in roughly 1 percent in those states — small but significant totals in contests that were decided by slim margins.

In any single poll, it is difficult for pollsters to reach a significant number of voters who supported third-party candidates in 2016, making it impossible to trace their preferences now. And Mr. Trump — who faced vocal opposition that year from some prominent Republicans and won anyway — remains overwhelmingly popular with Republican voters. While many center-right voters have distanced themselves from his party, there are others who initially expressed misgivings about him and have since come to embrace him, resistant to the leftward drift of the Democratic Party.

But in a year when swing voters are scarce, some of the voters who effectively stayed on the sidelines in 2016 are showing signs of political movement now — and there is evidence that Mr. Biden stands to benefit.

There appears to be far less interest in third-party candidates compared with the same point in 2016, pollsters say.

“Barring some unforeseen circumstance, there’s just not a lot of appetite for third party,” said Patrick Murray, director of the Monmouth University Polling Institute. “This is two-person for nearly all American voters.”

His polling from late June found that among voters who have unfavorable views of both candidates, Mr. Biden leads the president 55 percent to 21 percent. In 2016, Mr. Trump won the voters who disliked both candidates, according to exit polls.

And according to a recent poll of registered voters in six major battleground states by The Times and Siena College, people who say they did not vote in 2016 overwhelmingly favor Mr. Biden over Mr. Trump in November, 56 percent to 25 percent. Among registered voters in those states who said they did cast ballots in 2016, 47 percent said they planned to support Mr. Biden and 42 percent said they would back Mr. Trump

The Monmouth poll also found that at this point, “fewer voters have a negative opinion of the Democratic nominee” compared with four years ago.

“You had two lightning rod candidates running last time,” said the veteran Republican pollster Glen Bolger, who added that there was still time for Republicans to shape perceptions of Mr. Biden. “At this point in time, Joe Biden isn’t nearly as controversial as Hillary Clinton was, so I think third party candidates are a little bit slower to come out of the woodwork.”

In 2016, voters who went third party spanned the ideological spectrum, from Republicans who did not believe Mr. Trump was a true conservative, to progressives who opposed Mrs. Clinton from the left. The Biden campaign has been working to improve Mr. Biden’s standing with young liberals, aware of the need to engage and mobilize those voters who have long been skeptical of his relatively centrist policy stances. In part because of his difficulty gaining the confidence of young voters and liberals, Mr. Biden’s net favorability rating nationwide remains stuck close to zero.

But Mr. Biden’s team also sees significant opportunities to improve his favorability rating both with disaffected voters who have been moving away from the Democratic Party — voters without college degrees, for example — and with center-right moderates who, in the Trump era, have slipped farther from the Republican Party.

This year, a number of organizations have also mobilized to target Republican-leaning voters who dislike Mr. Trump but do not consider themselves Democrats, aiming to bring them into the Biden fold.

An organization called Republican Voters Against Trump has released testimonials from voters who have never voted for a Democrat before. And veterans of the George W. Bush administration announced a new political action committee last week in support of Mr. Biden; one of the leaders is Kristopher Purcell, who worked in the communications office under Mr. Bush.

Mr. Purcell submitted a write-in vote in 2016. This year, he said, will be the first time he votes for a Democrat for president.

“We have seen over the last four years what a Trump presidency means for the country, and it’s increasingly negative, it’s increasingly damaging,” Mr. Purcell said. “We want to really focus on persuading historically Republican voters.”

Mr. Spaulding of New Hampshire would fall into that category.

He chaired the late Senator John McCain’s presidential bids there in 2000 and 2008, currently serves as a commissioner of Merrimack County in New Hampshire and continues to identify as a Republican. This year, he chaired the New Hampshire campaign of former Gov. William F. Weld, Republican of Massachusetts, who challenged Mr. Trump in the primary before exiting the race in March.

Mr. Spaulding has never voted for a Democrat for president, he said in an interview, but would “probably” support Mr. Biden this time. He called the former vice president “a middle of the roader-type Democrat” who “will do the things that need to be done to get our country back together again.”

Asked if he had any reservations about voting for a Democrat, Mr. Spaulding replied, “not when the stakes are as high as they are this year.”

In interviews, a number of Republican-leaning voters who supported neither major-party candidate last time echoed Mr. Spaulding’s view that they were comfortable with the relatively moderate Mr. Biden, for the very reasons that more progressive voters have been unenthusiastic about his candidacy.

Some people interviewed, however, admitted to being uneasy about whether Mr. Biden would be pushed too far to the left by ascendant voices in the Democratic Party.

“If you look at the entire field the Democratic Party put up, he was probably the most centrist of them all, and it’s that centrist side that leads me to be OK to vote for him,” said Emmanuel Wilder, who voted for Mr. Johnson in 2016 and ran unsuccessfully for the North Carolina Statehouse as a Republican in 2018.

Mr. Wilder intends to vote for Mr. Biden, but added, “I have that concern, whether he will govern like that or whether he will lean more toward following the lead of his party.”

Still, not everyone who opposed the major candidates in 2016 wants to pick a side yet.

“It’s an unbelievably bad choice twice now,” said Richard Vinroot, a Republican former mayor of Charlotte, N.C., who opposed Mr. Trump and Mrs. Clinton in 2016, and will not vote for Mr. Trump or Mr. Biden this year. “I’m very disappointed in the choice that we have.”

The Trump campaign hopes to fuel perceptions that Mr. Biden and the Democratic Party are too radical, seeking to link Mr. Biden to the most progressive voices in his party at a moment of national unrest over racism and policing.

“Our data shows that a lot of people know of Joe Biden, but not very many know much about him,” said Tim Murtaugh a spokesman for Mr. Trump’s re-election campaign, calling Mr. Biden “incapable of standing up to the most extreme elements in his party.”

“By Election Day, voters will be aware of that,” he said.

Yet polling shows that it is Mr. Trump who is out of step with much of the country on issues of racial justice. And Mr. Biden, who has supported protesters of police brutality, has also rejected the most far-reaching measures proposed by some in his party — he opposes defunding the police, for example.

Back in Arizona, Barbara Hill, 85, reflected on her 2016 vote.

“I voted for somebody else on the ballot,’’ she said. “I wasted my vote, in other words, but I couldn’t stand either one of them.”

This time, she said, she will be voting for Mr. Biden.

I guess it’s up to them, I’m not going to try to convince people otherwise because unlike some people, I’m not a hysteric who thinks my preferred candidate losing means the end of democracy or something

I do want to leave this here
Image

Of course you were never one of those whose votes can be swayed since you lean heavily libertarian. That's fine since it's your choice, but it's interesting nevertheless to see more of those 2016-style voters who voted neither are now going for Biden.
Free Palestine, stop the genocide in Gaza

User avatar
Aureumterra
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 8521
Founded: Oct 25, 2017
Ex-Nation

Postby Aureumterra » Tue Jul 07, 2020 7:39 pm

No State Here wrote:
Zurkerx wrote:Some voters who disliked both nominees in 2016 chose a third-party candidate instead. Now, many of them are shunning President Trump and are ready to back Joe Biden. Polling has also shown that for voters that hate both 2020 nominees and didn't vote in 2016 because of the horrendous choices, back Biden overwhelmingly. Even a decent amount of center-right voters are considering or voting for Biden. All of this are dangerous signs for Trump, who's re-election is in jeopardy.

In Florida in 2016, J.C. Planas, a former Republican state representative, was uncomfortable with Hillary Clinton but detested Donald Trump, so he wrote in former Gov. Jeb Bush for president.

In New Hampshire that year, Peter J. Spaulding, a longtime Republican official, supported the Libertarian ticket.

And in Arizona, Lorena Burns, 56, also voted third party, seeing the choice between Mr. Trump and Mrs. Clinton as a contest between “two bads.”

“I didn’t want to be responsible for either,” she said.

This year, all three of them intend to diverge from their Republican leanings and vote for former Vice President Joseph R. Biden Jr., the presumptive Democratic nominee. They are among an emerging group of voters who disliked both major-party presidential nominees in 2016, but who are now so disillusioned with President Trump — and sufficiently comfortable with Mr. Biden — that they are increasingly willing to support the Democrat.

It’s a dynamic that could have significant implications in several of the most competitive battleground states, like Arizona and Wisconsin, where the third-party vote in 2016 was greater than the margin of difference between Mr. Trump and Mrs. Clinton. Recent polling also shows that Mr. Biden has an overwhelming advantage over Mr. Trump among voters who have unfavorable views of both candidates — a cohort that ultimately broke in Mr. Trump’s favor in 2016, exit polls showed.

Ms. Burns of Guadalupe, Ariz., said she recently made her first political donation, to the Democratic National Committee. She said she agreed with many of Mr. Trump’s policies, but was turned off by his behavior. “Just the lying, just the craziness, the bullying — I’d rather pay more money than be with him for another four years,” she said. “I’m willing to pay more money in taxes just to be away from him. He’s corrupting the country.”

In Ms. Burns’s state of Arizona, Mr. Trump won by 3.5 percentage points in 2016. The Libertarian Party nominee, Gary Johnson, won 4.1 percent of the vote, and in other states where the race was even closer — including Pennsylvania, Michigan, Wisconsin and Florida — he pulled in between 2 and 4 percent. The Green Party candidate Jill Stein took in roughly 1 percent in those states — small but significant totals in contests that were decided by slim margins.

In any single poll, it is difficult for pollsters to reach a significant number of voters who supported third-party candidates in 2016, making it impossible to trace their preferences now. And Mr. Trump — who faced vocal opposition that year from some prominent Republicans and won anyway — remains overwhelmingly popular with Republican voters. While many center-right voters have distanced themselves from his party, there are others who initially expressed misgivings about him and have since come to embrace him, resistant to the leftward drift of the Democratic Party.

But in a year when swing voters are scarce, some of the voters who effectively stayed on the sidelines in 2016 are showing signs of political movement now — and there is evidence that Mr. Biden stands to benefit.

There appears to be far less interest in third-party candidates compared with the same point in 2016, pollsters say.

“Barring some unforeseen circumstance, there’s just not a lot of appetite for third party,” said Patrick Murray, director of the Monmouth University Polling Institute. “This is two-person for nearly all American voters.”

His polling from late June found that among voters who have unfavorable views of both candidates, Mr. Biden leads the president 55 percent to 21 percent. In 2016, Mr. Trump won the voters who disliked both candidates, according to exit polls.

And according to a recent poll of registered voters in six major battleground states by The Times and Siena College, people who say they did not vote in 2016 overwhelmingly favor Mr. Biden over Mr. Trump in November, 56 percent to 25 percent. Among registered voters in those states who said they did cast ballots in 2016, 47 percent said they planned to support Mr. Biden and 42 percent said they would back Mr. Trump

The Monmouth poll also found that at this point, “fewer voters have a negative opinion of the Democratic nominee” compared with four years ago.

“You had two lightning rod candidates running last time,” said the veteran Republican pollster Glen Bolger, who added that there was still time for Republicans to shape perceptions of Mr. Biden. “At this point in time, Joe Biden isn’t nearly as controversial as Hillary Clinton was, so I think third party candidates are a little bit slower to come out of the woodwork.”

In 2016, voters who went third party spanned the ideological spectrum, from Republicans who did not believe Mr. Trump was a true conservative, to progressives who opposed Mrs. Clinton from the left. The Biden campaign has been working to improve Mr. Biden’s standing with young liberals, aware of the need to engage and mobilize those voters who have long been skeptical of his relatively centrist policy stances. In part because of his difficulty gaining the confidence of young voters and liberals, Mr. Biden’s net favorability rating nationwide remains stuck close to zero.

But Mr. Biden’s team also sees significant opportunities to improve his favorability rating both with disaffected voters who have been moving away from the Democratic Party — voters without college degrees, for example — and with center-right moderates who, in the Trump era, have slipped farther from the Republican Party.

This year, a number of organizations have also mobilized to target Republican-leaning voters who dislike Mr. Trump but do not consider themselves Democrats, aiming to bring them into the Biden fold.

An organization called Republican Voters Against Trump has released testimonials from voters who have never voted for a Democrat before. And veterans of the George W. Bush administration announced a new political action committee last week in support of Mr. Biden; one of the leaders is Kristopher Purcell, who worked in the communications office under Mr. Bush.

Mr. Purcell submitted a write-in vote in 2016. This year, he said, will be the first time he votes for a Democrat for president.

“We have seen over the last four years what a Trump presidency means for the country, and it’s increasingly negative, it’s increasingly damaging,” Mr. Purcell said. “We want to really focus on persuading historically Republican voters.”

Mr. Spaulding of New Hampshire would fall into that category.

He chaired the late Senator John McCain’s presidential bids there in 2000 and 2008, currently serves as a commissioner of Merrimack County in New Hampshire and continues to identify as a Republican. This year, he chaired the New Hampshire campaign of former Gov. William F. Weld, Republican of Massachusetts, who challenged Mr. Trump in the primary before exiting the race in March.

Mr. Spaulding has never voted for a Democrat for president, he said in an interview, but would “probably” support Mr. Biden this time. He called the former vice president “a middle of the roader-type Democrat” who “will do the things that need to be done to get our country back together again.”

Asked if he had any reservations about voting for a Democrat, Mr. Spaulding replied, “not when the stakes are as high as they are this year.”

In interviews, a number of Republican-leaning voters who supported neither major-party candidate last time echoed Mr. Spaulding’s view that they were comfortable with the relatively moderate Mr. Biden, for the very reasons that more progressive voters have been unenthusiastic about his candidacy.

Some people interviewed, however, admitted to being uneasy about whether Mr. Biden would be pushed too far to the left by ascendant voices in the Democratic Party.

“If you look at the entire field the Democratic Party put up, he was probably the most centrist of them all, and it’s that centrist side that leads me to be OK to vote for him,” said Emmanuel Wilder, who voted for Mr. Johnson in 2016 and ran unsuccessfully for the North Carolina Statehouse as a Republican in 2018.

Mr. Wilder intends to vote for Mr. Biden, but added, “I have that concern, whether he will govern like that or whether he will lean more toward following the lead of his party.”

Still, not everyone who opposed the major candidates in 2016 wants to pick a side yet.

“It’s an unbelievably bad choice twice now,” said Richard Vinroot, a Republican former mayor of Charlotte, N.C., who opposed Mr. Trump and Mrs. Clinton in 2016, and will not vote for Mr. Trump or Mr. Biden this year. “I’m very disappointed in the choice that we have.”

The Trump campaign hopes to fuel perceptions that Mr. Biden and the Democratic Party are too radical, seeking to link Mr. Biden to the most progressive voices in his party at a moment of national unrest over racism and policing.

“Our data shows that a lot of people know of Joe Biden, but not very many know much about him,” said Tim Murtaugh a spokesman for Mr. Trump’s re-election campaign, calling Mr. Biden “incapable of standing up to the most extreme elements in his party.”

“By Election Day, voters will be aware of that,” he said.

Yet polling shows that it is Mr. Trump who is out of step with much of the country on issues of racial justice. And Mr. Biden, who has supported protesters of police brutality, has also rejected the most far-reaching measures proposed by some in his party — he opposes defunding the police, for example.

Back in Arizona, Barbara Hill, 85, reflected on her 2016 vote.

“I voted for somebody else on the ballot,’’ she said. “I wasted my vote, in other words, but I couldn’t stand either one of them.”

This time, she said, she will be voting for Mr. Biden.

I guess it’s up to them, I’m not going to try to convince people otherwise because unlike some people, I’m not a hysteric who thinks my preferred candidate losing means the end of democracy or something

"I swear, democracy will end if we don’t win!"
-Every politician ever
NS Parliament: Aditya Sriraam - Unity and Consolidation Party
Latin American Political RP
RightValues
Icelandic Civic Nationalist and proud
I’m your average Íslandic NS player
I DO NOT USE NS STATS!
A 12 civilization, according to this index.
Scary Right Wing Capitalist who thinks the current state of the world (before the pandemic) is the best it had been

User avatar
Nobel Hobos 2
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 14114
Founded: Dec 04, 2019
Ex-Nation

Postby Nobel Hobos 2 » Tue Jul 07, 2020 8:01 pm

San Lumen wrote:https://www.virginiamercury.com/2020/07/07/virginia-elections-board-votes-to-allow-freitas-good-on-ballot-despite-late-filings/

Gop candidates Bob Good and Nick Freitas will be allowed on the ballot in Virginia after the state board of elections voted to give them an extension to file their paperwork


The SBE is a three-member body consisting of a chair, vice-chair, and secretary, that manages the electoral process and investigates and adjudicates disputes and campaign law violations. Under the Code of Virginia, "Two Board members shall be of the political party which cast the highest number of votes for Governor at that election." --Wikipedia


Top notch Virginia. Explicitly grant partisan control of elections to whoever won the Governorship.

Though the SBE made the opposite decision (against partisanship) this time, it's still a dumb idea.
I report offenses if and only if they are crimes.
No footwear industry: citizens cannot afford new shoes.
High rate of Nobel prizes and other academic achievements.

User avatar
Nobel Hobos 2
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 14114
Founded: Dec 04, 2019
Ex-Nation

Postby Nobel Hobos 2 » Tue Jul 07, 2020 8:04 pm

Aureumterra wrote:
No State Here wrote:I guess it’s up to them, I’m not going to try to convince people otherwise because unlike some people, I’m not a hysteric who thinks my preferred candidate losing means the end of democracy or something

"I swear, democracy will end if we don’t win!"
-Every politician ever


Al Gore. Democracy DID end and he was still a gentleman about it.
I report offenses if and only if they are crimes.
No footwear industry: citizens cannot afford new shoes.
High rate of Nobel prizes and other academic achievements.

User avatar
Zurkerx
Retired Moderator
 
Posts: 12340
Founded: Jan 20, 2011
Anarchy

Postby Zurkerx » Tue Jul 07, 2020 8:05 pm

Shrillland wrote:Another call to make:

GOP NJ-5(Paramus-North Jersey): Frank Pallotta
Dem NJ-5(Paramus-North Jersey): Josh Gottheimer

This is going faster that I expected, just three races left to call.


New Jersey happens to be effective in their vote counting, go us :p

Outer Sparta wrote:Of course you were never one of those whose votes can be swayed since you lean heavily libertarian. That's fine since it's your choice, but it's interesting nevertheless to see more of those 2016-style voters who voted neither are now going for Biden.


I won't lie here: if Amash was the nominee for the Libertarians, I would be instantly voting for them. Unfortunately, he decided not to run and the Libertarians had nothing more than dull candidates at best; memes at worst. My vote for Biden isn't because I agree with Biden on a majority of issues; I don't: it's more of a statement against the vile corruption and ineptitude of this administration and the Republican Party. Even though I agree with Trump's tax cuts, of which, has benefited me, I still had no intention of voting for Trump. My family is baffled that I want to harm my "self-interests" (it's honestly more their interests). I am disgusted with the Right Wing Parties in the United States right now, I'll put it that way.
A Golden Civic: The New Pragmatic Libertarian
My Words: Indeed, Indubitably & Malarkey
Retired Admin in NSGS and NS Parliament

Accountant, Author, History Buff, Political Junkie
“Has ambition so eclipsed principle?” ~ Mitt Romney
"Try not to become a person of success, but rather try to become a person of value." ~ Albert Einstein
"Trust, but verify." ~ Ronald Reagan

User avatar
Outer Sparta
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 15106
Founded: Dec 26, 2014
Democratic Socialists

Postby Outer Sparta » Tue Jul 07, 2020 8:07 pm

Zurkerx wrote:
Shrillland wrote:Another call to make:

GOP NJ-5(Paramus-North Jersey): Frank Pallotta
Dem NJ-5(Paramus-North Jersey): Josh Gottheimer

This is going faster that I expected, just three races left to call.


New Jersey happens to be effective in their vote counting, go us :p

Outer Sparta wrote:Of course you were never one of those whose votes can be swayed since you lean heavily libertarian. That's fine since it's your choice, but it's interesting nevertheless to see more of those 2016-style voters who voted neither are now going for Biden.


I won't lie here: if Amash was the nominee for the Libertarians, I would be instantly voting for them. Unfortunately, he decided not to run and the Libertarians had nothing more than dull candidates at best; memes at worst. My vote for Biden isn't because I agree with Biden on a majority of issues; I don't: it's more of a statement against the vile corruption and ineptitude of this administration and the Republican Party. Even though I agree with Trump's tax cuts, of which, has benefited me, I still had no intention of voting for Trump. My family is baffled that I want to harm my "self-interests" (it's honestly more their interests). I am disgusted with the Right Wing Parties in the United States right now, I'll put it that way.

Don't you come from a more right-wing family? I remember you said your family members were more or less Trump supporters.
Free Palestine, stop the genocide in Gaza

User avatar
San Lumen
Post Kaiser
 
Posts: 87246
Founded: Jul 02, 2009
Liberal Democratic Socialists

Postby San Lumen » Tue Jul 07, 2020 8:15 pm

Nobel Hobos 2 wrote:
San Lumen wrote:https://www.virginiamercury.com/2020/07/07/virginia-elections-board-votes-to-allow-freitas-good-on-ballot-despite-late-filings/

Gop candidates Bob Good and Nick Freitas will be allowed on the ballot in Virginia after the state board of elections voted to give them an extension to file their paperwork


The SBE is a three-member body consisting of a chair, vice-chair, and secretary, that manages the electoral process and investigates and adjudicates disputes and campaign law violations. Under the Code of Virginia, "Two Board members shall be of the political party which cast the highest number of votes for Governor at that election." --Wikipedia


Top notch Virginia. Explicitly grant partisan control of elections to whoever won the Governorship.

Though the SBE made the opposite decision (against partisanship) this time, it's still a dumb idea.


Im not sure how i feel about it. If it was the Democratic nominee in this position and the Board was controlled by Republicans I it is almost certain they would have denied them ballot access

User avatar
Zurkerx
Retired Moderator
 
Posts: 12340
Founded: Jan 20, 2011
Anarchy

Postby Zurkerx » Tue Jul 07, 2020 8:17 pm

Outer Sparta wrote:
Zurkerx wrote:
New Jersey happens to be effective in their vote counting, go us :p



I won't lie here: if Amash was the nominee for the Libertarians, I would be instantly voting for them. Unfortunately, he decided not to run and the Libertarians had nothing more than dull candidates at best; memes at worst. My vote for Biden isn't because I agree with Biden on a majority of issues; I don't: it's more of a statement against the vile corruption and ineptitude of this administration and the Republican Party. Even though I agree with Trump's tax cuts, of which, has benefited me, I still had no intention of voting for Trump. My family is baffled that I want to harm my "self-interests" (it's honestly more their interests). I am disgusted with the Right Wing Parties in the United States right now, I'll put it that way.

Don't you come from a more right-wing family? I remember you said your family members were more or less Trump supporters.


I do: they will vote Republican until the day they die, and follow them like sheep. To them, the worst Republican is better than the best Democrat. Economically, they are Republican but socially, they're centrists: they don't mind abortion or gay marriage but are certainly stricter on immigration. However, half of my family, while preaching conspiratorial nonsense, aren't the fondest of him: they view Trump as an idiot, a city-person that knows jack shit. Yet, that's still somehow better than any Democrat, whom they have described as "socialists" trying to bring in foreigners to make the US a "third world country". There's a lot more I can list (the pandemic is a myth or overblown, COVID deaths are inflated, Democrats vote illegally, etc.) but you get the point.

Myself, I'm right wing economically based on tests, but I'm much more pragmatic on economic issues: I generally can compromise easily on them. Normally, I would either vote Republican or Libertarian, depending on the candidate. However, given this era of politics, I'm willing to hold my nose and vote Democrat for this rare occasion.
A Golden Civic: The New Pragmatic Libertarian
My Words: Indeed, Indubitably & Malarkey
Retired Admin in NSGS and NS Parliament

Accountant, Author, History Buff, Political Junkie
“Has ambition so eclipsed principle?” ~ Mitt Romney
"Try not to become a person of success, but rather try to become a person of value." ~ Albert Einstein
"Trust, but verify." ~ Ronald Reagan

User avatar
San Lumen
Post Kaiser
 
Posts: 87246
Founded: Jul 02, 2009
Liberal Democratic Socialists

Postby San Lumen » Tue Jul 07, 2020 8:17 pm

Shrillland wrote:Another call to make:

GOP NJ-5(Paramus-North Jersey): Frank Pallotta
Dem NJ-5(Paramus-North Jersey): Josh Gottheimer

This is going faster that I expected, just three races left to call.

Happy to hear Gottheimer won and by such a wide margin too. Hes a perfect fit for that district and his opponent was probably a bit too left to win it.

User avatar
San Lumen
Post Kaiser
 
Posts: 87246
Founded: Jul 02, 2009
Liberal Democratic Socialists

Postby San Lumen » Tue Jul 07, 2020 8:19 pm

Zurkerx wrote:Amy Kennedy, who is married to one of the Kennedy's, will face off against Jeff Van Drew in the 2nd District. That area leans red and will probably stay red though Democrats are making it personal: they want Drew out.

she is Ted Kennedy's daughter in law and wife of former Rhode Island Congressman Patrick Kennedy.
Last edited by San Lumen on Tue Jul 07, 2020 8:20 pm, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
Nobel Hobos 2
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 14114
Founded: Dec 04, 2019
Ex-Nation

Postby Nobel Hobos 2 » Tue Jul 07, 2020 8:27 pm

San Lumen wrote:
Zurkerx wrote:Amy Kennedy, who is married to one of the Kennedy's, will face off against Jeff Van Drew in the 2nd District. That area leans red and will probably stay red though Democrats are making it personal: they want Drew out.

she is Ted Kennedy's daughter in law and wife of former Rhode Island Congressman Patrick Kennedy.


If I have that straight, her mother married a Kennedy so she married a Kennedy too. It's not technically inbreeding, but still I get a disturbing whiff of aristocracy.
I report offenses if and only if they are crimes.
No footwear industry: citizens cannot afford new shoes.
High rate of Nobel prizes and other academic achievements.

User avatar
Cisairse
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 10935
Founded: Mar 17, 2017
Ex-Nation

Postby Cisairse » Tue Jul 07, 2020 8:34 pm

Nobel Hobos 2 wrote:
San Lumen wrote:she is Ted Kennedy's daughter in law and wife of former Rhode Island Congressman Patrick Kennedy.


If I have that straight, her mother married a Kennedy so she married a Kennedy too. It's not technically inbreeding, but still I get a disturbing whiff of aristocracy.

Ted Kennedy is her father-in-law, not the other way around.
The details of the above post are subject to leftist infighting.

I officially endorse Fivey Fox for president of the United States.

User avatar
San Lumen
Post Kaiser
 
Posts: 87246
Founded: Jul 02, 2009
Liberal Democratic Socialists

Postby San Lumen » Tue Jul 07, 2020 8:35 pm

Cisairse wrote:
Nobel Hobos 2 wrote:
If I have that straight, her mother married a Kennedy so she married a Kennedy too. It's not technically inbreeding, but still I get a disturbing whiff of aristocracy.

Ted Kennedy is her father-in-law, not the other way around.

Was I correct in calling her his daughter in law?

User avatar
South Odreria 2
Minister
 
Posts: 3102
Founded: Aug 26, 2019
Ex-Nation

Postby South Odreria 2 » Tue Jul 07, 2020 8:35 pm

Cisairse wrote:
Nobel Hobos 2 wrote:
If I have that straight, her mother married a Kennedy so she married a Kennedy too. It's not technically inbreeding, but still I get a disturbing whiff of aristocracy.

Ted Kennedy is her father-in-law, not the other way around.

People here thinking she is Ted Kennedy’s father in law
Valrifell wrote:
Disregard whatever this poster says

User avatar
Cisairse
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 10935
Founded: Mar 17, 2017
Ex-Nation

Postby Cisairse » Tue Jul 07, 2020 8:36 pm

San Lumen wrote:
Cisairse wrote:Ted Kennedy is her father-in-law, not the other way around.

Was I correct in calling her his daughter in law?

Someone being your father in law doesn't mean you're their daughter in law

The former implies you married person's son, the latter implied person married your mother
The details of the above post are subject to leftist infighting.

I officially endorse Fivey Fox for president of the United States.

User avatar
San Lumen
Post Kaiser
 
Posts: 87246
Founded: Jul 02, 2009
Liberal Democratic Socialists

Postby San Lumen » Tue Jul 07, 2020 8:40 pm

Cisairse wrote:
San Lumen wrote:Was I correct in calling her his daughter in law?

Someone being your father in law doesn't mean you're their daughter in law

The former implies you married person's son, the latter implied person married your mother

Patrick Kennedy is Ted's son therefore doesn't that make her his daughter in law?

User avatar
Nobel Hobos 2
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 14114
Founded: Dec 04, 2019
Ex-Nation

Postby Nobel Hobos 2 » Tue Jul 07, 2020 8:41 pm

Cisairse wrote:
Nobel Hobos 2 wrote:
If I have that straight, her mother married a Kennedy so she married a Kennedy too. It's not technically inbreeding, but still I get a disturbing whiff of aristocracy.

Ted Kennedy is her father-in-law, not the other way around.


I'm still not sure I had I right, but your "correction" isn't helping.
I report offenses if and only if they are crimes.
No footwear industry: citizens cannot afford new shoes.
High rate of Nobel prizes and other academic achievements.

User avatar
Cisairse
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 10935
Founded: Mar 17, 2017
Ex-Nation

Postby Cisairse » Tue Jul 07, 2020 8:43 pm

Yeah wait hold on I'm all turned around here

I'm jsut gonna go with what South Odreria 2 said
The details of the above post are subject to leftist infighting.

I officially endorse Fivey Fox for president of the United States.

User avatar
Cannot think of a name
Post Czar
 
Posts: 45100
Founded: Antiquity
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby Cannot think of a name » Tue Jul 07, 2020 8:50 pm

Aureumterra wrote:
Major-Tom wrote:Tucker Carlson for 2024? The GOP is buzzing.

I've joked about the possibility of Carlson winning the nom in 2024, but I guess the GOP is actually entertaining this idea. The fucked thing is - say Trump loses in 2020 and Biden has an average first term marked by a likely continuing economic recession / general instability & polarization. Carlson could easily win the primary and definitely be a contender in the general.

Certainly not a pleasant thought.

Nah Ron DeSantis seems more likely to be in the spotlight, considering he's the more bipartisan one, he’s also a third positionist basically, rare in US politics

One election at a time, puppy haters.
"...I have been gravely disappointed with the white moderate. I have almost reached the regrettable conclusion that the Negro's great stumbling block in the stride toward freedom is not the White Citizen's Council-er or the Ku Klux Klanner, but the white moderate who is more devoted to "order" than to justice; who prefers a negative peace which is the absence of tension to a positive peace which is the presence of justice; who constantly says "I agree with you in the goal you seek, but I can't agree with your methods of direct action;" who paternalistically feels he can set the timetable for another man's freedom; who lives by the myth of time and who constantly advises the Negro to wait until a "more convenient season." -MLK Jr.

User avatar
Shrillland
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 22231
Founded: Apr 12, 2010
Scandinavian Liberal Paradise

Postby Shrillland » Tue Jul 07, 2020 8:51 pm

....NYT says provisional and absentee ballots can't be counted for a week, which is the end of the mailing period for regular ballots.
Last edited by Shrillland on Tue Jul 07, 2020 8:52 pm, edited 1 time in total.
How America Came to This, by Kowani: Racialised Politics, Ideological Media Gaslighting, and What It All Means For The Future
Plebiscite Plaza 2024
Confused by the names I use for House districts? Here's a primer!
In 1963, Doctor Who taught us all we need to know about politics when a cave woman said, "Old men see no further than tomorrow's meat".

User avatar
San Lumen
Post Kaiser
 
Posts: 87246
Founded: Jul 02, 2009
Liberal Democratic Socialists

Postby San Lumen » Tue Jul 07, 2020 8:53 pm

Shrillland wrote:....NYT says provisional and absentee ballots can't be counted for a week, which is the end of the mailing period for regular ballots.

They need to fix this for the general. A two week wait to count any provisional and absentee ballots is absurd.

User avatar
Cisairse
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 10935
Founded: Mar 17, 2017
Ex-Nation

Postby Cisairse » Tue Jul 07, 2020 8:55 pm

San Lumen wrote:
Shrillland wrote:....NYT says provisional and absentee ballots can't be counted for a week, which is the end of the mailing period for regular ballots.

They need to fix this for the general. A two week wait to count any provisional and absentee ballots is absurd.

Not really.
The details of the above post are subject to leftist infighting.

I officially endorse Fivey Fox for president of the United States.

User avatar
San Lumen
Post Kaiser
 
Posts: 87246
Founded: Jul 02, 2009
Liberal Democratic Socialists

Postby San Lumen » Tue Jul 07, 2020 8:57 pm

Cisairse wrote:
San Lumen wrote:They need to fix this for the general. A two week wait to count any provisional and absentee ballots is absurd.

Not really.

Why not? No other state has a rule like that as far as I know.

User avatar
Ngelmish
Minister
 
Posts: 3070
Founded: Dec 06, 2009
Scandinavian Liberal Paradise

Postby Ngelmish » Tue Jul 07, 2020 8:58 pm

Zurkerx wrote:
Outer Sparta wrote:Don't you come from a more right-wing family? I remember you said your family members were more or less Trump supporters.


I do: they will vote Republican until the day they die, and follow them like sheep. To them, the worst Republican is better than the best Democrat. Economically, they are Republican but socially, they're centrists: they don't mind abortion or gay marriage but are certainly stricter on immigration. However, half of my family, while preaching conspiratorial nonsense, aren't the fondest of him: they view Trump as an idiot, a city-person that knows jack shit. Yet, that's still somehow better than any Democrat, whom they have described as "socialists" trying to bring in foreigners to make the US a "third world country". There's a lot more I can list (the pandemic is a myth or overblown, COVID deaths are inflated, Democrats vote illegally, etc.) but you get the point.

Myself, I'm right wing economically based on tests, but I'm much more pragmatic on economic issues: I generally can compromise easily on them. Normally, I would either vote Republican or Libertarian, depending on the candidate. However, given this era of politics, I'm willing to hold my nose and vote Democrat for this rare occasion.


"Our worst is better than their best," is a very interesting dilemma. In 2016, when I was hard, as opposed to lukewarm, anti Bernie Sanders, a good friend of mine argued that, because personnel is policy, even if Sanders was a bad president he'd appoint the right kind of people. And from a zero sum perspective, that's not untrue. But, when I think about it, Jimmy Carter was a bad deal for the Democratic Party. Yeah, he got his four years, but he was more conservative than the median Democrat and got steamrolled in '80, because, among other reasons, while Democrats liked him, they didn't love him. We traded off an immediate victory for a long series of defeats.

Trump gives me that vibe now, and of course it's not been proven yet with him, but... sometimes you worst is a hell of a lot of a steeper price to pay than just four years.

User avatar
Cannot think of a name
Post Czar
 
Posts: 45100
Founded: Antiquity
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby Cannot think of a name » Tue Jul 07, 2020 8:58 pm

Cisairse wrote:
San Lumen wrote:They need to fix this for the general. A two week wait to count any provisional and absentee ballots is absurd.

Not really.

I’ll take accurate over fast.
"...I have been gravely disappointed with the white moderate. I have almost reached the regrettable conclusion that the Negro's great stumbling block in the stride toward freedom is not the White Citizen's Council-er or the Ku Klux Klanner, but the white moderate who is more devoted to "order" than to justice; who prefers a negative peace which is the absence of tension to a positive peace which is the presence of justice; who constantly says "I agree with you in the goal you seek, but I can't agree with your methods of direct action;" who paternalistically feels he can set the timetable for another man's freedom; who lives by the myth of time and who constantly advises the Negro to wait until a "more convenient season." -MLK Jr.

PreviousNext

Advertisement

Remove ads

Return to General

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Big Eyed Animation, Haganham, Ineva, Lardus, Paappapapa, Tillania, Tremereika

Advertisement

Remove ads