Advertisement
by South Odreria 2 » Thu Jun 18, 2020 8:45 pm
Valrifell wrote:
Disregard whatever this poster says
by Izandai » Thu Jun 18, 2020 8:47 pm
by Uiiop » Thu Jun 18, 2020 8:54 pm
by Kowani » Thu Jun 18, 2020 9:03 pm
Uiiop wrote:San Lumen wrote:How is it tokenism?
Her record as DA and AG sucks. Having someone's skin color used to ignore their past support of racism sounds pretty much like the definition of tokenism.
by Cisairse » Thu Jun 18, 2020 9:06 pm
South Odreria 2 wrote:The running mate will be Warren,ora woman of color.
by San Lumen » Thu Jun 18, 2020 9:06 pm
Uiiop wrote:San Lumen wrote:How is it tokenism?
Her record as DA and AG sucks. Having someone's skin color used to ignore their past support of racism sounds pretty much like the definition of tokenism.
by Uiiop » Thu Jun 18, 2020 9:07 pm
Kowani wrote:Uiiop wrote:Her record as DA and AG sucks. Having someone's skin color used to ignore their past support of racism sounds pretty much like the definition of tokenism.
Nobody mentioned Kamala. (Who I would agree would be a terrible pick.)
San Lumen wrote:Uiiop wrote:Her record as DA and AG sucks. Having someone's skin color used to ignore their past support of racism sounds pretty much like the definition of tokenism.
There are others he could pick such as Val Demings, Keisha Lance Bottoms, Susan Rice or Michelle Lujan Grisham
by Cisairse » Thu Jun 18, 2020 9:08 pm
Uiiop wrote:San Lumen wrote:How is it tokenism?
Her record as DA and AG sucks. Having someone's skin color used to ignore their past support of racism sounds pretty much like the definition of tokenism.
by Gormwood » Thu Jun 18, 2020 9:09 pm
by Uiiop » Thu Jun 18, 2020 9:09 pm
Cisairse wrote:Uiiop wrote:Her record as DA and AG sucks. Having someone's skin color used to ignore their past support of racism sounds pretty much like the definition of tokenism.
I hate Kamala as much as the next prog, but that article does not say what you think it says.
by Cisairse » Thu Jun 18, 2020 9:11 pm
by Gormwood » Thu Jun 18, 2020 9:12 pm
by Kowani » Thu Jun 18, 2020 9:18 pm
by South Odreria 2 » Thu Jun 18, 2020 9:21 pm
Valrifell wrote:
Disregard whatever this poster says
by Myrensis » Fri Jun 19, 2020 2:01 am
by Thermodolia » Fri Jun 19, 2020 3:36 am
by Thermodolia » Fri Jun 19, 2020 3:48 am
Shofercia wrote:Gormwood wrote:
Not to mention trying to imply people are suddenly Bolton groupies because he's dishing dirt on Trump.
Oh, is that all Bolton is? So then you won't mind saying "NO" to future war with Iran loud and proud, would you Gormwood? After all, if he's just an innocent witness, and not at all doing this for his warmongering ideas that he wants to enact in the future, you'd have no issues saying that War with Iran would be catastrophic, and warmongering's very wrong. So c'mon Gormwood, say it, loud and proud: "warmongering without a purpose is wrong!" After all, it's part of what Obama ran on in 2008, and part of what Trump ran on in 2016. When Bolton can't win at the ballot box, he tries to cast actual winners as mobsters, for which Gormwood and others hail him as a poor, poor, mob prosecution witness.
Tombradyonia wrote:
And what Bolton is saying about DJT is pretty much what everyone else who left the administration is saying, which basically is that DJT is a huge manbaby who thinks he's the expert on everything and doesn't listen to anyone whose name isn't Kim.
So is that what Sean Spicer's saying? Yes, yes, we get it, "Orange Man Bad" but you know what's really, really, really, actually, bad? Iraq War. That's very bad. Killed over one hundred thousand innocent Iraqi civilians, women and children, sent thousands of Americans home with PTSD, stole money that could've gone to education reform, what a rotten, rotten, rotten war. Hmm, I wonder who the architect was? Oh yeah, John Bolton.
by Zurkerx » Fri Jun 19, 2020 5:18 am
San Lumen wrote:Zurkerx wrote:
She went on to say Biden should pick a woman of color, which appears almost a 100% guarantee; only Warren has a shot at this point.
I'm a bit surprised though the writing was on the wall for her: if her past wasn't that troubling and she had broad appeal, she would have been selected easily. Now, 15 years ago, she would have been easily picked but times have changed.
I agree but at this point, given what's been transpiring with Trump, I'll be voting for Biden, regardless of who he picks.
Picking black woman is a very good choice politically and strategically. It could drive up black turnout to 2008 levels or possibly higher
Uiiop wrote:Kowani wrote:Nobody mentioned Kamala. (Who I would agree would be a terrible pick.)
Zurkerx did in the post that there were applying to.
Nevertheless the subject was Black VPs in general and she's demonstrate of the pitfalls of where that may lead. So i think my point still stands.San Lumen wrote:There are others he could pick such as Val Demings, Keisha Lance Bottoms, Susan Rice or Michelle Lujan Grisham
Only that last one wouldn't fit with what i was talking about but there are others yes.
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Northern Socialist Council Republics, Philjia, Phoeniae, Shrillland, Sublime Ottoman State 1800 RP, Tungstan
Advertisement