Gravlen wrote:Confessional Korea wrote:Nope, it does. If X are more likely to run into the police, then X should have a higher probability of being shot at by the police.
Black people = 13% of population
Black people = 50%~ of violent crimes
Black people = 24% of police killings
This does show that black people are, relative to share of population, disproportionately killed by the police. However, it is because they also disproportionately commit violent crimes. This is the abstract of Cesario et al. (2018) paper "Is There Evidence of Racial Disparity in Police Use of Deadly Force? Analyses of Officer-Involved Fatal Shootings in 2015–2016":
Is there evidence of a Black–White disparity in death by police gunfire in the United States? This is commonly answered by comparing the odds of being fatally shot for Blacks and Whites, with odds benchmarked against each group’s population proportion. However, adjusting for population values has questionable assumptions given the context of deadly force decisions. We benchmark 2 years of fatal shooting data on 16 crime rate estimates. When adjusting for crime, we find no systematic evidence of anti-Black disparities in fatal shootings, fatal shootings of unarmed citizens, or fatal shootings involving misidentification of harmless objects. Multiverse analyses showed only one significant anti-Black disparity of 144 possible tests. Exposure to police given crime rate differences likely accounts for the higher per capita rate of fatal police shootings for Blacks, at least when analyzing all shootings. For unarmed shootings or misidentification shootings, data are too uncertain to be conclusive.
Cesario went onto explain the research in detail following a critique in 2019, which you can find located here: https://psyarxiv.com/p3ejq/
Nothing in here suggests that black people are "underrepresented" in police killings.
Also, you leave out many factors in your analysis, including policies such as stop and frisk as well as increased police presence in black neighborhoods.
There's no point in me bothering with you. You have been presented with a clear case for why there is no systematic racism among the American police, something attested to be Correll et al. (2014), complete with multiple citations to back up the conclusions reached. And you just look at it and say "hmm no I disagree" without even reading the two papers I linked to you.






