Does it? I'm just repeating the same things we hear when the cops shoot someone. If that sounds to you like I want cops to be shot, maybe what you're saying is that you want the cops to keep on murdering innocent people. Or maybe not, who can say?
Advertisement
by Ifreann » Tue Sep 15, 2020 6:22 am
by Nobel Hobos 2 » Tue Sep 15, 2020 6:23 am
Loben III wrote:Borderlands of Rojava wrote:
Who said I celebrated it? Did you see me going "YEEEEAH FUCK EM ALL"? No, I did not. I simply have very little sympathy for them, like how when a mobster gets shot in his driveway by hired hitmen sent by a rival crime family, i dont go "oh thats so horrible." I know my opinions on these kinds of things are unorthodox but if you're gonna criticize them, understand them fully first. My opinion isn't "let's kill all the cops." My opinion is "they joined a department with a culture of violence and it's kind of hypocritical that they can go around murdering people but then start whining when they get shot." I would rather no one be getting shot, but at the same time they've been killing quite a few people so they kinda dug themselves into a hole.
Did those two cops kill anybody?
by Salus Maior » Tue Sep 15, 2020 6:54 am
by The Rich Port » Tue Sep 15, 2020 7:58 am
Fartsniffage wrote:The Rich Port wrote:
I dunno if $3 billion is a good estimate but thems the cruel mathematics of a dead child, I guess.It's like this. A dead plaintiff is rarely worth as much as a living, severely-maimed plaintiff. However, if it's a long slow agonizing death, as opposed to a quick drowning or car wreck, the value can rise considerably. A dead adult in his 20s is generally worth less than one who is middle aged. A dead woman less than a dead man. A single adult less than one who's married. Black less than white. Poor less than rich. The perfect victim is a white male professional, 40 years old, at the height of his earning power, struck down in his prime. And the most imperfect? Well, in the calculus of personal injury law, a dead child is worth the least of all.
by Ifreann » Tue Sep 15, 2020 8:07 am
by Salus Maior » Tue Sep 15, 2020 8:20 am
Ifreann wrote:
Nobody's offering the same kinds of justifications we see when cops shoot someone. Except me, and I'm doing it to make the point that no one else is doing it. When the cops shoot someone, people come out to give them the benefit of the doubt, people try to find reasons to make the shooting justified. But that's not happening now that some cops have been shot.
What's up with that?
by Ifreann » Tue Sep 15, 2020 8:23 am
Salus Maior wrote:Ifreann wrote:Nobody's offering the same kinds of justifications we see when cops shoot someone. Except me, and I'm doing it to make the point that no one else is doing it. When the cops shoot someone, people come out to give them the benefit of the doubt, people try to find reasons to make the shooting justified. But that's not happening now that some cops have been shot.
What's up with that?
I've literally condemned all the unjustified cop shootings.
So no, you're not the "lone voice" here.
by Kowani » Tue Sep 15, 2020 8:48 am
The city of Louisville, Kentucky, has reached a settlement with Breonna Taylor's family six months after she was killed in her home during a police drug raid. A source familiar with the details of the settlement told NBC News the agreement is in the millions of dollars and will include a list of police reforms that will address officer accountability and the execution of search warrants. The settlement was first reported by The Louisville Courier-Journal. Attorneys Benjamin Crump, Sam Aguiar and Lonita Baker, who are representing Taylor's family, will discuss the settlement at a 2 p.m. ET news conference with Mayor Greg Fischer. The mayor's spokeswoman declined to comment Tuesday morning.
by The Emerald Legion » Tue Sep 15, 2020 8:58 am
by Loben III » Tue Sep 15, 2020 8:59 am
The Emerald Legion wrote:No Knock Warrants are stupid. How the fuck am I supposed to know you're the police if you don't tell me you're the police?
by Kowani » Tue Sep 15, 2020 9:03 am
The Emerald Legion wrote:No Knock Warrants are stupid. How the fuck am I supposed to know you're the police if you don't tell me you're the police?
by The Emerald Legion » Tue Sep 15, 2020 9:04 am
by Loben III » Tue Sep 15, 2020 9:05 am
The Emerald Legion wrote:Loben III wrote:
The idea is surprise irc for armed and dangerous types.
Dunno if Taylor or anyone else in her home we’re considered that tho.
The police opened fire after Breonna's roommate shot at them and injured one of the officers because he thought they were burglars/intruders.
by Cannot think of a name » Tue Sep 15, 2020 10:23 am
by The Rich Port » Tue Sep 15, 2020 10:26 am
Cannot think of a name wrote:Loben III wrote:
The idea is surprise irc for armed and dangerous types.
Dunno if Taylor or anyone else in her home we’re considered that tho.
They weren't considered anything, the police were at the wrong house and they had already gotten the person they were there to get.
by Blasted Craigs » Tue Sep 15, 2020 1:25 pm
by Fahran » Tue Sep 15, 2020 1:32 pm
Ifreann wrote:But when the cops kill people without due process, this line is trotted out in their defence all the time.
by Celritannia » Tue Sep 15, 2020 1:33 pm
Fahran wrote:Ifreann wrote:But when the cops kill people without due process, this line is trotted out in their defence all the time.
And it's a non-sequitur argument. The justification for shooting a suspect should be limited to "he/she was putting other people in immediate threat of serious bodily harm or death." Their past record for drinking underage or robbing a convenience store is irrelevant to that decision.
My DeviantArt Obey When you annoy a Celritannian U W0T M8?
| Citizen of Earth, Commonwealthian, European, British, Yorkshireman. Atheist, Environmentalist |
by Great Confederacy of Commonwealth States » Tue Sep 15, 2020 1:36 pm
Celritannia wrote:Fahran wrote:And it's a non-sequitur argument. The justification for shooting a suspect should be limited to "he/she was putting other people in immediate threat of serious bodily harm or death." Their past record for drinking underage or robbing a convenience store is irrelevant to that decision.
A police officer can shoot someone without killing them though.
by Saiwania » Tue Sep 15, 2020 1:37 pm
Celritannia wrote:A police officer can shoot someone without killing them though.
by Fahran » Tue Sep 15, 2020 1:39 pm
Celritannia wrote:A police officer can shoot someone without killing them though.
by San Lumen » Tue Sep 15, 2020 1:44 pm
by Borderlands of Rojava » Tue Sep 15, 2020 1:45 pm
Celestial Provinces wrote:Ifreann wrote:The law says that if your boss owes you $1,000 in wages and only gives you $200, that's not a crime, the cops can't do anything to help you, you have to just take that $200 and try to cover all your bills and also hire a lawyer to sue your boss. The law says that if the cops find you walking home with $200 cash on you, they can take it from you, claim that they believe the money might be used in a crime, and since they're technically bringing charges against the money itself and not you, you have basically zero legal recourse, even if you could use the $0 you now have to hire a lawyer.
The law says that if you end up homeless because of all this bullshit, and you find a bench that's only slightly painful to sleep on, the cops can lock you up. The law says that if you beg for help somewhere that people might have money to spare to help you, the cops can lock you up. The law says that if you can't handle the misery of all this bullshit and want to get high to feel better, the cops can lock you up. The law says that if you steal a $1.50 candy bar from the boss who owes you $800, the cops can lock you up.
No, depends on the department.
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Benuty, Elejamie, House of Cromwell, Imperial Japanese islands, Kostane, Likhinia, Neu California, New haven america, Nyoskova, Perchan, Port Carverton, The Apollonian Systems, The Black Forrest, The Two Jerseys, Theyra, Turenia
Advertisement