Mirjt wrote:The Reformed American Republic wrote:You're still going to need to involuntarily detain serial killers like Ted Bundy. I don't think there will ever be a situation where you can completely get rid of prisons. Even if only a fraction of arrestees are dangerous, prisons are still needed for the dangerous few.
That might be true for the truly dangerous few, but we don't really know, because we haven't tried to come up with alternatives to incarceration, and almost all efforts at rehabilitation have been half-hearted efforts full of bias against the offenders. Ideally we would prevent the crimes of the dangerous few before they happen.
Psychologists will usually tell you that psychopaths are not rehabilitatable. Look, I'm all for rehabilitation, and I think we should take elements from Norway's model, but abolishing prisons altogether is not a good idea. Massive reform required, and we need to go further than what the Democrats propose, but not abolition. Unlike nonpsychopathic criminals, true Ted Bundy like psychopaths are a lost cause.