Liriena wrote:The Reformed American Republic wrote:Many are to the left of liberalism and others are just non-ideological criminals taking advantage. I'm not endorsing liberalism here, as it is a worthless ideology, but not every act of rioting is due to the innate nature of a political group you do not like.
I remember photographs of Party for Socialism and Liberation signs being displayed at the Ferguson riots. Those are not liberals. I cannot stand this hyper partisanship between our two mainstream parties, especially when facts aren't the reason for it.
You'd think someone genuinely curious about the politics of rioters in Democrat-dominated cities would maybe look into what they and their online supporters say about their local Democrat politicians, or just Democrats in general.
One of the things I saw on social media last night, for instance, was left-wingers pointing out that Amy Klobuchar might have played a role in maintaining the impunity of the officer who murdered Floyd. Turns out that a lot of left-wingers aren't so ideologically blinded by the two-party system that they'll defend liberal politicians whose policies hurt black Americans or any other group.
Hell, did Rijkenlandd somehow miss all of the progressives during the Democratic primaries who very publicly and very loudly shat all over Joe Biden's record with matters of race? Or the progressives who rejected Kamala Harris for being a "cop"? Or the progressives who still demand Rahm Emanuel's head on a platter for everything the Chicago government and police did to their own community?
And Rahm Emanuel is advising Biden, because of course he is.







