Caracasus wrote:Nobel Hobos 2 wrote:
More interestingly, if a cop (on duty) sprayed a civilian with "water" I wouldn't find grounds for arrest.
It's not that I trust cops to use water when it seems to be water, more than civilians. It's because the cop has a badge and can be ID'd through their commander, so they can be prosecuted if the "water" turned out to be something dangerous. It's not necessary to arrest them to ID them, so there's not enough reason for an arrest.
Essential to this line of reasoning is that assaulting someone with a sprinkle of (somehow verified) plain water is not itself a sufficiently serious crime to warrant arrest and charge, so unless there's suspicion of something else or property is damaged by the water, it wouldn't be enough for an arrest either. Arrest without charge is sometimes justified: for probable cause or to remove a person from a situation (say blocking traffic) or perhaps to allow them to talk freely without other civilian witnesses. In this case it would be "probable cause for a search" and it might be only a few minutes before the cop who got sprinkled is reassured that they haven't been poisoned or maimed. The "search" being their investigation of the effects of the liquid.
Ah water and police and accountability.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Death_o ... 20touch%22.
Tl:dr pigs 'punished' a mentally ill black man by boiling him alive in a prison shower.
A couple of them lost their jobs.
They’re not cops though. They’re corrections officers from the sounds of it.






