NATION

PASSWORD

Belgium bans the burqa.

For discussion and debate about anything. (Not a roleplay related forum; out-of-character commentary only.)

Advertisement

Remove ads

User avatar
West Estainia
Chargé d'Affaires
 
Posts: 359
Founded: Aug 15, 2009
Ex-Nation

Postby West Estainia » Fri Apr 30, 2010 8:34 am

Sun Aut Ex wrote:http://www.news.com.au/travel/world/belgium-bans-wearing-of-islamic-burqa-in-public/story-e6frfqai-1225860803117

BELGIUM became Europe's first country to vote for a ban on the full Islamic veil or burqa, sparking dismay today among Muslims and warnings of a dangerous precedent with France set to follow suit.

The bill, which also drew fire from human rights group Amnesty International, will not enter force for weeks and may have to be re-examined if early elections are called as Belgium battles a political crisis.

"We're the first country to spring the locks that have made a good number of women slaves, and we hope to be followed by France, Switzerland, Italy, and the Netherlands; countries that think,'' said Liberal Deputy Denis Ducarme.

In the lower house of the federal parliament yesterday, 136 deputies supported a nationwide ban on clothes or veils that do not allow the wearer to be fully identified, including the full-face niqab and burqa.

There were two abstentions. No one voted against.


That's good stuff.



Go Belgium.
Tsardom of Estainia
Nomadic, and looking

User avatar
Zeppy
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 10112
Founded: Oct 30, 2008
Ex-Nation

Postby Zeppy » Fri Apr 30, 2010 8:34 am

Karsol wrote:Which is why, when all forms of personal expression are legal, it should be legal to beat down someone who offends you or is wearing offensive slongans etc


So you support the legality of a miltant religious person to gay bash during gay parades because he/she finds gay to be offense against his beliefs and god?
Last edited by Zeppy on Fri Apr 30, 2010 8:47 am, edited 3 times in total.

User avatar
Ulu Turan
Diplomat
 
Posts: 779
Founded: Feb 25, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Ulu Turan » Fri Apr 30, 2010 8:34 am

they may be fined

User avatar
Upper North Yorkshire
Envoy
 
Posts: 232
Founded: Mar 27, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Upper North Yorkshire » Fri Apr 30, 2010 8:38 am

what a pathetic ban, I didn't realise Belgian's were mental. According to the BBC its estimated that there are only about 30 women who wear it in the whole country, what the big deal. if they want to ear it let them!

User avatar
Hindopia
Diplomat
 
Posts: 592
Founded: Jan 07, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Hindopia » Fri Apr 30, 2010 8:39 am

Hamilay wrote:A grand total of thirty women wear the burqa in Belgium.

Even if we jump straight to the dubious conclusion that burqas are a potential security risk and symbolise oppression of women the state attempting to implement and enforce such a law is a total waste of time. I don't see how this could be construed as anything other than a way to take a cheap populist jab at Muslims.

That's all it is. A downside to democracy. When the people get scared, the politicians love it.
Playing NationStates since November 27, 2009
Back after a long hiatus

User avatar
Hindopia
Diplomat
 
Posts: 592
Founded: Jan 07, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Hindopia » Fri Apr 30, 2010 8:41 am

Zeppy wrote:
Karsol wrote:Which is why, when all forms of personal expression are legal, it should be legal to beat down someone who offends you or is wearing offensive slongans etc


So you support gay bashing during gay parades?

Cat fights could become legal. :eek:
Playing NationStates since November 27, 2009
Back after a long hiatus

User avatar
Upper North Yorkshire
Envoy
 
Posts: 232
Founded: Mar 27, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Upper North Yorkshire » Fri Apr 30, 2010 8:45 am

if anything this move has made belgium more likely as a potential target for an extremist attack!

User avatar
Hindopia
Diplomat
 
Posts: 592
Founded: Jan 07, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Hindopia » Fri Apr 30, 2010 8:47 am

Upper North Yorkshire wrote:if anything this move has made belgium more likely as a potential target for an extremist attack!

If that ever happened, it would just give them the ammunition they needed to outlaw the whole practice of the religion. They know what they're doing...
Playing NationStates since November 27, 2009
Back after a long hiatus

User avatar
West Estainia
Chargé d'Affaires
 
Posts: 359
Founded: Aug 15, 2009
Ex-Nation

Postby West Estainia » Fri Apr 30, 2010 8:48 am

Upper North Yorkshire wrote:if anything this move has made belgium more likely as a potential target for an extremist attack!


That is sadly true.
Tsardom of Estainia
Nomadic, and looking

User avatar
Flameswroth
Senator
 
Posts: 4773
Founded: Sep 05, 2008
Ex-Nation

Postby Flameswroth » Fri Apr 30, 2010 8:48 am

I'm kind of on the fence about this one. I mean, I'll say unabashedly that I have no problem with implementing this clear targeting of Muslims. But at the same time, I try to think of other religions with clothing they feel is important to religion, then think of how I'd feel if they got them removed.

If priests couldn't wear those little white collar things because of the law (which cited health concerns or something, but with actual intent to target priests) I would be far less pleased...even though I've never once attended a church wherein a leader wore such a collar.

So yeah, I'm not so sure I'm keen on this. I won't fly off the handle and call Belgium bigots like others do, as it's not THAT bad, but I do find it a little disconcerting.
Czardas wrote:Why should we bail out climate change with billions of dollars, when lesbians are starving in the streets because they can't afford an abortion?

Reagan Clone wrote:What you are proposing is glorifying God by loving, respecting, or at least tolerating, his other creations.

That is the gayest fucking shit I've ever heard, and I had Barry Manilow perform at the White House in '82.



User avatar
Scarsaw
Minister
 
Posts: 2586
Founded: Jun 12, 2009
Ex-Nation

Postby Scarsaw » Fri Apr 30, 2010 8:51 am

Europe and its anti-Muslim, gotta keep Europe culture pure, stance is starting to get me a bit worried :eyebrow: Sounds like the 20s all over again.
Last edited by Scarsaw on Fri Apr 30, 2010 8:52 am, edited 1 time in total.
Before us lies National Socialism, in us marches National Socialism, and behind us comes National Socialism.

User avatar
Ulu Turan
Diplomat
 
Posts: 779
Founded: Feb 25, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Ulu Turan » Fri Apr 30, 2010 8:54 am

aa i dont see any problem. this bann is fo the public places only i assume, so the women who wish to cover themselves may stay at home in burka without being disturbed

User avatar
Volnotov
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1680
Founded: Mar 27, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Volnotov » Fri Apr 30, 2010 8:55 am

Scarsaw wrote:Europe and its anti-Muslim, gotta keep Europe culture pure, stance is starting to get me a bit worried :eyebrow: Sounds like the 20s all over again.


Yes, opposing a religion that says unbelievers should have their heads cut off is always wrong...
What is your political orientation?
Participate now in the NS Political Orietnation Poll!

Political Spectrum Quiz Results

"There are those people that believe that we are all equal, that every person should recieve an equal piece of the cake regardless of what they contributed to it.
I believe in a fair society, were those that contributed the most to the cake recieve the biggest share. Maybe that is not *equal*, but sure it is fair."

User avatar
Tekania
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 21671
Founded: May 26, 2004
Civil Rights Lovefest

Postby Tekania » Fri Apr 30, 2010 8:58 am

Volnotov wrote:
Scarsaw wrote:Europe and its anti-Muslim, gotta keep Europe culture pure, stance is starting to get me a bit worried :eyebrow: Sounds like the 20s all over again.


Yes, opposing a religion that says unbelievers should have their heads cut off is always wrong...


Using the power of the civil government to oppose a religious belief, yes... it is always wrong.
Such heroic nonsense!

User avatar
North Suran
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 9974
Founded: Jul 12, 2009
Ex-Nation

Postby North Suran » Fri Apr 30, 2010 9:00 am

Volnotov wrote:
Scarsaw wrote:Europe and its anti-Muslim, gotta keep Europe culture pure, stance is starting to get me a bit worried :eyebrow: Sounds like the 20s all over again.


Yes, opposing a religion that says unbelievers should have their heads cut off is always wrong...

I take it that you're in favour of banning Christianity, as well, considering the wealth of atrocities recorded within the Bible?
Neu Mitanni wrote:As for NS, his latest statement is grounded in ignorance and contrary to fact, much to the surprise of all NSGers.


User avatar
Ulu Turan
Diplomat
 
Posts: 779
Founded: Feb 25, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Ulu Turan » Fri Apr 30, 2010 9:01 am

in belgium i suppose its not such a problem, the muslims make 5-6% of the population

User avatar
Khorata
Minister
 
Posts: 2612
Founded: Jan 22, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Khorata » Fri Apr 30, 2010 9:08 am

Karsol wrote:
Khislav wrote:
Karsol wrote:
Khislav wrote:
Karsol wrote:
Khislav wrote:
Karsol wrote:
Khislav wrote:
Karsol wrote:
Khislav wrote:
South Norwega wrote:
Volnotov wrote:
Khorata wrote:Couldn't that ban be racist? Like seriously, my opinion is lift that ban, for [spoiler]France to drop that plan and just forget all about the anti-Islamization plans. Like, seriously, just because a terrorist is a Muslim does not mean all Muslims are terrorists. It is time somebody dropped that wrecking ball on that plan, to ensure IT will never happen.

Just my 2¢.


It's not rascist, stop reading left wing propaganda.

This law isn't targeted against a certain race or ethnicity, thus it is not rascist.

It's certainly not rascist, it's not racist either, but that's a silly point anyway.

It's still discrimination. Religious discrimination. It may not say it is specifically targeted against Muslims, but the fact is that only Muslims wear Burqas, really.[/spoiler]


It covers anything that hides the face, not just burqas.

What if I need to have bandages around my face due to 3rd degree burns?! Will I be refused treatment?! zomg they want to kill me!!!!


I'm pretty sure that's quite a bit different...

It still hides the face. Stick to the law you arnarchistic scum!!!!


Medical reasons easily trump religion reasons in every way.

There is no clause in the law that covers medical coverage. :/


What are you talking about? Not wearing a burqa will not cause your face to become infected. Not wearing bandages can. Monumental difference.

I am sorry sir, the laws the law.


And I assure you, wearing bandages will not be a problem. Fortunately, legislators have more common sense than you.

I got arrested nce for not wearing a seat belt, which I couldn't due to the 5 fractured ribs I had.
But sorry "Laws the law".

And i was just leaving the hostpital too >.>


IC: Besides? What will happen next. Outlawing Islam? Banning all religions? The possibilities is endless!

OOC: Time to put a spoiler on the first couple posts in that quote pyramid.
If you are in a roleplay with me, read my wiki. That way, that's all you need to know.http://www.nswiki.net/index.php?title=Khorata


THE FIRST EVER NATIONSTATES SERIAL! http://forum.nationstates.net/viewtopic.php?f=19&t=59368

User avatar
Scarsaw
Minister
 
Posts: 2586
Founded: Jun 12, 2009
Ex-Nation

Postby Scarsaw » Fri Apr 30, 2010 9:10 am

Volnotov wrote:
Scarsaw wrote:Europe and its anti-Muslim, gotta keep Europe culture pure, stance is starting to get me a bit worried :eyebrow: Sounds like the 20s all over again.


Yes, opposing a religion that says unbelievers should have their heads cut off is always wrong...


The Christian bible isn't much better, and I'm sure the Hebrew bible is really where all the fun stuff is. Quite a few religions have a violent aspect to them, which is usually a result of their creation in a world where such violence against others was acceptable. The thing is, you don't see many Christians or Jews running around with stones!

Islam is the same, and to oppose an entire group because of the actions of fanatics is wrong. It's no different than to judge the actions of all white people because some KKK members beat on a black man, or to judge all Christians because a group went down to bash on gays. Generalization, such as thinking ALL Muslims wish for our death, often leads us to places we don't want to go. In addition, this is more than opposing a religion because of it's values but is more about opposing a mass immigration of a culture that is quite different than the culture of the land. Europe is afraid of loosing their culture and so, like nationalism does when threatened, is greatly enacting all these laws to try and protect itself.

The problem is, and what I am getting worried about, is that this is very similar to the laws and attitudes Europe had towards the Jews who were immigrating to their lands. They also tried to ban some of the practices Jews did to discourage immigration, and I see this burka ban no different. In addition, your attitude alone tells me that the anti-Muslim shift is happening and it won't take long before people take the next step and ban the religion. Then deportation will occur and, if no country will let them in...well...maybe I can add another chapter to my Nazism studies.
Before us lies National Socialism, in us marches National Socialism, and behind us comes National Socialism.

User avatar
Gravlen
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 17261
Founded: Jul 01, 2005
Father Knows Best State

Postby Gravlen » Fri Apr 30, 2010 9:10 am

Ulu Turan wrote:aa i dont see any problem. this bann is fo the public places only i assume, so the women who wish to cover themselves may stay at home in burka without being disturbed

Why is it OK to ban the burqa in public places?
EnragedMaldivians wrote:That's preposterous. Gravlens's not a white nationalist; Gravlen's a penguin.

Unio de Sovetaj Socialismaj Respublikoj wrote:There is no use arguing the definition of murder with someone who has a picture of a penguin with a chainsaw as their nations flag.

User avatar
Gauthier
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 52887
Founded: Antiquity
Ex-Nation

Postby Gauthier » Fri Apr 30, 2010 9:11 am

Gravlen wrote:
Sionis Prioratus wrote:In Saudi Arabia, Bibles are banned; there are reports of airport customs searching for them and destroying them upon finding; no non-muslim gatherings of any sort are even allowed; and non-muslim French tourists have been shot and killed for accidentally taking the road that leads to Mecca.

So, it's fair game.

Before anybody says "Sources?", I'm about to go to work, and I can surely find them later.

I'm not gonna say "Sources?".

I'll just say, "Relevancy?"


The old excuse that the oppressive practices of Islamic theocracies make it valid for secular western nations to oppress Islam in turn.
Crimes committed by Muslims will be a pan-Islamic plot and proof of Islam's inherent evil. On the other hand crimes committed by non-Muslims will merely be the acts of loners who do not represent their belief system at all.
The probability of one's participation in homosexual acts is directly proportional to one's public disdain and disgust for homosexuals.
If a political figure makes an accusation of wrongdoing without evidence, odds are probable that the accuser or an associate thereof has in fact committed the very same act, possibly to a worse degree.
Where is your God-Emperor now?

User avatar
Flameswroth
Senator
 
Posts: 4773
Founded: Sep 05, 2008
Ex-Nation

Postby Flameswroth » Fri Apr 30, 2010 9:12 am

Gravlen wrote:
Ulu Turan wrote:aa i dont see any problem. this bann is fo the public places only i assume, so the women who wish to cover themselves may stay at home in burka without being disturbed

Why is it OK to ban the burqa in public places?

Because if you're hitting on a chick, you wanna know if she's packing a 'stache or not. Seriously, if anyone's gonna give mustache rides, it's me, amirite?

G-guys...?
Czardas wrote:Why should we bail out climate change with billions of dollars, when lesbians are starving in the streets because they can't afford an abortion?

Reagan Clone wrote:What you are proposing is glorifying God by loving, respecting, or at least tolerating, his other creations.

That is the gayest fucking shit I've ever heard, and I had Barry Manilow perform at the White House in '82.



User avatar
Ulu Turan
Diplomat
 
Posts: 779
Founded: Feb 25, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Ulu Turan » Fri Apr 30, 2010 9:15 am

Gravlen wrote:
Ulu Turan wrote:aa i dont see any problem. this bann is fo the public places only i assume, so the women who wish to cover themselves may stay at home in burka without being disturbed

Why is it OK to ban the burqa in public places?

not only the burka- the hijab, too

User avatar
Volnotov
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1680
Founded: Mar 27, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Volnotov » Fri Apr 30, 2010 9:17 am

Scarsaw wrote:
Volnotov wrote:
Scarsaw wrote:Europe and its anti-Muslim, gotta keep Europe culture pure, stance is starting to get me a bit worried :eyebrow: Sounds like the 20s all over again.


Yes, opposing a religion that says unbelievers should have their heads cut off is always wrong...


The Christian bible isn't much better, and I'm sure the Hebrew bible is really where all the fun stuff is. Quite a few religions have a violent aspect to them, which is usually a result of their creation in a world where such violence against others was acceptable. The thing is, you don't see many Christians or Jews running around with stones!

Islam is the same, and to oppose an entire group because of the actions of fanatics is wrong. It's no different than to judge the actions of all white people because some KKK members beat on a black man, or to judge all Christians because a group went down to bash on gays. Generalization, such as thinking ALL Muslims wish for our death, often leads us to places we don't want to go. In addition, this is more than opposing a religion because of it's values but is more about opposing a mass immigration of a culture that is quite different than the culture of the land. Europe is afraid of loosing their culture and so, like nationalism does when threatened, is greatly enacting all these laws to try and protect itself.

The problem is, and what I am getting worried about, is that this is very similar to the laws and attitudes Europe had towards the Jews who were immigrating to their lands. They also tried to ban some of the practices Jews did to discourage immigration, and I see this burka ban no different. In addition, your attitude alone tells me that the anti-Muslim shift is happening and it won't take long before people take the next step and ban the religion. Then deportation will occur and, if no country will let them in...well...maybe I can add another chapter to my Nazism studies.


I would see no problem in the deportation of Muslims and Jews.

I have read the Bible and the Quran. I know what I am talking about.
What is your political orientation?
Participate now in the NS Political Orietnation Poll!

Political Spectrum Quiz Results

"There are those people that believe that we are all equal, that every person should recieve an equal piece of the cake regardless of what they contributed to it.
I believe in a fair society, were those that contributed the most to the cake recieve the biggest share. Maybe that is not *equal*, but sure it is fair."

User avatar
Scarsaw
Minister
 
Posts: 2586
Founded: Jun 12, 2009
Ex-Nation

Postby Scarsaw » Fri Apr 30, 2010 9:22 am

Volnotov wrote:I would see no problem in the deportation of Muslims and Jews.

I have read the Bible and the Quran. I know what I am talking about.


Yes, but apparently you haven't read a history book as you have no clue what you're talking about. Hitler tried the deportation of Jews, but found you can't mass deport a nation of people because there is no country that will take them. Countries will only take people of their citizenship, not nationality, and so when deportation fails...Himmler turned to the final solution; as you can always deport people to death.

I see a problem in the deportation of Muslims and Jews.

I have read a history book. I know what I am talking about.
Before us lies National Socialism, in us marches National Socialism, and behind us comes National Socialism.

User avatar
Genyria
Chargé d'Affaires
 
Posts: 390
Founded: Nov 09, 2008
Ex-Nation

Postby Genyria » Fri Apr 30, 2010 9:26 am

I want to know why I didn't hear this coming. France've been discussing for ages, but Belgium ... where has this appeared from?!
Rt. Hon. Vyacheslav Molotov MC, Secretary of State for Foreign Affairs
floreat res publica Genyrica
FactbookEmbassy programmeList of General CouncillorsWikistates page

United Dependencies: I wouldn't mind if the companies gave us Christians back our holiday.
Dakini: I wouldn't mind if Christians gave the pagans back their holiday.

PreviousNext

Advertisement

Remove ads

Return to General

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Austria-Bohemia-Hungary, Elejamie, Garghania, Greater Europia, La Xinga, Page, Port Carverton, Stratonesia, The Confederate States of America, Unogonduria, Vassenor

Advertisement

Remove ads