Advertisement
by Heinleinites » Fri Apr 30, 2010 9:27 am
by EvilDarkMagicians » Fri Apr 30, 2010 9:28 am
by Scarsaw » Fri Apr 30, 2010 9:29 am
Genyria wrote:I want to know why I didn't hear this coming. France've been discussing for ages, but Belgium ... where has this appeared from?!
by Volnotov » Fri Apr 30, 2010 9:30 am
Scarsaw wrote:Volnotov wrote:I would see no problem in the deportation of Muslims and Jews.
I have read the Bible and the Quran. I know what I am talking about.
Yes, but apparently you haven't read a history book as you have no clue what you're talking about. Hitler tried the deportation of Jews, but found you can't mass deport a nation of people because there is no country that will take them. Countries will only take people of their citizenship, not nationality, and so when deportation fails...Himmler turned to the final solution; as you can always deport people to death.
I see a problem in the deportation of Muslims and Jews.
I have read a history book. I know what I am talking about.
by Scarsaw » Fri Apr 30, 2010 9:31 am
Volnotov wrote:I have read history books too, I love documentries about history, I love articles about history and I love to watch programs about history.
Don't assume I know nothing about history.
by The Alma Mater » Fri Apr 30, 2010 9:32 am
Genyria wrote:I want to know why I didn't hear this coming. France've been discussing for ages, but Belgium ... where has this appeared from?!
by Volnotov » Fri Apr 30, 2010 9:34 am
Scarsaw wrote:Volnotov wrote:I have read history books too, I love documentries about history, I love articles about history and I love to watch programs about history.
Don't assume I know nothing about history.
I will continue to assume you know nothing of history until you start using some of your knowledge gained by reading history books.
by Central Slavia » Fri Apr 30, 2010 9:37 am
Post-Unity Terra wrote:
Is it liberals or evil foreign muslims who are killing Europe? Make your mind up.
I wonder if a ban on the wearing of the Yarmulke would be seen as acceptable.
Glorious Homeland wrote:
You would be wrong. There's something wrong with the Americans, the Japanese are actually insane, the Chinese don't seem capable of free-thought and just defer judgement to the most powerful strong man, the Russians are quite like that, only more aggressive and mad, and Belarus? Hah.
Omnicracy wrote:The Soviet Union did not support pro-Soviet governments, it compleatly controled them. The U.S. did not controle the corrupt regiems it set up against the Soviet Union, it just sugested things and changed leaders if they weer not takeing enough sugestions
Great Nepal wrote:Please stick to OFFICIAL numbers. Why to go to scholars,[cut]
by Genyria » Fri Apr 30, 2010 9:37 am
by Cappadokhia » Fri Apr 30, 2010 9:48 am
by Non Aligned States » Fri Apr 30, 2010 9:50 am
by Post-Unity Terra » Fri Apr 30, 2010 10:02 am
Scarsaw wrote:Volnotov wrote:I have read history books too, I love documentries about history, I love articles about history and I love to watch programs about history.
Don't assume I know nothing about history.
I will continue to assume you know nothing of history until you start using some of your knowledge gained by reading history books.
by Aggicificicerous » Fri Apr 30, 2010 10:04 am
by EvilDarkMagicians » Fri Apr 30, 2010 10:04 am
Post-Unity Terra wrote:
Is it liberals or evil foreign muslims who are killing Europe? Make your mind up.
I wonder if a ban on the wearing of the Yarmulke would be seen as acceptable.
by Cappadokhia » Fri Apr 30, 2010 10:07 am
Non Aligned States wrote:Has anyone entertained the thought that maybe, just maybe, the women who do wear a burqa out of social and cultural pressures will keep doing so because their families demand it? And that the absolute idiocy of banning it only puts them in a no-lose situation of either going to jail or being attacked/cut of by their families?
A bit like targeting the victim. Now where have I heard that before? Oh yes, from the "She was asking to be raped" crowd.
Bet that never crossed the mind of all you people in favor of the ban.
by Post-Unity Terra » Fri Apr 30, 2010 10:07 am
by Scarsaw » Fri Apr 30, 2010 10:09 am
Volnotov wrote:Scarsaw wrote:Volnotov wrote:I have read history books too, I love documentries about history, I love articles about history and I love to watch programs about history.
Don't assume I know nothing about history.
I will continue to assume you know nothing of history until you start using some of your knowledge gained by reading history books.
What? Please elaborate? Just because I have a problem with the Jewish and Islamic ideology just like I have with Nazism, Fascism and Communism means I know nothing about history and do not use knowledge, logic and reason?
by Scarsaw » Fri Apr 30, 2010 10:10 am
by Volnotov » Fri Apr 30, 2010 10:16 am
Scarsaw wrote:Volnotov wrote:Scarsaw wrote:Volnotov wrote:I have read history books too, I love documentries about history, I love articles about history and I love to watch programs about history.
Don't assume I know nothing about history.
I will continue to assume you know nothing of history until you start using some of your knowledge gained by reading history books.
What? Please elaborate? Just because I have a problem with the Jewish and Islamic ideology just like I have with Nazism, Fascism and Communism means I know nothing about history and do not use knowledge, logic and reason?
The fact that you seem unaware of the consequences (mass murder) of attempting to deport a large group of people, despite the fact that it has been repeated several times in history, makes me question your knowledge of history. I can claim to have read every book in the world, however, if I do not use that knowledge than I do not bring much validity to my claim.
by Post-Unity Terra » Fri Apr 30, 2010 10:17 am
Volnotov wrote:Scarsaw wrote:Volnotov wrote:Scarsaw wrote:Volnotov wrote:I have read history books too, I love documentries about history, I love articles about history and I love to watch programs about history.
Don't assume I know nothing about history.
I will continue to assume you know nothing of history until you start using some of your knowledge gained by reading history books.
What? Please elaborate? Just because I have a problem with the Jewish and Islamic ideology just like I have with Nazism, Fascism and Communism means I know nothing about history and do not use knowledge, logic and reason?
The fact that you seem unaware of the consequences (mass murder) of attempting to deport a large group of people, despite the fact that it has been repeated several times in history, makes me question your knowledge of history. I can claim to have read every book in the world, however, if I do not use that knowledge than I do not bring much validity to my claim.
Who says I support the ethnic genocide of the Jews?
Wow, just wow.
by Tekania » Fri Apr 30, 2010 10:17 am
Cappadokhia wrote:Non Aligned States wrote:Has anyone entertained the thought that maybe, just maybe, the women who do wear a burqa out of social and cultural pressures will keep doing so because their families demand it? And that the absolute idiocy of banning it only puts them in a no-lose situation of either going to jail or being attacked/cut of by their families?
A bit like targeting the victim. Now where have I heard that before? Oh yes, from the "She was asking to be raped" crowd.
Bet that never crossed the mind of all you people in favor of the ban.
It actually has. However, should the people of Belgium also bow down to the same pressures? Perhaps instead of saying this is a lose-lose situation for the woman, have you considered that this could be a deterrent against more radical forms of Islam that inherently discriminate and debase women? Perhaps Belgium could become a haven for women trying to escape this form of abuse if it backbone grows a bit more.
by The Alma Mater » Fri Apr 30, 2010 10:20 am
Non Aligned States wrote:Has anyone entertained the thought that maybe, just maybe, the women who do wear a burqa out of social and cultural pressures will keep doing so because their families demand it? And that the absolute idiocy of banning it only puts them in a no-lose situation of either going to jail or being attacked/cut of by their families?
by Cappadokhia » Fri Apr 30, 2010 10:21 am
Tekania wrote:Cappadokhia wrote:Non Aligned States wrote:Has anyone entertained the thought that maybe, just maybe, the women who do wear a burqa out of social and cultural pressures will keep doing so because their families demand it? And that the absolute idiocy of banning it only puts them in a no-lose situation of either going to jail or being attacked/cut of by their families?
A bit like targeting the victim. Now where have I heard that before? Oh yes, from the "She was asking to be raped" crowd.
Bet that never crossed the mind of all you people in favor of the ban.
It actually has. However, should the people of Belgium also bow down to the same pressures? Perhaps instead of saying this is a lose-lose situation for the woman, have you considered that this could be a deterrent against more radical forms of Islam that inherently discriminate and debase women? Perhaps Belgium could become a haven for women trying to escape this form of abuse if it backbone grows a bit more.
B****** can become the next haven for a fascist dictator.
by Tekania » Fri Apr 30, 2010 10:24 am
Cappadokhia wrote:Tekania wrote:Cappadokhia wrote:Non Aligned States wrote:Has anyone entertained the thought that maybe, just maybe, the women who do wear a burqa out of social and cultural pressures will keep doing so because their families demand it? And that the absolute idiocy of banning it only puts them in a no-lose situation of either going to jail or being attacked/cut of by their families?
A bit like targeting the victim. Now where have I heard that before? Oh yes, from the "She was asking to be raped" crowd.
Bet that never crossed the mind of all you people in favor of the ban.
It actually has. However, should the people of Belgium also bow down to the same pressures? Perhaps instead of saying this is a lose-lose situation for the woman, have you considered that this could be a deterrent against more radical forms of Islam that inherently discriminate and debase women? Perhaps Belgium could become a haven for women trying to escape this form of abuse if it backbone grows a bit more.
B****** can become the next haven for a fascist dictator.
Anywhere can. But I think Iran actually beat Belgium to it.
by Scarsaw » Fri Apr 30, 2010 10:24 am
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Aadhiris, Ancientania, El Lazaro, Hidrandia, Ineva, Luziyca, M-x B-rry, Maximum Imperium Rex, Neo-Hermitius, New Temecula, Rusozak, Sarolandia, Statesburg, Thal Dorthat, Tiami
Advertisement