Should Religions Be Taught in Schools?

[Neanderthaland]

Really? Because I see more bushes than cactus.

(Image)

Is this Sinai?

Nope, but this is:

Not seeing any cactus.

But I am seeing plenty cattle could eat. Which makes it all the more absurd that none of them ever pooped.

[La Xinga]

Is this Sinai?

Nope, but this is:

Not seeing any cactus.

But I am seeing plenty cattle could eat. Which makes it all the more absurd that none of them ever pooped.

1. I see grass all around.
2. The Jews were covered by the clouds, it wouldn't make sense for the animals not to be. The clouds cleared out everything, bushes, cactus, grass, Neut's bridge, everything.

[Temple State]

Christian doctrine should be taught, all else should be banned and only referred to as pagan and heretical.

[Neutraligon]

Is this Sinai?

Nope, but this is:

Not seeing any cactus.

But I am seeing plenty cattle could eat. Which makes it all the more absurd that none of them ever pooped.

I feel bad for all those humans with all that bloat. I mean, they would not even be able to get rid of the waste that cells always need to get rid of. Plus...pretty sure the babies would need to poop given they where not eating manh.

[The Alma Mater]

Christian doctrine should be taught, all else should be banned and only referred to as pagan and heretical.

So.back to an amish lifestyle, since physics and such do not correspond with the Bible ?

[Godular]

Good for you. You’re wrong. The Greek mythos was written down, but that does not inherently make it true. Can you truly be so naíve as to think that something being written down reinforces its veracity?

An opinion can't be wrong.

When facts rather specifically stand against that opinion, it most assuredly can be wrong.

[Neanderthaland]

Nope, but this is:

Not seeing any cactus.

But I am seeing plenty cattle could eat. Which makes it all the more absurd that none of them ever pooped.

1. I see grass all around.

That's not grass.

2. The Jews were covered by the clouds, it wouldn't make sense for the animals not to be. The clouds cleared out everything, bushes, cactus, grass, Neut's bridge, everything.

Now that would DEFINITELY leave a mark Archaeologists would find.

[Temple State]

Christian doctrine should be taught, all else should be banned and only referred to as pagan and heretical.

So.back to an amish lifestyle, since physics and such do not correspond with the Bible ?

Wrong. Technical science does not have anything to do with cosmology or theoretical biology.

[Neutraligon]

So.back to an amish lifestyle, since physics and such do not correspond with the Bible ?

Wrong. Technical science does not have anything to do with cosmology or theoretical biology.

Factually wrong, there are a ton of new forms of technology that use evolution as their basis.

[La Xinga]

1. I see grass all around.

That's not grass.

2. The Jews were covered by the clouds, it wouldn't make sense for the animals not to be. The clouds cleared out everything, bushes, cactus, grass, Neut's bridge, everything.

Now that would DEFINITELY leave a mark Archaeologists would find.

1. Then it's?
2. No one ever said it was left like that.

[The Alma Mater]

So.back to an amish lifestyle, since physics and such do not correspond with the Bible ?

Wrong. Technical science does not have anything to do with cosmology or theoretical biology.

You obviously know nothing of technology. Which is good, since it is heretical.

[Neanderthaland]

So.back to an amish lifestyle, since physics and such do not correspond with the Bible ?

Wrong. Technical science does not have anything to do with cosmology or theoretical biology.

I mean, oil companies hire paleontologists to help them find oil.

Evolution totally factors into all kinds of industry.

[Godular]

Christian doctrine should be taught, all else should be banned and only referred to as pagan and heretical.

‘Shariah Law should be taught, all else is pagan and heretical.’

[Temple State]

Wrong. Technical science does not have anything to do with cosmology or theoretical biology.

Factually wrong, there are a ton of new forms of technology that use evolution as their basis.

Only micro-evolution has been proven anyway. The Bible does not speak of "species" it speaks of "kinds" which would correspond to something like family in modern taxonomy. A dog type creature will not "evolve" into a cat type creature, they change a little bit depending on environment, but it remains within a definite span of possible shapes and abilities.

[Neanderthaland]

That's not grass.


Now that would DEFINITELY leave a mark Archaeologists would find.

1. Then it's?

Shrubs.

2. No one ever said it was left like that.

It doesn't matter. When you leave a giant mark on the landscape, some trace of it will remain. Clouds, especially in a desert, would change the composition of the rocks they covered, if nothing else.

[La Xinga]

An opinion can't be wrong.

When facts rather specifically stand against that opinion, it most assuredly can be wrong.

Example? (And not the creation one, we all heard it already)

[Region of Dwipantara]

That's not grass.


Now that would DEFINITELY leave a mark Archaeologists would find.

1. Then it's?
2. No one ever said it was left like that.

How NSG can turn a discussion of public education policy to a debate of sand plant species is beyond me.

[Temple State]

Christian doctrine should be taught, all else should be banned and only referred to as pagan and heretical.

‘Shariah Law should be taught, all else is pagan and heretical.’

Mosaic Law. But Yes. I don't care through what snowflake lens you want to frame it.

[Neutraligon]

Wrong. Technical science does not have anything to do with cosmology or theoretical biology.

I mean, oil companies hire paleontologists to help them find oil.

Evolution totally factors into all kinds of industry.

Let's of course not ignore that evolution is also directly related to controlling and treating various diseases. It is why it is so hard to treat HIV and also why we have to worry bout antibiotic resistant diseases like TB.

[La Xinga]

1. Then it's?
2. No one ever said it was left like that.

How NSG can turn a discussion of public education policy to a debate of sand plant species is beyond me.

NSG is a magical place.

[Neanderthaland]

Factually wrong, there are a ton of new forms of technology that use evolution as their basis.

Only micro-evolution has been proven anyway. The Bible does not speak of "species" it speaks of "kinds" which would correspond to something like family in modern taxonomy. A dog type creature will not "evolve" into a cat type creature, they change a little bit depending on environment, but it remains within a definite span of possible shapes and abilities.

Nope, they both evolved from an undifferentiated caniform, that looked something like a weasel.

And this creationist bullshit is bullshit.

[Region of Dwipantara]

When facts rather specifically stand against that opinion, it most assuredly can be wrong.

Example? (And not the creation one, we all heard it already)

Opinion: '2 + 2 = 5' -> Wrong

[La Xinga]

Ok, I'm tired, gonna take nap. Bye.

[Godular]

Factually wrong, there are a ton of new forms of technology that use evolution as their basis.

Only micro-evolution has been proven anyway.

ALL evolution is microevolution.

[The Alma Mater]

Factually wrong, there are a ton of new forms of technology that use evolution as their basis.

Only micro-evolution has been proven anyway. The Bible does not speak of "species" it speaks of "kinds" which would correspond to something like family in modern taxonomy. A dog type creature will not "evolve" into a cat type creature, they change a little bit depending on environment, but it remains within a definite span of possible shapes and abilities.

Radiowaves, optic cables for that speedy internet, nuclear power plants, solar panels - all those technologies have implications for the age of the earth.
Unless you are not a young earth creationist those would be heretic.